AzTrials
AzTrials

MalariaPMCEffectNCT06155448

Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention (PMC) Effect Study

A study testing Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention effect in people with Malaria, run by Malaria Consortium at 1 site in Nigeria.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Malaria Consortium Nigeria (MC) will coordinate a trial of PMC in Osun State, Nigeria with strategic support from the National Malaria Elimination Programme of the Government of Nigeria (NMEP) and financial support from the BMGF. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 weeks to 24 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Malaria
What is being tested?
Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention effect
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,000 participants
Where
1 siteNigeria
Study dates
8 Aug 2023to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 weeks to 24 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 10 weeks to 24 months
  • Healthy

Who cannot join

  • severe acute malnutrition, or
  • allergic to sulphur containing medication,
  • HIV positive,
  • taking cotrimoxazole as prophylaxis or treatment, or SP, or other sulphur-containing medication in the previous 4 weeks, and
  • children with a positive malaria RDT

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Nigeria1 site
  • Ministry of Health

    Oshogbo, Osun State

Other trials in Nigeria

About this study

Official title: Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention (PMC) Effect Study: Nigeria Operational Feasibility and Effectiveness

The Malaria Consortium Nigeria (MC) will coordinate a trial of PMC in Osun State, Nigeria with strategic support from the National Malaria Elimination Programme of the Government of Nigeria (NMEP) and financial support from the BMGF. The primary purpose of the study is to provide evidence of the impact of PMC on malaria burden and related clinical outcomes, and its operational feasibility for policy decision and the inclusion of PMC into upcoming programme and funding cycles for its National Malaria Control Strategic Plan. The objectives are:

  1. To evaluate the impact of PMC in children aged 2-18 months on key child health outcomes including malaria burden, hospitalisations, and anaemia.
  2. To describe indicators of operational feasibility of PMC by identification and measurement of key determinants of successful uptake and implementation of PMC.
Read the detailed description

Study Design and Procedures The impact of PMC will be evaluated in a two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial and nested case control study. The primary impact outcomes are a comparison of the incidence of clinical malaria in children 2-18 months of age visiting selected sentinel primary care facilities in intervention arm and comparison (standard care) arm wards in the study site, and the protective effectiveness of SP in the 28 days following a dose in intervention arm wards. A ward, the lowest level of health services administration for the State, will be the cluster unit of randomisation. A single facility meeting study eligibility criteria will be selected in each ward as the sentinel facility in which study outcomes will be evaluated (bi-monthly extraction of data on confirmed malaria cases by the study team). Strengthened age recording (full age in months) of visiting children will be implemented in each sentinel facility. An identical programme of data collection will take place in secondary and tertiary hospitals which serve the study site and will include data on admissions of children with an address in a study ward.

Cross sectional household 'malariometric' surveys will be conducted in catchment area communities of ;in both arms at baseline, at 18 months following start of PMC implementation, and at 24 months once implementation ends. Data on coverage of PMC doses (main indicator of feasibility) will be collected from child health record cards or caregiver report for children in the age groups eligible to receive the doses in question. Additional data on malaria infection (RDT test) and anaemia prevalence will be collected during the cross sectional surveys.

Collection of malaria data from sentinel facilities for children aged 19 months and older who were eligible to receive PMC during the implementation period (but too old at the end of implementation) will continue for an additional 12 months following the end of implementation period. The potential rebound effects of the intervention will be assessed in this period by a comparison of incidence rates in control and intervention arm wards.

Sample size (impact): The expected reduction in incidence of malaria in children aged 2-18 months after 18 months of implementation is conservatively estimated to be between 18%-32% contingent on the level of coverage of PMC doses in the intervention arm; enrolling 40 wards in each arm (for a total of 80) will provide 90% power to detect an impact of 20% in this age group after 18 months of implementation, and 95% after 24 months of implementation. We will also recruit children aged 2-18m with clinical malaria from 8 of the 40 intervention arm sentinel facilities and match these to 2-4 controls to have 95% power to detect a protective effectiveness of 50% reduction in malaria in the 28 days following a dose of SP.

Sample size (feasibility): To estimate coverage for any dose of 50% with a margin of error of 8%, assuming a design effect of 2.44 based on an implied intra cluster correlation coefficient of 0.18 (Nigeria DHS) to account for the cluster sample strategy, and allowing for 10% non-response, 25 children aged 2-36 months will be required in each cluster (ward), for a total of 25x40=1,000 in each arm of the study and with a total of 2000 across both arms.

Follow-up period: The total follow-up period of implementation will be 24 months, starting April 2023 to March 2025. The primary evaluation of impact and feasibility will occur in the first 18 months of implementation (April 2023 - September 2024).

Description of intervention: Health facility staff will be trained to offer scheduled doses of SP linked to the EPI delivery platform in children aged 10 weeks to 15 months (six doses), plus additional 'pragmatic' monthly doses offered outside of the EPI schedule to children up to 18 months of age (up to eleven additional doses). Additional social mobilisation and social behaviour change (SBC) activities will be conducted throughout the implementation period to increase demand and uptake of vaccination and PMC services in the study population.

Pharmacovigilance: Spontaneous (passive) adverse event (AE) reporting will be implemented in all study facilities (both sentinel and non-sentinel facilities in study wards),and will include training of health facility staff to recognise and manage known potential side effects of SP, and the development of picture based AE cards and posters for families and facility staff. Children with severe AEs will be referred to secondary/tertiary facilities as appropriate. A programme of active AE monitoring in a cohort of children will be additionally implemented in 2 facilities in each intervention arm in order to collect more detailed data on timings and symptoms following PMC or EPI doses, and to compare AE reporting rates between arms.

Additional activities: Cross-sectional health facility surveys and stakeholder interviews will take place during the follow-up period to collect data on implementation outcomes, alongside qualitative data collection in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews.

Conditions
Malaria
Being tested
Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention effect
Keywords
PMC, Chemoprevention, Malaria, Integrated delivery
Medical subject headings
Malaria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention effectOther

    Also called PMC effect

    Assessing the effectiveness and feasibility of Perennial malaria chemoprevention delivery through EPI platform.

Study groups in NCT06155448
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PMC interventionExperimentalThe PMC intervention is designed to deliver a core regimen of six paediatric doses of sulphadoxine pyrimethamine linked to the EPI delivery platform in children 10 weeks to 15 months of age through trained health facility staff, plus additional 'pragmatic' monthly doses offered outside of the EPI schedule to children up to 18 months of age. Additional social mobilisation and social behaviour change (SBC) activities will be conducted throughout the implementation period to increase demand and uptake of vaccination and PMC services in the study population. at EPI scheduled touchpoints, plus additional monthly doses at non-scheduled monthly intervals up to age 18 months. The primary source of delivery will be government-run primary care health facilities in intervention arm wards. Coordination of implementation of the study within intervention and control arm wards will take place at the LGA level (unit of implementation).
Receives: Other: Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention effect
ControlNo interventionThe control sites will have normal immunization as business as usual. However, the same sentinel site surveillance happening in the intervention arm will also be carried out in this arm. Pharmacovigilance will be passive in the control arm.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. . Incidence rate of clinical malaria

    Incidence rate of parasitologically-confirmed clinical malaria cases in children 2-18 months presenting to selected sentinel facilities over 18 months* of implementation.

    Measured: 18 months

  2. Protective effectiveness of SP

    Protective effectiveness of SP treatments as measured by the percentage reduction in the incidence of malaria associated with receipt of SP in the last 28 days over 18 months* of implementation

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Prevalence of malaria infection

    Prevalence of reported malaria in eligible children aged 2-18 months visited in an endline cross-sectional survey after 18m of implementation.

    Measured: 18 months

  2. Prevalence of anaemia

    Prevalence of anaemia (haemoglobin <80g/L) in eligible children aged 2-18 months visited in an endline cross-sectional survey after 18m of implementation.

    Measured: 18 months

  3. Incidence rate of all-cause hospitalisations

    Incidence of all-cause hospitalisations in eligible children aged 2-18 months with an address in a study ward, collected from hospital registration records over 18 months* of implementation.

    Measured: 18 months

  4. Incidence rate of clinical malaria (rebound period)

    Incidence rate of parasitologically-confirmed clinical malaria cases in children aged 19-36 months presenting to selected sentinel facilities in the 12 months following the end of the implementation period

    Measured: 12 months following implementation

  5. Coverage of scheduled SP doses

    For each of six scheduled doses of SP, the percentage of children who received the dose in question on time or within 4 weeks following the scheduled date will be estimated for children meeting age-eligibility criteria for each dose, in a cross sectional survey after 18 months* of implementation

    Measured: 18 months

  6. Coverage of vaccine or vitamin A doses

    For each EPI timepoint, the percentage of children who received the vaccine/supplement in question in will be estimated for children meeting age-eligibility criteria for each dose, in a cross sectional survey after 18 months* of implementation

    Measured: 18 months of implementation

  7. Acceptability of PMC

    Mean PMC acceptability score using an appropriate validated instrument (Acceptability of Intervention Measure - AIM), given by caregivers of eligible children in the intervention arm, measured during the endline cross-sectional survey after 18m of implementation. (intervention arms only) Mean PMC acceptability score using an appropriate validated instrument (Acceptability of Intervention Measure - AIM[Weiner et al 2017]" The instrument is validated in short form to gauge respondent acceptance of a programme by answering 4 direct questions. Minimum and maximum values for this measure are 4 and 20.

    Measured: 18 month

  8. Integration of PMC into EPI delivery platform

    Percentage of children visited in an endline cross-sectional survey who were eligible to receive SP and vaccines or vitamin A at a scheduled visit who received both an SP dose and the appropriate vaccine or Vitamin A on the same day. (intervention arms only)

    Measured: 18 months

  9. Appropriateness of PMC

    Mean appropriateness of PMC score using a suitable validated instrument (Intervention Appropriateness Measure - IAM27), given by policymakers at local (facility), state and national level interviewed at the end of follow-up. Mean appropriateness of PMC score using a suitable validated instrument (Intervention Appropriateness Measure - IAM[Weiner et al 2017]").

    The instrument is validated in short form to gauge degree of appropriateness (perspective of respondent) of a programme by answering 4 direct questions. Minimum and maximum values for this measure are 4 and 20.

    No cut-off scores for these instruments have been validated so it is recommended that full or mean scores are compared.

    Measured: 18 months

  10. Fidelity of PMC delivery

    Mean health worker performance score based on a checklist-based survey of in-person observations of facility staff delivering PMC. (intervention arm only) Mean health worker performance score based on a checklist-based survey of in-person observations of facility[/and CHW] staff delivering PMC" using WHO health facility Survey manual.

    Min=0 max=100

    Measured: 18months

  11. . Adoption of PMC by facilities

    Percentage of eligible intervention arm facilities surveyed that provided PMC services to children in the last 28 days. (intervention arms only)

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2023
  2. Study start8 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion7 Aug 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The intervention arm will comprise PMC-plus: A 6-scheduled dose regimen administered to eligible children at 10 weeks, 14 weeks, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months and 15 months of age concurrently with EPI vaccinations DTP2/Penta2, DTP3/Penta3, vitamin A, and measles immunisation where appropriate. Eligible children attending the participating health facilities for other reasons beyond EPI would be invited to receive additional monthly doses between scheduled EPI-linked visits up until the child reaches 18 months of age
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06155448
Sponsor's protocol ID
PMCEFFECTNG
Other IDs
INV-004302
Acronym
PMCEffect
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
14 Nov 2023
Last updated
4 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention effect in people with Malaria, run by Malaria Consortium at 1 site in Nigeria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Nigeria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

. Incidence rate of clinical malaria (time frame: 18 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in