AzTrials
AzTrials

MicrometastasesNCT06149884

Micrometastases in Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer, Post-neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

An observational study of Micrometastases and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, run by Gangnam Severance Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to investigate the significance of minimal residual axillary disease following NAC, with a particular focus on micrometastases (ypNmi), in comparison to pathologic lymph node-negative (ypN0) or macrometastases (ypN+). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Micrometastases, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
What is being tested?
Sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
978 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2006to 28 Feb 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: We conducted a retrospective review of primary breast cancer patients from the breast cancer registries of Gangnam Severance Hospital and Severance Hospital, who underwent surgery following NAC between September 2006 and February 2018. These patients were clinically diagnosed with stage II or III breast cancer and underwent ALND, with or without SLNB. The surgical approach, encompassing either total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery, was dictated by the number and size of the tumors present. Exclusion criteria comprised of patients who had initial surgery, underwent only SLNB, or presented with de novo stage IV disease.

Who may be able to join

  • Stage II or III primary breast cancer patients
  • Patients who performed neoadjuvant chemotherpay
  • Patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy

Who cannot join

  • Patients who performed upfront surgery
  • De novo stage IV patients

About this study

This study aims to investigate the significance of minimal residual axillary disease following NAC, with a particular focus on micrometastases (ypNmi), in comparison to pathologic lymph node-negative (ypN0) or macrometastases (ypN+). The investigators will further explore the prognostic implications of SLNmi for the prediction of axillary LN status and survival outcomes.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to investigate the significance of minimal residual axillary disease following NAC, with a particular focus on micrometastases (ypNmi), in comparison to pathologic lymph node-negative (ypN0) or macrometastases (ypN+). The investigators will further explore the prognostic implications of SLNmi for the prediction of axillary LN status and survival outcomes.

Being tested
Sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm Micrometastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissectionProcedure or surgery

    SLNB was performed using single or dual tracers. For the single tracer technique, Technetium 99, a radioactive substance, was administered periareolarly prior to surgery, and SLNs were identified intraoperatively via a gamma detection system (Neoprobe®). The dual tracer method employed both an isosulfan blue dye and Technetium 99 concurrently. The choice of SLNB technique was contingent upon the surgeon's discretion. SLNs were categorized as one or multiple, and any LN identified by either or both methods was defined as SLN. LNs resected during SLNB without tracer signal were not classified as SLNs.

    ALND was characterized by the removal of all LNs in axillary levels I and II. Patients documented to have undergone ALND in surgical records were primarily selected from our registry. Among them, those with fewer than 10 LNs were excluded, based on the assumption that a competent ALND necessitated the removal of 10 or more LNs as defined in previous studies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recurrence-free survival

    locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, any cause of death

    Measured: the interval from breast cancer diagnosis to the initial recurrence or death upto 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Nov 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2006
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2018
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
978 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06149884
Sponsor's protocol ID
3-2023-0214
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
14 Nov 2023
Last updated
29 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Micrometastases and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, run by Gangnam Severance Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recurrence-free survival (time frame: the interval from breast cancer diagnosis to the initial recurrence or death upto 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in