AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeEFECTSNCT06149897

Feasibility and Effectiveness of tDCS in the Treatment of Post-stroke Fatigue (EFECTS).

A study testing tDCS in people with Stroke, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to analyze the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) is beneficial for the treatment of post-stroke fatigue. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
tDCS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
54 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
10 Nov 2023to 21 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • First stroke within 45 (+-7) days of the ischemic or hemorrhagic episode.
  • Ability to understand and execute simple instructions
  • Over 18 years.
  • Fatigue Scale of fatigue severity with a score greater than or equal to 24

Who cannot join

  • A score > 2 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) before the stroke.
  • Patients with decompensated cardiorespiratory and/or psychiatric pathology.
  • Comorbidity causing disproportionate fatigue, such as long-term COVID.
  • Patients who are cancer survivors or who are undergoing cancer treatment.
  • Patients with a history of epilepsy or who are taking antiepileptic medication.
  • Patents with major depression.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, Spain, 08036

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Effectiveness of Tdcs in a Multimodal Treatment With Health Education and Aerobic Exercise in the Treatment of Post-stroke Fatigue.

This study aims to analyze the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) is beneficial for the treatment of post-stroke fatigue.

Read the detailed description

A single-blind randomized clinical trial will be conducted. The intervention will consist of 8 20-minute tDCS sessions conducted over four weeks. The stimulation will be performed by applying the stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the left side (F3) and the cathode will be at point O2 of the right hemisphere. The study will consist of two groups: the control group in which sham stimulation will be applied and therapeutic education and aerobic exercise; the intervention group in which stimulation, therapeutic education and therapeutic exercise will be carried out.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
tDCS
Keywords
tdcs, post stroke fatigue
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tDCSDevice

    Also called physical exercise, therapeutic education

    Non invasive brain stimulation with sham and active comparators

Study groups in NCT06149897
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupSham comparator* Therapeutic education about post-stroke fatigue * Sham stimulation with tDCS: Anode placed in F3 and cathode in O2, 20 minutes. * Aerobic exercise measured with Borg scale (moderate intensity)
Receives: Device: tDCS
Experimental groupActive comparator* Therapeutic education about post-stroke fatigue * Stimulation with tDCS: Anode placed in F3 and cathode in O2, intensity 2mA during 20 minutes. * Aerobic exercise measured with Borg scale (moderate intensity)
Receives: Device: tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fatigue Assessment Scale

    The scale consists of 10 questions about the characteristics of fatigue in the current daily routine, which are rated on a five-point range from 1, "never," to 5, "always." Higher scores indicate more fatigue, with a cut-off point of ≥24 defining the presence of fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  2. HADS

    It is a scale that can be used both at the hospital and outpatient level. It consists of 14 questions: 7 questions related to depression and another 7 related to anxiety. An independent score on each scale of ≥ 8 will be suggestive of depression and/or anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale

    It is a scale with 15 items that is used to measure the severity of stroke. It includes different areas: level of consciousness, eye movements, integrity of visual fields, facial movements, muscle strength, sensitivity, coordination, language and negligence. Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 2, 0 to 3 or 0 to 4. The total is added and a score is obtained that can range from 0 to 42, the higher the score, the greater the deficits.

    Measured: Baseline. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  2. Borg Modified Scale

    The Borg scale is a tool that measures a person's perception of exertion, shortness of breath, and fatigue during physical exertion. It is a modified scale, it is an 11-point scale that ranges from 0=no fatigue to 10=very great effort.

    Measured: During the sessions. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  3. PROMIS-Sleep

    This is a Likert-type scale that evaluates the quality of sleep during the last week. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  4. Modified Rankin Scale

    It is the most commonly used functional measure in stroke research, particularly in studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments. The scale is numerical and ranges from 0 to 6. 0: no symptoms; 1: without significant disability (the patient is able to carry out his/her usual activities and obligations); 2: mild disability; 3: moderate disability; 4: moderately severe disability; 5: severe disability (totally dependent patient); 6: death.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 6 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  5. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

    To measure the level of physical activity during the last week. There are two forms of output from scoring the IPAQ. Results can be reported in categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels or high activity levels) or as a continuous variable (MET minutes a week). MET minutes represent the amount of energy expended carrying out physical activity. A MET is a multiple of your estimated resting energy expenditure. One MET is what you expend when you are at rest. Therefore 2 METS is twice what you expend at rest. To get a continuous variable score from the IPAQ (MET minutes a week) we will consider walking to be 3.3 METS, moderate physical activity to be 4 METS and vigorous physical activity to be 8 METS.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  6. Eq-5D

    Assess the quality of life perceived by the patients. The scale ranges from 100 ('the best imaginable health state' or 'the best health state you can imagine') to 0 ('the worst imaginable health state' or 'the worst health you can imagine'). This is used to obtain a respondent's stated preference values, not to record their own health state.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Nov 2023
  2. Study start10 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion5 May 2026
  4. Study completion21 May 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
54 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06149897
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCB/2022/1193
Acronym
EFECTS
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
14 Nov 2023
Last updated
26 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tDCS in people with Stroke, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fatigue Assessment Scale (time frame: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in