Fragility FracturePROTECT-2NCT06134908
PRevention of OsTEoporotiC FracTure 2 Pilot Study
A study testing Multifaceted Intervention in people with Fragility Fracture, run by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University at 7 sites in China.
Trial summary
With the aging of the world population, osteoporosis and fragility fractures have become global public health concerns. It has been estimated the population of people ≥60 years of age will increase from 229 million (16.2%) in 2017 to 479 million (35.1%) by 2050 in China. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Fragility Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Multifaceted Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2024to Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Local residents (live in the city where the hospital is located for half a year or more);
- Hospitalized patients with fractures aged 50 years and above;
- First fracture, without history of fracture;
- Never diagnosed as "osteoporosis" before admission;
- No fracture history, and never receive any bone mineral density test, and never take anti-osteoporosis medication in the 4 years before admission;
- Hospitalized patients with the following fractures: hip fracture, thoracic spine fracture, and lumbar spine fracture;
Show all 9Show fewer
- New fragility fracture: fracture that occurs after minor trauma or daily activities, such as a fracture caused by a fall from standing height or less; fracture happened within 6 weeks;
- Not living in a nursing or rehabilitation institution before fracture;
- Possess reading ability, and can read and understand informed consent forms or medical materials independently.
Who cannot join
- Patients with pathological fractures caused by tumor or infection;
- Patients with cognitive dysfunction or mental disorder;
- AIDS patients;
- Patients who refuse to follow-up, or have poor compliance for follow-up, or fail to understand and cooperate for follow-up;
- Hearing or visual impairment, and unable to communicate or read materials;
- Patients who have participate in other studies;
- Other conditions that the investigator considered inappropriate to enroll.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
7 sites in 1 country
China7 sites, 7 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
Changsha
Jingqi Zeng, MD
- Recruiting
Dongguan Eighth People's Hospital
Dongguan
Wenbo Cui, MD
- Recruiting
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou
Jian Mo, MD, +86 (020) 85252900, mojian3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
- Recruiting
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou
Shunwu Fan, MD
- Recruiting
The First People's Hospital of Hefei
Hefei
Zhou Dong, MD
- Recruiting
Longgang Orthopedics Hospital of Shenzhen
Shenzhen
Jie Li, MD
- Recruiting
The Third People's Hospital of Longgang District Shenzhen
Shenzhen
Shaomin Huang, MD
About this study
Official title: The Application of "Precise Education + Shared Decision-Making" Program for the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures Based on Behavioral Theories: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
With the aging of the world population, osteoporosis and fragility fractures have become global public health concerns. It has been estimated the population of people ≥60 years of age will increase from 229 million (16.2%) in 2017 to 479 million (35.1%) by 2050 in China. Because age is an important predictor of osteoporosis and fragility fracture, the incidence of fragility fracture has increased dramatically in China over the past decades. Timely treatment of osteoporosis is an effective way to decrease additional fracture risk among patients with fragility fractures, but anti-osteoporosis treatment rate is relatively low in China. Effective fracture prevention intervention is urgently needed in China.
As a potential way to achieve effective risk communication, shared decision-making allows patients to be active participants in the management of osteoporosis. The investigators designed a multifaceted intervention, which was named as "Precise Education + Shared Decision-Making" program for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures based on behavioral theories, and assessed the effectiveness for fracture prevention using a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial among several hospitals in China.
The aim of this pilot study is to test the acceptability and feasibility as well as preliminary efficacy of this program in patients with fragility fractures.
- Conditions
- Fragility Fracture
- Being tested
- Multifaceted Intervention
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Fragility Fracture, Shared Decision-Making, Education
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multifaceted InterventionBehavioural
The multicomponent intervention elements include education for clinicians and patients as well as a shared decision-making program among clinicians and patients. A shared decision-making booklet and a mobile application will be used to promote osteoporosis management and fracture practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multifaceted Intervention | Experimental | Group in the intervention arm will receive a multicomponent intervention at the clinician- and patient-level, with a shared decision-making booklet as well as a mobile application to promote osteoporosis management and fracture practice. Receives: Behavioral: Multifaceted Intervention |
| Usual-care Control | No intervention | Group in the control arm will receive a leaflet and routine medical care per their existing health care providers. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Trial feasibility - Recruitment
Number or N (%) participants recruited within 3 months of trial initiation at each centre.
Measured: 3 months
Trial feasibility - Acceptability of the multicomponent program component
Participants will be asked to evaluate the program with a questionnaire with questions about frequency, length, content, delivery, and duration of the booklet and the mobile application using a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: 30 days after study recruitment
Trial feasibility - Acceptability of the shared decision-making process
Both clinicians and patients will be asked to evaluate the shared decision-making process once they completed it. A survey will be administered to evaluate the content and comprehension of the program using a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: 7 days after study recruitment
Trial feasibility - Retention
The retention rates will be assessed as the 30-day follow-up rate.
Measured: 30 days after study recruitment
Secondary outcomes (8)
Anti-osteoporosis treatment rate
The patients will be followed up and asked whether they accept any anti-osteoporosis medication.
Measured: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Shared decision-making process
Standardized questionnaires will be used to evaluated the shared decision-making process.
Measured: 7 days after study recruitment
Bone mineral density test
The patients will be followed up and asked whether they accept bone mineral density test.
Measured: 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Adherence of anti-osteoporosis medication
Adherence of anti-osteoporosis medication will be assessed with medication possession ratio and self-reported question.
Measured: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Diagnosis, education, and follow-up practice of osteoporosis
The patients will be followed up with questionnaires about diagnosis, education, and follow-up of osteoporosis.
Measured: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Refracture
The patients will be followed up and asked whether they have refracture.
Measured: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Survival
The patients will be followed up about their survival status.
Measured: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Patients' knowledge and attitude about osteoporosis and fragility fracture
Patients' knowledge and attitude about osteoporosis and fragility fracture will be evaluated with standardized questionnaires.
Measured: baseline; 1 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2023
- Study start13 Jan 2024
- Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fragility FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Longgang Orthopedics Hospital of Shenzhen, The First People's Hospital of Hefei, Dongguan Eighth People's Hospital, The Third People's Hospital of Longgang District Shenzhen
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jian Mo, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
- Investigators
- Jian Mo, MD, Principal investigator, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06134908
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROTECT-2 Pilot
- Acronym
- PROTECT-2
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 28 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Application of "Precise Education + Shared Decision-Making" Program for the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures Based on Behavioral Theories: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06134908
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROTECT-2 / PROTECT-2 Pilot
- Conditions
- Fragility Fracture
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Fragility Fracture, Shared Decision-Making, Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Longgang Orthopedics Hospital of Shenzhen, The First People's Hospital of Hefei, Dongguan Eighth People's Hospital, The Third People's Hospital of Longgang District Shenzhen
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With the aging of the world population, osteoporosis and fragility fractures have become global public health concerns. It has been estimated the population of people ≥60 years of age will increase from 229 million (16.2%) in 2017 to 479 million (35.1%) by 2050 in China. Because age is an important predictor of osteoporosis and fragility fracture, the incidence of fragility fracture has increased dramatically in China over the past decades. Timely treatment of osteoporosis is an effective way to decrease additional fracture risk among patients with fragility fractures, but anti-osteoporosis treatment rate is relatively low in China. Effective fracture prevention intervention is urgently needed in China.
As a potential way to achieve effective risk communication, shared decision-making allows patients to be active participants in the management of osteoporosis. The investigators designed a multifaceted intervention, which was named as "Precise Education + Shared Decision-Making" program for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures based on behavioral theories, and assessed the effectiveness for fracture prevention using a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial among several hospitals in China.
The aim of this pilot study is to test the acceptability and feasibility as well as preliminary efficacy of this program in patients with fragility fractures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multifaceted Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Multifaceted InterventionGroup in the intervention arm will receive a multicomponent intervention at the clinician- and patient-level, with a shared decision-making booklet as well as a mobile application to promote osteoporosis management and fracture practice. |
| Usual-care Control | No intervention | –Group in the control arm will receive a leaflet and routine medical care per their existing health care providers. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Local residents (live in the city where the hospital is located for half a year or more);
- Hospitalized patients with fractures aged 50 years and above;
- First fracture, without history of fracture;
- Never diagnosed as "osteoporosis" before admission;
- No fracture history, and never receive any bone mineral density test, and never take anti-osteoporosis medication in the 4 years before admission;
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with pathological fractures caused by tumor or infection;
- Patients with cognitive dysfunction or mental disorder;
- AIDS patients;
- Patients who refuse to follow-up, or have poor compliance for follow-up, or fail to understand and cooperate for follow-up;
- Hearing or visual impairment, and unable to communicate or read materials;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multifaceted InterventionThe multicomponent intervention elements include education for clinicians and patients as well as a shared decision-making program among clinicians and patients. A shared decision-making booklet and a mobile application will be used to promote osteoporosis management and fracture practice. | Behavioural | Multifaceted Intervention |
Primary outcome
Trial feasibility - Recruitment
Time frame: 3 months
Number or N (%) participants recruited within 3 months of trial initiation at each centre.
Trial feasibility - Acceptability of the multicomponent program component
Time frame: 30 days after study recruitment
Participants will be asked to evaluate the program with a questionnaire with questions about frequency, length, content, delivery, and duration of the booklet and the mobile application using a 5-point Likert scale.
Trial feasibility - Acceptability of the shared decision-making process
Time frame: 7 days after study recruitment
Both clinicians and patients will be asked to evaluate the shared decision-making process once they completed it. A survey will be administered to evaluate the content and comprehension of the program using a 5-point Likert scale.
Trial feasibility - Retention
Time frame: 30 days after study recruitment
The retention rates will be assessed as the 30-day follow-up rate.
8 secondary outcomes
Anti-osteoporosis treatment rate
Time frame: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Shared decision-making process
Time frame: 7 days after study recruitment
Bone mineral density test
Time frame: 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Adherence of anti-osteoporosis medication
Time frame: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Diagnosis, education, and follow-up practice of osteoporosis
Time frame: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Refracture
Time frame: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Survival
Time frame: 1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-up
Patients' knowledge and attitude about osteoporosis and fragility fracture
Time frame: baseline; 1 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fragility Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence of SI-BONE's iFuse TORQ TNT Advancing Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures
Fracture; Pelvic, Insufficiency Fractures
Recruiting
Surgeon-Initiated Bone Health Referral Pathway in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
Osteoporosis, Arthroplasty Complications
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Outcomes in Older Adults With Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: The FFP-France Study
Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP), Osteoporotic Fractures
RecruitingPhase 2
Essential Amino Acid Supplementation for Femoral Fragility Fractures
Femoral Fracture, Fragility Fracture
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
PROactive HEALing in High-Risk Pelvic and Non-hip Lower Extremity Fragility Fractures (PRO HEAL Pilot)
Lower Extremity Fractures, Pelvis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jian Mo, MD principal investigator
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multifaceted Intervention in people with Fragility Fracture, run by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University at 7 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jian Mo, MD (+86 (020) 85252900, mojian3@mail.sysu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Trial feasibility - Recruitment (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2024.