Ovarian CancerNCT06120309
New Prognostic Index for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcome in Patients With Advanced High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
An observational study of Ovarian Cancer and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
A validated prognostic index for the outcome of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is still lacking. To address this need, we developed an ovarian neoadjuvant chemotherapy prognostic index (ONCPI) to improve predictive accuracy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Prognostic Cancer Model
- What is being tested?
- CRS scoring and Routine blood laboratory testing before treatment
- How many people
- 465 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2023to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with advanced HGSOC receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before interval debulking surgery (IDS) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled
Who may be able to join
- confirmed diagnosis of HGSOC by two experienced pathologists;
- clinical stage III-IV according to the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guideline;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECGO) performance status of 0 to 1;
- no prior anti-cancer therapy;
- received ≥ 3 cycles of platinum-based NACT followed by IDS;
- complete pretreatment blood test results and clinical and imaging data.
Who cannot join
- other pathological types;
- without NACT or IDS;
- incomplete pretreatment data;
- lost to follow-up.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 520120
About this study
A validated prognostic index for the outcome of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is still lacking. To address this need, we developed an ovarian neoadjuvant chemotherapy prognostic index (ONCPI) to improve predictive accuracy. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of advanced HGSOC patients receiving platinum-based NACT. Blood inflammatory composite markers were calculated and binary-transformed using optimal cutoffs. Omental hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) stained slides were selected for the assessment of chemotherapy response score (CRS). Logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression model were utilized to develop a prognostic index.
Read the detailed description
- The clinicopathological data of patients newly diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital were collected and screened.
- Statistical analysis of hematological indicators that may be related to inflammation before platinum-based therapy in patients who met the inclusion criteria, including but not limited to: Absolute white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, absolute monocyte count, platelet count, hemoglobin and fibrinogen were calculated. NLR, MLR, PLR, FLR and SII were calculated, and the correlation between the above indicators and tumor grade, stage, platinum-based drug sensitivity and prognosis was analyzed.
- CRS scoring was performed using H\&E sections of omentum obtained during IDS surgery.
- logistic regression and Cox regression were used to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the sensitivity of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and the prognosis of patients.
- K-M analysis and ROC curve were used to analyze the predictive value of NLR combined with CRS ONCPI index for the response of high-grade serous ovarian cancer to platinum therapy.
- Being tested
- CRS scoring, Routine blood laboratory testing before treatment
- Keywords
- High-grade serous ovarian cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Prognostic index
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CRS scoringDiagnostic test
For pathological evaluation, the omental specimens resected during the IDS were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) and reviewed independently by two gynecologic pathologists, both blinded to the clinical data and each other's results. The pathology slide obtained from omentum, usually the site with the most viable tumor, was selected for CRS assessment according to the three-tiered CRS system recommended by 2019 ESMO ovarian cancer guidelines
Routine blood laboratory testing before treatmentDiagnostic test
The routine blood tests and tumor marker measurements, including CA125, HE4, and inflammation-related serum biomarkers including neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, fibrinogen, and platelets, were conducted within three days before the first NACT.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NACT Group | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: CRS scoring; Diagnostic Test: Routine blood laboratory testing before treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response to platinum-based chemotherapy
After NACT-IDS and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, treatment efficacy was assessed according to NCCN guidelines. For primary tumor, patients who relapsed 6 months or more after initial chemotherapy were termed platinum-sensitive. In contrast, patients whose disease recurred in less than 6 months were classified as platinum-resistant.
Measured: At least 6 months after initial chemotherapy
Secondary outcomes (2)
3-year progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS was calculated from the date of the first NACT until disease progression or death due to any cause.
Measured: 3 years
3-year overall survival (OS)
OS was calculated from the date of the first NACT administration until death due to any cause.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2023
- Study start1 Nov 2023
- Primary completion1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 465 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06120309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SYSKY-2023-963-01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: If IPD is to be shared, it will be limited to the patient's clinicopathological and prognostic data, and the patient's personal information will be protected
Publications
Hudry D, Becourt S, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Primary or Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: a Personalized Decision-a Literature Review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):1661-1668. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01318-9. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
PubMed 35969358Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, Ledermann J, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, Morice P, Pignata S, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, Baert T, Belaroussi I, Dashora A, Olbrecht S, Planchamp F, Querleu D; ESMO-ESGO Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference Working Group. ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent diseasedagger. Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672-705. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz062.
PubMed 31046081Liang WF, Wang LJ, Li H, Liu CH, Wu MF, Li J. The added value of CA125 normalization before interval debulking surgery to the chemotherapy response score for the prognostication of ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease. J Cancer. 2021 Jan 1;12(3):946-953. doi: 10.7150/jca.52711. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33403051Li C, Wu J, Jiang L, Zhang L, Huang J, Tian Y, Zhao Y, Liu X, Xia L, E H, Gao P, Hou L, Yang M, Ma M, Su C, Zhang H, Chen H, She Y, Xie D, Luo Q, Chen C. The predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers for major pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and its association with the immune-related tumor microenvironment: a multi-center study. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023 Mar;72(3):783-794. doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03262-w. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
PubMed 36056951Rodolakis I, Pergialiotis V, Liontos M, Haidopoulos D, Loutradis D, Rodolakis A, Bamias A, Thomakos N. Chemotherapy Response Score in Ovarian Cancer Patients: An Overview of Its Clinical Utility. J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 10;12(6):2155. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062155.
PubMed 36983157
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- New Prognostic Index for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcome in Patients With Advanced High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06120309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SYSKY-2023-963-01
- Keywords
- High-grade serous ovarian cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Prognostic index
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 465 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A validated prognostic index for the outcome of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is still lacking. To address this need, we developed an ovarian neoadjuvant chemotherapy prognostic index (ONCPI) to improve predictive accuracy. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of advanced HGSOC patients receiving platinum-based NACT. Blood inflammatory composite markers were calculated and binary-transformed using optimal cutoffs. Omental hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) stained slides were selected for the assessment of chemotherapy response score (CRS). Logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression model were utilized to develop a prognostic index.
Detailed description
- The clinicopathological data of patients newly diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital were collected and screened.
- Statistical analysis of hematological indicators that may be related to inflammation before platinum-based therapy in patients who met the inclusion criteria, including but not limited to: Absolute white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, absolute monocyte count, platelet count, hemoglobin and fibrinogen were calculated. NLR, MLR, PLR, FLR and SII were calculated, and the correlation between the above indicators and tumor grade, stage, platinum-based drug sensitivity and prognosis was analyzed.
- CRS scoring was performed using H\&E sections of omentum obtained during IDS surgery.
- logistic regression and Cox regression were used to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the sensitivity of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and the prognosis of patients.
- K-M analysis and ROC curve were used to analyze the predictive value of NLR combined with CRS ONCPI index for the response of high-grade serous ovarian cancer to platinum therapy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NACT Group | – | Diagnostic Test: CRS scoring, Diagnostic Test: Routine blood laboratory testing before treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with advanced HGSOC receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before interval debulking surgery (IDS) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- confirmed diagnosis of HGSOC by two experienced pathologists;
- clinical stage III-IV according to the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guideline;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECGO) performance status of 0 to 1;
- no prior anti-cancer therapy;
- received ≥ 3 cycles of platinum-based NACT followed by IDS;
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- other pathological types;
- without NACT or IDS;
- incomplete pretreatment data;
- lost to follow-up.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CRS scoringFor pathological evaluation, the omental specimens resected during the IDS were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) and reviewed independently by two gynecologic pathologists, both blinded to the clinical data and each other's results. The pathology slide obtained from omentum, usually the site with the most viable tumor, was selected for CRS assessment according to the three-tiered CRS system recommended by 2019 ESMO ovarian cancer guidelines | Diagnostic test | NACT Group |
| Routine blood laboratory testing before treatmentThe routine blood tests and tumor marker measurements, including CA125, HE4, and inflammation-related serum biomarkers including neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, fibrinogen, and platelets, were conducted within three days before the first NACT. | Diagnostic test | NACT Group |
Primary outcome
Response to platinum-based chemotherapy
Time frame: At least 6 months after initial chemotherapy
After NACT-IDS and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, treatment efficacy was assessed according to NCCN guidelines. For primary tumor, patients who relapsed 6 months or more after initial chemotherapy were termed platinum-sensitive. In contrast, patients whose disease recurred in less than 6 months were classified as platinum-resistant.
2 secondary outcomes
3-year progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame: 3 years
3-year overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 35969358Hudry D, Becourt S, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Primary or Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: a Personalized Decision-a Literature Review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):1661-1668. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01318-9. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 31046081Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, Ledermann J, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, Morice P, Pignata S, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, Baert T, Belaroussi I, Dashora A, Olbrecht S, Planchamp F, Querleu D; ESMO-ESGO Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference Working Group. ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent diseasedagger. Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672-705. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz062.
- Results publication: PubMed 33403051Liang WF, Wang LJ, Li H, Liu CH, Wu MF, Li J. The added value of CA125 normalization before interval debulking surgery to the chemotherapy response score for the prognostication of ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease. J Cancer. 2021 Jan 1;12(3):946-953. doi: 10.7150/jca.52711. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 36056951Li C, Wu J, Jiang L, Zhang L, Huang J, Tian Y, Zhao Y, Liu X, Xia L, E H, Gao P, Hou L, Yang M, Ma M, Su C, Zhang H, Chen H, She Y, Xie D, Luo Q, Chen C. The predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers for major pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and its association with the immune-related tumor microenvironment: a multi-center study. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023 Mar;72(3):783-794. doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03262-w. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 36983157Rodolakis I, Pergialiotis V, Liontos M, Haidopoulos D, Loutradis D, Rodolakis A, Bamias A, Thomakos N. Chemotherapy Response Score in Ovarian Cancer Patients: An Overview of Its Clinical Utility. J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 10;12(6):2155. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062155.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. If IPD is to be shared, it will be limited to the patient's clinicopathological and prognostic data, and the patient's personal information will be protected
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ovarian Cancer and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response to platinum-based chemotherapy (time frame: At least 6 months after initial chemotherapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06120309, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2023.