AzTrials
AzTrials

Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3NCT06143878

A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 164 sites in 13 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plaque Psoriasis
What is being tested?
JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
774 participants
Where
164 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
17 Jan 2024to 1 Jun 2027
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
  • Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
  • Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
  • Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis

Who cannot join

  • Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113, deucravacitinib, or to any of the excipients or components of the study intervention
  • Major surgical procedure, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgical procedure, or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

164 sites in 13 countries.

164 sites in 13 countries

United States50 sites
  • Hamilton Research LLC

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022

  • David Fivenson MD, Dermatology

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103

  • Oakview Dermatology

    Athens, Ohio, 45701

  • Optima Research

    Boardman, Ohio, 44512

  • Tufts Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • DeNova Research

    Chicago, Illinois, 60602

  • Michigan Center of Medical Research

    Clarkston, Michigan, 48346

  • Modern Research Associates

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Henry Ford Medical Center

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Schweiger Dermatology Group

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • Hamzavi Dermatology

    Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059

  • Johnson Dermatology

    Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916

  • First OC Dermatology

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Center for Dermatology Clinical Research

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Schweiger Dermatology Group 1

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Center for Clinical Studies 1

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research 1

    Houston, Texas, 77056

  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250

  • Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics

    Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605

  • Fife Dermatology

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119

  • Dermatology Specialists

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40241

  • Skin Care Physicians of Georgia

    Macon, Georgia, 31217

  • Driven Research LLC

    Miami, Florida, 33126

  • Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC

    Mill Creek, Washington, 98012

  • Ziaderm Research LLC

    North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162

  • Renstar Medical Research

    Ocala, Florida, 34470

  • Central Sooner Research

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73170

  • Skin Specialists

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research

    Pflugerville, Texas, 78660

  • Medical Dermatology Specialists

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Medical Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97201

  • StracSkin

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Health Concepts

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702

  • National Clinical Research

    Richmond, Virginia, 23294

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • Integrative Skin Science and Research

    Sacramento, California, 95815

  • MediSearch Clinical Trials

    Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506

  • Progressive Clinical Research

    San Antonio, Texas, 78213

  • Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists

    San Antonio, Texas, 78218

  • Southern California Dermatology

    Santa Ana, California, 92701

  • Clinical Science Institute

    Santa Monica, California, 90403

  • Center for Dermatology and Plastic Surgery

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260

  • Endeavor Health

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • Premier Clinical Research

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

  • Derm Research Center of New York, Inc.

    Stony Brook, New York, 11790

  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Dundee Dermatology

    West Dundee, Illinois, 60118

  • Wilmington Dermatology Center

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405

Other trials in United States

Japan23 sites
  • Fukuoka University Hospital

    Fukuoka, 814-0180

  • Hino Dermatology Clinic

    Fukutsu, 811-3217

  • Gifu University Hospital

    Gifu, 501-1112

  • University of the Ryukyus Hospital

    Ginowan, 901 2725

  • Gunma University Hospital

    Gunma, 371 8511

  • JR Sapporo Hospital

    Hokkaido, 060-0033

  • Asahikawa Medical University Hospital

    Hokkaido, 078 8510

  • Tokai University Hospital

    Isehara, 259-1193

  • St Marianna University Hospital

    Kawasaki, 216 8511

  • Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health

    Kitakyushu-shi, 807-8556

  • Nagoya City University Hospital

    Nagoya, 467 8602

  • Kume Clinic

    Nishiku, 593-8324

  • Takagi Dermatological Clinic

    Obihiro Shi, 080 0013

  • Public Interest Incorporated Foundation Nipoon Life Saiseikai Nippon Life Hospital

    Osaka, 550 0006

  • Kindai University Hospital

    Sakai, 590 0197

  • Sapporo Skin Clinic

    Sapporo, 060 0063

  • Tohoku University Hospital

    Sendai, 980 8574

  • The University of Osaka Hospital

    Suita, 565 0871

  • Teikyo University Hospital

    tabashi City, 173 8606

  • Jitaikai Tachikawa dermatology clinic

    Tachikawa, 190 0023

  • Shirasaki Dermatology Clinic

    Takaoka Shi, 933-0871

  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital

    Tokyo, 160-0023

  • Mie University Hospital

    Tsu, 514 8507

Other trials in Japan

Poland16 sites
  • Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik

    Bialystok, 15-351

  • Specderm Poznanska sp j

    Bialystok, 15-375

  • Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J Brzezicki B Gornikiewicz Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska

    Elblag, 82 300

  • Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o

    Krakow, 30 438

  • Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna

    Krakow, 30-002

  • Centrum Medyczne Promed

    Krakow, 31-411

  • Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna

    Lodz, 90-338

  • Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C

    Osielsko, 86031

  • SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne

    Poznan, 60 529

  • Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k

    Poznan, 61 731

  • Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna

    Warsaw, 01 817

  • Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia

    Warsaw, 02 953

  • DERMMEDICA Sp.z o.o.

    Wroclaw, 51 503

  • Wro Medica

    Wroclaw, 51 685

  • Centrum Medyczne Oporow

    Wroclaw, 52 416

Other trials in Poland

Germany15 sites
  • ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH

    Berlin, 10789

  • Hautarztpraxis 3

    Bramsche, 49565

  • Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH

    Dresden, 01069

  • Praxis fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie

    Dresden, 01097

  • Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf

    Hamburg, 20246

  • MensingDerma research GmbH

    Hamburg, 22391

  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Campus Kiel

    Kiel, 24105

  • Studienzentrum Dr Schwarz Germany

    Langenau, 89129

  • Universitatsklinikum Leipzig AOR

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Campus Lubeck

    Lübeck, 23562

  • Universitaetsklinikum Mannheim

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Klinik und Poliklinik fur Dermatologie und Allergologie am Biederstein

    München, 80802

  • Hautarztpraxis 1

    Potsdam, 14467

  • Universitaetsmedizin Rostock

    Rostock, 18057

Other trials in Germany

Spain12 sites
  • Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis

    Alicante, 03010

  • Hosp. Univ. de Cruces

    Barakaldo, 48902

  • Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Hosp. Univ. San Cecilio

    Granada, 18016

  • Hosp. Univ. de Bellvitge

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907

  • Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen

    Madrid, 28002

  • Hosp. Univ. de La Princesa

    Madrid, 28006

  • Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hosp. Univ. Infanta Leonor

    Madrid, 28031

  • Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hosp. Univ. de La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Argentina8 sites
  • Instituto Medico De Alta Complejidad (IMAC)

    Buenos Aires, B1643CRO

  • ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion

    Buenos Aires, C1406AGA

  • Halitus Instituto Medico S.A. - Dermatologia y Estetica

    Caba, C1122AAF

  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

    Caba, C1199ABD

  • Instituto de Neumonologia y Dermatologia

    CABA, C1425BEA

  • Hospital Italiano de La Plata

    La Plata, B1900AXI

  • Instituto Caici Srl.

    Rosario, S2000PBJ

  • Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman

    San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL

Other trials in Argentina

Canada8 sites
  • CCA Medical Research Corporation

    Ajax, Ontario, L1S7K8

  • SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Centre

    Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1

  • Dermatrials Research

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2

  • York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B1L1

  • Karma Clinical Trials Inc.

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 4Y3

  • Enverus Medical

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6

  • Alliance Clinical Trials

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4

  • XLR8 Medical Research

    Windsor, Ontario, N8T 1E6

Other trials in Canada

Hungary8 sites
  • Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem

    Borgyogyaszati Klinika, 7632

  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft

    Budapest, 1036

  • Derma-B Kft

    Debrecen, 4031

  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz

    Kaposvár, 7400

  • SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika

    Szeged, 6720

  • Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.

    Szolnok, 5000

  • Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

South Korea7 sites
  • Pusan National University Hospital

    Busan, 49241

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam-si, 13620

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Hanyang University Medical Center

    Seoul, 04763

  • Konkuk University Medical Center

    Seoul, 05030

  • The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Marys Hospital

    Seoul, 06591

  • Kyung Hee University Hospital

    Seoul, 130 050

Other trials in South Korea

Taiwan7 sites
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch

    Hsinchu, 30059

  • Chang Kung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 833

  • Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

    New Taipei City, 235

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10048

  • Taipei Mackay Memorial Hospital

    Taipei, 10449

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, 112

  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Taoyuan, 33382

Other trials in Taiwan

Australia5 sites
  • North Eastern Health Specialists

    Campbelltown, 5074

  • Paratus Clinical Research Woden

    Canberra, 2606

  • Sinclair Dermatology

    East Melbourne, 3002

  • Veracity Clinical Research

    Greenslopes, 4120

  • Skin Health Institute Inc.

    Melbourne, 3053

Other trials in Australia

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Royal Berkshire Hospital

    Reading, RG1 5AN

  • Salford Royal Hospital

    Salford, M6 8HD

  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

    Southampton, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Brazil1 site
  • Cepes - Fmabc

    São Paulo, 09060-870

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Deucravacitinib Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib.

Being tested
JNJ-77242113, JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo, Deucravacitinib, Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • JNJ-77242113Drug

    JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.

  • JNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboDrug

    JNJ-77242113 matching placebo will be administered orally.

  • DeucravacitinibDrug

    Deucravacitinib will be administered orally.

  • Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboDrug

    Deucravacitinib matching placebo will be administered orally.

Study groups in NCT06143878
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
JNJ-77242113ExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo
DeucravacitinibActive comparatorParticipants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema, scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration:0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (34)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Weeks 4 and 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 4 and 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 at Week 8

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 8 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 8

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2

    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 8 and 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 16

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation, =0.25 mm; 2=mild plaque elevation, =0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation, =0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over <5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Weeks 16 and 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 at Weeks 16 and 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 at Weeks 16 and 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date

    Measured: Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  15. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  16. Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2

    The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  18. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2

    The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and a >=2-grade improvement from baseline. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  19. Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0

    Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported. The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features. The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1 = onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2 = pitting, and 3 = nail plate crumbling. Next four features was each scored 0 absent or 1 present, and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula. Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  20. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline f-PGA Score >=2

    Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  21. Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms score at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  22. Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD sign score at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  23. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  24. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3

    The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  25. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  26. Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 was reported. The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  27. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  28. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  29. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 24 Among Participants With Baseline Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date

    Measured: Week 24

  30. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 After Week 24, Among PASI 75 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24

    Measured: Week 24 up to Week 160

  31. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 After Week 24, Among PASI 90 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24

    Measured: Week 24 up to Week 160

  32. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 or 1 After Week 24, Among Participants in the Deucravacitinib Group With IGA Score >=2 at Week 24

    Measured: Week 24 up to Week 160

  33. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160

  34. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2023
  2. Study start17 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion17 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
774 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06143878
Sponsor's protocol ID
77242113PSO3002
Other IDs
77242113PSO3002
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
14 Nov 2023
Last updated
4 Nov 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Publications

  • Stein Gold L, Armstrong AW, Soung J, Vender RB, Gonzalez Cantero A, Hoffmann M, Guenthner ST, Hong HC, Murrell DF, Song EJ, Kircik L, Augustin M, Sauder M, Gerdes S, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell J, Cresswell K, Kephart L, Li S, Yang YW, Bissonnette R. Durability of response to icotrokinra in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 1-year results from the phase III, placebo- and active comparator-controlled ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 and ICONIC-ADVANCE 2 trials. Br J Dermatol. 2026 Sep 18;195(4):600. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljag264.

    PubMed 42397072
  • Gold LS, Armstrong AW, Bissonnette R, Magnolo N, Vender RB, Sebastian M, Galimberti ML, Tsianakas A, Arnone M, Wallace P, Simon M, Riera-Monroig J, Gerdes S, Waibel J, Gonzalez-Cantero A, Schwarz B, Tada Y, Cecchini M, Ehst B, Kircik L, Kephart L, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell JH, Shen YK, Cresswell K, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Papp KA. Once-daily oral icotrokinra versus placebo and once-daily oral deucravacitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 & 2): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled and active-comparator-controlled trials. Lancet. 2025 Sep 27;406(10510):1363-1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01576-4. Epub 2025 Sep 18.

    PubMed 40976249

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 164 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 164 sites in United States, Japan, Poland, Germany, Spain and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06143878, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in