AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT06120439

Comparing the QoR of PECS Block and GA in Breast-conserving Surgery With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

A study testing PECS II combined with intercostal nerve blockade; and General anesthesia with laryngeal mask in people with Breast Cancer and Pectoral Nerves Block, run by Jun Zhang at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the Quality of Recovery (QoR) in Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS) with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) using Pectoral Nerves (PECS) Block and General Anesthesia (GA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
What is being tested?
PECS II combined with intercostal nerve blockade; and General anesthesia with laryngeal mask
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
96 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Dec 2023to 15 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled for breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy.
  • Age between 18 and 70 years.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification grade I-III.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to regional anesthesia: site infection at the puncture site, allergy to local anesthetics, coagulation disorders, or bleeding risks.
  • Impaired liver or kidney function.
  • Pregnancy, lactation, possibility of pregnancy, or planned pregnancy.
  • Preoperative use of analgesic drugs, history of chronic pain, or history of opioid abuse.
  • Mental illness.
  • Patients who refuse to participate.
  • Patients deemed unsuitable for the clinical trial by the researchers.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Quality of Recovery(QoR) of Pectoral Nerves(PECS) Block and General Anesthesia(GA) in Breast-conserving Surgery(BCS) With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy(SLNB):A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the Quality of Recovery (QoR) in Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS) with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) using Pectoral Nerves (PECS) Block and General Anesthesia (GA). The primary objectives are as follows: First, to determine if the PECS group exhibits better QoR; Second, to investigate if the PECS group experiences less postoperative pain and complications; Third, to examine if the PECS group demonstrates more stable hemodynamics.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial, with a 1:1 ratio for grouping. The experimental group is the T group, receiving Pecs II combined with intercostal nerve block, while the control group is the C group, receiving general anesthesia. The primary outcome measure is the QoR-15 score of the subjects 6 hours after surgery. Based on preliminary results, the control group had a QoR-15 score of 133±8 (n=6), and the experimental group needs to improve by at least 8 points (which is generally considered clinically significant, PMID:27159009). With a two-sided α=0.05 and a power of 99%, accounting for a 20% dropout rate, the final required sample size was calculated to be 96 cases, with 48 cases in each group.

If the proportion of dropout cases is less than 5% and considered "completely random missing," the missing records generated by the dropout cases will be directly excluded. Depending on the specific circumstances, either single imputation or multiple imputation methods will be used.

Being tested
PECS II combined with intercostal nerve blockade;, General anesthesia with laryngeal mask
Keywords
Pectoral nerves block II, intercostal nerve block, dexmedetomidine, breast-conserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy, quality of recovery
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PECS II combined with intercostal nerve blockade;Combination product

    The patient was in a supine position, and under ultrasound guidance, the needle tip was first placed in the plane between the pectoralis major and minor muscles, and 10ml of 0.3% ropivacaine was injected. The needle was then advanced into the space between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles, and 20ml of 0.3% ropivacaine was injected. Intercostal nerve blockade: The range of intercostal blockade was determined based on the location of the breast surgery. The needle was inserted into the intercostal space from the posterior axillary line, and 3ml of 0.3% ropivacaine was injected into each intercostal space.

  • General anesthesia with laryngeal maskCombination product

    The C Group underwent general anesthesia induction using TCI propofol 3-3.5μg/ml, TCI remifentanil 1-2ng/ml, sufentanil 0.3μg/kg iv, midazolam 0.05mg/kg iv, and rocuronium 0.6mg/kg iv after loss of consciousness. After muscle relaxation, the laryngeal mask was inserted, and mechanical ventilation was performed with a tidal volume of 6ml/kg. Anesthesia maintenance included propofol 3-4μg/ml and remifentanil 1-2ng/ml.

Study groups in NCT06120439
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
T GroupExperimentalThe T Group received PECS II(PMID: 22939099) combined with intercostal nerve block
Receives: Combination Product: PECS II combined with intercostal nerve blockade;
C GroupActive comparatorC Group underwent laryngeal mask insertion after general anesthesia induction.
Receives: Combination Product: General anesthesia with laryngeal mask

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative QoR-15 at 6 hours

    The 15-item quality of recovery(QoR-15) at 6 hours after the surgery.

    Measured: 6 hours after the surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Postoperative NRS pain score at 6 hours

    Postoperative numeric rating scales pain score at 6 hours after the surgery. Postoperative pain severity at rest and movement measured using a numerical rating scale(NRS) at 24 h. The numerical rating scale (NRS) is a line with numbers from 0 to 10 are spaced evenly across the page. And the NRS is bounded at the left-most end with "no pain" and at the right-most end with "worst pain imaginable". Pain levels below "4" are considered mild, "4-7" is moderate pain, and anything above "7" is considered severe pain. Patients are instructed to circle the number that represents the amount of pain that they are experiencing at the time of the evaluation. The movement status refers to maximum mobility of the upper arm of the surgical side. Remedial pain relief measures are initiated when the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score exceeds 4.

    Measured: 6 hours after the surgery

  2. The number of patients who experience intraoperative hypotension

    During the surgery and anesthesia process, MAP ≤ 65 mmHg is defined as intraoperative hypotension. Record the number of patients who experience intraoperative hypotension.

    Measured: From the beginning of anesthesia to the end of the surgery.

  3. Changes in hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure) after the surgical incision.

    Monitor the magnitude of hemodynamic changes compared to baseline after the incision. The main comparison is the magnitude of changes in mean arterial pressure between the two groups.

    Measured: From the beginning of anesthesia to three minutes after the surgical incision.

  4. Changes in hemodynamics (heart rate) after the surgical incision.

    Monitor the magnitude of hemodynamic changes compared to baseline after the incision. The main comparison is the magnitude of changes in heart rate between the two groups.

    Measured: From the beginning of anesthesia to three minutes after the surgical incision.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2023
  2. Study start1 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion11 May 2024
  4. Study completion15 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The nerve block group was named the test group (T Group), and the laryngeal mask general anesthesia group was named the control group (C Group). The T Group received PECS II combined with intercostal nerve blockade, while the C Group underwent laryngeal mask insertion after general anesthesia induction.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06120439
Sponsor's protocol ID
CSYDXSJLHLJSJ-1
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
1 Nov 2023
Last updated
18 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PECS II combined with intercostal nerve blockade; and General anesthesia with laryngeal mask in people with Breast Cancer and Pectoral Nerves Block, run by Jun Zhang at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative QoR-15 at 6 hours (time frame: 6 hours after the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in