AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseCABGNCT06155045

Comparing a New Technique of Combining Carbon-dioxide With Electrocautery With Usual Technique of Stand-alone Electrocautery for Taking Down Left Internal Mammary Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass(CABG)

A study testing Modified Carbo-dissection Technique and Conventional Arm in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Disease With Myocardial Infarction, run by Government Medical College Kottayam at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of a new harvesting technique for an arterial conduit(LIMA - Left Internal Mammary artery) in patients undergoing Coronary artery bypass grafting. The researcher will compare the 1. Time taken to harvest the artery 2. Flow of blood between the two techniques Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Modified Carbo-dissection Technique and Conventional Arm
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Elective CABG
  • Hemodynamically stable CAD patients

Who cannot join

  • Re-operation, previous sternotomy (where LIMA is already dissected)
  • concomitant valve operation, ventricular aneurysm resection
  • other additional major cardiac procedures
  • Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Government Medical College Kottayam

    Kottayam, Kerala, 686008

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Study Between Conventional & Modified Carbo-dissection Techniques for LIMA Harvesting in CABG Patients

The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of a new harvesting technique for an arterial conduit(LIMA - Left Internal Mammary artery) in patients undergoing Coronary artery bypass grafting. The researcher will compare the

  1. Time taken to harvest the artery
  2. Flow of blood between the two techniques
Read the detailed description

Following consultation to our department, after a detailed history and clinical examination,patients with CAD, being planned for CABG, will be subjected to a detailed pre-op Echocardiogram and coronary angiogram. After necessary pre-op assessment, patient will be taken up for the surgery. Invasive monitoring will be done.

Following dissection of LIMA by the above mentioned technique, flow of blood from the harvested LIMA, for one whole minute is noted. The operative time required for the dissection of LIMA will be noted and entered.

The data between the two techniques will be compared statistically.

Being tested
Modified Carbo-dissection Technique, Conventional Arm
Keywords
CABG, LIMA harvesting, CAD
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Autosomal Dominant, 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified Carbo-dissection TechniqueProcedure or surgery

    This technique comes the C02 blower with electrocautery. Thereby, producing vasodilatation due to the gas and dissection aided by the electrocautery.

  • Conventional ArmProcedure or surgery

    This technique uses only the electrocautery as conventional model

Study groups in NCT06155045
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Modified Carbo-dissection techniqueExperimentalThe carbo-dissection technique is performed using an improvised instrument that combines an electrocautery pencil (ValleylabTM Force FX electrocautery Pencil, Covidien, USA) with a CO2 mister blower (PerfX® Heart Lung pack Blower/Mister Kit, B L Lifesciences, Noida, India) and the instruments are fixed together using silk ties.The electrocautery is used in the coagulation mode at a setting of 10 to 15. The C02 flow is set at 2 to 3 litres/minute. Saline flow is adjusted to a level that does not hinder the effective coagulation but still prevents drying and desiccation of the tissues. Following the dissection of LIMA by the techniques mentioned above, blood flow from the harvested LIMA for one whole minute was noted(1 min post division of LIMA). The operative time required for LIMA dissection was also noted and entered. Patient's s demographic data were also collected and entered.
Receives: Procedure: Modified Carbo-dissection Technique
Conventional ArmActive comparatorThe conventional technique is performed using an electrocautery pencil (ValleylabTM Force FX electrocautery Pencil, Covidien, USA). The electrocautery is used in the coagulation mode at a setting of 10 to 15. Following the dissection of LIMA, blood flow from the harvested LIMA for one whole minute was noted(1 min post division of LIMA). The operative time required for LIMA dissection was also noted and entered. Patient's s demographic data were also collected and entered.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional Arm

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative time

    Time taken to perform the harvesting of the LIMA

    Measured: 10-20 min

  2. Blood flow/min

    Post dividing of the LIMA: blood from the LIMA is measured for 1 min

    Measured: 1 min

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The interventional group was compared with the conventional group in terms of two parameters : 1) operative time 2) blood flow/min
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06155045
Sponsor's protocol ID
95/2020
Acronym
CABG
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
24 Nov 2023
Last updated
15 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The two parameters: Operative time and Blood flow/min between two techniques will be shared. Co-morbidities data will also be shared

Publications

  • Gilbert S, Singh D, Sivakumar MK. Modified carbodissection: A new technique for harvesting the internal mammary artery. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 29;2017. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2017.018.

    PubMed 29300076
  • Ozkan M, Koramaz I, Ulus AT, Tavil Y, Filizlioglu H, Baykan EC, Eryilmaz S, Inan B, Katircioglu SF, Ozyurda U. Effect of carbon dioxide insufflation on free internal thoracic artery flows: is it a vasodilator? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Sep;128(3):354-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.006.

    PubMed 15354091
  • Lee ME. Carbodissection of the internal thoracic artery pedicle. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Oct;46(4):470-1. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64671-1.

    PubMed 3140750
  • Nair JTK, Sathanantham DK, Thomas JK. Comparison of conventional and modified carbo-dissection techniques for LIMA harvesting in CABG. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Feb;41(2):162-166. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01780-z. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

    PubMed 39822879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Modified Carbo-dissection Technique and Conventional Arm in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Disease With Myocardial Infarction, run by Government Medical College Kottayam at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operative time (time frame: 10-20 min). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06155045, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in