HypertensionCOACHNCT06124716
Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure
A study testing Enhanced COACH CDS Tool in people with Hypertension and Multiple Chronic Conditions, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Hypertension is a significant contributor to poor cardiovascular outcomes. Self-management support tools can increase patient behaviors to improve blood pressure. The investigators created a clinical decision support app, called COACH, to integrate home blood pressure data and goals into EHR reporting and workflow… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Multiple Chronic Conditions
- What is being tested?
- Enhanced COACH CDS Tool
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 550 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2024to 30 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged 18-100 years old
- Patient receives care at a participating primary care clinic and has been seen in the last year
- Patient has high BP, defined as an average of 4 BPs > 140 systolic or > 90 diastolic (clinic) or > 135 OR > 85 (home)
- Patient is enrolled in online health portal
- Patient can communicate in English
- Patient has been recommended by their physician who thinks the patient would benefit from a home blood pressure monitoring program.
Who cannot join
- Patient is pregnant at the time of consent
- Patient who, in the opinion of the primary care clinician, has severe cognitive impairment
- Patient is on hospice care and/or has a life expectancy of less than 2 years
- Patient has end stage renal disease
- Patient for whom tight blood pressure control presents a greater risk, such as those with a history of adverse events from hypertension treatment (falls, dizziness, electrolyte disturbances, hypotension, active heart failure)
- Patient has any other disease or disorder that in the opinion of the investigator or the patient's primary care clinician, could put participants at risk and affect trial results, or hinder participation will exclude them from participating
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
University of Missouri-Columbia
Columbia, Missouri, 65211
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
About this study
Hypertension is a significant contributor to poor cardiovascular outcomes. Self-management support tools can increase patient behaviors to improve blood pressure. The investigators created a clinical decision support app, called COACH, to integrate home blood pressure data and goals into EHR reporting and workflow with communications informed by behavioral economics principles to support shared decision-making. The study aims to measure the effectiveness of the COACH intervention in a pragmatic multi-site randomized trial in a primary care setting.
Read the detailed description
This protocol addresses the challenge of implementing scalable, interoperable clinical decision support (CDS) and the patient-centered outcome of avoiding heart attacks and strokes through high blood pressure control in the setting of multiple chronic illnesses. It leverages substantial extant work to build patient-centered CDS for high blood pressure, electronic care planning and health coaching at scale, implementing and testing these tools in new primary care settings. This protocol implements a new patient-facing CDS across multiple clinic sites spanning three major health systems and in the nation's two leading EHR vendor platforms. Controlling blood pressure is a singularly important goal; nearly 50% of adults in health care have high blood pressure, which increases their risk of heart attack and stroke. However, managing blood pressure requires navigation within a narrow therapeutic index, where overtreatment leads to substantial complications, including kidney damage, low blood pressure, falls, and mood disorders. Balancing treatment to reduce risk while avoiding harm requires engaging patients directly in intensive goal setting, shared care planning around nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments, and self-monitoring for effectiveness and adverse events.
Hypertension rarely occurs alone; providing clinical decision support, care planning, and self-management support in the context of multiple chronic illnesses is required.
The study team will address patient-centered needs by scaling our implemented, patient-facing CDS for eCare Planning, Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) to 3 sites and testing whether it reduces blood pressure and risk of heart attack and stroke. To do so, we embed a diverse patient perspective into a robust, feasible, and effective CDS implementation and evaluation process by 1) capturing patient input throughout the CDS lifecycle; 2) adapting the COACH CDS to patient preferences, values, and goals; and 3) disseminating the tested FHIR-based (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) patient-facing application into organizations that combines blood pressure control with relevant risk scores into an eCare Plan application and framework and implementing these patient-centered approaches in feasible, context-responsive, and effective ways. The investigators address scalability by helping organizations advance their use of patient-generated health data and patient-reported outcomes using standard implementation frameworks while producing CDS artifacts and implementation guides that can be leveraged to increase adoption beyond the work of this proposal. For interoperability, we use a standard-based, structured process that re-uses concept and value sets whenever possible while using robust techniques to develop new sets and make them available for future innovators.
To complete these goals, the study investigators leverage previous work in building standardized HBP value sets, logic, and a patient-facing FHIR tool. In this work, we have engaged in several collaborations, most notably with the CDS Connect Community, where we will upload all artifacts, but also with other AHRQ digital health efforts and with other large collaboratives, including the ACC/AHA and JNC8 guideline developers, the HL7 CPG-on-FHIR, and the eCare Planning project from NIDDK and AHRQ. The study investigators will use two frameworks to evaluate the implementation. First, adaptation in implementation science is both common and may be required for success; we explore the ways in which the 5 rights-the right information to the right person in the right intervention format through the right channel at the right time in workflow-can be adapted for key organizational needs while retaining fidelity to the goals. In addition, we consider a framework that combines usability with effectiveness for complex conditions by exploring concepts related to appropriate simplicity, prioritization, summarization, adjudication, and actionability to enhance CDS effectiveness for patient needs.
Thus, the study's specific aims are:
- To refine and implement a patient-facing, adaptable Blood Pressure Control CDS system in 3 diverse settings, using implementation science and patient engagement to maximize effectiveness.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the application at lowering blood pressure employing a mixed methods design, with qualitative inquiry nested within a randomized controlled trial, secondary RE-AIM and social cognitive theory outcomes, and qualitative evaluation of implementations across sites.
- To develop robust, sharable, interoperable mechanisms, leveraging collaborations and synthesis of the implementation experience to aid in further dissemination and implementations of patient-facing CDS.
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Multiple Chronic Conditions
- Being tested
- Enhanced COACH CDS Tool, Usual Care COACH CDS Tool
- Keywords
- Pragmatic trial, Primary care, Clinical decision support
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Multiple Chronic Conditions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enhanced COACH CDS ToolOther
CDS tool with features to promote high blood pressure management
Usual Care COACH CDS ToolOther
CDS tool with limited features to promote high blood pressure management
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced COACH | Experimental | Enhanced blood pressure management recommendations that use cognitive and behavioral science to increase the likelihood of self-management goal setting to lower blood pressure. The CDS tool allows participant access to BP visualizations, reminders, and affectively tailored messaging about blood pressure management. Receives: Other: Enhanced COACH CDS Tool |
| Usual Care COACH | Active comparator | Equivalent of usual care delivered through the CDS tool: Blood pressure management with basic information, reduced reminders, and no affective alerts. Receives: Other: Usual Care COACH CDS Tool |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Blood Pressure Control
Percent of participants at or below 140/90 (office BP) or 135/85 (home BP) average.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Reduction in Systolic and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Percent of participants displaying a decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure readings over the 6-month course of measurement
Measured: Up to 6 months
Demographic factors contributing to blood pressure control
Age- and socioeconomic status-reported participant data
Measured: Up to 6 months
COACH Application System Usability Evaluation
Participant assessment of application using the System Usability Scale questions using 4-point scale for 10 agreement questions where low scores indicate less agreement and high scores are higher agreement of usability of the application
Measured: Up to 6 months
Participant report of health behaviors including Self Efficacy, Social Support, Outcome Expectations and Self-regulation
Participant self-report of factors related to health beliefs using 10-point sliding scale for 25 agreement questions where low scores indicate less agreement and high scores are higher agreement of aspects of health beliefs
Measured: 2 months, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2023
- Study start12 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 May 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oregon Health and Science UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Mixed methods design with qualitative RE-AIM inquiry nested within a pragmatic multi-site randomized trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 550 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Health and Science University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David Dorr, Oregon Health and Science University
- Investigators
- David Dorr, MD, MS, FACMI, FAMIA, Principal investigator, Oregon Health and Science UniversityRichelle Koopman, MD, Principal investigator, University of Missouri-Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06124716
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R18HS028579
- Acronym
- COACH
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will make all materials available as open source documents and CDS artifacts on our GitHub site, on the content implementation guide, on AHRQ's CDS Connect Community, and elsewhere as directed. We will publish the application on the GitHub site as open source. We will share all resources and work with all committees to find conferences, journals, and other opportunities to discuss dissemination.
Publications
Dorr DA, Montgomery E, Ghumman AJ, Michaels L, Rolbiecki A, Canfield S, Shaffer V, Johnson B, Lockwood M, Ghosh P, Martinez W, Koopman R; COACH Consortium. Study protocol: Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) in adults - a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 8;14(7):e085898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085898.
PubMed 38977368
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06124716
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COACH / R18HS028579
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Multiple Chronic Conditions
- Keywords
- Pragmatic trial, Primary care, Clinical decision support
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 550 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Health and Science UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Missouri-Columbia, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypertension is a significant contributor to poor cardiovascular outcomes. Self-management support tools can increase patient behaviors to improve blood pressure. The investigators created a clinical decision support app, called COACH, to integrate home blood pressure data and goals into EHR reporting and workflow with communications informed by behavioral economics principles to support shared decision-making. The study aims to measure the effectiveness of the COACH intervention in a pragmatic multi-site randomized trial in a primary care setting.
Detailed description
This protocol addresses the challenge of implementing scalable, interoperable clinical decision support (CDS) and the patient-centered outcome of avoiding heart attacks and strokes through high blood pressure control in the setting of multiple chronic illnesses. It leverages substantial extant work to build patient-centered CDS for high blood pressure, electronic care planning and health coaching at scale, implementing and testing these tools in new primary care settings. This protocol implements a new patient-facing CDS across multiple clinic sites spanning three major health systems and in the nation's two leading EHR vendor platforms. Controlling blood pressure is a singularly important goal; nearly 50% of adults in health care have high blood pressure, which increases their risk of heart attack and stroke. However, managing blood pressure requires navigation within a narrow therapeutic index, where overtreatment leads to substantial complications, including kidney damage, low blood pressure, falls, and mood disorders. Balancing treatment to reduce risk while avoiding harm requires engaging patients directly in intensive goal setting, shared care planning around nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments, and self-monitoring for effectiveness and adverse events.
Hypertension rarely occurs alone; providing clinical decision support, care planning, and self-management support in the context of multiple chronic illnesses is required.
The study team will address patient-centered needs by scaling our implemented, patient-facing CDS for eCare Planning, Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) to 3 sites and testing whether it reduces blood pressure and risk of heart attack and stroke. To do so, we embed a diverse patient perspective into a robust, feasible, and effective CDS implementation and evaluation process by 1) capturing patient input throughout the CDS lifecycle; 2) adapting the COACH CDS to patient preferences, values, and goals; and 3) disseminating the tested FHIR-based (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) patient-facing application into organizations that combines blood pressure control with relevant risk scores into an eCare Plan application and framework and implementing these patient-centered approaches in feasible, context-responsive, and effective ways. The investigators address scalability by helping organizations advance their use of patient-generated health data and patient-reported outcomes using standard implementation frameworks while producing CDS artifacts and implementation guides that can be leveraged to increase adoption beyond the work of this proposal. For interoperability, we use a standard-based, structured process that re-uses concept and value sets whenever possible while using robust techniques to develop new sets and make them available for future innovators.
To complete these goals, the study investigators leverage previous work in building standardized HBP value sets, logic, and a patient-facing FHIR tool. In this work, we have engaged in several collaborations, most notably with the CDS Connect Community, where we will upload all artifacts, but also with other AHRQ digital health efforts and with other large collaboratives, including the ACC/AHA and JNC8 guideline developers, the HL7 CPG-on-FHIR, and the eCare Planning project from NIDDK and AHRQ. The study investigators will use two frameworks to evaluate the implementation. First, adaptation in implementation science is both common and may be required for success; we explore the ways in which the 5 rights-the right information to the right person in the right intervention format through the right channel at the right time in workflow-can be adapted for key organizational needs while retaining fidelity to the goals. In addition, we consider a framework that combines usability with effectiveness for complex conditions by exploring concepts related to appropriate simplicity, prioritization, summarization, adjudication, and actionability to enhance CDS effectiveness for patient needs.
Thus, the study's specific aims are:
- To refine and implement a patient-facing, adaptable Blood Pressure Control CDS system in 3 diverse settings, using implementation science and patient engagement to maximize effectiveness.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the application at lowering blood pressure employing a mixed methods design, with qualitative inquiry nested within a randomized controlled trial, secondary RE-AIM and social cognitive theory outcomes, and qualitative evaluation of implementations across sites.
- To develop robust, sharable, interoperable mechanisms, leveraging collaborations and synthesis of the implementation experience to aid in further dissemination and implementations of patient-facing CDS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Mixed methods design with qualitative RE-AIM inquiry nested within a pragmatic multi-site randomized trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced COACH | Experimental | Other: Enhanced COACH CDS ToolEnhanced blood pressure management recommendations that use cognitive and behavioral science to increase the likelihood of self-management goal setting to lower blood pressure. The CDS tool allows participant access to BP visualizations, reminders, and affectively tailored messaging about blood pressure management. |
| Usual Care COACH | Active comparator | Other: Usual Care COACH CDS ToolEquivalent of usual care delivered through the CDS tool: Blood pressure management with basic information, reduced reminders, and no affective alerts. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult patients aged 18-100 years old
- Patient receives care at a participating primary care clinic and has been seen in the last year
- Patient has high BP, defined as an average of 4 BPs > 140 systolic or > 90 diastolic (clinic) or > 135 OR > 85 (home)
- Patient is enrolled in online health portal
- Patient can communicate in English
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient is pregnant at the time of consent
- Patient who, in the opinion of the primary care clinician, has severe cognitive impairment
- Patient is on hospice care and/or has a life expectancy of less than 2 years
- Patient has end stage renal disease
- Patient for whom tight blood pressure control presents a greater risk, such as those with a history of adverse events from hypertension treatment (falls, dizziness, electrolyte disturbances, hypotension, active heart failure)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced COACH CDS ToolCDS tool with features to promote high blood pressure management | Other | Enhanced COACH |
| Usual Care COACH CDS ToolCDS tool with limited features to promote high blood pressure management | Other | Usual Care COACH |
Primary outcome
Blood Pressure Control
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Percent of participants at or below 140/90 (office BP) or 135/85 (home BP) average.
4 secondary outcomes
Reduction in Systolic and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Demographic factors contributing to blood pressure control
Time frame: Up to 6 months
COACH Application System Usability Evaluation
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Participant report of health behaviors including Self Efficacy, Social Support, Outcome Expectations and Self-regulation
Time frame: 2 months, 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38977368Dorr DA, Montgomery E, Ghumman AJ, Michaels L, Rolbiecki A, Canfield S, Shaffer V, Johnson B, Lockwood M, Ghosh P, Martinez W, Koopman R; COACH Consortium. Study protocol: Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) in adults - a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 8;14(7):e085898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085898.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will make all materials available as open source documents and CDS artifacts on our GitHub site, on the content implementation guide, on AHRQ's CDS Connect Community, and elsewhere as directed. We will publish the application on the GitHub site as open source. We will share all resources and work with all committees to find conferences, journals, and other opportunities to discuss dissemination.
Related trials for Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes in West Africans
Hypertension, Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Electronic Alert to Improve Testing For Primary Aldosteronism in Patients With Hypertension
Primary Aldosteronism, Resistant Hypertension
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Study of to Confirm the Doses of Selexipag in Children With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
A Study to Lower Blood Pressure One Year After Childbirth in Women Who Had Preeclampsia
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, Cardiovascular Diseases
Recruiting
Controlled Remote Monitoring and Optimization of Oxygen Therapy in Preterm Infants
BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Dorr, MD, MS, FACMI, FAMIA principal investigator
Oregon Health and Science University
Richelle Koopman, MD principal investigator
University of Missouri-Columbia
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Enhanced COACH CDS Tool in people with Hypertension and Multiple Chronic Conditions, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Blood Pressure Control (time frame: Up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06124716, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2026.