Urinary Tract Infections in ChildrenPhase 3NCT06109688
Effect of Lactoferrin Supplementation on Urinary Tract Infections in Infants.
A Phase 3 study testing Bovine Lactoferrin in people with Urinary Tract Infections in Children, run by Medical University of Lublin.
Trial summary
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered bovine lactoferrin (bLF) on Urinary Tract Infections in neonates and infants. Fifty-five patients with urinary tract infection were randomized to receive either bLF (n = 27) or an identical placebo (n = 28) for 4 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 days to 12 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Tract Infections in Children
- What is being tested?
- Bovine Lactoferrin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2015to 15 Feb 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 days to 12 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Neonates and infants with symptoms of Urinary Tract Infection.
- Active infection at enrollment, confirmed and documented in medical record.
- Children with Urinary Tract Infection treated according to current recommendations.
Who cannot join
- Unconfirmed Urinary Tract Infection.
- Critical illness and/or hemodynamic instability.
- Allergy or sensitivity to lactoferrin or bovine derived proteins or bovine milk.
- Children whose parents/guardians decline to participate.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Lactoferrin Supplementation on Urinary Tract Infections in Infants: a Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered bovine lactoferrin (bLF) on Urinary Tract Infections in neonates and infants. Fifty-five patients with urinary tract infection were randomized to receive either bLF (n = 27) or an identical placebo (n = 28) for 4 weeks. The patients were assessed clinically and laboratory.
Read the detailed description
This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial at a single university medical center. Participants were neonates or infants with Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) admitted to the Neonatal and Infant Pathology Department of Children's University Hospital in the period from July 2015 to December 2017. The intervention was bovine lactoferrin at a dosage of 100 mg/day for a period of 4 weeks compared with placebo in a control group.
During hospital treatment, laboratory tests were performed to evaluate the activity of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 levels and white blood cell count).
Fifty-five patients heve been included in the study.
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infections in Children
- Being tested
- Bovine Lactoferrin, placebo
- Keywords
- urinary tract infections, infants, lactoferrin
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bovine LactoferrinDietary supplement
Also called Lactoferrin 100 mg
Orally intake 1 sachet per day for 4 weeks. Lactoferrin will be dissolved in human milk or infant formula or in a 5% glucose solution.
placeboDietary supplement
Also called Maltodextrin
Orally intake 1 sachet per day for 4 weeks. Maltodextrin will be dissolved in human milk or infant formula or in a 5% glucose solution.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bovine lactoferrin | Experimental | Sachets with bovine lactoferrin at a dosage of 100 mg/day for a period of 4 weeks. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Bovine Lactoferrin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matched sachets with maltodextrin for a period of 4 weeks. Receives: Dietary Supplement: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Monitoring of parameters of inflammation.
C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels in both groups. Comparing possible change.
Measured: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
Influence of lactoferrin on Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8.
Levels of Interleukin in both groups. Comparing possible change.
Measured: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
Effect of lactoferrin on white blood cells.
To assess the change in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils.
Measured: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
Effect of lactoferrin on urinary inflammatory markers.
The presence of bacteria in urine and semi-quantitative measurement of white blood cells count in urine.
Measured: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
Secondary outcomes (3)
To evaluate the efficacy of lactoferrin in the reduction of probable recurrence of Urinary Tract Infection.
The number of recurrent Urinary Tract Infections occur due to bacterial reinfection or bacterial persistence.
Measured: 1 month
The number of days of hospitalization.
Length of stay. Comparing possible differences in groups.
Measured: 1 month
Evaluation of the safety of the administration of lactoferrin by monitoring possible adverse effects.
Incidence, frequency and severity of treatment emergent adverse events.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2023
- Study start1 Jul 2015
- Primary completion31 Dec 2017
- Study completion15 Feb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Tract Infections in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- patients with Urinary Tract Infections were recruited subjects were randomized into two groups: * the experimental group received bLF * the control group received placebo without bLF
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Lublin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pharmabest Sp. z o.o.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ewa Kuźma, Principal investigator, Department of Neonate and Infant Pathology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06109688
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0254/297/2014
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Manzoni P, Dall'Agnola A, Tome D, Kaufman DA, Tavella E, Pieretto M, Messina A, De Luca D, Bellaiche M, Mosca A, Piloquet H, Simeoni U, Picaud JC, Del Vecchio A. Role of Lactoferrin in Neonates and Infants: An Update. Am J Perinatol. 2018 May;35(6):561-565. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639359. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
PubMed 29694997Artym J, Zimecki M. [The role of lactoferrin in the proper development of newborns]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2005;59:421-32. Polish.
PubMed 16106243Balighian E, Burke M. Urinary Tract Infections in Children. Pediatr Rev. 2018 Jan;39(1):3-12. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0007. No abstract available.
PubMed 29292282Garout WA, Kurdi HS, Shilli AH, Kari JA. Urinary tract infection in children younger than 5 years. Etiology and associated urological anomalies. Saudi Med J. 2015 Apr;36(4):497-501. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.4.10770.
PubMed 25828291Renata Y, Jassar H, Katz R, Hochberg A, Nir RR, Klein-Kremer A. Urinary concentration of cytokines in children with acute pyelonephritis. Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Jun;172(6):769-74. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1914-2. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
PubMed 23389820Krzemien G, Szmigielska A, Turczyn A, Panczyk-Tomaszewska M. Urine interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and transforming growth factor beta1 in infants with urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2016;41(3):260-267. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2016.63125. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
PubMed 27833443Miguel-Bayarri V, Casanoves-Laparra EB, Pallas-Beneyto L, Sancho-Chinesta S, Martin-Osorio LF, Tormo-Calandin C, Bautista-Rentero D. Prognostic value of the biomarkers procalcitonin, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in severe sepsis. Med Intensiva. 2012 Nov;36(8):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Apr 10. English, Spanish.
PubMed 22495097
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Lactoferrin Supplementation on Urinary Tract Infections in Infants: a Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06109688
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0254/297/2014
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infections in Children
- Keywords
- urinary tract infections, infants, lactoferrin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of LublinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pharmabest Sp. z o.o.
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered bovine lactoferrin (bLF) on Urinary Tract Infections in neonates and infants. Fifty-five patients with urinary tract infection were randomized to receive either bLF (n = 27) or an identical placebo (n = 28) for 4 weeks. The patients were assessed clinically and laboratory.
Detailed description
This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial at a single university medical center. Participants were neonates or infants with Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) admitted to the Neonatal and Infant Pathology Department of Children's University Hospital in the period from July 2015 to December 2017. The intervention was bovine lactoferrin at a dosage of 100 mg/day for a period of 4 weeks compared with placebo in a control group.
During hospital treatment, laboratory tests were performed to evaluate the activity of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 levels and white blood cell count).
Fifty-five patients heve been included in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- patients with Urinary Tract Infections were recruited subjects were randomized into two groups: * the experimental group received bLF * the control group received placebo without bLF
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bovine lactoferrin | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Bovine LactoferrinSachets with bovine lactoferrin at a dosage of 100 mg/day for a period of 4 weeks. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: placeboMatched sachets with maltodextrin for a period of 4 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 days to 12 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Neonates and infants with symptoms of Urinary Tract Infection.
- Active infection at enrollment, confirmed and documented in medical record.
- Children with Urinary Tract Infection treated according to current recommendations.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unconfirmed Urinary Tract Infection.
- Critical illness and/or hemodynamic instability.
- Allergy or sensitivity to lactoferrin or bovine derived proteins or bovine milk.
- Children whose parents/guardians decline to participate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bovine LactoferrinAlso: Lactoferrin 100 mgOrally intake 1 sachet per day for 4 weeks. Lactoferrin will be dissolved in human milk or infant formula or in a 5% glucose solution. | Dietary supplement | Bovine lactoferrin |
| placeboAlso: MaltodextrinOrally intake 1 sachet per day for 4 weeks. Maltodextrin will be dissolved in human milk or infant formula or in a 5% glucose solution. | Dietary supplement | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Monitoring of parameters of inflammation.
Time frame: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels in both groups. Comparing possible change.
Influence of lactoferrin on Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8.
Time frame: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
Levels of Interleukin in both groups. Comparing possible change.
Effect of lactoferrin on white blood cells.
Time frame: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
To assess the change in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils.
Effect of lactoferrin on urinary inflammatory markers.
Time frame: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment
The presence of bacteria in urine and semi-quantitative measurement of white blood cells count in urine.
3 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the efficacy of lactoferrin in the reduction of probable recurrence of Urinary Tract Infection.
Time frame: 1 month
The number of days of hospitalization.
Time frame: 1 month
Evaluation of the safety of the administration of lactoferrin by monitoring possible adverse effects.
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29694997Manzoni P, Dall'Agnola A, Tome D, Kaufman DA, Tavella E, Pieretto M, Messina A, De Luca D, Bellaiche M, Mosca A, Piloquet H, Simeoni U, Picaud JC, Del Vecchio A. Role of Lactoferrin in Neonates and Infants: An Update. Am J Perinatol. 2018 May;35(6):561-565. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639359. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 16106243Artym J, Zimecki M. [The role of lactoferrin in the proper development of newborns]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2005;59:421-32. Polish.
- Background: PubMed 29292282Balighian E, Burke M. Urinary Tract Infections in Children. Pediatr Rev. 2018 Jan;39(1):3-12. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0007. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25828291Garout WA, Kurdi HS, Shilli AH, Kari JA. Urinary tract infection in children younger than 5 years. Etiology and associated urological anomalies. Saudi Med J. 2015 Apr;36(4):497-501. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.4.10770.
- Background: PubMed 23389820Renata Y, Jassar H, Katz R, Hochberg A, Nir RR, Klein-Kremer A. Urinary concentration of cytokines in children with acute pyelonephritis. Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Jun;172(6):769-74. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1914-2. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
- Background: PubMed 27833443Krzemien G, Szmigielska A, Turczyn A, Panczyk-Tomaszewska M. Urine interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and transforming growth factor beta1 in infants with urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2016;41(3):260-267. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2016.63125. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 22495097Miguel-Bayarri V, Casanoves-Laparra EB, Pallas-Beneyto L, Sancho-Chinesta S, Martin-Osorio LF, Tormo-Calandin C, Bautista-Rentero D. Prognostic value of the biomarkers procalcitonin, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in severe sepsis. Med Intensiva. 2012 Nov;36(8):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Apr 10. English, Spanish.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urinary Tract Infections in Children
RecruitingObservational study
Urine Collection and Novel UTI Biomarkers in Children and Older Adults
UTI - Urinary Tract Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Single Dose Intravenous Antibiotics for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Children
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Infection
Recruiting
Perspectives on Antibiotics and Tracking Symptoms in Children
Urinary Tract Infection, Cellulitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem-Vaborbactam in Children With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Acute Pyelonephritis
Acute Pyelonephritis, Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical Efficacy of Stopping Oral Antibiotics When Symptoms Stop, Compared to 'Finishing the Course'
Urinary Tract Infection, Cellulitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ewa Kuźma principal investigator
Department of Neonate and Infant Pathology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bovine Lactoferrin in people with Urinary Tract Infections in Children, run by Medical University of Lublin.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Monitoring of parameters of inflammation. (time frame: at baseline, after 5 days of treatment). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06109688, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2023.