AzTrials
AzTrials

Peritoneal CancerNCT06144853

The PIPAC-OPC7 Study: The Use of PET/CT Scans as a Method of Evaluation in Patients Treated With PIPAC, a Pilot Study.

An observational study of Peritoneal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastases, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The pilot study will investigate the use of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans in 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis originating from abdominal cancers treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
scan
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
15 Mar 2024to 5 Mar 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis, four from each of the groups: gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colo-rectal cancer and ovarien cancer, eligebel for inclusion in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with synchronous or metachronous histology or cytology proven GC, PC, CRC, or OC with clinical evidence of PM.
  • Patients who are eligible for and offered PIPAC at the discretion of the dedicated multidisciplinary tumor conference and subsequent out-patient evaluation at Odense PIPAC Center
  • Patients with a maximum of one extra-peritoneal metastasis at CT dated within one month of inclusion.
  • Patients in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1.
  • Patients >18 years of age.
  • Patients must be able to give mandatory oral and written consent in Danish.

Who cannot join

  • Concomitant systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional treatment).
  • Known allergies to contrast dye.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the results.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Odense PIPAC Center

    Odense, Funen, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: FDG-PET/CT as a Method of Patient Selection and Response Evaluation in Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis Treated With Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. A Pilot Study

The pilot study will investigate the use of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans in 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis originating from abdominal cancers treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. The study will focus on the potential of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans to evaluate the treatment as well as the feasibility in the patient group.

Read the detailed description

Background: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a late-stage manifestation of several gastro-intestinal cancers. Conventional administrated chemotherapy has limited effect due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier and most patients will die from their disease within a few months. An alternative treatment strategy, Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), has gained interest in the last decade. Prospective phase II studies have demonstrated significant local treatment effect and promising survival data initially within the palliative setting but more recently also with curative intent. The technical aspects of PIPAC are nearly uniform worldwide but there is no consensus on the optimal evaluation of treatment response. Currently, histological features in repeated biopsies from the peritoneum are used as an indicator of treatment response. Thus, easily accessible, and non-invasive alternatives are needed to optimize and personalize patient selection and to improve the response assessment. Both are also essential regarding future development and implementation of this treatment for both curative and palliative purposes. This could be achieved with the use of imaging techniques. Computed tomography (CT) scan holds well-known limitations in the detection of PM. Alternatively, several studies have investigated the use of the Positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT) scans in the diagnostic setting of PM. This method shows promising results concerning visualization and assessing PM lesions, but no studies have investigated the ability of PET/CT scans to detect changes in PM during PIPAC treatment. Enabling the use of PET/CT scans as an evaluation tool for PIPAC-directed therapy is an important and necessary step to expand the clinical application. Also, non-invasive evaluation methods and consensus of evaluation is of significant importance for the quality of future randomized controlled trials in this field of research. We want to conduct a prospective study to investigate if PET/CT scans can detect changes within PM lesions in patients treated with PIPAC directed therapy. Since the study is the first of its kind, we plan to start with a pilot study including only a few patients. We will use the results to generate important knowledge for subsequent larger randomized studies on and clinical optimization of PIPAC directed therapy in patients with PM.

Objective: To investigate whether FDG-PET/CT scans can detect changes in PM in patients treated with PIPAC and whether the repeated scans are feasible within this group of patients.

Method: The pilot study will include 16 patients with known PM, four from each of the groups: gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colo-rectal cancer and ovarian cancer will be included. The patient will be offered standard PIPAC directed treatment (including standard histological evaluation of biopsies of the peritoneum) according to local guidelines. During the first series (one series is equivalent to three PIPAC treatments each five weeks) patients will receive three FDG-PET/CT's, one before PIPAC 1, one after PIPAC 2 and one after PIPAC 3. The scans will be described according to PERCIST (PET response criteria in solid tumors). In case of FDG-negative PM-disease at the first scan the patient will receive only one follow-up scan after PIPAC 2 to investigate whether the treatment if self can cause FDG-uptake in the PM elements.

Being tested
scan
Keywords
PIPAC, Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, FDG-PET/CT, Positron Emission Tomography scan, response evaluation
Medical subject headings
Peritoneal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • scanOther

    Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/Computed tomography scan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3

    The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The number of patients with metabolic response after PIPAC 1 according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0

    The number of patients with metabolic response after PIPAC 1 according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0

    Measured: 18 months

  2. The number of patients with changed treatment strategy due to extraperitoneal FDG-PET/CT findings after PIPAC 1 or PIPAC 3

    The number of patients with changed treatment strategy due to extraperitoneal FDG-PET/CT findings after PIPAC 1 or PIPAC 3

    Measured: 18 months

  3. The number and reasons for discontinued FDG-PET/CT scans (feasibility)

    The number and reasons for discontinued FDG-PET/CT scans (feasibility)

    Measured: 18 months

  4. Number of patients with FDG-PET/CT positive peritoneal surface after PIPAC 1 despite negative baseline FDG-PET/CT (false positive/feasibility)

    Number of patients with FDG-PET/CT positive peritoneal surface after PIPAC 1 despite negative baseline FDG-PET/CT (false positive/feasibility)

    Measured: 18 months

  5. The number of patients where FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST one lesion agrees with histological response according to PRGS after PIPAC 1 and 3

    The number of patients where FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST one lesion agrees with histological response according to PRGS after PIPAC 1 and 3

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2023
  2. Study start15 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion5 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion5 Mar 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06144853
Sponsor's protocol ID
PIPAC_OPC7
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
17 Nov 2023
Last updated
16 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Publications and presentations will be based on patient data, but the database is not open to other researchers.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Peritoneal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastases, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3 (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in