Laryngeal MaskNCT06168981
The Effect of Preoperative Chewing Gum on Anxiety and Sore Throat in Patients With Laryngeal Mask Airway
A study testing Chewing Gum in people with Laryngeal Mask and Throat Pain, run by Ankara Medipol University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study was planned to investigate the effect of chewing gum in the preoperative period on patients' sore throat and anxiety levels. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Laryngeal Mask, Throat Pain, Anxiety
- What is being tested?
- Chewing Gum
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 92 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2023to 31 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Undergoing elective surgery
- Being intubated with a laryngeal mask
- Being ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II
Who cannot join
- Using cigarette
- Having asthma
- Having chronic laryngitis
- Having gastroesophageal reflux
- Steroid use in the preoperative or intraoperative period
- Mallampati score greater than two
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Ankara Medipol University
Ankara, Keçiören
Neslihan Ilkaz
Ankara, Keçiören
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Preoperative Chewing Gum on Anxiety and Sore Throat in Patients With Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomised Controlled Trial
This study was planned to investigate the effect of chewing gum in the preoperative period on patients' sore throat and anxiety levels.
Read the detailed description
Postoperative sore throat is a common complaint (1,2). It is reported in the literature that there are various pharmacological methods to reduce this condition, such as the use of nebula, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or lidocaine. However, these methods have various advantages and disadvantages (3,4). Chewing gum, one of the non-pharmacological methods may be safer for the patient. Chewing gum increases salivary gland secretion and provides lubrication of the oral cavity (5). For this reason, it was thought that chewing gum before surgery could reduce throat pain after using a laryngeal mask due to the effect it provides. It has been determined that there are few experimental studies on the subject in the literature (6,7).
The presence of preoperative anxiety may lead to an increase in the need for intraoperative anesthesia and analgesic consumption in the postoperative period (8,9). However, it may cause a decrease in patient satisfaction and prolong the recovery process in the postoperative period (8,9). Pharmacological approaches can be applied to address this concern. However, non-pharmacological approaches may be safer for patients. Chewing gum during this process can also reduce patients' anxiety levels. A sufficient number of studies on the subject could not be found (10).
The study will conduct as a prospective randomized controlled trial. After obtaining verbal and written consent from the patients before and after the surgery, the study will conduct with various data collection forms.
These forms are; patient Identification form, Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients will randomize. The chewing gum group in group- I (n=46), and group II (n=46) will be the control group. We have two stage.In first stage; anxiety levels will be measured for both group. In second stage; throat pain will evaluated at 2.-4.-6. hours.
- Conditions
- Laryngeal Mask, Throat Pain, Anxiety
- Being tested
- Chewing Gum
- Keywords
- Laryngeal mask, Pain, Chewing gum, Anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Pharyngitis, Anxiety Disorders, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chewing GumOther
The patient will be asked to chew gum before the surgery during the 2 minutes. Anxiety level will evaluated before and after chewing gum.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chewing Gum | Experimental | Before the surgery, the patient will chew gum for 2 minutes and routine nursing care will be applied. Anxiety level will be evaluated before and after chewing gum. Receives: Other: Chewing Gum |
| Control Group | No intervention | Anxiety level will be evaluated before and after routine nursing care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from preoperative anxiety level in a 2 minutes
In this section, the anxiety level will decrease or disappear. This status will evaluate with Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). APAIS consists of two scales, including a four-item anxiety scale and two-items information requirement. Items are rated on a Likert scale from 1 ("not at all worried") to 5 ("very worried"). The score ranges for the anxiety subscale and the information need subscale are 4-20 and 2-10, respectively. High scores are associated with higher levels of anxiety and need for information. Cronbach's α coefficients for the anxiety subscale and the information need subscale were 0.86 and 0.68, respectively (Moerman et al.1996).
Çetinkaya et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of APAIS was verified in 2019. Cronbach's α coefficients of the APAIS anxiety and information need subscales were 0.897 and 0.786, respectively
Measured: After chewing gum for 2 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change from postoperative throat pain level at 2., 4., 6. hours
In this section, the degree of postoperative throat pain level will decrease or disappear. This status will evaluate with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS is a horizontal line with a length of 10 cm. According to VAS, 0 is the lowest level and 10 is the highest level.
Measured: Time frame: Postoperative time at 2., 4., 6., hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2023
- Study start1 Dec 2023
- Primary completion31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Laryngeal MaskStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 92 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara Medipol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Neslihan Ilkaz, Ankara Medipol University
- Investigators
- Neslihan Ilkaz, PhD, Principal investigator, Ankara Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06168981
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023/197
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 26 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Segaran S, Bacthavasalame AT, Venkatesh RR, Zachariah M, George SK, Kandasamy R. Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine with Nebulized Magnesium Sulfate on the Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):885-890. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_148_18.
PubMed 30662125Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Can J Anaesth. 2006 Feb;53(2):188-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03021826.
PubMed 16434761Yu J, Ren L, Min S, Yang Y, Lv F. Nebulized pharmacological agents for preventing postoperative sore throat: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237174. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32776966Wang G, Qi Y, Wu L, Jiang G. Comparative Efficacy of 6 Topical Pharmacological Agents for Preventive Interventions of Postoperative Sore Throat After Tracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2021 Jul 1;133(1):58-67. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005521.
PubMed 33886521Hashiba T, Takeuchi K, Shimazaki Y, Takeshita T, Yamashita Y. Chewing xylitol gum improves self-rated and objective indicators of oral health status under conditions interrupting regular oral hygiene. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015 Jan;235(1):39-46. doi: 10.1620/tjem.235.39.
PubMed 257443626. Abdelgalil, A. S., Abdelrahman, A. S., & Hassan, M. E. (2023). Preoperative gum chewing for different durations to prevent postoperative sore throat after endotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 101216.
Zemla AJ, Nowicka-Sauer K, Jarmoszewicz K, Wera K, Batkiewicz S, Pietrzykowska M. Measures of preoperative anxiety. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(1):64-69. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2019.0013.
PubMed 31280554Stamenkovic DM, Rancic NK, Latas MB, Neskovic V, Rondovic GM, Wu JD, Cattano D. Preoperative anxiety and implications on postoperative recovery: what can we do to change our history. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Nov;84(11):1307-1317. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12520-X. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
PubMed 29624026Bang YJ, Lee JH, Kim CS, Lee YY, Min JJ. Anxiolytic effects of chewing gum during preoperative fasting and patient-centered outcome in female patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery: randomized controlled study. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07942-6.
PubMed 35264684Erten E, Parlak EA, Ilkaz N. The Effect of Preoperative Chewing Gum on Anxiety and Postoperative Sore Throat in Patients Using a Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2026 Aug;32(4):e70171. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70171.
PubMed 42460602
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Preoperative Chewing Gum on Anxiety and Sore Throat in Patients With Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06168981
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023/197
- Conditions
- Laryngeal Mask, Throat Pain, Anxiety
- Keywords
- Laryngeal mask, Pain, Chewing gum, Anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 92 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara Medipol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was planned to investigate the effect of chewing gum in the preoperative period on patients' sore throat and anxiety levels.
Detailed description
Postoperative sore throat is a common complaint (1,2). It is reported in the literature that there are various pharmacological methods to reduce this condition, such as the use of nebula, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or lidocaine. However, these methods have various advantages and disadvantages (3,4). Chewing gum, one of the non-pharmacological methods may be safer for the patient. Chewing gum increases salivary gland secretion and provides lubrication of the oral cavity (5). For this reason, it was thought that chewing gum before surgery could reduce throat pain after using a laryngeal mask due to the effect it provides. It has been determined that there are few experimental studies on the subject in the literature (6,7).
The presence of preoperative anxiety may lead to an increase in the need for intraoperative anesthesia and analgesic consumption in the postoperative period (8,9). However, it may cause a decrease in patient satisfaction and prolong the recovery process in the postoperative period (8,9). Pharmacological approaches can be applied to address this concern. However, non-pharmacological approaches may be safer for patients. Chewing gum during this process can also reduce patients' anxiety levels. A sufficient number of studies on the subject could not be found (10).
The study will conduct as a prospective randomized controlled trial. After obtaining verbal and written consent from the patients before and after the surgery, the study will conduct with various data collection forms.
These forms are; patient Identification form, Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients will randomize. The chewing gum group in group- I (n=46), and group II (n=46) will be the control group. We have two stage.In first stage; anxiety levels will be measured for both group. In second stage; throat pain will evaluated at 2.-4.-6. hours.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chewing Gum | Experimental | Other: Chewing GumBefore the surgery, the patient will chew gum for 2 minutes and routine nursing care will be applied. Anxiety level will be evaluated before and after chewing gum. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Anxiety level will be evaluated before and after routine nursing care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Undergoing elective surgery
- Being intubated with a laryngeal mask
- Being ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Using cigarette
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chewing GumThe patient will be asked to chew gum before the surgery during the 2 minutes. Anxiety level will evaluated before and after chewing gum. | Other | Chewing Gum |
Primary outcome
Change from preoperative anxiety level in a 2 minutes
Time frame: After chewing gum for 2 minutes
In this section, the anxiety level will decrease or disappear. This status will evaluate with Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). APAIS consists of two scales, including a four-item anxiety scale and two-items information requirement. Items are rated on a Likert scale from 1 ("not at all worried") to 5 ("very worried"). The score ranges for the anxiety subscale and the information need subscale are 4-20 and 2-10, respectively. High scores are associated with higher levels of anxiety and need for information. Cronbach's α coefficients for the anxiety subscale and the information need subscale were 0.86 and 0.68, respectively (Moerman et al.1996). Çetinkaya et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of APAIS was verified in 2019. Cronbach's α coefficients of the APAIS anxiety and information need subscales were 0.897 and 0.786, respectively
1 secondary outcome
Change from postoperative throat pain level at 2., 4., 6. hours
Time frame: Time frame: Postoperative time at 2., 4., 6., hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Dec 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30662125Segaran S, Bacthavasalame AT, Venkatesh RR, Zachariah M, George SK, Kandasamy R. Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine with Nebulized Magnesium Sulfate on the Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):885-890. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_148_18.
- Background: PubMed 16434761Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Can J Anaesth. 2006 Feb;53(2):188-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03021826.
- Background: PubMed 32776966Yu J, Ren L, Min S, Yang Y, Lv F. Nebulized pharmacological agents for preventing postoperative sore throat: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237174. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 33886521Wang G, Qi Y, Wu L, Jiang G. Comparative Efficacy of 6 Topical Pharmacological Agents for Preventive Interventions of Postoperative Sore Throat After Tracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2021 Jul 1;133(1):58-67. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005521.
- Background: PubMed 25744362Hashiba T, Takeuchi K, Shimazaki Y, Takeshita T, Yamashita Y. Chewing xylitol gum improves self-rated and objective indicators of oral health status under conditions interrupting regular oral hygiene. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015 Jan;235(1):39-46. doi: 10.1620/tjem.235.39.
- Background6. Abdelgalil, A. S., Abdelrahman, A. S., & Hassan, M. E. (2023). Preoperative gum chewing for different durations to prevent postoperative sore throat after endotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 101216.
- Background: PubMed 31280554Zemla AJ, Nowicka-Sauer K, Jarmoszewicz K, Wera K, Batkiewicz S, Pietrzykowska M. Measures of preoperative anxiety. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(1):64-69. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2019.0013.
- Background: PubMed 29624026Stamenkovic DM, Rancic NK, Latas MB, Neskovic V, Rondovic GM, Wu JD, Cattano D. Preoperative anxiety and implications on postoperative recovery: what can we do to change our history. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Nov;84(11):1307-1317. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12520-X. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
- Background: PubMed 35264684Bang YJ, Lee JH, Kim CS, Lee YY, Min JJ. Anxiolytic effects of chewing gum during preoperative fasting and patient-centered outcome in female patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery: randomized controlled study. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07942-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42460602Erten E, Parlak EA, Ilkaz N. The Effect of Preoperative Chewing Gum on Anxiety and Postoperative Sore Throat in Patients Using a Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2026 Aug;32(4):e70171. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70171.
Related trials for Laryngeal Mask
Not yet recruiting
Tizanidine Premedication Versus Placebo for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Recovery in Adults Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery
Airway Management
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
Airway Management, Anesthesia, General
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway vs Endotracheal Tube on Hypothermia in Laparoscopic Hernia Surgery
Perioperative Hypothermia, Hernia, Inguinal
RecruitingPhase 4
Propofol-Ketamine Versus Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization
Propofol, Ketamine
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Use on Video Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
Airway Management, Supraglottic Airway Device Insertion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Neslihan Ilkaz, PhD principal investigator
Ankara Medipol University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Chewing Gum in people with Laryngeal Mask and Throat Pain, run by Ankara Medipol University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from preoperative anxiety level in a 2 minutes (time frame: After chewing gum for 2 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06168981, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Dec 2023.