AzTrials
AzTrials

Endodontically Treated TeethNCT06151665

Single Rotary File System Versus Conventional Manual K-file in Pulpectomy of Primary Molars.

A study testing single file rotary and Conventional Manual K files in people with Endodontically Treated Teeth, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The sample size will be divided between two groups, Group A pulpectomy will be done using single rotary file in primary molars and group B pulpectomy will be done using manual K file system. follow up of the patients and clinical and radiographical success rates of cases will be seen. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 7 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Endodontically Treated Teeth
What is being tested?
single file rotary and Conventional Manual K files
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Dec 2023to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 7 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Absence of external or internal root resorption
  • presence of two thirds of the root
  • Primary molars with deep caries and irreversible pulpitis that require pulpectomy in a single visit. Molars can be vital with a history of spontaneous pain or non-vital as indicated by absence of bleeding from the pulp.

Who cannot join

  • Children with physical, intellectual disability or medical conditions that may complicate treatment.
  • Teeth with poor prognosis due to the presence of a sinus, excessive mobility or advanced bone resorption.
  • Teeth with radiolucent areas in furcation regions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

sarah m. azer, master's contact

00201224553994

Sarah.azer88@gmail.com

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of dentistry Ain shams University

    Cairo

    sarah azer, masters, 01224553994, sarah.azer88@gmail.com

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Study Between Single Rotary File System and Conventional Manual K-File in Pulpectomy of Primary Molars.

The sample size will be divided between two groups, Group A pulpectomy will be done using single rotary file in primary molars and group B pulpectomy will be done using manual K file system. follow up of the patients and clinical and radiographical success rates of cases will be seen.

Read the detailed description

Each patient will have access in the primary molar and pulpectomy procedure will be done according to inclusion and exclusion criteria , the patients will be divided according to two groups Group A using single File rotary and group B manual K file system. Time will be recorded in each procedure and each patient will receive stainless steel crown. Follow up for the patients will be done clinical and radiographical success will be seen, postoperative pain will be measured and all data will be collected and statistically analyzed.

Being tested
single file rotary, Conventional Manual K files
Keywords
primary-molars, pulpectomy, Rotary
Medical subject headings
Tooth, Nonvital

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • single file rotaryProcedure or surgery

    Kedo-S plus file is the fifth generation of pediatric files will be used in pulpectomy of primary molars

  • Conventional Manual K filesProcedure or surgery

    Stainless-steel K files is the golden standard files used in pulpectomy of primary molars

Study groups in NCT06151665
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single Rotary fileExperimentalsingle rotary file will be used in primary molars to preform pulpectomy then restored with zinc oxide eugenol and stainless steel crown.
Receives: Procedure: single file rotary
Conventional Manual FilesActive comparatorConventional Manual Stainless steel K files will be used in primary molars to preform pulpectomy then restored with zinc oxide eugenol and stainless steel crown.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional Manual K files

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical and Radiographical Success

    Clinical evaluation to swelling, fistula and pain on percussion by clinical examination followed by a radiographic evaluation to absence of periapical and inter-radicular radiolucency, external or internal root resorption according to radiographic images

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. postoperative pain

    Postoperative pain will be recorded at six, 12, 24, 48, and72 hours following the pulpectomy. To ensure standardization, the same parent will be asked to record the pain intensity at all intervals as told by the child. Wong Bakers FACES Pain Rating Scale (WB-FPRS) will be employed to assess post-operative pain. The scale is a pictorial representation of the discomfort level experienced by children which comprise six faces, each depicting an expression of pain. Also visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment will be used.

    Measured: 3 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2023
  2. Study start1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Primary molars with irreversible pulpitis
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06151665
Sponsor's protocol ID
PED23-3D
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
16 Nov 2023
Last updated
30 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

    PubMed 30003514
  • Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):75-79. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_72_18.

    PubMed 30804311
  • Priyadarshini P, Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Subramanian EMG. Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

    PubMed 32185634
  • Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):57-63.

    PubMed 8668572

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing single file rotary and Conventional Manual K files in people with Endodontically Treated Teeth, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact sarah m. azer, master's (00201224553994, Sarah.azer88@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical and Radiographical Success (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06151665, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in