Chronic PainACUAWARENCT06145997
Feasibility and Acceptability Study of ACUAWARE
An observational study of Chronic Pain, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to gather preliminary feasibility and acceptability data to justify a subsequent trial that would fill a gap in knowledge regarding acupuncture therapy (AT) effects on interoceptive awareness (IA) among those with chronic pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Acupuncture therapy
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2023to 15 Oct 2024
- How long will I take part?
- 24 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults in the United States with chronic pain, defined as pain lasting of 3 or more months, and given a score of 5 or greater on a 1-10 scale.
Who may be able to join
- Patients:
- Age 18 or older;
- experiencing chronic pain,
- complaint of 3+ months,
- score of 5 or greater on a 1-10 scale;
- able to provide informed consent
- willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines,
- English speaking and writing.
Who cannot join
- Prior or current diagnosis of:
- cancer,
- Multiple Sclerosis (MS),
- any Dementia,
- Parkinson's Disease,
- Autism Spectrum Disorder,
Show all 11Show fewer
- Pregnancy,
- Fibromyalgia,
- Eating Disorder,
- Down's Syndrome
- Schizophrenia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Utah College of Nursing
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
About this study
Official title: Collecting Pragmatic Data Via Electronic Health Records: ACUAWARE Feasibility and Acceptability Study
This study aims to gather preliminary feasibility and acceptability data to justify a subsequent trial that would fill a gap in knowledge regarding acupuncture therapy (AT) effects on interoceptive awareness (IA) among those with chronic pain.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to gather preliminary feasibility and acceptability data to justify a subsequent trial that would fill a gap in knowledge regarding acupuncture's effects on interoceptive awareness among individuals with chronic pain. Our primary hypotheses are that (1) Feasibility: it is feasible for us to enroll and retain 70% of the patients and it is feasible to collect data from at least 70% of participants at 3-months follow-up, and (2) Acceptability: it is acceptable for 70% of licensed acupuncturists to use Acu-Track Registry; it is acceptable for 70% of patients to complete questionnaires emailed to them via Acu-Track Registry.
The investigators propose to evaluate these hypotheses by conducting a prospective, pragmatic single-arm feasibility and acceptability study among individuals with chronic pain of any etiology or location, except if due to cancer. Chronic pain is defined as pain that persists or recurs for more than 3 months.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Acupuncture therapy
- Keywords
- Chronic pain, Feasibility study, Acceptability study
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acupuncture therapyOther
Acupuncture therapy (AT) is delivered by Licensed Acupuncturists (LAcs). Treatment plans are determined according to each patient's presentation and resulting traditional East Asian medicine (TEAM) differential diagnosis. TEAM therapeutics include AT, Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), Kampo herbal medicine, gua sha, tui na, cupping and lifestyle advice. All TEAM therapeutics are allowed in this study because it is a pragmatic, effectiveness study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Persons with chronic pain | Standard acupuncture care will be provided to persons (n=50) with chronic pain. Standard care is defined as the care a participant was already receiving and that care will not be interrupted in any way for any study participant. Receives: Other: Acupuncture therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility metrics - rate of enrollment
Rate of enrollment of acupuncturists and patients (frequency count)
Measured: 24 months
Feasibility metrics - rate of retention
Rate of retention of acupuncturists and participants (frequency count)
Measured: 24 months
Feasibility metrics - rate of questionnaire completion
Rate of questionnaire completion by participants (frequency count)
Measured: 24 months
Feasibility metrics - completion rate of acupuncture therapy
Rate of completion of acupuncture therapy (AT) (frequency count)
Measured: 24 months
Feasibility metrics - rate of serious adverse events
Rate of serious adverse events (frequency count)
Measured: 24 months
Acceptability metrics
Acceptability ratings by licensed acupuncturists and by participants. Acceptability is asked in a binary question: "Is it acceptable to you to use the Acu-Track registry?" Yes/No. We define "acceptable" as 70% or more of licensed acupuncturists to use Acu-Track Registry; and acceptable for 70% or more of patients to complete questionnaires emailed to them via Acu-Track Registry.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale, 2 (MAIA-2)
The MAIA-2, or Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale, will be used to measure interoceptive awareness (IA). The MAIA-2 is comprised of 8 subscales and 37 items. Items are scored 0-5, with higher scores indicating increased IA.
Measured: 24 months
Global Impression of Change (GIC)
This simple 1 question measure is a retrospective rating scale that asks the patient how much better or worse their health complaint is since beginning their course of treatments or care. It is a quick and straightforward way to gauge a patient's own belief about their improvement so far. Our PGIC scale is health complaint specific, rather than general, providing the ability to focus on monitoring a specific problem.
Measured: 24 months
Physical Function from Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10)
PROMIS-10 scoring will be used to evaluate physical function. PROMIS-10 scoring allows each of the individual items to be examined separately to provide specific information about perceptions of health (e.g., physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, social health and general perceptions of health). We are using the single item: "To what extent are you able to carry out your everyday physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, carrying groceries, or moving a chair?" Likert type scale 5-1: (5) completely, to (1) not at all.
Measured: 24 months
Global Mental Health
PROMIS-10 scoring will also be used to evaluate global mental health. We are using the single item: "In the past 7 days: How often have you been bothered by emotional problems such as feeling anxious, depressed, or irritable?" Likert type scale 0-10: (0) no pain to (10) worst pain imaginable
Measured: 24 months
Anxiety
PROMIS-10 scoring allows each of the individual items to be examined separately to provide specific information about perceptions of health. We are using the single item: "In the past 7 days: How often have you been bothered by emotional problems such as feeling anxious?" Likert type scale 0-10: (0) no pain to (10) worst pain imaginable.
Measured: 24 months
Depression
PROMIS-10 scoring allows each of the individual items to be examined separately to provide specific information about perceptions of health. We are using the single item: "In the past 7 days: How often have you been bothered by emotional problems such as feeling depressed?" Likert type scale 0-10: (0) no pain to (10) worst pain imaginable.
Measured: 24 months
Irritability
PROMIS-10 scoring allows each of the individual items to be examined separately to provide specific information about perceptions of health. We are using the single item: "In the past 7 days: How often have you been bothered by emotional problems such as feeling irritable?" Likert type scale 0-10: (0) no pain to (10) worst pain imaginable.
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2023
- Study start15 Dec 2023
- Primary completion15 Oct 2024
- Study completion15 Oct 2024
Why it stopped: Lack of enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 24 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Utah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pace University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lisa J Taylor-Swanson, PHD, Principal investigator, University of Utah College of Nursing
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06145997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00139124
- Acronym
- ACUAWARE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No individual participant data (IPD) will be used or received in this study, thus no IPD can be made available to other researchers.
Publications
Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt ED. Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PubMed 28192793Di Lernia D, Serino S, Riva G. Pain in the body. Altered interoception in chronic pain conditions: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:328-341. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 18.
PubMed 27654341Grissa MH, Baccouche H, Boubaker H, Beltaief K, Bzeouich N, Fredj N, Msolli MA, Boukef R, Bouida W, Nouira S. Acupuncture vs intravenous morphine in the management of acute pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;34(11):2112-2116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
PubMed 27475042Teng B, Wang D, Su C, Zhou H, Wang T, Mehling WE, Hu Y. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2: Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 11;13:970982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.970982. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36440402
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Collecting Pragmatic Data Via Electronic Health Records: ACUAWARE Feasibility and Acceptability Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06145997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACUAWARE / 00139124
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- Chronic pain, Feasibility study, Acceptability study
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of enrollment
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of UtahUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pace University
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to gather preliminary feasibility and acceptability data to justify a subsequent trial that would fill a gap in knowledge regarding acupuncture therapy (AT) effects on interoceptive awareness (IA) among those with chronic pain.
Detailed description
This study aims to gather preliminary feasibility and acceptability data to justify a subsequent trial that would fill a gap in knowledge regarding acupuncture's effects on interoceptive awareness among individuals with chronic pain. Our primary hypotheses are that (1) Feasibility: it is feasible for us to enroll and retain 70% of the patients and it is feasible to collect data from at least 70% of participants at 3-months follow-up, and (2) Acceptability: it is acceptable for 70% of licensed acupuncturists to use Acu-Track Registry; it is acceptable for 70% of patients to complete questionnaires emailed to them via Acu-Track Registry.
The investigators propose to evaluate these hypotheses by conducting a prospective, pragmatic single-arm feasibility and acceptability study among individuals with chronic pain of any etiology or location, except if due to cancer. Chronic pain is defined as pain that persists or recurs for more than 3 months.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 24 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Persons with chronic pain | – | Other: Acupuncture therapyStandard acupuncture care will be provided to persons (n=50) with chronic pain. Standard care is defined as the care a participant was already receiving and that care will not be interrupted in any way for any study participant. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults in the United States with chronic pain, defined as pain lasting of 3 or more months, and given a score of 5 or greater on a 1-10 scale.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 18 or older;
- experiencing chronic pain,
- complaint of 3+ months,
- score of 5 or greater on a 1-10 scale;
- able to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- cancer,
- Multiple Sclerosis (MS),
- any Dementia,
- Parkinson's Disease,
- Autism Spectrum Disorder,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture therapyAcupuncture therapy (AT) is delivered by Licensed Acupuncturists (LAcs). Treatment plans are determined according to each patient's presentation and resulting traditional East Asian medicine (TEAM) differential diagnosis. TEAM therapeutics include AT, Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), Kampo herbal medicine, gua sha, tui na, cupping and lifestyle advice. All TEAM therapeutics are allowed in this study because it is a pragmatic, effectiveness study. | Other | Persons with chronic pain |
Primary outcome
Feasibility metrics - rate of enrollment
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of enrollment of acupuncturists and patients (frequency count)
Feasibility metrics - rate of retention
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of retention of acupuncturists and participants (frequency count)
Feasibility metrics - rate of questionnaire completion
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of questionnaire completion by participants (frequency count)
Feasibility metrics - completion rate of acupuncture therapy
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of completion of acupuncture therapy (AT) (frequency count)
Feasibility metrics - rate of serious adverse events
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of serious adverse events (frequency count)
Acceptability metrics
Time frame: 24 months
Acceptability ratings by licensed acupuncturists and by participants. Acceptability is asked in a binary question: "Is it acceptable to you to use the Acu-Track registry?" Yes/No. We define "acceptable" as 70% or more of licensed acupuncturists to use Acu-Track Registry; and acceptable for 70% or more of patients to complete questionnaires emailed to them via Acu-Track Registry.
7 secondary outcomes
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale, 2 (MAIA-2)
Time frame: 24 months
Global Impression of Change (GIC)
Time frame: 24 months
Physical Function from Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10)
Time frame: 24 months
Global Mental Health
Time frame: 24 months
Anxiety
Time frame: 24 months
Depression
Time frame: 24 months
Irritability
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 28192793Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt ED. Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 27654341Di Lernia D, Serino S, Riva G. Pain in the body. Altered interoception in chronic pain conditions: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:328-341. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 27475042Grissa MH, Baccouche H, Boubaker H, Beltaief K, Bzeouich N, Fredj N, Msolli MA, Boukef R, Bouida W, Nouira S. Acupuncture vs intravenous morphine in the management of acute pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;34(11):2112-2116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 36440402Teng B, Wang D, Su C, Zhou H, Wang T, Mehling WE, Hu Y. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2: Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 11;13:970982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.970982. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No individual participant data (IPD) will be used or received in this study, thus no IPD can be made available to other researchers.
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
The Intervention Effect of Exercise on Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injuries
Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain, Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injury
Not yet recruiting
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Plus Physiotherapy for Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Erector Spinae Plane Block With or Without Thoracolumbar Fascia Injection for Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Healing Track Clinical Trial
Chronic Back Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa J Taylor-Swanson, PHD principal investigator
University of Utah College of Nursing
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Pain, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility metrics - rate of enrollment (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06145997, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2025.