AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute BronchiolitisEarly Phase 1NCT06139029

Comparison of 3% Normal Saline Nebulization Versus Steroid Nebulization in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis

A Early Phase 1 study testing 3% normal saline and steroid(beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal saline in people with Acute Bronchiolitis, run by Mardan Medical Complex at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the efficacy of 3% normal saline nebulization and steroid nebulization in the treatment of bronchiolitis in infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 12 months
Conditions the study is for
Acute Bronchiolitis
What is being tested?
3% normal saline and steroid(beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal saline
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
15 Nov 2022to 15 Mar 2023
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 12 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • age 3 to 12 months
  • both genders
  • acute brochiolitis as defined

Who cannot join

  • prior history of wheezing
  • family history of asthma
  • pneumonia
  • TB
  • progressive respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventillation
  • underlying diseases (e-g cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and cardiac or renal disease)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Faizan Sadiq

    Mardan, Kpk

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

To compare the efficacy of 3% normal saline nebulization and steroid nebulization in the treatment of bronchiolitis in infants.

Read the detailed description

Comparison of 3% normal saline nebulization versus steroid nebulization in the treatment of bronchiolitis Abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 3% normal saline nebulization and steroid nebulization in the treatment of bronchiolitis in infants.

Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Place and duration of study: This study was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan from 15th of November 2022 to 15th of March 2023.

Methods: A total of 60 infants between the ages of 3 to 12 months admitted in the pediatric unit with bronchiolitis were equally randomized into 2 groups. Patients in Group-A were nebulized with 3% normal saline while patients in Group-B were nebulized with steroid and salbutamol, 3 times a day at intervals of 8 hours until they improved enough for discharge. Assessment was done at 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours using respiratory distress assessment instrument. Primary outcome was efficacy of the treatment defined as number of patients discharged from hospital in ≤ 72 hours after start of treatment. Efficacy between the 2 groups was compared by applying the chi-square test, p ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Keywords: 3% normal saline, Bronchiolitis, Nebulization, Pediatric intensive care unit, Steroids.

Introduction:

Bronchiolitis is among the common acute infections reported at the pediatric units and is related to lower respiratory tract infections (RTI). These pediatric patients especially including infants are presented with signs of wheezing, crackles and mild to moderate breathing difficulties.The causes of bronchiolitis may include influenza (A \& B), parainfluenza (A\&B), adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, rhinovirus and coronavirus however the most common cause is reported to be respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Bronchiolitis is a mild, self-limited infection in the majority of children but may sometimes progress to respiratory failure in infants.

The global prevalence of bronchiolitis is frequent and lower RTI caused by RSV was reported to be as high as 33 Million in 2019. A study collecting the data from intensive care registry of pediatrics in New Zealand and Australia reported an increase in admission rates due to bronchiolitis from 62.5 to 208 per 1,00,000 infants over a period of 12 years. In our region the RSV remains at its peak during the winter season and rainy seasons and is responsible for approximately 30 to 70% of the cases. This number is rising on yearly basis and the economic cost of the disease is also notable as the patients who required hospitalization was 3.6 Million and 26300 cases ended up to mortality. Every year, the cost of treating children with this condition is estimated to be in the millions of dollars.

The diagnosis of bronchiolitis is primarily based on the history and a rapid assay can detect the involvement of RSV. The symptoms of bronchiolitis typically begin with coughing and acute viral rhinitis. The infants then develop fever which may persist from 1 to 3 days and can lead to respiratory distress. The peak symptoms mostly appear in 4 four days which are related to maximum viral load, this duration however may vary among children. In severe cases, physical signs like inadequate nutrition and tachypnea are apparent which further appears in shape of chest hyperinflation, chest retractions, use of accessory muscles and decreased levels of SaO2. The presence of an elevated respiratory rate is a notable indicator of severity and apnea is an alert sign of developing respiratory failure.

Management of bronchiolitis includes the supportive interventions like oxygen and hydration which mostly helps to improve the course of disease while there is no specific treatment for infection is recommended. Infants reporting with symptoms of mild to moderate intensity are given the treatments including nasal saline, cool mist humidifier and paracetamol to control fever. The infants presenting with severity of symptoms like signs of dehydration and hypoxia and at risk of developing respiratory distress are recommended for immediate hospital admission. Interventions like aggressive hydration is important in these cases as their feeding is mostly compromised and the oxygen saturation must be kept above 90%. Treatments including beta-adrenergic agonists and steroids have been used in these cases however the efficacy data of these treatments is not decisive.

Methodology:

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan over a period of 4 months from 15th of November 2022 to 15th of March 2023.

Sample size was calculated with OpenEpi calculator using 95% confidence level and power 80%.

Expected efficacy in the treatment of bronchiolitis, P1 (3% normal saline nebulization) =94%, P2 (commonly used strategy) =58% .15 Estimated sample size 60, n1 (Patients in Group-A) =30, n2 (Patients in Group-B) =30.

A total of 60 infants from both the genders between the ages of 3 to 12 months admitted in the pediatric unit with bronchiolitis were included in this study through non-probability consecutive sampling and equally randomized into 2 groups.

Patients in Group-A were nebulized with 3% normal saline while patients in Group-B were nebulized with steroid (beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day in 3 divided doses) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal saline, 3 times a day at intervals of 8 hours until they improved enough for discharge. Patients of both the groups will receive the supportive treatment as per needed including nasal suction, propped up position, organizing pneumonia (OP), intravenous (IV) fluid, oxygen therapy (when oxygen saturation <90%), paracetamol for fever, antibiotic, feeding and counseling.

Bronchiolitis was defined as when infant presenting with a rasping and persistent dry cough and noisy breathing (wheezing) with crackling or rattling sounds heard in the lungs on stethoscope on the respiratory distress assessment index (RDAI) with score of 4 to 15.

Patients were monitored by respiratory distress assessment instrument (RDAI) score initially at 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours.

Efficacy was noted for both the groups on a given format. Primary outcome was efficacy of the treatment defined as number of patients discharged from hospital in ≤ 72 hours after start of treatment.

A written consent was taken from the parents/guardians of infants for the participation in study.

Permission for conducting study was taken from the ethical committee of the Hospital.

Data was analyzed using statistical analysis program SPSS 26. Mean ±SD was be calculated for quantitative variables like age, severity of bronchiolitis and duration of hospital stay. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables like gender and efficacy. Efficacy in between the 2 groups was compared by applying the chi-square test, where p ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Discussion:

Bronchiolitis being the most common respiratory conditions in children and the most frequent reason of hospitalizations in infants under the age of 2 years has been frequently studied using different therapeutic options. During the past few years different researchers have mentioned the efficacy of 3% normal saline in comparison to other commonly used treatments in treating the bronchiolitis. Gupta V compared the efficacy of nebulization with 3% HS and 0.9% normal saline with salbutamol in infants with acute bronchiolitis. The clinical severity score of 3% HS solution as evaluated on 3rd day of treatment was 1.0 ± 1.1 compared clinical severity score of 3.3 ± 0.5 with 0.9% normal saline with salbutamol (p=0.000). The LHS was also significantly lower in 3% HS group compared to other group (3.4 ± 1.7 Vs 4.9 ± 1.4, p=0.001). The researchers thereby concluded that nebulization with 3% HS is not only effective but also help to cut the economic cost of treatment.

Stobbelaar K aimed to study the effects of nebulization with 3% HS in infants with an average age of 3.4 months admitted in the intensive care unit due to severe bronchiolitis. The results showed that nebulization with HS significantly reduced the need for respiratory support (P = 0.01) and LHS (P = 0.04) compared to patients who didn't received this treatment.

Majagaiya BS in their study conducted with infants suffering from moderate bronchiolitis compared the efficacy of nebulization with3% HS versus nebulization with 0.9% saline given 8 hourly, while salbutamol and corticosteroid was added to the therapies. The results of the study showed a significant improvement in CS score and decrease in LHS in the group taking 3% HS. The study thereby concluded that 3% HS solution is effective and safe choice for treating moderate bronchiolitis in infants.

In a recent study conducted in Pakistan, the comparison of efficacy was made between the group of infants taking the commonly recommended nebulization with salbutamol and other medications versus the group taking the HS nebulization for their bronchiolitis treatment. The CS score was significantly improved after 24 hours in the group taking 3% HS nebulization compared to group taking routine nebulization (p=0.000). Similarly LHS was significantly less in the group nebulized with HS (p=0.003).

Disclaimer of funding:

No

Conflict of interest:

No

Acknowledgments:

The services of departmental paramedic staff for their help in taking and keeping patient record are acknowledged.

Being tested
3% normal saline, steroid(beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal saline
Keywords
3% normal saline, Bronchiolitis, Nebulization, Steroids., Pediatric intensive care unit
Medical subject headings
Bronchiolitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 3% normal salineDrug

    nebulization

  • steroid(beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal salineDrug

    nebulization

Study groups in NCT06139029
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients in Group-A were nebulized with 3% normal salineExperimentalPatients in Group-A were nebulized with 3% normal saline 3 times a day at intervals of 8 hours until they improved enough for discharge
Receives: Drug: 3% normal saline
patients in Group-B were nebulized with steroid and salbutamol with 0.9% normal salineExperimentalpatients in Group-B were nebulized with steroid (beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day in 3 divided doses) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal saline 3 times a day at intervals of 8 hours until they improved enough for discharge
Receives: Drug: steroid(beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. efficacy of 3% hypertonic saline in acute brochiolitis

    Primary outcome was efficacy of the treatment defined as number of patients discharged from hospital in ≤ 72 hours after start of treatment. Efficacy between the 2 groups was compared by applying the chi-square test, p ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Measured: discharged from hospital in ≤ 72 hours after start of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2023
  2. Study start15 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan over a period of 4 months from 15th of November 2022 to 15th of March 2023. Sample size was calculated with OpenEpi calculator using 95% confidence level and power 80%. Estimated sample size 60, n1 (Patients in Group-A) =30, n2 (Patients in Group-B) =30. A total of 60 infants from both the genders between the ages of 3 to 12 months admitted in the pediatric unit with bronchiolitis were included in this study through non-probability consecutive sampling and equally randomized into 2 groups. Exclusion Criteria was set as infants having some underlying disease (e.g. Cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and cardiac or renal disease), prior history of wheezing, family history of asthma, pneumonia, TB, allergic history and progressive respira
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06139029
Sponsor's protocol ID
284/BKMC
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
4 Nov 2023
Last updated
21 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Stobbelaar K, Kool M, de Kruijf D, Van Hoorenbeeck K, Jorens P, De Dooy J, Verhulst S. Nebulised hypertonic saline in children with bronchiolitis admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit: A retrospective study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Sep;55(9):1125-1132. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14371. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

    PubMed 30645038
  • Picone S, Fabiano A, Roma D, Di Palma F, Paolillo P. Re-comparing of three different epidemic seasons of bronchiolitis: different prophylaxis approaches. Ital J Pediatr. 2018 Dec 12;44(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13052-018-0593-7.

    PubMed 30541607
  • Gold J, Hametz P, Sen AI, Maykowski P, Leone N, Lee DS, Gagliardo C, Hymes S, Biller R, Saiman L. Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Bronchiolitis and Pneumonia Guidelines. Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Feb;9(2):87-91. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0211. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

    PubMed 30610012
  • Oz-Alcalay L, Ashkenazi S, Glatman-Freedman A, Weisman-Demri S, Lowenthal A, Livni G. Hospitalization for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis in the Palivizumab Prophylaxis Era: Need for Reconsideration of Preventive Timing and Eligibility. Isr Med Assoc J. 2019 Feb;21(2):110-115.

    PubMed 30772962
  • Skjerven HO, Megremis S, Papadopoulos NG, Mowinckel P, Carlsen KH, Lodrup Carlsen KC; ORAACLE Study Group. Virus Type and Genomic Load in Acute Bronchiolitis: Severity and Treatment Response With Inhaled Adrenaline. J Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 15;213(6):915-21. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv513. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

    PubMed 26508124
  • Heppe Montero M, Gil-Prieto R, Walter S, Aleixandre Blanquer F, Gil De Miguel A. Burden of severe bronchiolitis in children up to 2 years of age in Spain from 2012 to 2017. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1883379. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1883379. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

    PubMed 33653212
  • Panda S, Mohakud NK, Suar M, Kumar S. Etiology, seasonality, and clinical characteristics of respiratory viruses in children with respiratory tract infections in Eastern India (Bhubaneswar, Odisha). J Med Virol. 2017 Mar;89(3):553-558. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24661. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

    PubMed 27509268
  • Schlapbach LJ, Straney L, Gelbart B, Alexander J, Franklin D, Beca J, Whitty JA, Ganu S, Wilkins B, Slater A, Croston E, Erickson S, Schibler A; Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes & Resource Evaluation (CORE) and the Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Paediatric Study Group. Burden of disease and change in practice in critically ill infants with bronchiolitis. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jun 1;49(6):1601648. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01648-2016. Print 2017 Jun.

    PubMed 28572120
  • Li Y, Wang X, Blau DM, Caballero MT, Feikin DR, Gill CJ, Madhi SA, Omer SB, Simoes EAF, Campbell H, Pariente AB, Bardach D, Bassat Q, Casalegno JS, Chakhunashvili G, Crawford N, Danilenko D, Do LAH, Echavarria M, Gentile A, Gordon A, Heikkinen T, Huang QS, Jullien S, Krishnan A, Lopez EL, Markic J, Mira-Iglesias A, Moore HC, Moyes J, Mwananyanda L, Nokes DJ, Noordeen F, Obodai E, Palani N, Romero C, Salimi V, Satav A, Seo E, Shchomak Z, Singleton R, Stolyarov K, Stoszek SK, von Gottberg A, Wurzel D, Yoshida LM, Yung CF, Zar HJ; Respiratory Virus Global Epidemiology Network; Nair H; RESCEU investigators. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022 May 28;399(10340):2047-2064. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00478-0. Epub 2022 May 19.

    PubMed 35598608
  • Fretzayas A, Moustaki M. Etiology and clinical features of viral bronchiolitis in infancy. World J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;13(4):293-299. doi: 10.1007/s12519-017-0031-8. Epub 2017 May 4.

    PubMed 28470580
  • Jo YM, Kim J, Chang J. Vaccine containing G protein fragment and recombinant baculovirus expressing M2 protein induces protective immunity to respiratory syncytial virus. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2019 Jan;8(1):43-53. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2019.8.1.43. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

    PubMed 30775350
  • Polack FP, Stein RT, Custovic A. The Syndrome We Agreed to Call Bronchiolitis. J Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 19;220(2):184-186. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz082.

    PubMed 30783666

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing 3% normal saline and steroid(beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day) and salbutamol with 0.9% normal saline in people with Acute Bronchiolitis, run by Mardan Medical Complex at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

efficacy of 3% hypertonic saline in acute brochiolitis (time frame: discharged from hospital in ≤ 72 hours after start of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06139029, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in