AzTrials
AzTrials

Vertebral Compression FractureNCT06153576

The Value of Systematic Biopsies During Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

An observational study of Vertebral Compression Fracture and Myeloma, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background : Vertebral fracture is the most common complication of osteoporosis. Vertebroplasty is a widespread treatment modality for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, providing consolidation, rapid pain relief and preventing secondary vertebral collapse. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 17 to 96 years
How many people
1,120 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2016to 1 Mar 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 17 to 96 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients who underwent a vertebroplasty with bone biopsy during the study period in the osteoarticular interventional radiology department of the Pasteur 2 hospital of the CHU of Nice

Who may be able to join

  • all patients who underwent a vertebroplasty with bone biopsy

Who cannot join

  • non-vertebral bone biopsies
  • not performed during vertebroplasty

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU NICE

    Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06000

Other trials in France

About this study

Background : Vertebral fracture is the most common complication of osteoporosis. Vertebroplasty is a widespread treatment modality for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, providing consolidation, rapid pain relief and preventing secondary vertebral collapse. Performing a biopsy at the same time as the operation does not lengthen the procedure or increase the risk of complications. The question therefore arises as to whether it is cost-effective diagnostically: are non-osteoporotic vertebral lesions detected when biopsies are taken? Methods: The investigators carried out a single-centre retrospective study at Nice University Hospital.

From January 2016 to March 2022, 1729 biopsies were performed during 1439 vertebroplasty procedures on 1120 patients.

Read more

The pre-operative laboratory work-up included a blood count, a C-reactive protein assay and a coagulation test.

The imaging work-up systematically included MRI, unless contraindicated, in which case CT alone was performed.

Vertebroplasty was performed in an interventional CT suite under dual CT and fluoroscopic guidance. The systematic biopsy sample was then sent to the anatomopathology department for analysis.

Findings :

The samples detected cancer in 35 patients, including 5 (0.44%) for whom the pre-operative work-up had not raised any suspicion.

All the incidental findings were haemopathies, including 4 myelomas and one lymphoma.

Conclusion :

These results highlight the good performance of MRI in distinguishing osteoporotic vertebral fractures from solid tumour metastases.

However, an exhaustive pre-operative work-up does not seem to be able to formally rule out an underlying malignant lesion.

The investigators therefore recommend that biopsies be taken systematically when performing vertebroplasty.

Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell, Lymphoma, Plasmacytoma

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of incidental discovery of malignant lesions during systematic biopsies for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

    incidental findings of neoplasia during vertebroplasty for presumed osteoporotic fractures

    Measured: 5 years and 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Dec 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2022
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06153576
Sponsor's protocol ID
23Imagerie03
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
23 Nov 2023
Last updated
11 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vertebral Compression Fracture and Myeloma, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of incidental discovery of malignant lesions during systematic biopsies for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures (time frame: 5 years and 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in