Rectal CancerPhase 3RECTILNCT06123156
Interest of Early Erectile Rehabilitation With Sildenafil After Radiotherapy and Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Sildenafil in people with Rectal Cancer, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 14 sites in France.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of erectile rehabilitation with Sildenafil, in men treated with neoadjuvant proctectomy and radiotherapy for rectal cancer, in preventing long-term erectile dysfunction at 12 months post-operatively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Sildenafil
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Sep 2025to Feb 2030
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men aged 18 to 70
- Patients undergoing surgery for cancer of the lower or middle rectum by total removal of the mesorectum with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis after neoadjuvant radiotherapy, with normal preoperative erectile function (defined by a combined IIEF erectile function domain score of at least 22).
- Nerve-conserving surgery
- Sexually active patient without treatment for erectile function prior to surgery
- Presence of a regular sexual partner (male or female)
- Adult having read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form
- Membership of a social security scheme
Who cannot join
- T4 tumor or tumor requiring extended surgery
- Patients with abnormal erectile function defined by a combined IIEF erectile function domain score of less than 22.
- History of prostate cancer
- Sleep disorders, patients taking sedatives/hypnotics
- Contraindication to SILDENAFIL EG 50 mg, film-coated tablet
- Contraindication to placebo
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients already treated with PDE5 inhibitors
- Patients suffering from SARS COV 2*
- Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under court protection / sub-guardianship or guardianship.
- Any history of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol, or to prevent the subject from giving informed consent.
- Person participating in another drug trial.
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
14 sites in 1 country
France14 sites, 14 recruiting
- Recruiting
Chu Amiens
Amiens, 80054
Charles Sabbagh, Pr, 03 22 08 88 93, Sabbagh.charles@chu-amiens.fr
Charles Sabbagh, Pr
- Recruiting
Hopital Beauvais
Beauvais, 60000
François Mauvais, Pr, 03 44 11 26 26, f.mauvais@ch-beauvais.fr
François Mauvais, Pr
- Recruiting
Chu Besancon
Besançon, 25030
Zaher Lakkis, Dr, 03 81 66 93 44, zlakkis@chu-besancon.fr
Zaher Lakkis, Dr
- Recruiting
Aphp Bicetre
Bicêtre, 94275
Stéphane Benoist, Pr, 01 45 21 70 30, stephane.benoist@aphp.fr
Stéphane Benoist, Pr
- Recruiting
Chu Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33000
Benjamin Fernandez, Dr, 05 56 79 58 10, benjamin.fernandez@chu-bordeaux.fr
Benjamin Fernandez, Dr
- Recruiting
Institut Bordeaux Colorectal
Bordeaux, 33000
Quentin Denoist, Dr, 05 47 50 15 75, q.denost@bordeaux-colorectal-institute.fr
Quentin Denoist, Dr
- Recruiting
Chu Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Anne Dubois, Dr, 04 73 75 05 32, a_dubois@chu-clermontferrand.fr
Anne Dubois, Dr
- Recruiting
Chu Lille
Lille, 59000
Guillaume Piessen, Dr, 03 20 44 44 07, guillaume.piessen@chru-lille.fr
Guillaume Piessen, Dr
- Recruiting
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Marie Dazza, Dr, 06 83 32 41 77, dazzam@ipc.unicancer.fr
Marie Dazza, Dr
- Recruiting
Institut Du Cancer Montpellier
Montpellier, 34000
Philippe Rouanet, Pr, 04 67 61 30 71, Philippe.Rouanet@icm.unicancer.fr
Philippe Rouanet, Pr
- Recruiting
Aphp St Antoine
Paris, 75012
Jérémie Lefevre, Dr, 01 49 28 26 87, jeremie.lefevre@aphp.fr
Jérémie Lefevre, Dr
- Recruiting
Aphp Hegp
Paris, 75908
Medhi Karoui, Pr, 01 56 09 35 34, mehdi.karoui@aphp.fr
Medhi Karoui, Pr
- Recruiting
Chu Rouen
Rouen, 76031
Julien Coget, Dr, 02 32 88 82 83, julien.coget@chu-rouen.fr
Julien Coget, Dr
- Recruiting
Chu Tours
Tours, 37000
Mehdi Ouaissi, Pr, 02 18 37 05 75, m.ouaissi@chu-tours.fr
Mehdi Ouaissi, Pr
About this study
Official title: Intérêt de la rééducation érectile précoce Par Sildénafil après radiothérapie et Proctectomie Pour Cancer du Rectum : Essai contrôlé randomisé
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of erectile rehabilitation with Sildenafil, in men treated with neoadjuvant proctectomy and radiotherapy for rectal cancer, in preventing long-term erectile dysfunction at 12 months post-operatively.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men in France, after lung and prostate cancer. Proctectomy (possibly preceded by radiotherapy) is the most effective treatment for this cancer, but erectile dysfunction (ED) is a frequent complication, even when the nerves are preserved during dissection, and has a major impact on the quality of life of operated men.
The cause of erectile dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery is usually neurological, due to intraoperative trauma to the autonomic nerves, while erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy is mainly vascular in origin, with damage to erectile tissue.
Several risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery have been reported (age, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, type of resection, operative difficulties and complications, body image affected by protective stoma). On the other hand, surgical expertise may be a protective factor.
In the physiological condition, the nitric oxide released by the pelvic nerves causes an increase in cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which in turn causes smooth muscle cells relaxation and an influx of blood into the cavernous body, triggering and maintaining the erection.
Similar to prostatectomy, nerve damage can occur during proctectomy through stretching, heat, ischemia or inflammation; this nerve damage results in reduced nitric oxide production.
Even in the absence of nerve damage, it has been demonstrated (in an animal model) that post-operative neurapraxia is responsible for the at least temporary disappearance of spontaneous and nocturnal erections, leading to cavernous hypoxia. This is followed by tissue changes (reduction in smooth and elastic muscle fibers in the corpora cavernosa, increase in collagen and endothelial dysfunction), which modify the hemodynamics of the carvernum body and ultimately lead to fibrosis of the erectile tissue.
These changes can become permanent despite subsequent nerve recovery, and are exacerbated by neoadjuvant radiotherapy. It is therefore important not to wait passively for erectile function to be restored, as lack of oxygenation to the corpora cavernosa can lead to permanent fibrosis and dysfunction.
This physiopathology is at the origin of the concept of erectile rehabilitation after prostatectomy, with the aim of maintain erections post-operatively and thus limiting fibrosis.
The benefits of erectile re-education after prostatectomy were first reported in 1997, with the early use of intracavernous injections of alprostadil. Following this study, various rehabilitation strategies have been recommended. Early treatment, i.e. within the first month, is recommended to promote cavernous oxygenation and prevent fibrosis.
The aims of rehabilitation are as follows :
- limit fibrosis;
- limit penis retraction and loss of height;
- oxygenate the cavernum body;
- preserve endothelial structure;
- preserve smooth muscle cell structure.
Various types of rehabilitation have been proposed: oral PDE-5 inhibitors, intra-cavernosal injections, urethral suppositories or vaccum.
PDE-5 inhibitors prevent the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, thus compensating for the reduction in nitric oxide and enabling a better erection.
Erectile rehabilitation using PDE-5 inhibitors could protect cavernous smooth muscle from irreversible pathophysiological changes. The basic concept is to administer a PDE-5 inhibitor at bedtime to facilitate nocturnal erections, which are thought to have a natural protective effect on the function of the cavernous bodies.
Padma-Nathan et al. reported the prospective administration of sildenafil 50 and 100 mg vs. placebo, daily and at bedtime, in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. After 36 weeks, erectile function was significantly better in the sildenafil group, with 27% responders, vs. 4% in the placebo group.
The mechanisms involved in erectile dysfunction after proctectomy for rectal cancer are similar to those of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
The efficacy of PDE-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after proctectomy has already been demonstrated. However, its use as a preventive measure has rarely been reported.
Three studies have evaluated PDE-5 inhibitors in patients with erectile dysfunction after rectal resection, two of which used sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer, New York, NY)
To our knowledge, only one study has evaluated the role of PDE-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) in a preventive strategy.
Originality and innovation Despite the fact that sexual dysfunction is recognized as a frequent complication of rectal cancer treatment, there are currently no recommendations for its prevention and management.
In contrast to prostate cancer patients, information and treatment concerning erectile dysfunction (ED) are not systematically offered to men with colorectal cancer. The ability of sildenafil to facilitate the return of erections after radical prostatectomy has been demonstrated in several studies, and this treatment could benefit patients treated for rectal cancer.
To date, no randomized study has examined the usefulness of this early rehabilitation in patients managed for rectal cancer. This study proposes, for the first time, to evaluate the use of sildenafil after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Sildenafil, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SildenafilDrug
Also called Arm I
Sildénafil during 10 months (50mg daily), start 30 days after surgery
PlaceboOther
Also called Arm II
1 platelet during 10 months (daily), start 30 days after surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Sildénafil) | Active comparator | Sildénafil during 10 months (50mg daily), start 30 days after surgery Receives: Drug: Sildenafil |
| Arm II (Placebo) | Placebo comparator | Patients receive placebo during 10 month (1 platelet per day) Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the patient's response
A patient is defined as a responder by a score of at least 22 for the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), comprising the six IIEF questions relating to erection (Q1-Q5 and Q15).
Measured: 12 months postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (9)
IIEF erectile function domain score
Mesure of IIEF erectile function domain score, comprising the six IIEF erectile function questions (Q1-Q5 andQ15) at D0, M1, M3, M6, M9 and M12
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month12
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) global score
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) global score measured at D0, M1, M3, M6, M9 and M12
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Quality of life score
Mesure of quality of life score (EORTC QLQ - C30 and QLQ - CR29) at D0, M1, M3, M6, M9 and M12
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
LARS score
LARS score measured at D0, M1, M3, M6, M9 and M12
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Fecal Continence Score
Fecal Continence Score (Wexner score) measured at D0, M1, M3, M6, M9 and M12
Measured: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Spontaneous erection evaluation
Number of patients with spontaneous erections on treatment at M3, M6, M9 and without treatment at M1, and M12
Measured: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Benefits of psychological follow-up
The number of patients with or without regular psychological follow-up. A patient is defined as having regular follow-up if he/she visits a psychologist and/or psychiatrist once or twice a month.
Measured: after 10 months of treatment
Compliance with treatment
Number of unused tablets during the study. The patient will be considered as non-compliant if pill-taking over the entire 10-month treatment period is <80%.
Measured: after 10 months of treatment
Adverse and suspected adverse events
Number of AEs and SAEs in each group at M1, M3, M6, M9 and M12
Measured: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2023
- Study start25 Sep 2025
- Primary completionFeb 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, RouenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06123156
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019/0398/HP
- Other IDs
- 2020-002682-34
- Acronym
- RECTIL
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 12 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intérêt de la rééducation érectile précoce Par Sildénafil après radiothérapie et Proctectomie Pour Cancer du Rectum : Essai contrôlé randomisé
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06123156
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECTIL / 2019/0398/HP
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, RouenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of erectile rehabilitation with Sildenafil, in men treated with neoadjuvant proctectomy and radiotherapy for rectal cancer, in preventing long-term erectile dysfunction at 12 months post-operatively.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men in France, after lung and prostate cancer. Proctectomy (possibly preceded by radiotherapy) is the most effective treatment for this cancer, but erectile dysfunction (ED) is a frequent complication, even when the nerves are preserved during dissection, and has a major impact on the quality of life of operated men.
The cause of erectile dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery is usually neurological, due to intraoperative trauma to the autonomic nerves, while erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy is mainly vascular in origin, with damage to erectile tissue.
Several risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery have been reported (age, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, type of resection, operative difficulties and complications, body image affected by protective stoma). On the other hand, surgical expertise may be a protective factor.
In the physiological condition, the nitric oxide released by the pelvic nerves causes an increase in cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which in turn causes smooth muscle cells relaxation and an influx of blood into the cavernous body, triggering and maintaining the erection.
Similar to prostatectomy, nerve damage can occur during proctectomy through stretching, heat, ischemia or inflammation; this nerve damage results in reduced nitric oxide production.
Even in the absence of nerve damage, it has been demonstrated (in an animal model) that post-operative neurapraxia is responsible for the at least temporary disappearance of spontaneous and nocturnal erections, leading to cavernous hypoxia. This is followed by tissue changes (reduction in smooth and elastic muscle fibers in the corpora cavernosa, increase in collagen and endothelial dysfunction), which modify the hemodynamics of the carvernum body and ultimately lead to fibrosis of the erectile tissue.
These changes can become permanent despite subsequent nerve recovery, and are exacerbated by neoadjuvant radiotherapy. It is therefore important not to wait passively for erectile function to be restored, as lack of oxygenation to the corpora cavernosa can lead to permanent fibrosis and dysfunction.
This physiopathology is at the origin of the concept of erectile rehabilitation after prostatectomy, with the aim of maintain erections post-operatively and thus limiting fibrosis.
The benefits of erectile re-education after prostatectomy were first reported in 1997, with the early use of intracavernous injections of alprostadil. Following this study, various rehabilitation strategies have been recommended. Early treatment, i.e. within the first month, is recommended to promote cavernous oxygenation and prevent fibrosis.
The aims of rehabilitation are as follows :
- limit fibrosis;
- limit penis retraction and loss of height;
- oxygenate the cavernum body;
- preserve endothelial structure;
- preserve smooth muscle cell structure.
Various types of rehabilitation have been proposed: oral PDE-5 inhibitors, intra-cavernosal injections, urethral suppositories or vaccum.
PDE-5 inhibitors prevent the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, thus compensating for the reduction in nitric oxide and enabling a better erection.
Erectile rehabilitation using PDE-5 inhibitors could protect cavernous smooth muscle from irreversible pathophysiological changes. The basic concept is to administer a PDE-5 inhibitor at bedtime to facilitate nocturnal erections, which are thought to have a natural protective effect on the function of the cavernous bodies.
Padma-Nathan et al. reported the prospective administration of sildenafil 50 and 100 mg vs. placebo, daily and at bedtime, in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. After 36 weeks, erectile function was significantly better in the sildenafil group, with 27% responders, vs. 4% in the placebo group.
The mechanisms involved in erectile dysfunction after proctectomy for rectal cancer are similar to those of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
The efficacy of PDE-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after proctectomy has already been demonstrated. However, its use as a preventive measure has rarely been reported.
Three studies have evaluated PDE-5 inhibitors in patients with erectile dysfunction after rectal resection, two of which used sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer, New York, NY)
To our knowledge, only one study has evaluated the role of PDE-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) in a preventive strategy.
Originality and innovation Despite the fact that sexual dysfunction is recognized as a frequent complication of rectal cancer treatment, there are currently no recommendations for its prevention and management.
In contrast to prostate cancer patients, information and treatment concerning erectile dysfunction (ED) are not systematically offered to men with colorectal cancer. The ability of sildenafil to facilitate the return of erections after radical prostatectomy has been demonstrated in several studies, and this treatment could benefit patients treated for rectal cancer.
To date, no randomized study has examined the usefulness of this early rehabilitation in patients managed for rectal cancer. This study proposes, for the first time, to evaluate the use of sildenafil after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Sildénafil) | Active comparator | Drug: SildenafilSildénafil during 10 months (50mg daily), start 30 days after surgery |
| Arm II (Placebo) | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPatients receive placebo during 10 month (1 platelet per day) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Men aged 18 to 70
- Patients undergoing surgery for cancer of the lower or middle rectum by total removal of the mesorectum with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis after neoadjuvant radiotherapy, with normal preoperative erectile function (defined by a combined IIEF erectile function domain score of at least 22).
- Nerve-conserving surgery
- Sexually active patient without treatment for erectile function prior to surgery
- Presence of a regular sexual partner (male or female)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- T4 tumor or tumor requiring extended surgery
- Patients with abnormal erectile function defined by a combined IIEF erectile function domain score of less than 22.
- History of prostate cancer
- Sleep disorders, patients taking sedatives/hypnotics
- Contraindication to SILDENAFIL EG 50 mg, film-coated tablet
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SildenafilAlso: Arm ISildénafil during 10 months (50mg daily), start 30 days after surgery | Drug | Arm I (Sildénafil) |
| PlaceboAlso: Arm II1 platelet during 10 months (daily), start 30 days after surgery | Other | Arm II (Placebo) |
Primary outcome
the patient's response
Time frame: 12 months postoperatively
A patient is defined as a responder by a score of at least 22 for the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), comprising the six IIEF questions relating to erection (Q1-Q5 and Q15).
9 secondary outcomes
IIEF erectile function domain score
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month12
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) global score
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Quality of life score
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
LARS score
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Fecal Continence Score
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Spontaneous erection evaluation
Time frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Benefits of psychological follow-up
Time frame: after 10 months of treatment
Compliance with treatment
Time frame: after 10 months of treatment
Adverse and suspected adverse events
Time frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sildenafil in people with Rectal Cancer, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 14 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Valérie Bridoux (0232881347 ext. +33, valerie.bridoux@chu-rouen.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the patient's response (time frame: 12 months postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2026.