Regional AnesthesiaCIANCT06115720
Consent in Anaesthesia
A study testing Video assisted consent in people with Regional Anesthesia and Patient Satisfaction, run by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
Trial summary
DESIGN: Prospective randomised-controlled trial AIM: To determine whether presenting both techniques of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia in an unbiased manner, with video media, aids the anaesthetic consent process, compared to standard verbal consent alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Regional Anesthesia, Patient Satisfaction
- What is being tested?
- Video assisted consent
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 206 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2023to 31 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Presenting to pre-operative orthopaedic surgical clinic
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients <18 years or vulnerable groups
- Inability to communicate in English or language difficulty that requires an interpreter
- Severe vision or hearing loss if lack of other communication channels
- Private patients
- Prisoners
- Patients who reside outside the United Kingdom (home address)
- Opt-out patients on General Practitioner register
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: CIA: Consent in Anaesthesia, Prospective Randomised-controlled Trial
DESIGN: Prospective randomised-controlled trial AIM: To determine whether presenting both techniques of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia in an unbiased manner, with video media, aids the anaesthetic consent process, compared to standard verbal consent alone.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary outcome:
- Participants' satisfaction regarding the anaesthetic consent process
Secondary outcomes:
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards anaesthesia
- Participants' choice of anaesthetic technique POPULATION: General adult population (>18yrs), males and females DURATION: 2 years
Read the detailed description
The main aim of this study is to determine if presenting both anaesthetic techniques of general anaesthesia (GA) and regional anaesthesia (RA) to a participant in an unbiased manner, with video media, affects the participants' satisfaction, knowledge of, and attitudes towards anaesthesia. The investigators hypothesise that using video media will improve participants' satisfaction with the anaesthetic consent process, thereby resulting in better quality informed consent.
Participant's knowledge retention, attitudes and practices towards GA and RA, measured by an knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) questionnaire based on the consent process. Participant's stated preference for anaesthetic technique (i.e. General or Regional).
Several studies have shown that video-based patient education have led to better patient comprehension and satisfaction as well as reduced patient anxiety during the consent process compared to verbal consent.
Examples The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial showed that 80.7% of patients preferred portable video media (PVM) and 19.3% preferred standard video consent (SVC). PVM improves patient's understanding compared with SVC and is a more effective means of content delivery to patients in terms of overall preference and knowledge gained during the consent process.
Effect of preoperative multimedia information on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing procedures under regional anaesthesia, showed that preoperative multimedia information reduces the anxiety of patients undergoing surgery under regional anaesthesia. This type of information is easily delivered and can benefit many patients.
Oxford Video Informed Consent Tool (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction concluded: "Introduction of a video consent tool was found to be a positive adjunct to traditional consenting methods. Patient-clinician consent dialogue can now be documented. A randomised controlled study to further evaluate the effects of video consent on patients' retention of information, preoperative and postoperative anxiety, patient reported outcome measures as well as length of stay may be beneficial."
During the Covid pandemic, with the need for social distancing, this is particularly useful and allows for involvement of family support for decision making by allowing sufficient time for informed consent to be made.
The aim of this study is to determine if the use of video assisted consent during the anaesthetic consent process, for both GA and RA, affects the participants' satisfaction, knowledge of, and attitudes towards, anaesthesia.
The investigators hypothesise that using video media will improve participant knowledge, understanding and satisfaction of the anaesthetic consent process, thereby resulting in better quality informed consent.
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia, Patient Satisfaction
- Being tested
- Video assisted consent
- Keywords
- Consent, Patient information, Regional Anaesthesia, General Anaesthesia
- Medical subject headings
- Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video assisted consentOther
The intervention group will also be shown the same pre-recorded standard verbal consent, but following this will additionally be shown a specifically recorded video of the anaesthetic process for both GA and RA. This video will aim to communicate the same information as that found in the traditional verbal consent, using an actor undergoing an anaesthetic to provide context.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard video verbal consent process | No intervention | The control group will undergo the standard video verbal consent process for both GA and RA for orthopaedic surgery. This will be delivered using a standardised video script that will be generated from existing certified material. |
| Video assisted consent process | Experimental | The intervention group will also be shown the same pre-recorded standard verbal consent, but following this will additionally be shown a specifically recorded video of the anaesthetic process for both GA and RA. Receives: Other: Video assisted consent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient satisfaction CSQ-8
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire is a questionnaire measuring satisfaction. Response options differ from item to item, but all are based on a four-point scale. Examples include: "How satisfied are you with the amount of help you have received?" (which response options: 1 = "Quite dissatisfied", 2 = "Indifferent or mildly dissatisfied", 3 = "Mostly satisfied", 4 = "Very satisfied"; and, "Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?" (Which has the response options: 4 = Yes, they helped a great deal", 3 = "Yes, they helped somewhat", 2 = "No, they didn't help", 1 = "No, they seemed to make things worse". with an overall score is produced by summing all item responses. For the CSQ-8 version, scores range from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.
Measured: 5 -10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
KAP Questionnaire
Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards anaesthesia. Response options differ from item to item, but all are based on a five-point scale. Examples include: "How afraid are you of a sore throat?" (which response options: 1 = "Very unafraid", 2 = "Unafraid", 3 = "Neither afraid or unafraid", 4 = "Afraid", 5 = "Very Afraid"; and, "Having permanent nerve damage" (Which has the response options: 1 = "Very unafraid", 2 = "Unafraid", 3 = "Neither afraid or unafraid", 4 = "Afraid", 5 = "Very Afraid"; with an overall score is produced by summing all item responses. Higher values indicating a higher level of being afaid.
Measured: 5 - 10 minutes
Anaesthetic choice
Participants' preferred choice choice of anaesthetic technique: General or Regional tick box
Measured: 1 - 2 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2023
- Study start1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Regional AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Recruited participants, randomised to one of two groups. Control group: standard video verbal consent process for GA and RA for orthopaedic surgery. This verbal communication will be pre-recorded and shown to the participant. Intervention group: Same pre-recorded standard verbal consent, additionally recorded video of the anaesthetic process for both GA and RA.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College London
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boyne Bellew, Principal investigator, Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustChristopher Mullington, Principal investigator, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06115720
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 305199
- Other IDs
- 23SM8319
- Acronym
- CIA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Woodall NM, Cook TM. National census of airway management techniques used for anaesthesia in the UK: first phase of the Fourth National Audit Project at the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):266-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq339. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
PubMed 21131655Sury MR, Palmer JH, Cook TM, Pandit JJ. The state of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in 2013. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;113(4):575-84. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu292. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
PubMed 25236896O'Donnell BD, Ryan H, O'Sullivan O, Iohom G. Ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with 20 milliliters local anesthetic mixture versus general anesthesia for upper limb trauma surgery: an observer-blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):279-83. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a3e721.
PubMed 19535722Galos DK, Taormina DP, Crespo A, Ding DY, Sapienza A, Jain S, Tejwani NC. Does Brachial Plexus Blockade Result in Improved Pain Scores After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation? A Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1247-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4735-1. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
PubMed 26869374Mulroy MF, Larkin KL, Batra MS, Hodgson PS, Owens BD. Femoral nerve block with 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia following outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):24-9. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.20773.
PubMed 11172507Williams BA, Bottegal MT, Kentor ML, Irrgang JJ, Williams JP. Rebound pain scores as a function of femoral nerve block duration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective analysis of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.10.011.
PubMed 17543812Bulka CM, Shotwell MS, Gupta RK, Sandberg WS, Ehrenfeld JM. Regional anesthesia, time to hospital discharge, and in-hospital mortality: a propensity score matched analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):381-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000121.
PubMed 25025697Yentis SM, Hartle AJ, Barker IR, Barker P, Bogod DG, Clutton-Brock TH, Ruck Keene A, Leifer S, Naughton A, Plunkett E. AAGBI: Consent for anaesthesia 2017: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72(1):93-105. doi: 10.1111/anae.13762.
PubMed 27988961Winter M, Kam J, Nalavenkata S, Hardy E, Handmer M, Ainsworth H, Lee WG, Louie-Johnsun M. The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial. BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):823-828. doi: 10.1111/bju.13595. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
PubMed 27440499Armstrong AW, Alikhan A, Cheng LS, Schupp C, Kurlinkus C, Eisen DB. Portable video media for presenting informed consent and wound care instructions for skin biopsies: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Nov;163(5):1014-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10067.x.
PubMed 20977443Jlala HA, French JL, Foxall GL, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Effect of preoperative multimedia information on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing procedures under regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;104(3):369-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq002. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
PubMed 20124283Mawhinney G, Thakar C, Williamson V, Rothenfluh DA, Reynolds J. Oxford Video Informed Consent Tool (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e027712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027712.
PubMed 31345967Zhang Y, Ruan X, Tang H, Yang W, Xian Z, Lu M. Video-Assisted Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:9593631. doi: 10.1155/2017/9593631. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
PubMed 28191349Tipotsch-Maca SM, Varsits RM, Ginzel C, Vecsei-Marlovits PV. Effect of a multimedia-assisted informed consent procedure on the information gain, satisfaction, and anxiety of cataract surgery patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.019.
PubMed 26948785Batuyong ED, Jowett AJ, Wickramasinghe N, Beischer AD. Using multimedia to enhance the consent process for bunion correction surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):249-54. doi: 10.1111/ans.12534.
PubMed 24812709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CIA: Consent in Anaesthesia, Prospective Randomised-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06115720
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIA / 305199
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia, Patient Satisfaction
- Keywords
- Consent, Patient information, Regional Anaesthesia, General Anaesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College London
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
DESIGN: Prospective randomised-controlled trial AIM: To determine whether presenting both techniques of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia in an unbiased manner, with video media, aids the anaesthetic consent process, compared to standard verbal consent alone.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary outcome:
- Participants' satisfaction regarding the anaesthetic consent process
Secondary outcomes:
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards anaesthesia
- Participants' choice of anaesthetic technique POPULATION: General adult population (>18yrs), males and females DURATION: 2 years
Detailed description
The main aim of this study is to determine if presenting both anaesthetic techniques of general anaesthesia (GA) and regional anaesthesia (RA) to a participant in an unbiased manner, with video media, affects the participants' satisfaction, knowledge of, and attitudes towards anaesthesia. The investigators hypothesise that using video media will improve participants' satisfaction with the anaesthetic consent process, thereby resulting in better quality informed consent.
Participant's knowledge retention, attitudes and practices towards GA and RA, measured by an knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) questionnaire based on the consent process. Participant's stated preference for anaesthetic technique (i.e. General or Regional).
Several studies have shown that video-based patient education have led to better patient comprehension and satisfaction as well as reduced patient anxiety during the consent process compared to verbal consent.
Examples The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial showed that 80.7% of patients preferred portable video media (PVM) and 19.3% preferred standard video consent (SVC). PVM improves patient's understanding compared with SVC and is a more effective means of content delivery to patients in terms of overall preference and knowledge gained during the consent process.
Effect of preoperative multimedia information on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing procedures under regional anaesthesia, showed that preoperative multimedia information reduces the anxiety of patients undergoing surgery under regional anaesthesia. This type of information is easily delivered and can benefit many patients.
Oxford Video Informed Consent Tool (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction concluded: "Introduction of a video consent tool was found to be a positive adjunct to traditional consenting methods. Patient-clinician consent dialogue can now be documented. A randomised controlled study to further evaluate the effects of video consent on patients' retention of information, preoperative and postoperative anxiety, patient reported outcome measures as well as length of stay may be beneficial."
During the Covid pandemic, with the need for social distancing, this is particularly useful and allows for involvement of family support for decision making by allowing sufficient time for informed consent to be made.
The aim of this study is to determine if the use of video assisted consent during the anaesthetic consent process, for both GA and RA, affects the participants' satisfaction, knowledge of, and attitudes towards, anaesthesia.
The investigators hypothesise that using video media will improve participant knowledge, understanding and satisfaction of the anaesthetic consent process, thereby resulting in better quality informed consent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Recruited participants, randomised to one of two groups. Control group: standard video verbal consent process for GA and RA for orthopaedic surgery. This verbal communication will be pre-recorded and shown to the participant. Intervention group: Same pre-recorded standard verbal consent, additionally recorded video of the anaesthetic process for both GA and RA.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard video verbal consent process | No intervention | –The control group will undergo the standard video verbal consent process for both GA and RA for orthopaedic surgery. This will be delivered using a standardised video script that will be generated from existing certified material. |
| Video assisted consent process | Experimental | Other: Video assisted consentThe intervention group will also be shown the same pre-recorded standard verbal consent, but following this will additionally be shown a specifically recorded video of the anaesthetic process for both GA and RA. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Presenting to pre-operative orthopaedic surgical clinic
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients <18 years or vulnerable groups
- Inability to communicate in English or language difficulty that requires an interpreter
- Severe vision or hearing loss if lack of other communication channels
- Private patients
- Prisoners
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video assisted consentThe intervention group will also be shown the same pre-recorded standard verbal consent, but following this will additionally be shown a specifically recorded video of the anaesthetic process for both GA and RA. This video will aim to communicate the same information as that found in the traditional verbal consent, using an actor undergoing an anaesthetic to provide context. | Other | Video assisted consent process |
Primary outcome
Patient satisfaction CSQ-8
Time frame: 5 -10 minutes
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire is a questionnaire measuring satisfaction. Response options differ from item to item, but all are based on a four-point scale. Examples include: "How satisfied are you with the amount of help you have received?" (which response options: 1 = "Quite dissatisfied", 2 = "Indifferent or mildly dissatisfied", 3 = "Mostly satisfied", 4 = "Very satisfied"; and, "Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?" (Which has the response options: 4 = Yes, they helped a great deal", 3 = "Yes, they helped somewhat", 2 = "No, they didn't help", 1 = "No, they seemed to make things worse". with an overall score is produced by summing all item responses. For the CSQ-8 version, scores range from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.
2 secondary outcomes
KAP Questionnaire
Time frame: 5 - 10 minutes
Anaesthetic choice
Time frame: 1 - 2 minutes
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 21131655Woodall NM, Cook TM. National census of airway management techniques used for anaesthesia in the UK: first phase of the Fourth National Audit Project at the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):266-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq339. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
- Background: PubMed 25236896Sury MR, Palmer JH, Cook TM, Pandit JJ. The state of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in 2013. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;113(4):575-84. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu292. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
- Background: PubMed 19535722O'Donnell BD, Ryan H, O'Sullivan O, Iohom G. Ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with 20 milliliters local anesthetic mixture versus general anesthesia for upper limb trauma surgery: an observer-blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):279-83. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a3e721.
- Background: PubMed 26869374Galos DK, Taormina DP, Crespo A, Ding DY, Sapienza A, Jain S, Tejwani NC. Does Brachial Plexus Blockade Result in Improved Pain Scores After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation? A Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1247-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4735-1. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
- Background: PubMed 11172507Mulroy MF, Larkin KL, Batra MS, Hodgson PS, Owens BD. Femoral nerve block with 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia following outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):24-9. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.20773.
- Background: PubMed 17543812Williams BA, Bottegal MT, Kentor ML, Irrgang JJ, Williams JP. Rebound pain scores as a function of femoral nerve block duration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective analysis of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.10.011.
- Background: PubMed 25025697Bulka CM, Shotwell MS, Gupta RK, Sandberg WS, Ehrenfeld JM. Regional anesthesia, time to hospital discharge, and in-hospital mortality: a propensity score matched analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):381-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000121.
- Background: PubMed 27988961Yentis SM, Hartle AJ, Barker IR, Barker P, Bogod DG, Clutton-Brock TH, Ruck Keene A, Leifer S, Naughton A, Plunkett E. AAGBI: Consent for anaesthesia 2017: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72(1):93-105. doi: 10.1111/anae.13762.
- Background: PubMed 27440499Winter M, Kam J, Nalavenkata S, Hardy E, Handmer M, Ainsworth H, Lee WG, Louie-Johnsun M. The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial. BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):823-828. doi: 10.1111/bju.13595. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
- Background: PubMed 20977443Armstrong AW, Alikhan A, Cheng LS, Schupp C, Kurlinkus C, Eisen DB. Portable video media for presenting informed consent and wound care instructions for skin biopsies: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Nov;163(5):1014-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10067.x.
- Background: PubMed 20124283Jlala HA, French JL, Foxall GL, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Effect of preoperative multimedia information on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing procedures under regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;104(3):369-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq002. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
- Background: PubMed 31345967Mawhinney G, Thakar C, Williamson V, Rothenfluh DA, Reynolds J. Oxford Video Informed Consent Tool (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e027712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027712.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Regional Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
Pulse Wave Transit Time After Infraclavicular Block
Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
Recruiting
Lateral QL Block vs Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Section
Anesthesia, Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
ESP Versus SPSIP Block for Pain Relief After Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Cost-Effectiveness of Upfront Supplemental Anaesthesia in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Irreversible Pulpitis, Anesthesia, Local
Not yet recruiting
Impact of High Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Diaphragmatic Function: a Prospective Study
Breast Cancer Surgery, Breast Cancer Surgery Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boyne Bellew principal investigator
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Christopher Mullington principal investigator
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video assisted consent in people with Regional Anesthesia and Patient Satisfaction, run by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Boyne Bellew (+44(0)203 312 1248, boyne.bellew@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient satisfaction CSQ-8 (time frame: 5 -10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06115720, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2023.