Cognitive ImpairmentOASISNCT06150339
Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment Doing Sit to Stands, Walking in Transitional Care Programs: A Feasibility Study
A study testing OASIS Walking Intervention in people with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this intervention study is to test the effects of a nurse-led mobility intervention (known as the OASIS Walking Intervention (Older Adults performing Sit to Stands and Walking Intervention)) in older adults with cognitive impairment, such as dementia, in transitional care programs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Delirium
- What is being tested?
- OASIS Walking Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2024to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- aged 65 years and older;
- have cognitive impairment (dementia, delirium, cognitive impairment, or unspecified cognitive impairment) as documented in the medical record or Quick Dementia Rating Scale (QDRS) score of ≥2)
- admitted to a transitional care unit after a hospitalization
- can speak English
- has received clearance from the physiotherapist to participate in the study
- has received clearance from the nurse practitioner to participate in the study
Show all 10Show fewer
- were community-dwelling (lived in a home or retirement home; not a nursing home) prior to hospitalization
- were able to walk independently or with the assistance of one person (with or without a gait aid) prior to hospital admission
- is currently able to ambulate either independently or with the assistance of one person (with or without a gait aid)
- has a care partner (family member, friend) who is willing participate in an interview about the patient for the study.
Who cannot join
- 1) Palliative (having <six months prognosis as documented in the medical chart)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Abbeylawn Retirement Home Transitional Care Unit (Operated by Bayshore Health Care)
Pickering, Ontario, L1W 2B2
Cedarbrook Lodge Retirement Home Transitional Care Unit (Operated by Bayshore Health Care)
Scarborough Village, Ontario, M1H 3A1
About this study
Official title: The OASIS Walking Study - Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment Performing Sit to Stands and Walking in Transitional Care Programs: A Feasibility Study
The goal of this intervention study is to test the effects of a nurse-led mobility intervention (known as the OASIS Walking Intervention (Older Adults performing Sit to Stands and Walking Intervention)) in older adults with cognitive impairment, such as dementia, in transitional care programs.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Read more
- Is the study doable and are older adults satisfied with the intervention?
- Does the intervention improve older adults' muscle strength, mobility, functional status and quality of life?
Participants will be asked to do the following:
- Be interviewed once so that a patient-centred communication care plan can be made
- Do sit to stand activity
- Walk as part of a walking program.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of and satisfaction of participants with a novel intervention - the OASIS Walking Intervention (that is, the Older Adults with cognitive impairment performing Sit to Stands and Walking Intervention) in a facility-based TCPs.
The second aim is to determine the efficacy of the OASIS Walking intervention on muscle strength, mobility, functional status, quality of life, and discharge destination.
A feasibility study will be undertaken for this three-component intervention project. In terms of study design, a quasi-experimental one group time series design will be used.
A sample size of 26 patient participants and their substitute decision makers will participate in the study. Participants will be older adults ≥65 years admitted to a facility-based transitional care unit in Ontario.
The Older Adults with cognitive impairment performing the Sit to Stands and Walking Intervention is a nurse-led intervention that consists of three components: 1) Patient-Centered Communication Care Plan (informed by interviews with the participant and their care partner); 2) Sit to Stand Activity; and 3) Walking program. This intervention is grounded using a patient centered approach.
For patients in the Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm, the dose of the intervention is: up to 45 minutes per session, five sessions per week, for six weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking with the participant and up to 15 minutes will be spent performing the sit-to-stand activity.
For patients in the Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm, the dose of the intervention is: up to 45 minutes per session, five sessions per week, for three weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking with the participant and up to 15 minutes will be spent performing the sit-to-stand activity.
- Conditions
- Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Delirium, Functional Decline
- Being tested
- OASIS Walking Intervention
- Keywords
- Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Delirium, Functional Decline, Walking, Walking Program, Activity, Sit to Stand, Chair Stand, Nurse-led, Mobility, Feasibility, Intervention, Quasi-experimental
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction, Dementia, Delirium, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OASIS Walking InterventionOther
Communication Care Plan, Sit to Stand Activity, Walking Program
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Intervention Arm | Experimental | Intervention Dose: Up to 45 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking; up to 15 minutes will be spent performing sit-to-stands.
Intervention Components:
Component 1: Patient-Centered Communication Care Plan. A patient-centered communication care plan will be created, to promote enjoyment and engagement during the sessions. The care plan will be informed by interviews with the participant and their care partner.
Component 2: Sit to Stand Activity. A target number of sit to stands per session will be determined based on a baseline assessment and according to an algorithm; the target will be progressed halfway into the intervention.
Component 3: Walking Program. Based on the findings from the patient-centered assessment interviews as well as the performance of the participants on a walk test at baseline (Time 1), an individualized walking program will be carried out with participants. Receives: Other: OASIS Walking Intervention |
| Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm | Experimental | Intervention Dose: up to 45 minutes per session, five sessions per week, for 3 weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking with the participant and up to 15 minutes will be spent performing the sit-to-stands.
Component 1: Patient-Centered Communication Care Plan. A patient-centered communication care plan will be created, to promote enjoyment and engagement during the sessions. The care plan will be informed by interviews with the participant and their care partner.
Component 2: Sit to Stand Activity. A target number of sit to stands per session will be determined based on a baseline assessment and according to an algorithm; the target will be progressed halfway into the intervention.
Component 3: Walking Program. Based on the findings from the patient-centered assessment interviews as well as the performance of the participants on a walk test at baseline (Time 1), an individualized walking program will be carried out with participants. Receives: Other: OASIS Walking Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment rate
Recruitment rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who enroll in the study out of the total number of eligible participants
Measured: From start of recruitment to end of recruitment (6 months)
Retention rate
Retention rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who complete the study (i.e., receive the full dose of the intervention and provided post-test outcome data) out of the number of participants who were enrolled (i.e., signed a consent form and provided baseline data)
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Adherence (Level of engagement with the treatment [percentage]).
The level of engagement with the treatment (percentage). For this study, the planned number of sessions is five per week for 6 weeks for a total of 30 sessions.
Percentage = the number of sessions attended divided by the total number of sessions (30 sessions)
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Adherence (Average number of treatment sessions attended)
Average number of treatment sessions attended
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Adherence (Average duration of each intervention session)
The average duration of each intervention session (in minutes)
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Adherence (Average duration of each walking session)
The average duration of each walking session (in minutes)
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Adherence (Average number of sit to stands done per session)
Average number of sit to stands done per session.
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Adherence (Level of engagement with sit to stands [percentage])
Percentage = number of sit to stands done per session, divided by the goal number of sit to stands.
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Participant Satisfaction (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
8-Item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) + 3 Open-Ended Questions. The CSQ-8 has a minimum value is 8, the maximum value is 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Participant Satisfaction (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
8-Item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) + 3 Open-Ended Questions. The CSQ-8 has a minimum value is 8, the maximum value is 32. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Lower extremity muscle strength (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
time to perform one sit-to-stand
Measured: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Lower extremity muscle strength (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
time to perform one sit-to-stand
Measured: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 1.5 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Mobility (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
2-minute walk test
Measured: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Mobility (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
2-minute walk test
Measured: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 1.5 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Functional Status (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Barthel Index (BI). The BI has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 20. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Functional Status (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
Barthel Index (BI). The BI has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 20. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 1.5 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Patient's Quality of Life (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
The Quality of Life-AD Measure (QOL-AD). The QOL-AD is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants rate each item on a 4-point scale, with 1 being poor and 4 being excellent. The minimum score is 13 and the maximum score is 52. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Discharge destination (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Discharge destination after TCP
Measured: At the time of discharge from the TCU or within 60 days of admission to TCP, whichever comes first.
Discharge destination (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
Discharge destination after TCP
Measured: At the time of discharge from the TCU or within 60 days of admission to TCP, whichever comes first.
Intervention fidelity (percentage)
Intervention fidelity will also be measured through the interventionist's self-report of 12 intervention items. The percentage will be calculated as the number of items done divided by the 12 items on the intervention fidelity checklist. Minimum value is 0%, maximum value is 100%. A higher percentage means a better outcome (greater intervention fidelity).
Measured: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2023
- Study start1 Mar 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cognitive ImpairmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This is a feasibility study which will use a quasi-experimental one group time series design.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Katherine S McGilton, PhD, Principal investigator, University Health Network, Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06150339
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23-5543
- Acronym
- OASIS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cumal A, Colella TJF, Puts MT, McGilton KS. The OASIS walking study-Older adults with cognitive impairment performing sit to stands and walking in transitional care programs: Protocol for a feasibility study. PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0308268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308268. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39283901
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The OASIS Walking Study - Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment Performing Sit to Stands and Walking in Transitional Care Programs: A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06150339
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OASIS / 23-5543
- Conditions
- Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Delirium, Functional Decline
- Keywords
- Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Delirium, Functional Decline, Walking, Walking Program, Activity, Sit to Stand
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this intervention study is to test the effects of a nurse-led mobility intervention (known as the OASIS Walking Intervention (Older Adults performing Sit to Stands and Walking Intervention)) in older adults with cognitive impairment, such as dementia, in transitional care programs.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Is the study doable and are older adults satisfied with the intervention?
- Does the intervention improve older adults' muscle strength, mobility, functional status and quality of life?
Participants will be asked to do the following:
- Be interviewed once so that a patient-centred communication care plan can be made
- Do sit to stand activity
- Walk as part of a walking program.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of and satisfaction of participants with a novel intervention - the OASIS Walking Intervention (that is, the Older Adults with cognitive impairment performing Sit to Stands and Walking Intervention) in a facility-based TCPs.
The second aim is to determine the efficacy of the OASIS Walking intervention on muscle strength, mobility, functional status, quality of life, and discharge destination.
A feasibility study will be undertaken for this three-component intervention project. In terms of study design, a quasi-experimental one group time series design will be used.
A sample size of 26 patient participants and their substitute decision makers will participate in the study. Participants will be older adults ≥65 years admitted to a facility-based transitional care unit in Ontario.
The Older Adults with cognitive impairment performing the Sit to Stands and Walking Intervention is a nurse-led intervention that consists of three components: 1) Patient-Centered Communication Care Plan (informed by interviews with the participant and their care partner); 2) Sit to Stand Activity; and 3) Walking program. This intervention is grounded using a patient centered approach.
For patients in the Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm, the dose of the intervention is: up to 45 minutes per session, five sessions per week, for six weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking with the participant and up to 15 minutes will be spent performing the sit-to-stand activity.
For patients in the Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm, the dose of the intervention is: up to 45 minutes per session, five sessions per week, for three weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking with the participant and up to 15 minutes will be spent performing the sit-to-stand activity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a feasibility study which will use a quasi-experimental one group time series design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Intervention Arm | Experimental | Other: OASIS Walking InterventionIntervention Dose: Up to 45 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking; up to 15 minutes will be spent performing sit-to-stands. Intervention Components: Component 1: Patient-Centered Communication Care Plan. A patient-centered communication care plan will be created, to promote enjoyment and engagement during the sessions. The care plan will be informed by interviews with the participant and their care partner. Component 2: Sit to Stand Activity. A target number of sit to stands per session will be determined based on a baseline assessment and according to an algorithm; the target will be progressed halfway into the intervention. Component 3: Walking Program. Based on the findings from the patient-centered assessment interviews as well as the performance of the participants on a walk test at baseline (Time 1), an individualized walking program will be carried out with participants. |
| Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm | Experimental | Other: OASIS Walking InterventionIntervention Dose: up to 45 minutes per session, five sessions per week, for 3 weeks. Approximately up to 30 minutes will be spent walking with the participant and up to 15 minutes will be spent performing the sit-to-stands. Component 1: Patient-Centered Communication Care Plan. A patient-centered communication care plan will be created, to promote enjoyment and engagement during the sessions. The care plan will be informed by interviews with the participant and their care partner. Component 2: Sit to Stand Activity. A target number of sit to stands per session will be determined based on a baseline assessment and according to an algorithm; the target will be progressed halfway into the intervention. Component 3: Walking Program. Based on the findings from the patient-centered assessment interviews as well as the performance of the participants on a walk test at baseline (Time 1), an individualized walking program will be carried out with participants. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- aged 65 years and older;
- have cognitive impairment (dementia, delirium, cognitive impairment, or unspecified cognitive impairment) as documented in the medical record or Quick Dementia Rating Scale (QDRS) score of ≥2)
- admitted to a transitional care unit after a hospitalization
- can speak English
- has received clearance from the physiotherapist to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) Palliative (having <six months prognosis as documented in the medical chart)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OASIS Walking InterventionCommunication Care Plan, Sit to Stand Activity, Walking Program | Other | Long-term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Intervention Arm, Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
Recruitment rate
Time frame: From start of recruitment to end of recruitment (6 months)
Recruitment rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who enroll in the study out of the total number of eligible participants
Retention rate
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Retention rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who complete the study (i.e., receive the full dose of the intervention and provided post-test outcome data) out of the number of participants who were enrolled (i.e., signed a consent form and provided baseline data)
Adherence (Level of engagement with the treatment [percentage]).
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
The level of engagement with the treatment (percentage). For this study, the planned number of sessions is five per week for 6 weeks for a total of 30 sessions. Percentage = the number of sessions attended divided by the total number of sessions (30 sessions)
Adherence (Average number of treatment sessions attended)
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Average number of treatment sessions attended
Adherence (Average duration of each intervention session)
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
The average duration of each intervention session (in minutes)
Adherence (Average duration of each walking session)
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
The average duration of each walking session (in minutes)
Adherence (Average number of sit to stands done per session)
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Average number of sit to stands done per session.
Adherence (Level of engagement with sit to stands [percentage])
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Percentage = number of sit to stands done per session, divided by the goal number of sit to stands.
12 secondary outcomes
Participant Satisfaction (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Time frame: Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Participant Satisfaction (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
Time frame: Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Lower extremity muscle strength (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Time frame: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Lower extremity muscle strength (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
Time frame: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 1.5 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Mobility (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Time frame: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Mobility (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
Time frame: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 1.5 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Functional Status (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Time frame: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Functional Status (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
Time frame: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 1.5 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 3-week intervention) (Time 3)
Patient's Quality of Life (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Time frame: Pretest Initial Assessment (Time 1); After 3 weeks of intervention (Time 2); Posttest (Immediately after 6-week intervention) (Time 3)
Discharge destination (for Long-Term Care Stream or Rehab Stream Arm)
Time frame: At the time of discharge from the TCU or within 60 days of admission to TCP, whichever comes first.
Discharge destination (for Reactivation Stream Intervention Arm)
Time frame: At the time of discharge from the TCU or within 60 days of admission to TCP, whichever comes first.
Intervention fidelity (percentage)
Time frame: Calculated at the end of the study (6 months + 6 weeks from the start of recruitment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39283901Cumal A, Colella TJF, Puts MT, McGilton KS. The OASIS walking study-Older adults with cognitive impairment performing sit to stands and walking in transitional care programs: Protocol for a feasibility study. PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0308268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308268. eCollection 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Treating Insomnia in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Insomnia
RecruitingPhase 1
PET Imaging of Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) in Volunteers With Alzheimer Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Alzheimer s Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Neurobehavioral Changes Following Spaceflight Stressors
Stressor, Individual, Alcohol Impairment
Recruiting
Telehealth-Adapted Compensatory Training and Intervention for Cognition
MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Enrolling by invitation
Mild Cognitive Impairment and Neuromodulation
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Katherine S McGilton, PhD principal investigator
University Health Network, Toronto
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing OASIS Walking Intervention in people with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment rate (time frame: From start of recruitment to end of recruitment (6 months)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06150339, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.