AzTrials
AzTrials

Dysmenorrhea PrimaryNCT06129708

Effect of Aquatic Exercise Versus Aerobic Exercise on Primary Dysmenorrhea and Quality of Life in Adolescent Females

A study testing Aquatic Exercise and Aerobic Exercise in people with Dysmenorrhea Primary, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was conducted to determine the difference between impact of aerobic and aquatic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea and quality of life in adolescent girls. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 20 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Dysmenorrhea Primary
What is being tested?
Aquatic Exercise and Aerobic Exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Oct 2022to 1 Oct 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 20 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy, nonsmoking, virginal girls having moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea (score on pain rating scale > 3).
  • Their ages ranged from 14 to 20 years
  • Their body mass index (BMI) ranged from 18 to 25 kg/m2.
  • They haven't practice any sports at least one year

Who cannot join

  • Any musculoskeletal disorder.
  • Cardio-respiratory disease.
  • Diabetes, hypertension, or anemia.
  • Adolescent girls who have utilized hormonal treatment in the six months prior to study commencement.
  • currently undergoing pharmacological therapy for menstrual pain management

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Cairo University

    Giza

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Effect of Aquatic Exercise Versus Aerobic Exercise on Primary Dysmenorrhea and Quality of Life in Adolescent Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study was conducted to determine the difference between impact of aerobic and aquatic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea and quality of life in adolescent girls.

Read the detailed description

Dysmenorrhea manifests as painful menstrual flow it occurs in two forms primary and secondary. Primary and secondary dysmenorrhea is painful menstruation occur without any gynecological disease it was conducted that prevalence of dysmenorrhea 74.6% and it was significantly more frequent in students from rural residence (Shaimaa et al., 2018).

There is only one previous study investigate effect of aquatic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea (Rezvani et al., 2013). There are several previous studies investigate effect of aerobic ex , however non of the previous studies compared between effect of aerobic and aquatic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea and quality of life of adolescent girls .Therefore this study was the first one which aimed to investigate the difference between effect of aerobic and aquatic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea and quality of life in adolescent girls.

Being tested
Aquatic Exercise, Aerobic Exercise
Keywords
Primary Dysmenorrhea, Adolescent Females, Aquatic Exercise, Aerobic Exercise, Pressure Pain Threshold, Quality of Life

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aquatic ExerciseOther

    The aquatic exercises included 5 minutes of warming up in form of walking and running in water, 20 minutes of aerobic and strengthening exercises of pelvis, abdominal and thigh muscles (Double-leg Squat, lunge, knee flexion and extension, hip flexion and

  • Aerobic ExerciseOther

    The exercise protocol consists of 5 minute warm up, 35 min aerobic exercise and 5 minute cool-down. Exercises high-intensity treadmill-based treatment for primary dysmenorrhea for three days a week ,The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale from 6 ('no exertion at all') to 20 ('maximal exertion') was used to regulate the exercise intensity on the treadmill. Participants were encouraged to increase the speed of the treadmill until they perceived their RPE to be between 14 and 16. or at a perceived exertion of 11.0 (Borg scale) for the first five minutes (warm-up period), followed by aerobic exercise at 70-85% of maximum heart rate (MHR) (16.0-18.0 Borg scale) for 30 minutes. At the end of the exercise session, women completed a 5-minute cool-down (11.0 Borg scale).

Study groups in NCT06129708
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group (A) Aquatic Exercise GroupExperimentalThey participated in an aqua aerobic exercise program, 3 days per week, for 8 weeks
Receives: Other: Aquatic Exercise
Group (B) Aerobic Exercise GroupExperimentalThey participated in an aerobic exercise program on a treadmill, 3 days per week, for 8 weeks.
Receives: Other: Aerobic Exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of dysmenorrhea severity

    It was assessed for each participant in the two groups (A \& B) before and after 12 weeks of treatment at the first day of menstruation, using WaLIDD scale, which has high sensitivity and high specificity.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Measurement of pain intensity

    It was measured for each participant in both groups (A \& B) before and after 12 weeks of treatment at the first day of menstruation, using the Arabic version of numeric pain rating scale. The respondents were required to select a number (0-10 integers) that best reflected the intensity of her pain. In the numeric pain rating scale, 0 represented no pain, 1-3 indicated mild pain, 4-6 indicated moderate pain, while 7-10 indicated severe pain.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Assessment of pressure pain threshold (PPT)

    The PPT was measured for each participant in both groups (A \& B) before and after 12 weeks of treatment at the first day of menstruation, using a pressure algometry.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Assessment of health related quality of life

    The health related quality of life of all participants in both groups (A \& B) was evaluated before and after the end of treatment program, using the Arabic version of EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Nov 2023
  2. Study start1 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06129708
Sponsor's protocol ID
P.T.REC/012/004770
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
8 Nov 2023
Last updated
13 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Abdelrahman AY, El-Kosery SM, Abbassy AH, Botla AM. Effect of aquatic exercise versus aerobic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea and quality of life in adolescent females: A randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2024 Jul;29(3):e2095. doi: 10.1002/pri.2095.

    PubMed 38767193

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aquatic Exercise and Aerobic Exercise in people with Dysmenorrhea Primary, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of dysmenorrhea severity (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06129708, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in