Children, OnlyNCT06109298
The Effect of Cold Spray and Ice Applied During Intravenous Access on Pain and Fear i in Pediatric Emergency Unit
A study testing Cold spray and Refrigerated gel ice in people with Children, Only and Pain, run by Tarsus University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Many strategies have been developed for the prevention of to prevent procedural pain in pediatric emergency units where nurses play a vital role in patient comfort.Easy-to-use and inexpensive nonpharmacologic analgesic methods are important in emergency units.This study was conducted to determine the effect of cold… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 15 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Children, Only, Pain, Emergencies
- What is being tested?
- Cold spray and Refrigerated gel ice
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2021to 15 Apr 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 15 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children included in the study were 7-15 years old
- volunteered to participate
- Had no chronic diseases, mental or neurological disabilities, neurodevelopmental impairments, or life threatening conditions (sepsis, shock, respiratory/cardiogenic arrest, etc.).
Who cannot join
- Children who had taken any analgesic medication before presentation to the emergency department
- had undergone multiple attempts for vascular access
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Cold Spray and Ice Applied During Intravenous Access on Pain and Fear in Children Aged 7-15 Years in Pediatric Emergency Unit
Many strategies have been developed for the prevention of to prevent procedural pain in pediatric emergency units where nurses play a vital role in patient comfort.Easy-to-use and inexpensive nonpharmacologic analgesic methods are important in emergency units.This study was conducted to determine the effect of cold spray and ice applied during venipuncture on the level of fear and pain in children ages 7-15. This randomized, controlled experimental study was conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Clinic of Istanbul Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital between November 2021 7 and April 2022. The study was conducted with 96 children between the ages of 7 and 15 (cold spray group, ice group, and control group) who were scheduled to have venous access in the pediatric emergency clinic and met the sampling criteria.
The Pediatric Emergency Clinic consists of 10 beds. Patients with complaints such as fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and seizures comprise the majority of those admitted to the clinic. In the Pediatric Emergency Clinic, intravenous interventions were performed in the injection room.
Read the detailed description
This study aimed to determine the effect of cold spray and ice applied during venipuncture procedures on pain and fear in 67 children ages 7-15 admitted to the pediatric emergency unit.
Materials and Methods Setting This randomized, controlled experimental study was conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Clinic of Istanbul Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital between November 2021 7 and April 2022. The Pediatric Emergency Clinic consists of 10 beds. Patients with complaints such as fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and seizures comprise the majority of those admitted to the clinic. In the Pediatric Emergency Clinic, intravenous interventions were performed in the injection room.
Sample The study's population comprised children ages 7-15 treated in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital. The sample consisted of children undergoing intravenous access in line with the inclusion criteria. According to the power analysis for the sample size in line with the literatüre the power of the sample was calculated with the G*Power 3.1 program. With a Type I error of 0.05 and a test power of 0.80 (α= 0.05, 1-β= 0.80), the minimum sample size was calculated as children (30 children in 83 each group). The study was completed with 96 children, including 32 children in the study and control groups, taking into account the losses that might occur from the sample for any reason during the study period.
Allocation In the study, 96 children in the sample will randomly assigned to the control (n=32), ice (n=32), and spray groups (n=32). Random assignment will ensured by using a computer program to determine the group of children (https://www.randomlists.com/team-generator).
Data Collection Before starting the study, the families of the children were informed of the purpose, plan, duration, and how the data would be used. Written consent was obtained in light of the principle of willingness and voluntariness through the Voluntary Information and Consent Form. Pediatric patients included in the study were divided into three groups: cold spray, ice, and control. Environmental conditions were organized the same way in all three groups, and at least one parent was ensured to stay with each child. The study was conducted with a nurse performing intravenous intervention and a nurse researcher.
IV Catheter placement IV placement was performed using 24-gauge catheters appropriate in size for the age of the children and took an average of 3 minutes. The observer nurse evaluated the children in all groups before and after the procedure by filling out the data collection form and measuring the child's pain and fear assessment scales. The pain and fear scales were also evaluated by the child and parent. In all groups, IV insertion was performed by the same nurse following the procedure steps.
- First study group: Before performing intravenous intervention, cold spray was applied for 5 seconds at a distance of 15 cm to an area of approximately 5 cm2 at the site of the procedure. After tourniquet fixation and subsequent skin disinfection for 60 seconds, the nurse researcher performed intravenous administration.
- Second study group: Before the intravenous intervention, refrigerated gel ice was applied for 5 minutes at 2 cm above the area to be treated. After that, the nurse removed the gel ice from the procedure area, a tourniquet was applied, and skin disinfection was performed for 60 seconds. The nurse researcher performed intravenous administration.
- Control group: No pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic application was performed. The researcher performed intravenous access after skin disinfection by the nurse.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION Written permission were obtained from the ethics committee of Gaizosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital to collect the data before the study (No: 347, Date: 20.10.2021). The rules of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed throughout the study. Verbal and written informed consent was obtained from the families of pediatric patients who agreed to participate in the study. After patients entered the pediatric emergency clinic in accordance with the sample selection criteria, the parents were explained the purpose of the research, that their personal information would remain confidential, and that their privacy would be respected.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analyses were performed using R vers. 2.15.3 program Minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, median, first quartile, third quartile, frequency, and percentage were used to report the study data. The Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical analysis were used to evaluate the compliance of quantitative data with normal distribution. A dependent groups t-test was used to compare the values before and after the intervention. An independent groups t-test was used to evaluate normally distributed variables between two groups. One-way analysis of variance was used in the evaluations of variables with normal distribution between more than two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test evaluated variables that did not show normal distribution between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the evaluations of variables that did not show normal distribution between more than two groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between quantitative variables. The Pearson chi-square test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare qualitative variables. Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.
- Conditions
- Children, Only, Pain, Emergencies
- Being tested
- Cold spray, Refrigerated gel ice
- Keywords
- ıce pack, cold spray, fear, pain
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cold sprayOther
Cold spray was applied for 5 seconds at a distance of 15 cm to an area of approximately 5 cm2 at the site of the procedu
Refrigerated gel iceOther
Refrigerated gel ice was applied for 5 minutes at 2 cm above the area to be treated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| First study group | Experimental | Before performing intravenous intervention, cold spray was applied for 5 seconds at a distance of 15 cm to an area of approximately 5 cm2 at the site of the procedure. After tourniquet fixation and subsequent skin disinfection for 60 seconds, the nurse researcher performed intravenous administration. Receives: Other: Cold spray |
| Second study group | Experimental | Before the intravenous intervention, refrigerated gel ice was applied for 5 minutes at 2 cm above the area to be treated. After that, the nurse removed the gel ice from the procedure area, a tourniquet was applied, and skin disinfection was performed for 60 seconds. The nurse researcher performed intravenous administration. Receives: Other: Refrigerated gel ice |
| Control group | No intervention | No pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic application was performed. The researcher performed intravenous access after skin disinfection by the nurse. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Data Collection Form
The data collection form was prepared by reviewing the literature on the subject. It consisted of a total of 15 questions, including questions about the child's and family's descriptive characteristics (such as age and gender), the reason for going to the emergency room, and complaints, such as previous emergency room visits
Measured: 1 day
Child Fear Scale
The Child Fear Scale is used to assess the anxiety levels of children with five face shapes scored between 0-4: 0 = no anxiety, and 4 = severe anxiety. The scale can be evaluated by both the child and the researcher before, during, and after the intervention.
Measured: 1 day
Visual Analog Scale
The VAS is the most frequently used scale in pain studies. In children over 7 years of age, it is frequently used because it is common and easy. The VAS is a pain scale with numbers from 1 to 10, equally spaced on a 10 cm horizontal ruler. Children being assessed are asked to choose a pain value between 1 and 10 on this ruler.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2023
- Study start1 Nov 2021
- Primary completion15 Apr 2022
- Study completion15 Apr 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Children, OnlyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tarsus University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Duygu Sonmez Duzkaya, Tarsus University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06109298
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 347
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33939726Su HC, Hsieh CW, Lai NM, Chou PY, Lin PH, Chen KH. Using Vibrating and Cold Device for Pain Relieves in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;61:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
PubMed 33735633Bergomi P, Scudeller L, Pintaldi S, Dal Molin A. Efficacy of Non-pharmacological Methods of Pain Management in Children Undergoing Venipuncture in a Pediatric Outpatient Clinic: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Audiovisual Distraction and External Cold and Vibration. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Sep-Oct;42:e66-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 1.
PubMed 29728296Canbulat Sahiner N, Inal S, Sevim Akbay A. The effect of combined stimulation of external cold and vibration during immunization on pain and anxiety levels in children. J Perianesth Nurs. 2015 Jun;30(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.05.011.
PubMed 26003770Inal S, Kelleci M. The Effect of External Thermomechanical Stimulation and Distraction on Reducing Pain Experienced by Children During Blood Drawing. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Feb;36(2):66-69. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001264.
PubMed 28885392Potts DA, Davis KF, Elci OU, Fein JA. A Vibrating Cold Device to Reduce Pain in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jun;35(6):419-425. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001041.
PubMed 28121978Redfern RE, Micham J, Sievert D, Chen JT. Effects of Thermomechanical Stimulation During Intravenous Catheter Insertion in Adults: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Infus Nurs. 2018 Sep/Oct;41(5):294-300. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000294.
PubMed 30188451Zhu Y, Peng X, Wang S, Chen W, Liu C, Guo B, Zhao L, Gao Y, Wang K, Lou F. Vapocoolant spray versus placebo spray/no treatment for reducing pain from intravenous cannulation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;36(11):2085-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.068. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
PubMed 30253890Mu Y, Wang L. Standardized post-catheter nursing intervention reduces incidence of catheter complications in the disabled elderly and improves their quality of life. Am J Transl Res. 2021 Nov 15;13(11):12957-12964. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34956511
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Cold Spray and Ice Applied During Intravenous Access on Pain and Fear in Children Aged 7-15 Years in Pediatric Emergency Unit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06109298
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 347
- Conditions
- Children, Only, Pain, Emergencies
- Keywords
- ıce pack, cold spray, fear, pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tarsus UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many strategies have been developed for the prevention of to prevent procedural pain in pediatric emergency units where nurses play a vital role in patient comfort.Easy-to-use and inexpensive nonpharmacologic analgesic methods are important in emergency units.This study was conducted to determine the effect of cold spray and ice applied during venipuncture on the level of fear and pain in children ages 7-15. This randomized, controlled experimental study was conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Clinic of Istanbul Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital between November 2021 7 and April 2022. The study was conducted with 96 children between the ages of 7 and 15 (cold spray group, ice group, and control group) who were scheduled to have venous access in the pediatric emergency clinic and met the sampling criteria.
The Pediatric Emergency Clinic consists of 10 beds. Patients with complaints such as fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and seizures comprise the majority of those admitted to the clinic. In the Pediatric Emergency Clinic, intravenous interventions were performed in the injection room.
Detailed description
This study aimed to determine the effect of cold spray and ice applied during venipuncture procedures on pain and fear in 67 children ages 7-15 admitted to the pediatric emergency unit.
Materials and Methods Setting This randomized, controlled experimental study was conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Clinic of Istanbul Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital between November 2021 7 and April 2022. The Pediatric Emergency Clinic consists of 10 beds. Patients with complaints such as fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and seizures comprise the majority of those admitted to the clinic. In the Pediatric Emergency Clinic, intravenous interventions were performed in the injection room.
Sample The study's population comprised children ages 7-15 treated in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital. The sample consisted of children undergoing intravenous access in line with the inclusion criteria. According to the power analysis for the sample size in line with the literatüre the power of the sample was calculated with the G*Power 3.1 program. With a Type I error of 0.05 and a test power of 0.80 (α= 0.05, 1-β= 0.80), the minimum sample size was calculated as children (30 children in 83 each group). The study was completed with 96 children, including 32 children in the study and control groups, taking into account the losses that might occur from the sample for any reason during the study period.
Allocation In the study, 96 children in the sample will randomly assigned to the control (n=32), ice (n=32), and spray groups (n=32). Random assignment will ensured by using a computer program to determine the group of children (https://www.randomlists.com/team-generator).
Data Collection Before starting the study, the families of the children were informed of the purpose, plan, duration, and how the data would be used. Written consent was obtained in light of the principle of willingness and voluntariness through the Voluntary Information and Consent Form. Pediatric patients included in the study were divided into three groups: cold spray, ice, and control. Environmental conditions were organized the same way in all three groups, and at least one parent was ensured to stay with each child. The study was conducted with a nurse performing intravenous intervention and a nurse researcher.
IV Catheter placement IV placement was performed using 24-gauge catheters appropriate in size for the age of the children and took an average of 3 minutes. The observer nurse evaluated the children in all groups before and after the procedure by filling out the data collection form and measuring the child's pain and fear assessment scales. The pain and fear scales were also evaluated by the child and parent. In all groups, IV insertion was performed by the same nurse following the procedure steps.
- First study group: Before performing intravenous intervention, cold spray was applied for 5 seconds at a distance of 15 cm to an area of approximately 5 cm2 at the site of the procedure. After tourniquet fixation and subsequent skin disinfection for 60 seconds, the nurse researcher performed intravenous administration.
- Second study group: Before the intravenous intervention, refrigerated gel ice was applied for 5 minutes at 2 cm above the area to be treated. After that, the nurse removed the gel ice from the procedure area, a tourniquet was applied, and skin disinfection was performed for 60 seconds. The nurse researcher performed intravenous administration.
- Control group: No pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic application was performed. The researcher performed intravenous access after skin disinfection by the nurse.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION Written permission were obtained from the ethics committee of Gaizosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital to collect the data before the study (No: 347, Date: 20.10.2021). The rules of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed throughout the study. Verbal and written informed consent was obtained from the families of pediatric patients who agreed to participate in the study. After patients entered the pediatric emergency clinic in accordance with the sample selection criteria, the parents were explained the purpose of the research, that their personal information would remain confidential, and that their privacy would be respected.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analyses were performed using R vers. 2.15.3 program Minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, median, first quartile, third quartile, frequency, and percentage were used to report the study data. The Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical analysis were used to evaluate the compliance of quantitative data with normal distribution. A dependent groups t-test was used to compare the values before and after the intervention. An independent groups t-test was used to evaluate normally distributed variables between two groups. One-way analysis of variance was used in the evaluations of variables with normal distribution between more than two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test evaluated variables that did not show normal distribution between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the evaluations of variables that did not show normal distribution between more than two groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between quantitative variables. The Pearson chi-square test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare qualitative variables. Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| First study group | Experimental | Other: Cold sprayBefore performing intravenous intervention, cold spray was applied for 5 seconds at a distance of 15 cm to an area of approximately 5 cm2 at the site of the procedure. After tourniquet fixation and subsequent skin disinfection for 60 seconds, the nurse researcher performed intravenous administration. |
| Second study group | Experimental | Other: Refrigerated gel iceBefore the intravenous intervention, refrigerated gel ice was applied for 5 minutes at 2 cm above the area to be treated. After that, the nurse removed the gel ice from the procedure area, a tourniquet was applied, and skin disinfection was performed for 60 seconds. The nurse researcher performed intravenous administration. |
| Control group | No intervention | –No pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic application was performed. The researcher performed intravenous access after skin disinfection by the nurse. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children included in the study were 7-15 years old
- volunteered to participate
- Had no chronic diseases, mental or neurological disabilities, neurodevelopmental impairments, or life threatening conditions (sepsis, shock, respiratory/cardiogenic arrest, etc.).
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children who had taken any analgesic medication before presentation to the emergency department
- had undergone multiple attempts for vascular access
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cold sprayCold spray was applied for 5 seconds at a distance of 15 cm to an area of approximately 5 cm2 at the site of the procedu | Other | First study group |
| Refrigerated gel iceRefrigerated gel ice was applied for 5 minutes at 2 cm above the area to be treated. | Other | Second study group |
Primary outcome
Data Collection Form
Time frame: 1 day
The data collection form was prepared by reviewing the literature on the subject. It consisted of a total of 15 questions, including questions about the child's and family's descriptive characteristics (such as age and gender), the reason for going to the emergency room, and complaints, such as previous emergency room visits
Child Fear Scale
Time frame: 1 day
The Child Fear Scale is used to assess the anxiety levels of children with five face shapes scored between 0-4: 0 = no anxiety, and 4 = severe anxiety. The scale can be evaluated by both the child and the researcher before, during, and after the intervention.
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 1 day
The VAS is the most frequently used scale in pain studies. In children over 7 years of age, it is frequently used because it is common and easy. The VAS is a pain scale with numbers from 1 to 10, equally spaced on a 10 cm horizontal ruler. Children being assessed are asked to choose a pain value between 1 and 10 on this ruler.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 33939726Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 33735633Su HC, Hsieh CW, Lai NM, Chou PY, Lin PH, Chen KH. Using Vibrating and Cold Device for Pain Relieves in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;61:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 29728296Bergomi P, Scudeller L, Pintaldi S, Dal Molin A. Efficacy of Non-pharmacological Methods of Pain Management in Children Undergoing Venipuncture in a Pediatric Outpatient Clinic: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Audiovisual Distraction and External Cold and Vibration. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Sep-Oct;42:e66-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 1.
- Background: PubMed 26003770Canbulat Sahiner N, Inal S, Sevim Akbay A. The effect of combined stimulation of external cold and vibration during immunization on pain and anxiety levels in children. J Perianesth Nurs. 2015 Jun;30(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.05.011.
- Background: PubMed 28885392Inal S, Kelleci M. The Effect of External Thermomechanical Stimulation and Distraction on Reducing Pain Experienced by Children During Blood Drawing. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Feb;36(2):66-69. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001264.
- Background: PubMed 28121978Potts DA, Davis KF, Elci OU, Fein JA. A Vibrating Cold Device to Reduce Pain in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jun;35(6):419-425. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001041.
- Background: PubMed 30188451Redfern RE, Micham J, Sievert D, Chen JT. Effects of Thermomechanical Stimulation During Intravenous Catheter Insertion in Adults: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Infus Nurs. 2018 Sep/Oct;41(5):294-300. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000294.
- Background: PubMed 30253890Zhu Y, Peng X, Wang S, Chen W, Liu C, Guo B, Zhao L, Gao Y, Wang K, Lou F. Vapocoolant spray versus placebo spray/no treatment for reducing pain from intravenous cannulation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;36(11):2085-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.068. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
- Background: PubMed 34956511Mu Y, Wang L. Standardized post-catheter nursing intervention reduces incidence of catheter complications in the disabled elderly and improves their quality of life. Am J Transl Res. 2021 Nov 15;13(11):12957-12964. eCollection 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Children, Only
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Provide Continued Access to Study Drug to Children and Adolescents Who Have Completed Clinical Studies Involving Gilead HIV Treatments
HIV-1-infection
RecruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Immunogenicity of the altSonflex1-2-3 Shigella Vaccine in African Children
Diarrhoea
RecruitingObservational study
Audiological Rehabilitation of Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss
Unilateral Hearing Loss
Recruiting
Mobility Performance in Daily Activities Among Children Wearing Spectacle Lenses
Myopia, Myopia Progression
RecruitingPhase 2
Entrectinib as a Single Agent in Upfront Therapy for Children <3 Years of Age With NTRK1/2/3 or ROS1-FUSED CNS Tumors
High Grade Glioma, CNS Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cold spray and Refrigerated gel ice in people with Children, Only and Pain, run by Tarsus University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Data Collection Form (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06109298, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2023.