Peritoneal CancerNCT06144853
The PIPAC-OPC7 Study: The Use of PET/CT Scans as a Method of Evaluation in Patients Treated With PIPAC, a Pilot Study.
An observational study of Peritoneal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastases, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The pilot study will investigate the use of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans in 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis originating from abdominal cancers treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peritoneal Cancer, Peritoneal Metastases, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- What is being tested?
- scan
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2024to 5 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis, four from each of the groups: gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colo-rectal cancer and ovarien cancer, eligebel for inclusion in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with synchronous or metachronous histology or cytology proven GC, PC, CRC, or OC with clinical evidence of PM.
- Patients who are eligible for and offered PIPAC at the discretion of the dedicated multidisciplinary tumor conference and subsequent out-patient evaluation at Odense PIPAC Center
- Patients with a maximum of one extra-peritoneal metastasis at CT dated within one month of inclusion.
- Patients in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1.
- Patients >18 years of age.
- Patients must be able to give mandatory oral and written consent in Danish.
Who cannot join
- Concomitant systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional treatment).
- Known allergies to contrast dye.
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the results.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: FDG-PET/CT as a Method of Patient Selection and Response Evaluation in Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis Treated With Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. A Pilot Study
The pilot study will investigate the use of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans in 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis originating from abdominal cancers treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. The study will focus on the potential of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans to evaluate the treatment as well as the feasibility in the patient group.
Read the detailed description
Background: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a late-stage manifestation of several gastro-intestinal cancers. Conventional administrated chemotherapy has limited effect due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier and most patients will die from their disease within a few months. An alternative treatment strategy, Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), has gained interest in the last decade. Prospective phase II studies have demonstrated significant local treatment effect and promising survival data initially within the palliative setting but more recently also with curative intent. The technical aspects of PIPAC are nearly uniform worldwide but there is no consensus on the optimal evaluation of treatment response. Currently, histological features in repeated biopsies from the peritoneum are used as an indicator of treatment response. Thus, easily accessible, and non-invasive alternatives are needed to optimize and personalize patient selection and to improve the response assessment. Both are also essential regarding future development and implementation of this treatment for both curative and palliative purposes. This could be achieved with the use of imaging techniques. Computed tomography (CT) scan holds well-known limitations in the detection of PM. Alternatively, several studies have investigated the use of the Positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT) scans in the diagnostic setting of PM. This method shows promising results concerning visualization and assessing PM lesions, but no studies have investigated the ability of PET/CT scans to detect changes in PM during PIPAC treatment. Enabling the use of PET/CT scans as an evaluation tool for PIPAC-directed therapy is an important and necessary step to expand the clinical application. Also, non-invasive evaluation methods and consensus of evaluation is of significant importance for the quality of future randomized controlled trials in this field of research. We want to conduct a prospective study to investigate if PET/CT scans can detect changes within PM lesions in patients treated with PIPAC directed therapy. Since the study is the first of its kind, we plan to start with a pilot study including only a few patients. We will use the results to generate important knowledge for subsequent larger randomized studies on and clinical optimization of PIPAC directed therapy in patients with PM.
Objective: To investigate whether FDG-PET/CT scans can detect changes in PM in patients treated with PIPAC and whether the repeated scans are feasible within this group of patients.
Method: The pilot study will include 16 patients with known PM, four from each of the groups: gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colo-rectal cancer and ovarian cancer will be included. The patient will be offered standard PIPAC directed treatment (including standard histological evaluation of biopsies of the peritoneum) according to local guidelines. During the first series (one series is equivalent to three PIPAC treatments each five weeks) patients will receive three FDG-PET/CT's, one before PIPAC 1, one after PIPAC 2 and one after PIPAC 3. The scans will be described according to PERCIST (PET response criteria in solid tumors). In case of FDG-negative PM-disease at the first scan the patient will receive only one follow-up scan after PIPAC 2 to investigate whether the treatment if self can cause FDG-uptake in the PM elements.
- Being tested
- scan
- Keywords
- PIPAC, Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, FDG-PET/CT, Positron Emission Tomography scan, response evaluation
- Medical subject headings
- Peritoneal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
scanOther
Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/Computed tomography scan
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3
The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
The number of patients with metabolic response after PIPAC 1 according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0
The number of patients with metabolic response after PIPAC 1 according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0
Measured: 18 months
The number of patients with changed treatment strategy due to extraperitoneal FDG-PET/CT findings after PIPAC 1 or PIPAC 3
The number of patients with changed treatment strategy due to extraperitoneal FDG-PET/CT findings after PIPAC 1 or PIPAC 3
Measured: 18 months
The number and reasons for discontinued FDG-PET/CT scans (feasibility)
The number and reasons for discontinued FDG-PET/CT scans (feasibility)
Measured: 18 months
Number of patients with FDG-PET/CT positive peritoneal surface after PIPAC 1 despite negative baseline FDG-PET/CT (false positive/feasibility)
Number of patients with FDG-PET/CT positive peritoneal surface after PIPAC 1 despite negative baseline FDG-PET/CT (false positive/feasibility)
Measured: 18 months
The number of patients where FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST one lesion agrees with histological response according to PRGS after PIPAC 1 and 3
The number of patients where FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST one lesion agrees with histological response according to PRGS after PIPAC 1 and 3
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2023
- Study start15 Mar 2024
- Primary completion5 Mar 2026
- Study completion5 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peritoneal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael B Mortensen, Professor, Study director, Odense PIPAC Center, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06144853
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PIPAC_OPC7
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Publications and presentations will be based on patient data, but the database is not open to other researchers.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- FDG-PET/CT as a Method of Patient Selection and Response Evaluation in Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis Treated With Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06144853
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIPAC_OPC7
- Keywords
- PIPAC, Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, FDG-PET/CT, Positron Emission Tomography scan, response evaluation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The pilot study will investigate the use of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans in 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis originating from abdominal cancers treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. The study will focus on the potential of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans to evaluate the treatment as well as the feasibility in the patient group.
Detailed description
Background: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a late-stage manifestation of several gastro-intestinal cancers. Conventional administrated chemotherapy has limited effect due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier and most patients will die from their disease within a few months. An alternative treatment strategy, Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), has gained interest in the last decade. Prospective phase II studies have demonstrated significant local treatment effect and promising survival data initially within the palliative setting but more recently also with curative intent. The technical aspects of PIPAC are nearly uniform worldwide but there is no consensus on the optimal evaluation of treatment response. Currently, histological features in repeated biopsies from the peritoneum are used as an indicator of treatment response. Thus, easily accessible, and non-invasive alternatives are needed to optimize and personalize patient selection and to improve the response assessment. Both are also essential regarding future development and implementation of this treatment for both curative and palliative purposes. This could be achieved with the use of imaging techniques. Computed tomography (CT) scan holds well-known limitations in the detection of PM. Alternatively, several studies have investigated the use of the Positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT) scans in the diagnostic setting of PM. This method shows promising results concerning visualization and assessing PM lesions, but no studies have investigated the ability of PET/CT scans to detect changes in PM during PIPAC treatment. Enabling the use of PET/CT scans as an evaluation tool for PIPAC-directed therapy is an important and necessary step to expand the clinical application. Also, non-invasive evaluation methods and consensus of evaluation is of significant importance for the quality of future randomized controlled trials in this field of research. We want to conduct a prospective study to investigate if PET/CT scans can detect changes within PM lesions in patients treated with PIPAC directed therapy. Since the study is the first of its kind, we plan to start with a pilot study including only a few patients. We will use the results to generate important knowledge for subsequent larger randomized studies on and clinical optimization of PIPAC directed therapy in patients with PM.
Objective: To investigate whether FDG-PET/CT scans can detect changes in PM in patients treated with PIPAC and whether the repeated scans are feasible within this group of patients.
Method: The pilot study will include 16 patients with known PM, four from each of the groups: gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colo-rectal cancer and ovarian cancer will be included. The patient will be offered standard PIPAC directed treatment (including standard histological evaluation of biopsies of the peritoneum) according to local guidelines. During the first series (one series is equivalent to three PIPAC treatments each five weeks) patients will receive three FDG-PET/CT's, one before PIPAC 1, one after PIPAC 2 and one after PIPAC 3. The scans will be described according to PERCIST (PET response criteria in solid tumors). In case of FDG-negative PM-disease at the first scan the patient will receive only one follow-up scan after PIPAC 2 to investigate whether the treatment if self can cause FDG-uptake in the PM elements.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis, four from each of the groups: gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colo-rectal cancer and ovarien cancer, eligebel for inclusion in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with synchronous or metachronous histology or cytology proven GC, PC, CRC, or OC with clinical evidence of PM.
- Patients who are eligible for and offered PIPAC at the discretion of the dedicated multidisciplinary tumor conference and subsequent out-patient evaluation at Odense PIPAC Center
- Patients with a maximum of one extra-peritoneal metastasis at CT dated within one month of inclusion.
- Patients in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1.
- Patients >18 years of age.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Concomitant systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional treatment).
- Known allergies to contrast dye.
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the results.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| scanFluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/Computed tomography scan | Other | – |
Primary outcome
The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3
Time frame: 18 months
The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3
5 secondary outcomes
The number of patients with metabolic response after PIPAC 1 according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0
Time frame: 18 months
The number of patients with changed treatment strategy due to extraperitoneal FDG-PET/CT findings after PIPAC 1 or PIPAC 3
Time frame: 18 months
The number and reasons for discontinued FDG-PET/CT scans (feasibility)
Time frame: 18 months
Number of patients with FDG-PET/CT positive peritoneal surface after PIPAC 1 despite negative baseline FDG-PET/CT (false positive/feasibility)
Time frame: 18 months
The number of patients where FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST one lesion agrees with histological response according to PRGS after PIPAC 1 and 3
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Publications and presentations will be based on patient data, but the database is not open to other researchers.
Related trials for Peritoneal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Torvutatug Samrotecan Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Maintenance in Non-Homologous Recombination Deficiency (Non-HRD) Positive Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Clonal Hematopoiesis and Therapy-Emergent Myeloid Neoplasms in Patients With Cancers, CHANCES Study
Recurrent Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-Mesothelin TNaive/SCM hYP218 (TNhYP218) CAR T Cells in Participants With Mesothelin-Expressing Solid Tumors Including Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma, Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael B Mortensen, Professor study director
Odense PIPAC Center, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Peritoneal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastases, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The number of patients with metabolic response according to FDG-PET/CT evaluated by PERCIST 1.0 one lesion after PIPAC 3 (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2026.