AzTrials
AzTrials

Obstructive Sleep ApneaNCT06119841

Tonsillectomy and Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty Operations

A study testing Tonsillectomy and Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Osa Syndrome, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: To compare the efficacy of tonsillectomy and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) in the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Patients with Friedman grade III-IV tonsil hypertrophy and OSA diagnosed with polysomnography were separated into two groups according to the surgery… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 27 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Osa Syndrome
What is being tested?
Tonsillectomy and Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
53 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to 28 Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 27 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients aged >27 years
  • Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) value of ≥10.

Who cannot join

  • absent preoperative and/or postoperative PSG
  • craniofacial anomaly such as evident retrognathia
  • severe cardiac, respiratory, or neurological disease
  • an evident obstruction at the tongue base level in the endoscopic examination

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital

    Ankara, 06010

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of the Outcomes of Tonsillectomy and Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty Operations in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Background: To compare the efficacy of tonsillectomy and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) in the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Methods: Patients with Friedman grade III-IV tonsil hypertrophy and OSA diagnosed with polysomnography were separated into two groups according to the surgery performed, as the classic tonsillectomy group (Group 1) and the ESP group (Group 2). The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) value. The preoperative and postoperative AHI scores and the decreases in these scores were noted. The change in AHI was calculated as a percentage (preoperative AHI - postoperative AHI/ preoperative AHI x 100) and the two groups were compared. An AHI value of <10 events/hour was accepted as cure.

Read the detailed description

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a frequently seen sleep disorder characterised by the stopping or decrease of air flow, which occurs with the collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The upper airway can be described as an empty tube and if the air passing through this tube decreases or stops, an increase in negative pressure occurs, especially in the soft palate and lateral pharyngeal wall, causing pharyngeal collapse The increase in airway resistance because of both the upper airway collapse and increase in negative pressure can be a reason for loud snoring and apnea, and if not treated can also cause systemic complications. Upper airway obstruction formed in OSA can be due to structural anatomic factors or to abnormal upper airway motor tonus. The obstruction in the upper airway can occur in a single or several anatomic regions such as the soft palate, uvula, palatine tonsils, or tongue root. Treatment modalities include lifestyle changes, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), surgery, and intra-oral devices. The main aim of all treatments is to expand the upper airway and attempt to reduce airway collapse. In the surgical treatment applied for this purpose, it is aimed to remove pharyngeal tissue that narrows the upper airway, increase the stability of the pharyngeal air column, and expand the pharyngeal lumen.

The lateral pharyngeal wall has a complex structure including several pharyngeal muscles such as the palatopharyngeus, superior pharyngeal constrictor, and palatoglossus, and lymphoid tissue, and the palatine tonsils. In a previous study, the clinical importance was stated of lateral pharyngeal wall collapse in the pathogenesis of OSA. It was suggested in that study that the lateral pharyngeal wall could collapse more easily especially in patients with severe OSA compared to those without or with mild OSA, and because of this collapse, the narrowed lateral pharyngeal wall could be an independent risk factor affecting OSA. The palatine tonsils, especially those of Friedman grade III-IV dimensions, which occupy a large space in the lateral pharyngeal wall, seem to be a factor causing collapse. In OSA patients with grade III-IV tonsil hypertrophy, classic tonsillectomy is recommended as first-line treatment and is still the gold standard surgical method. However, sometimes tonsillectomy remains insufficient in the treatment of OSA. Therefore, to be able to prevent lateral pharyngeal wall collapse and increase stability, surgical techniques have been investigated, and lateral pharyngoplasty, relocation pharyngoplasty, and most recently, expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) have been defined. A previous study has reported that ESP is a suitable surgical procedure for patients with moderate or severe OSA who have severe palatal circumferential narrowing and greater lateral pharyngeal wall thickness. A meta-analysis that included 5 studies also emphasized that ESP was an effective surgical treatment for OSA patients. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the literature that has shown whether or not this surgical technique is superior to classical tonsillectomy. The need for this method, which is more major surgery than classic tonsillectomy, is not clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate and compare the surgical success of classic tonsillectomy and ESP in OSA surgery performed on a patient series in our hospital.

The study was conducted in the Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Clinic of a city hospital. A full ENT examination was made of patients with suspected OSA who presented with complaints of loud snoring, witnessed apnea, and daytime sleepiness. The obstruction localisation was evaluated using the Müller manoeuvre during the endoscopic examination and only patients with lateral pharyngeal collapse were included in the study.Then preoperative polysomnography (PSG) was performed on the patients with Friedman grade III-IV tonsil hypertrophy. The study included patients aged >18 years with an Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) value of ≥10. Patients were excluded from the study if they had not undergone preoperative or postoperative PSG, if they had a craniofacial anomaly such as evident retrognathia, any severe cardiac, respiratory, or neurological disease, or were determined with an evident obstruction at the tongue base level in the endoscopic examination.

The patients who underwent surgery for a diagnosis of OSA were separated into two groups as the classic tonsillectomy (Group 1) and ESP (Group 2) groups. All the operations were performed by two surgeons experienced in this subject (MM-AI). The patients were hospitalised for at least 2 days postoperatively, with hydration and pain relief provided.

The primary endpoint of the study was defined as the AHI score. The patients were separated into 3 subgroups according to the severity of OSA determined in the PSG recording: mild (AHI ≥ 10 and <15 events/hr), moderate (AHI ≥15 and <30 events/hr), and severe (AHI ≥ 30 events/hr). The preoperative and postoperative AHI scores and the decreases in these scores were noted. The change in AHI was calculated as a percentage (preoperative AHI - postoperative AHI/ preoperative AHI x 100) and the two groups were compared. An AHI value of <10 events/hr was accepted as cure. Success was considered as postoperative AHI <20 events/hr or a 50% reduction in the preoperative AHI.

The daytime sleepiness status of the patients was evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). A record was made for each patient of body mass index (BMI), smoking status and alcohol consumption, and history of comorbidities. At postoperative 6 months, PSG was repeated, the ESS was applied, and BMI was recorded.

All the operations were performed under general anaesthesia. Tonsillectomy was performed with cold dissection including the whole tonsil and capsule, and bleeding was controlled with bipolar cauterisation. In the ESP technique, following bilateral tonsillectomy with cold dissection and bleeding control with bipolar cauterisation, the palatopharyngeus muscle was identified and a superior-based muscle flap was formed by cutting the upper two-thirds of the muscle on both sides from the lower third attachment site. By opening tunnels to the anterior plica mucosa, the dissected palatopharyngeus muscle was placed in these tunnels, and was sutured to the pterygomandibular raphe with vicryl 2-0 sutures. The mucosal cuts were closed with vicryl 3-0 sutures. All the patients were discharged on postoperative day 2. Follow-up examinations were made at the end of postoperative 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months. The Clavien-Dindo system was used to evaluate complications.

Statistical Analysis Data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 26 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were reported as median (minimum-maximum) values, and categorical variables as number (n) and percentage (%). Nominal variables were assessed using the Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. For parameters that did not show normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test was applied in comparisons. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pre- and post-surgery AHI scores. A value of p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Tonsillectomy, Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty
Keywords
Apnea-Hypopnea Index, Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty, Obstructive sleep apnea, Tonsillectomy, Upper airway surgery
Medical subject headings
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Carnevale syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TonsillectomyProcedure or surgery

    Tonsillectomy was performed with cold dissection including the whole tonsil and capsule, and bleeding was controlled with bipolar cauterisation.

  • Expansion sphincter pharyngoplastyProcedure or surgery

    In the ESP technique, following bilateral tonsillectomy with cold dissection and bleeding control with bipolar cauterisation, the palatopharyngeus muscle was identified and a superior-based muscle flap was formed by cutting the upper two-thirds of the muscle on both sides from the lower third attachment site. By opening tunnels to the anterior plica mucosa, the dissected palatopharyngeus muscle was placed in these tunnels, and was sutured to the pterygomandibular raphe with vicryl 2-0 sutures. The mucosal cuts were closed with vicryl 3-0 sutures

Study groups in NCT06119841
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TonsillectomyExperimentalTonsillectomy was performed with cold dissection including the whole tonsil and capsule, and bleeding was controlled with bipolar cauterisation.
Receives: Procedure: Tonsillectomy
Expansion sphincter pharyngoplastyExperimentalIn the ESP technique, following bilateral tonsillectomy with cold dissection and bleeding control with bipolar cauterisation, the palatopharyngeus muscle was identified and a superior-based muscle flap was formed by cutting the upper two-thirds of the muscle on both sides from the lower third attachment site. By opening tunnels to the anterior plica mucosa, the dissected palatopharyngeus muscle was placed in these tunnels, and was sutured to the pterygomandibular raphe with vicryl 2-0 sutures. The mucosal cuts were closed with vicryl 3-0 sutures
Receives: Procedure: Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI)

    The patients were separated into 3 subgroups according to the severity of OSA determined in the PSG recording: mild (AHI ≥ 10 and <15 events/hr), moderate (AHI ≥15 and <30 events/hr), and severe (AHI ≥ 30 events/hr). The preoperative and postoperative AHI scores and the decreases in these scores were noted. The change in AHI was calculated as a percentage (preoperative AHI - postoperative AHI/ preoperative AHI x 100) and the two groups were compared. An AHI value of <10 events/hr was accepted as cure. Success was considered as postoperative AHI <20 events/hr or a 50% reduction in the preoperative AHI.

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06119841
Sponsor's protocol ID
SDoluoglu
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
28 Oct 2023
Last updated
21 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: To compare the efficacy of tonsillectomy and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) in the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tonsillectomy and Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Osa Syndrome, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT06119841 | AzTrials