COVID-19PROBOOSTVAXEDNCT06156215
PROmotion of COVID-19 BOOSTer VA(X)Ccination in the Emergency Department - PROBOOSTVAXED
A study testing Vaccine Messaging and Vaccine Acceptance Question in people with COVID-19, run by University of California, San Francisco at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this cluster randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of messaging interventions to increase booster vaccine uptake in adults in the emergency department(ED). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19
- What is being tested?
- Vaccine Messaging and Vaccine Acceptance Question
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 919 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Jan 2024to 18 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Presenting to ED
- No receipt of COVID-19 booster within prior 6 months
- Able to provide informed consent
- Fluent in English or Spanish
- Anticipated ability to complete study intervention in ED i.e., able to watch a 3-minute videoclip
Who cannot join
- Major trauma such that it will preclude survey
- Inability to participate in a survey because of intoxication, altered mental status, or critical illness
- Incarceration
- Psychiatric hold
- Patients who state that they have already received a bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine or other COVID-19 vaccine within the prior 6 months
- Patients who are in the ED for suspected acute COVID-19
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27708
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Jefferson Torresdale Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Jefferson Methodist Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19148
San Francisco General Hospital Emergency Department
San Francisco, California, 94110
University of California San Francisco Parnassus
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
The goal of this cluster randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of messaging interventions to increase booster vaccine uptake in adults in the emergency department(ED). The main question[s] and goals of this study are:
- does the intervention of vaccine messaging increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit?
- does the intervention of asking about vaccine acceptance increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit?
- considering recent national changes to funding and availability of updated vaccines, the investigators will examine the effects of these changes on vaccine acceptance and uptake in ED populations. Specifically, they will stratify EDs and ED patients according to the ED availability of vaccines, and they will also examine whether costs and availability of vaccines are a deterrent to patient acceptance and uptake of vaccines
Read the detailed description
- Overview On January 22, 2020, Acting Health and Human Services Secretary Norris Cochran declared COVID-19 a national public health emergency, an action that eventually enabled emergency authorization for free COVID-19 vaccines, testing and treatments. This public health declaration has been renewed seven times for 90-day intervals, as required under section 319 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. Under this declaration over the past two years, the US government has provided full support and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics (antibody therapies, remdesivir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir), such that they have been widely available and free of charge to all Americans. Although these measures have not, by any means, ended the pandemic, it is clear from multiple epidemiologic modeling studies that they have decreased hospitalizations and saved hundreds of thousands of lives. They have also led to a narrowing of the profound morbidity and mortality disparities gap that was seen in minority populations in the first two waves of the pandemic.
The PROCOVAXED trial was a multicenter study that sought to decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake through the use of vaccine messaging platforms in the emergency department (ED). In this trial, investigators found that implementation of our COVID-19 messaging platforms (videos, information sheets and scripted, direct messaging) were associated with greater COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake among unvaccinated ED patients (Rodriguez RM, Nichol G, Eucker SA, et al. Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging Platforms in Emergency Departments on Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(2):115-123. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5909).
In January 2022, the investigators extended PROCOVAXED by shifting the focus to vaccinated ED patients to examine the timely and critically important topic of booster vaccine hesitancy in underserved ED populations. To better characterize COVID-19 booster hesitancy, the investigators performed a cross-sectional study at five high-volume, safety-net hospital EDs in four cities (San Francisco, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Durham, NC) using survey tools to gather quantitative data on vaccination status, demographic variables, usual source of care, and attitudes toward booster vaccination. Of 771 participants who had completed their full initial series, 316 (41%) had not received any booster vaccine. Among these 316 non-boosted participants, 179 (57%, 95% CI 51-62) stated they would decline or were unsure whether they would accept a booster vaccine if it was offered to them (i.e., booster-hesitant). Investigators found the following associations with booster vaccine hesitancy: age 35-49 years vs age 18-34 years (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99-1.36); Asian vs White race (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.93); Hispanic/Latino vs White ethnicity (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.82-3.09); primary language non-English vs English (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.71); and Republican vs Democrat party affiliation (OR 6.07, 95% CI 4.21-8.75). The three most common reasons for booster vaccine hesitancy were a preference to wait for more information (25%), concerns about side effects and safety (24%), and "I don't need one because I'm fully vaccinated" (20%).
Recognizing the ED as a unique opportunity to address COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy in underserved populations, the investigators will launch the PROmotion of COVID-19 BOOSTer VA(X)ccination in the Emergency Department (PROBOOSTVAXED) trial as an extension of the PROCOVAXED trial, seeking to increase COVID-19 booster vaccine acceptance and uptake among vaccinated ED patients. Because of Omicron variant-associated surges during the COVID-19 pandemic with corresponding research staff illness and ED overcrowding, the investigators found wide week-to-week fluctuations in enrollment in the PROCOVAXED study. To reduce this variability of enrollment, the investigators have changed the unit of randomization from 1-week to 1-day in the PROBOOSTVAXED trial.
As of May 11, 2023, the COVID-19 public health emergency ended. Consequently, not only are the costs for vaccines, testing, and treatments shifted to health insurers and patients via commercial payment mechanisms, but COVID-19 vaccines are no longer available in some EDs. Since our research focuses on the delivery and availability of vaccines to underserved populations whose only health care access occurs in EDs, the team believes that this represents a potential barrier to 30-day vaccine uptake in these populations. The investigators have been informed that only some of the PROBOOSTVAXED study sites will have COVID-19 vaccines available for distribution in the ED, and this availability is subject to change throughout the study period. Nevertheless, the team will proceed with the same research protocol, however, the investigators feel it is important to examine how ED vaccine availability will affect 30-day vaccine uptake in underserved populations. They will therefore be performing additional subgroup analyses that compare 30-day vaccine uptake among sites with available COVID-19 vaccine to those without for the intervention and control arms.They will also evaluate whether patient costs of vaccines are a deterrent to acceptance and uptake.
While the sample size calculation for this research is derived from Aim 1, the investigators emphasize that this is a pragmatic study in which they seek to evaluate the fluid real-world changes in COVID-19 vaccine availability and funding. As stated above, there have been (and likely will continue to be) changes in payment for and availability of vaccines in EDs.
The investigators therefore have developed our protocol and aims below to assess the impact of these changes.
Aim1: To determine whether implementation of COVID-19 booster vaccine trusted messaging platforms is associated with increased booster vaccine uptake in ED patients. At five EDs (Zuckerberg San Francisco General, UCSF Parnassus Medical Center [San Francisco, CA], Thomas Jefferson University Hospital [Philadelphia, PA], Ben Taub Hospital [Houston, TX], Duke University Medical Center [Durham, NC]), investigators will conduct a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms, with 30-day booster vaccine uptake as the primary outcome and booster vaccine uptake in the ED as a secondary outcome. Hypothesis: Implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms in EDs will be associated with increased 30-day booster vaccine uptake in vaccinated ED patients.
Aim 1a: To determine whether implementation of COVID-19 booster vaccine trusted messaging platforms in EDs is associated with increased booster vaccine acceptance in ED patients. For this aim, booster vaccine acceptance in the ED assessed via ED survey will be the primary outcome. Hypothesis: Implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms in EDs will be associated with increased booster vaccine acceptance in ED patients.
Aim 2: To determine whether implementation of a protocol in which ED patients are asked whether they will accept a COVID-19 booster vaccine in the ED is associated with increased booster vaccine uptake in ED patients. Hypothesis: Implementation of an ED protocol in which patients are asked whether they will accept a COVID-19 booster vaccine will be associated with increased 30-day booster vaccine uptake in ED patients.
Aim 3: To compare vaccine uptake (during the index ED visit and 30 days post visit) between sites that have COVID-19 booster vaccine available and those that do not.
Aim 3a: To compare vaccine acceptance and 30-day uptake among patients with health insurance versus those without health insurance (evaluating the effects of patient vaccine cost on acceptance and uptake).
Aim 4: To compare COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this current study with data gathered in our previous COVID-19 vaccine messaging trial.
General Design: This is a three-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT).
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Being tested
- Vaccine Messaging, Vaccine Acceptance Question
- Keywords
- COVID-19, health disparities, booster vaccines, healthcare access, vaccination, public health
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vaccine MessagingBehavioural
- Video clips - short (approximately 3-minute) Public Service Announcement type videos to be viewed by participant using a QR code on their smartphone. If no smartphone is available, the video will be shown to the participant on an iPad.
- Printed materials - one page information sheets handed to subjects by CRCs.
- Face to face messaging - short (< 1 minute), scripted message from the patient's providers in the ED (nurse or provider)
Each site will maintain a library of
- 5 versions of the videos - the version used in any participant will be tailored to that participant's stated race/ethnicity.
- 5 versions of printed flyers - likewise, the version will be tailored to the participant's stated race/ethnicity.
- 1 version of scripted message to be delivered in English or Spanish.
Vaccine Acceptance QuestionBehavioural
The last question in the Vaccine Acceptance Survey in both the Intervention M and Intervention Q arms of the study is "Would you accept the COVID-19 booster vaccine in the emergency department today if your doctor asked you?"
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question) | Experimental | * Vaccine messaging
* Vaccine acceptance question All patients will receive an Intake Survey assessing their demographic and vaccination information.
At the end of the Intake Survey, the Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC) will deliver the booster vaccine information flyer and ask the patient if they will watch a short video on booster vaccines. If they agree, the CRC will give them a QR code to view the video on their smartphone or an iPad. After finishing with the video, the CRC will tell the subject that they will be back for the Vaccine Acceptance survey. The CRC will then leave the room and ask the patient's primary provider to deliver the booster vaccine scripted message. This message is short and should not significantly impact provider workflow.
Vaccine Acceptance Survey (Post-Intervention) in the ED: We will administer the Vaccine Acceptance Survey at 30 minutes to 3 hours after the Intake Survey. Receives: Behavioral: Vaccine Messaging; Behavioral: Vaccine Acceptance Question |
| Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging) | Active comparator | * No vaccine messaging
* Vaccine acceptance question asked in the Vaccine Acceptance Survey
Vaccine Acceptance Survey: We will administer the Vaccine Acceptance Survey at some time (generally 30 minutes but up to 3 hours) after the Intake Survey. The surveys in the control group retain the same key primary and secondary outcome questions as in the intervention group Vaccine Acceptance surveys. Receives: Behavioral: Vaccine Acceptance Question |
| Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question) | No intervention | * No vaccine messaging * No vaccine acceptance question The workflow during this arm is identical to the Intervention Q arm except there will be no Vaccine Acceptance Question survey. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake
Our primary outcome is booster vaccine uptake (at any vaccination location) within 30 days after participants' index ED visit, comparing Intervention M arm with Control
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number or Participants Receiving Booster Vaccination in the ED
Booster vaccine uptake in the ED on the day of the index visit, M arm versus control and Q arm versus control
Measured: day of index visit
Number of Participants Stating They Would Accept Vaccine in the ED
A response of "yes" to the question, "Would you accept the booster vaccine in the emergency department today if your doctor asked you?"), comparing M and Q arms
Measured: on the day of index ED visit
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake, Q Arm
Booster vaccine uptake (at any vaccination location) within 30 days after participants' index ED visit, comparing Intervention Q arm with Control
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2023
- Study start19 Jan 2024
- Primary completion18 Jul 2024
- Study completion18 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVID-19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- PROBOOSTVAXED has 3 arms: Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question) * Vaccine messaging given * Vaccine acceptance question asked Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging) * No vaccine messaging * Vaccine acceptance question asked Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question) * No vaccine messaging * No vaccine acceptance question
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 919 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Pfizer, Duke University, Baylor College of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert Rodriguez, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06156215
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23-39854
- Other IDs
- R01AI166967-01
- Acronym
- PROBOOSTVAXED
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Deidentified data will be made available after review of formal request.
Publications
Molina MF, Eucker SA, Rising KL, Kean ER, Rafique Z, Mesbah H, Glidden DV, Arreguin MI, Alvarez C, Rodriguez RM. COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Messaging in Emergency Departments: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2537655. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37655.
PubMed 41091465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PROmotion of COVID-19 BOOSTer VA(X)Ccination in the Emergency Department - PROBOOSTVAXED
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06156215
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROBOOSTVAXED / 23-39854
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Keywords
- COVID-19, health disparities, booster vaccines, healthcare access, vaccination, public health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 919 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Pfizer, Duke University, Baylor College of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University
- Study start
- 19 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Sep 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this cluster randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of messaging interventions to increase booster vaccine uptake in adults in the emergency department(ED). The main question[s] and goals of this study are:
- does the intervention of vaccine messaging increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit?
- does the intervention of asking about vaccine acceptance increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit?
- considering recent national changes to funding and availability of updated vaccines, the investigators will examine the effects of these changes on vaccine acceptance and uptake in ED populations. Specifically, they will stratify EDs and ED patients according to the ED availability of vaccines, and they will also examine whether costs and availability of vaccines are a deterrent to patient acceptance and uptake of vaccines
Detailed description
- Overview On January 22, 2020, Acting Health and Human Services Secretary Norris Cochran declared COVID-19 a national public health emergency, an action that eventually enabled emergency authorization for free COVID-19 vaccines, testing and treatments. This public health declaration has been renewed seven times for 90-day intervals, as required under section 319 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. Under this declaration over the past two years, the US government has provided full support and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics (antibody therapies, remdesivir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir), such that they have been widely available and free of charge to all Americans. Although these measures have not, by any means, ended the pandemic, it is clear from multiple epidemiologic modeling studies that they have decreased hospitalizations and saved hundreds of thousands of lives. They have also led to a narrowing of the profound morbidity and mortality disparities gap that was seen in minority populations in the first two waves of the pandemic.
The PROCOVAXED trial was a multicenter study that sought to decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake through the use of vaccine messaging platforms in the emergency department (ED). In this trial, investigators found that implementation of our COVID-19 messaging platforms (videos, information sheets and scripted, direct messaging) were associated with greater COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake among unvaccinated ED patients (Rodriguez RM, Nichol G, Eucker SA, et al. Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging Platforms in Emergency Departments on Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(2):115-123. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5909).
In January 2022, the investigators extended PROCOVAXED by shifting the focus to vaccinated ED patients to examine the timely and critically important topic of booster vaccine hesitancy in underserved ED populations. To better characterize COVID-19 booster hesitancy, the investigators performed a cross-sectional study at five high-volume, safety-net hospital EDs in four cities (San Francisco, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Durham, NC) using survey tools to gather quantitative data on vaccination status, demographic variables, usual source of care, and attitudes toward booster vaccination. Of 771 participants who had completed their full initial series, 316 (41%) had not received any booster vaccine. Among these 316 non-boosted participants, 179 (57%, 95% CI 51-62) stated they would decline or were unsure whether they would accept a booster vaccine if it was offered to them (i.e., booster-hesitant). Investigators found the following associations with booster vaccine hesitancy: age 35-49 years vs age 18-34 years (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99-1.36); Asian vs White race (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.93); Hispanic/Latino vs White ethnicity (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.82-3.09); primary language non-English vs English (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.71); and Republican vs Democrat party affiliation (OR 6.07, 95% CI 4.21-8.75). The three most common reasons for booster vaccine hesitancy were a preference to wait for more information (25%), concerns about side effects and safety (24%), and "I don't need one because I'm fully vaccinated" (20%).
Recognizing the ED as a unique opportunity to address COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy in underserved populations, the investigators will launch the PROmotion of COVID-19 BOOSTer VA(X)ccination in the Emergency Department (PROBOOSTVAXED) trial as an extension of the PROCOVAXED trial, seeking to increase COVID-19 booster vaccine acceptance and uptake among vaccinated ED patients. Because of Omicron variant-associated surges during the COVID-19 pandemic with corresponding research staff illness and ED overcrowding, the investigators found wide week-to-week fluctuations in enrollment in the PROCOVAXED study. To reduce this variability of enrollment, the investigators have changed the unit of randomization from 1-week to 1-day in the PROBOOSTVAXED trial.
As of May 11, 2023, the COVID-19 public health emergency ended. Consequently, not only are the costs for vaccines, testing, and treatments shifted to health insurers and patients via commercial payment mechanisms, but COVID-19 vaccines are no longer available in some EDs. Since our research focuses on the delivery and availability of vaccines to underserved populations whose only health care access occurs in EDs, the team believes that this represents a potential barrier to 30-day vaccine uptake in these populations. The investigators have been informed that only some of the PROBOOSTVAXED study sites will have COVID-19 vaccines available for distribution in the ED, and this availability is subject to change throughout the study period. Nevertheless, the team will proceed with the same research protocol, however, the investigators feel it is important to examine how ED vaccine availability will affect 30-day vaccine uptake in underserved populations. They will therefore be performing additional subgroup analyses that compare 30-day vaccine uptake among sites with available COVID-19 vaccine to those without for the intervention and control arms.They will also evaluate whether patient costs of vaccines are a deterrent to acceptance and uptake.
While the sample size calculation for this research is derived from Aim 1, the investigators emphasize that this is a pragmatic study in which they seek to evaluate the fluid real-world changes in COVID-19 vaccine availability and funding. As stated above, there have been (and likely will continue to be) changes in payment for and availability of vaccines in EDs.
The investigators therefore have developed our protocol and aims below to assess the impact of these changes.
Aim1: To determine whether implementation of COVID-19 booster vaccine trusted messaging platforms is associated with increased booster vaccine uptake in ED patients. At five EDs (Zuckerberg San Francisco General, UCSF Parnassus Medical Center [San Francisco, CA], Thomas Jefferson University Hospital [Philadelphia, PA], Ben Taub Hospital [Houston, TX], Duke University Medical Center [Durham, NC]), investigators will conduct a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms, with 30-day booster vaccine uptake as the primary outcome and booster vaccine uptake in the ED as a secondary outcome. Hypothesis: Implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms in EDs will be associated with increased 30-day booster vaccine uptake in vaccinated ED patients.
Aim 1a: To determine whether implementation of COVID-19 booster vaccine trusted messaging platforms in EDs is associated with increased booster vaccine acceptance in ED patients. For this aim, booster vaccine acceptance in the ED assessed via ED survey will be the primary outcome. Hypothesis: Implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms in EDs will be associated with increased booster vaccine acceptance in ED patients.
Aim 2: To determine whether implementation of a protocol in which ED patients are asked whether they will accept a COVID-19 booster vaccine in the ED is associated with increased booster vaccine uptake in ED patients. Hypothesis: Implementation of an ED protocol in which patients are asked whether they will accept a COVID-19 booster vaccine will be associated with increased 30-day booster vaccine uptake in ED patients.
Aim 3: To compare vaccine uptake (during the index ED visit and 30 days post visit) between sites that have COVID-19 booster vaccine available and those that do not.
Aim 3a: To compare vaccine acceptance and 30-day uptake among patients with health insurance versus those without health insurance (evaluating the effects of patient vaccine cost on acceptance and uptake).
Aim 4: To compare COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this current study with data gathered in our previous COVID-19 vaccine messaging trial.
General Design: This is a three-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- PROBOOSTVAXED has 3 arms: Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question) * Vaccine messaging given * Vaccine acceptance question asked Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging) * No vaccine messaging * Vaccine acceptance question asked Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question) * No vaccine messaging * No vaccine acceptance question
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question) | Experimental | Behavioral: Vaccine Messaging, Behavioral: Vaccine Acceptance Question* Vaccine messaging * Vaccine acceptance question All patients will receive an Intake Survey assessing their demographic and vaccination information. At the end of the Intake Survey, the Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC) will deliver the booster vaccine information flyer and ask the patient if they will watch a short video on booster vaccines. If they agree, the CRC will give them a QR code to view the video on their smartphone or an iPad. After finishing with the video, the CRC will tell the subject that they will be back for the Vaccine Acceptance survey. The CRC will then leave the room and ask the patient's primary provider to deliver the booster vaccine scripted message. This message is short and should not significantly impact provider workflow. Vaccine Acceptance Survey (Post-Intervention) in the ED: We will administer the Vaccine Acceptance Survey at 30 minutes to 3 hours after the Intake Survey. |
| Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Vaccine Acceptance Question* No vaccine messaging * Vaccine acceptance question asked in the Vaccine Acceptance Survey Vaccine Acceptance Survey: We will administer the Vaccine Acceptance Survey at some time (generally 30 minutes but up to 3 hours) after the Intake Survey. The surveys in the control group retain the same key primary and secondary outcome questions as in the intervention group Vaccine Acceptance surveys. |
| Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question) | No intervention | –* No vaccine messaging * No vaccine acceptance question The workflow during this arm is identical to the Intervention Q arm except there will be no Vaccine Acceptance Question survey. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Presenting to ED
- No receipt of COVID-19 booster within prior 6 months
- Able to provide informed consent
- Fluent in English or Spanish
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Major trauma such that it will preclude survey
- Inability to participate in a survey because of intoxication, altered mental status, or critical illness
- Incarceration
- Psychiatric hold
- Patients who state that they have already received a bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine or other COVID-19 vaccine within the prior 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vaccine Messaging1. Video clips - short (approximately 3-minute) Public Service Announcement type videos to be viewed by participant using a QR code on their smartphone. If no smartphone is available, the video will be shown to the participant on an iPad. 2. Printed materials - one page information sheets handed to subjects by CRCs. 3. Face to face messaging - short (< 1 minute), scripted message from the patient's providers in the ED (nurse or provider) Each site will maintain a library of A. 5 versions of the videos - the version used in any participant will be tailored to that participant's stated race/ethnicity. B. 5 versions of printed flyers - likewise, the version will be tailored to the participant's stated race/ethnicity. C. 1 version of scripted message to be delivered in English or Spanish. | Behavioural | PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question) |
| Vaccine Acceptance QuestionThe last question in the Vaccine Acceptance Survey in both the Intervention M and Intervention Q arms of the study is "Would you accept the COVID-19 booster vaccine in the emergency department today if your doctor asked you?" | Behavioural | Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging), PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake
Time frame: 30 days
Our primary outcome is booster vaccine uptake (at any vaccination location) within 30 days after participants' index ED visit, comparing Intervention M arm with Control
3 secondary outcomes
Number or Participants Receiving Booster Vaccination in the ED
Time frame: day of index visit
Number of Participants Stating They Would Accept Vaccine in the ED
Time frame: on the day of index ED visit
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake, Q Arm
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41091465Molina MF, Eucker SA, Rising KL, Kean ER, Rafique Z, Mesbah H, Glidden DV, Arreguin MI, Alvarez C, Rodriguez RM. COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Messaging in Emergency Departments: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2537655. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37655.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Deidentified data will be made available after review of formal request.
Related trials for COVID-19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Rodriguez, MD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vaccine Messaging and Vaccine Acceptance Question in people with COVID-19, run by University of California, San Francisco at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Sep 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06156215, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2025.