Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3NCT06143878
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 164 sites in 13 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Plaque Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 774 participants
- Where
- 164 sitesin 13 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Jan 2024to 1 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
- Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
- Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
- Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
- Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
Who cannot join
- Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113, deucravacitinib, or to any of the excipients or components of the study intervention
- Major surgical procedure, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgical procedure, or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
164 sites in 13 countries.
164 sites in 13 countries
United States50 sites
Hamilton Research LLC
Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022
David Fivenson MD, Dermatology
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103
Oakview Dermatology
Athens, Ohio, 45701
Optima Research
Boardman, Ohio, 44512
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
DeNova Research
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Michigan Center of Medical Research
Clarkston, Michigan, 48346
Modern Research Associates
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Henry Ford Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Schweiger Dermatology Group
East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520
Hamzavi Dermatology
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059
Johnson Dermatology
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916
First OC Dermatology
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Center for Dermatology Clinical Research
Fremont, California, 94538
Schweiger Dermatology Group 1
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Center for Clinical Studies 1
Houston, Texas, 77004
Austin Institute for Clinical Research 1
Houston, Texas, 77056
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250
Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605
Fife Dermatology
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Dermatology Specialists
Louisville, Kentucky, 40241
Skin Care Physicians of Georgia
Macon, Georgia, 31217
Driven Research LLC
Miami, Florida, 33126
Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC
Mill Creek, Washington, 98012
Ziaderm Research LLC
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162
Renstar Medical Research
Ocala, Florida, 34470
Central Sooner Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73170
Skin Specialists
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Austin Institute for Clinical Research
Pflugerville, Texas, 78660
Medical Dermatology Specialists
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Indiana Clinical Trial Center
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168
Oregon Medical Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97201
StracSkin
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
National Clinical Research
Richmond, Virginia, 23294
Arlington Dermatology
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008
Integrative Skin Science and Research
Sacramento, California, 95815
MediSearch Clinical Trials
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506
Progressive Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78213
Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists
San Antonio, Texas, 78218
Southern California Dermatology
Santa Ana, California, 92701
Clinical Science Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90403
Center for Dermatology and Plastic Surgery
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260
Endeavor Health
Skokie, Illinois, 60077
Premier Clinical Research
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Derm Research Center of New York, Inc.
Stony Brook, New York, 11790
Forcare Clinical Research Inc
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Center for Clinical Studies
Webster, Texas, 77598
Dundee Dermatology
West Dundee, Illinois, 60118
Wilmington Dermatology Center
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405
Japan23 sites
Fukuoka University Hospital
Fukuoka, 814-0180
Hino Dermatology Clinic
Fukutsu, 811-3217
Gifu University Hospital
Gifu, 501-1112
University of the Ryukyus Hospital
Ginowan, 901 2725
Gunma University Hospital
Gunma, 371 8511
JR Sapporo Hospital
Hokkaido, 060-0033
Asahikawa Medical University Hospital
Hokkaido, 078 8510
Tokai University Hospital
Isehara, 259-1193
St Marianna University Hospital
Kawasaki, 216 8511
Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health
Kitakyushu-shi, 807-8556
Nagoya City University Hospital
Nagoya, 467 8602
Kume Clinic
Nishiku, 593-8324
Takagi Dermatological Clinic
Obihiro Shi, 080 0013
Public Interest Incorporated Foundation Nipoon Life Saiseikai Nippon Life Hospital
Osaka, 550 0006
Kindai University Hospital
Sakai, 590 0197
Sapporo Skin Clinic
Sapporo, 060 0063
Tohoku University Hospital
Sendai, 980 8574
The University of Osaka Hospital
Suita, 565 0871
Teikyo University Hospital
tabashi City, 173 8606
Jitaikai Tachikawa dermatology clinic
Tachikawa, 190 0023
Shirasaki Dermatology Clinic
Takaoka Shi, 933-0871
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
Tokyo, 160-0023
Mie University Hospital
Tsu, 514 8507
Poland16 sites
Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik
Bialystok, 15-351
Specderm Poznanska sp j
Bialystok, 15-375
Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J Brzezicki B Gornikiewicz Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska
Elblag, 82 300
Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o
Krakow, 30 438
Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna
Krakow, 30-002
Centrum Medyczne Promed
Krakow, 31-411
Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
Lodz, 90-265
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna
Lodz, 90-338
Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C
Osielsko, 86031
SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne
Poznan, 60 529
Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k
Poznan, 61 731
Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna
Warsaw, 01 817
Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia
Warsaw, 02 953
DERMMEDICA Sp.z o.o.
Wroclaw, 51 503
Wro Medica
Wroclaw, 51 685
Centrum Medyczne Oporow
Wroclaw, 52 416
Germany15 sites
ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH
Berlin, 10789
Hautarztpraxis 3
Bramsche, 49565
Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH
Dresden, 01069
Praxis fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie
Dresden, 01097
Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
MensingDerma research GmbH
Hamburg, 22391
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Campus Kiel
Kiel, 24105
Studienzentrum Dr Schwarz Germany
Langenau, 89129
Universitatsklinikum Leipzig AOR
Leipzig, 04103
Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Campus Lubeck
Lübeck, 23562
Universitaetsklinikum Mannheim
Mannheim, 68167
Klinik und Poliklinik fur Dermatologie und Allergologie am Biederstein
München, 80802
Hautarztpraxis 1
Potsdam, 14467
Universitaetsmedizin Rostock
Rostock, 18057
Spain12 sites
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis
Alicante, 03010
Hosp. Univ. de Cruces
Barakaldo, 48902
Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hosp. Univ. San Cecilio
Granada, 18016
Hosp. Univ. de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907
Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen
Madrid, 28002
Hosp. Univ. de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28007
Hosp. Univ. Infanta Leonor
Madrid, 28031
Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hosp. Univ. de La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Argentina8 sites
Instituto Medico De Alta Complejidad (IMAC)
Buenos Aires, B1643CRO
ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion
Buenos Aires, C1406AGA
Halitus Instituto Medico S.A. - Dermatologia y Estetica
Caba, C1122AAF
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Caba, C1199ABD
Instituto de Neumonologia y Dermatologia
CABA, C1425BEA
Hospital Italiano de La Plata
La Plata, B1900AXI
Instituto Caici Srl.
Rosario, S2000PBJ
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL
Canada8 sites
CCA Medical Research Corporation
Ajax, Ontario, L1S7K8
SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Centre
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1
Dermatrials Research
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2
York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B1L1
Karma Clinical Trials Inc.
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 4Y3
Enverus Medical
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6
Alliance Clinical Trials
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
XLR8 Medical Research
Windsor, Ontario, N8T 1E6
Hungary8 sites
Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem
Borgyogyaszati Klinika, 7632
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
Budapest, 1036
Derma-B Kft
Debrecen, 4031
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont
Debrecen, 4032
Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz
Kaposvár, 7400
SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika
Szeged, 6720
Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.
Szolnok, 5000
Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.
Veszprém, 8200
South Korea7 sites
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan, 49241
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, 13620
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
Hanyang University Medical Center
Seoul, 04763
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul, 05030
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Marys Hospital
Seoul, 06591
Kyung Hee University Hospital
Seoul, 130 050
Taiwan7 sites
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch
Hsinchu, 30059
Chang Kung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 833
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
New Taipei City, 235
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10048
Taipei Mackay Memorial Hospital
Taipei, 10449
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 112
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, 33382
Australia5 sites
North Eastern Health Specialists
Campbelltown, 5074
Paratus Clinical Research Woden
Canberra, 2606
Sinclair Dermatology
East Melbourne, 3002
Veracity Clinical Research
Greenslopes, 4120
Skin Health Institute Inc.
Melbourne, 3053
United Kingdom4 sites
Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 9RT
Royal Berkshire Hospital
Reading, RG1 5AN
Salford Royal Hospital
Salford, M6 8HD
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, SO16 6YD
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Deucravacitinib Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib.
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Being tested
- JNJ-77242113, JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo, Deucravacitinib, Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
JNJ-77242113Drug
JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.
JNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboDrug
JNJ-77242113 matching placebo will be administered orally.
DeucravacitinibDrug
Deucravacitinib will be administered orally.
Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboDrug
Deucravacitinib matching placebo will be administered orally.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| JNJ-77242113 | Experimental | Participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo |
| Deucravacitinib | Active comparator | Participants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema, scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration:0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (34)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 4 and 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 at Week 8
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 8 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2
The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 8 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation, =0.25 mm; 2=mild plaque elevation, =0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation, =0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over <5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 at Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 at Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2
The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2
The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and a >=2-grade improvement from baseline. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported. The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features. The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1 = onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2 = pitting, and 3 = nail plate crumbling. Next four features was each scored 0 absent or 1 present, and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula. Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms score at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in PSSD sign score at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 was reported. The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 24 Among Participants With Baseline Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 After Week 24, Among PASI 75 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24
Measured: Week 24 up to Week 160
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 After Week 24, Among PASI 90 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24
Measured: Week 24 up to Week 160
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 or 1 After Week 24, Among Participants in the Deucravacitinib Group With IGA Score >=2 at Week 24
Measured: Week 24 up to Week 160
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2023
- Study start17 Jan 2024
- Primary completion17 Sep 2024
- Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 774 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinicaltrial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06143878
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 77242113PSO3002
- Other IDs
- 77242113PSO3002
- Status last verified
- Nov 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Publications
Stein Gold L, Armstrong AW, Soung J, Vender RB, Gonzalez Cantero A, Hoffmann M, Guenthner ST, Hong HC, Murrell DF, Song EJ, Kircik L, Augustin M, Sauder M, Gerdes S, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell J, Cresswell K, Kephart L, Li S, Yang YW, Bissonnette R. Durability of response to icotrokinra in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 1-year results from the phase III, placebo- and active comparator-controlled ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 and ICONIC-ADVANCE 2 trials. Br J Dermatol. 2026 Sep 18;195(4):600. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljag264.
PubMed 42397072Gold LS, Armstrong AW, Bissonnette R, Magnolo N, Vender RB, Sebastian M, Galimberti ML, Tsianakas A, Arnone M, Wallace P, Simon M, Riera-Monroig J, Gerdes S, Waibel J, Gonzalez-Cantero A, Schwarz B, Tada Y, Cecchini M, Ehst B, Kircik L, Kephart L, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell JH, Shen YK, Cresswell K, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Papp KA. Once-daily oral icotrokinra versus placebo and once-daily oral deucravacitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 & 2): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled and active-comparator-controlled trials. Lancet. 2025 Sep 27;406(10510):1363-1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01576-4. Epub 2025 Sep 18.
PubMed 40976249
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Deucravacitinib Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06143878
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 77242113PSO3002
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 774 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| JNJ-77242113 | Experimental | Drug: JNJ-77242113, Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: JNJ-77242113, Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo, Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156. |
| Deucravacitinib | Active comparator | Drug: JNJ-77242113, Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo, Drug: DeucravacitinibParticipants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
- Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
- Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
- Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
- Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113, deucravacitinib, or to any of the excipients or components of the study intervention
- Major surgical procedure, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgical procedure, or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| JNJ-77242113JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally. | Drug | Deucravacitinib, JNJ-77242113, Placebo |
| JNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboJNJ-77242113 matching placebo will be administered orally. | Drug | Deucravacitinib, Placebo |
| DeucravacitinibDeucravacitinib will be administered orally. | Drug | Deucravacitinib |
| Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboDeucravacitinib matching placebo will be administered orally. | Drug | JNJ-77242113, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema, scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration:0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
34 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Weeks 4 and 16
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
Time frame: Weeks 8 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptom Score >0
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >0
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 24 Among Participants With Baseline Symptom Score >0
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 After Week 24, Among PASI 75 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 160
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 After Week 24, Among PASI 90 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 160
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 or 1 After Week 24, Among Participants in the Deucravacitinib Group With IGA Score >=2 at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 160
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 160
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 160
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42397072Stein Gold L, Armstrong AW, Soung J, Vender RB, Gonzalez Cantero A, Hoffmann M, Guenthner ST, Hong HC, Murrell DF, Song EJ, Kircik L, Augustin M, Sauder M, Gerdes S, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell J, Cresswell K, Kephart L, Li S, Yang YW, Bissonnette R. Durability of response to icotrokinra in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 1-year results from the phase III, placebo- and active comparator-controlled ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 and ICONIC-ADVANCE 2 trials. Br J Dermatol. 2026 Sep 18;195(4):600. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljag264.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40976249Gold LS, Armstrong AW, Bissonnette R, Magnolo N, Vender RB, Sebastian M, Galimberti ML, Tsianakas A, Arnone M, Wallace P, Simon M, Riera-Monroig J, Gerdes S, Waibel J, Gonzalez-Cantero A, Schwarz B, Tada Y, Cecchini M, Ehst B, Kircik L, Kephart L, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell JH, Shen YK, Cresswell K, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Papp KA. Once-daily oral icotrokinra versus placebo and once-daily oral deucravacitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 & 2): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled and active-comparator-controlled trials. Lancet. 2025 Sep 27;406(10510):1363-1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01576-4. Epub 2025 Sep 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Related trials for Plaque Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CS32582 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Non-pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis
Palmoplantar Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) Following Initiation of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque PsO and Obesity or Overweight in Clinical Practice (TOGETHER AMPLIFY-PsO)
Psoriasis, Overweight or Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 2)
Plaque Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinicaltrial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
164 sites in 13 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 164 sites in 13 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 164 sites in United States, Japan, Poland, Germany, Spain and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06143878, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.