Type 1 DiabetesGlu-COACHNCT06171412
Glu-COACH: a Peer-mentoring Intervention to Reduce Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Use
A study testing Glu-COACH in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a study to develop and evaluate a peer mentoring intervention for Black and Latinx adolescents with type 1 diabetes to increase the initiation and maintenance of a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Glu-COACH
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 May 2024to Feb 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, as determined clinically by the presence of ketosis or ketoacidosis at presentation and/or the presence of at least one diabetes-related auto-antibody
- Self-identification as Black and/or Latinx.
- Ability of participant to comprehend and communicate in written and spoken English, in order to complete surveys and participate in mentioning sessions and other interview (parents/caregivers do not need to have English fluency)
- Access to personal cellphone or tablet to participate in remote video sessions with the peer mentor
- using CGM <50% of the time over the last 3 months
Who cannot join
- Participants with a prior severe skin reaction to CGM sensor or adhesive.
- Current use of CGM
- Current or planned pregnancy
- Inability to comprehend or communicate in spoken/written English
- Subjects with other medical or mental health conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigators, interfere with the conduct of the study or present additional risk to the individual.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Yale Children's Diabetes Clinic
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
About this study
This is a study to develop and evaluate a peer mentoring intervention for Black and Latinx adolescents with type 1 diabetes to increase the initiation and maintenance of a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. This device is a standard of care to improve diabetes management related to diet, exercise, and insulin. Use of CGM has been shown to improve health outcomes, but is not used by adolescents of color. Peer mentors may help improve usage.
Read the detailed description
In Phase 1, investigators developed the intervention with a stakeholder advisory group. In Phase 2, investigators will conduct a small clinical trial to evaluate the intervention. Phase 1 is complete with the focus of this registration being Phase 2, the clinical trial.
All study procedures will be conducted remotely by ZOOM, including consent/assent, device and training, and peer mentor sessions.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Glu-COACH
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitor
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Glu-COACHBehavioural
peer-mentoring support from a peer of the same cultural identity and access to a private social media group for all Black and Latinx teens
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Glu-COACH | Experimental | The experimental group will receive ESOC plus peer-mentoring support from a peer of the same cultural identity (Glu-COACH) and access to a private social media group for all Black and Latinx teens to improve the initiation and maintenance of CGM (Dexcom) Receives: Behavioral: Glu-COACH |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean hours per week CGM worn
Mean hours per week of documented CGM wear. This will be documented through the CGM program. The primary analysis will be CGM use time at 6 months between the two groups.
Measured: 3 months and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (14)
CGM Mean glucose
The mean glucose in mg/dL
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
CGM Percentage time in range (70-180mg/dL)
Percentage of time participants glucose values are in the target range of 70-180 mg/dL
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean A1C concentration
Mean A1C concentration
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Number of Adverse diabetes-related events (diabetic ketoacidosis)
Number of Yes/no responses via self report of diabetic ketoacidosis
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Number of Adverse diabetes-related events (severe hypoglycemia)
Number of Yes/no responses via self report of severe hypoglycemia
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score in Diabetes Distress using Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen (PAID-T) survey
PAID-T is a 26 item survey that measures of diabetes-specific distress for teenagers with type 1 diabetes. Items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale: 1-2, not a problem; 3-4, a moderate problem; or 5-6, a serious problem. Item scores are summed to form a total score (range 26-156), with higher scores indicating greater distress.
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Diabetes self-efficacy using Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy scale (DMSES)
Measures the diabetic patients confidence regarding diet, exercise and medical treatment. It is a 20 item survey. Responses are rated on a 5 point scale ranging from 1- ''can't do at all'' to 5- ''certain can do''. Item scores are summed to form a total score range 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy in performing diabetes self management activities.
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Depressive symptoms using Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)
The PHQ-2 is a 2 item questionnaire used to assess the frequency of depressed mood. Item scores are summed with a total score ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating higher frequency of depressed moods.
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Anxiety symptoms using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
General Anxiety Disorder- 7 (GAD-7) is a 7 item self report instrument that measures anxiety. Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)" to "nearly everyday (3)". Item scores are summed with a total score ranging from 0 to 21: 0-4 Minimal anxiety; 5-9 Mild anxiety; 10-14 Moderate anxiety; 15-21 Severe anxiety.
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Family conflict using Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS)
DFCS is a 19-item measure of diabetes management and the implications it has on the caregiver-child relationship. Items are scored on a 3-point Likert scale (1 = never argue, 2 = sometimes argue, and 3 = always argue). Item scores are summed with a total scale range of 19 to 57 with higher scores indicating a higher level of conflict.
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Benefits and burdens of CGM use
This survey consists of two sub-scales (one is benefits, one is burdens) with 8 items each. Each item scored Likert scale - Scored 1-5 Strongly Disagree to Agree. Items summed and divided by # of items. Mean score across participants. Each subscale range 1-5, with 5 indicating greater perceived benefits or burdens.
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean Score Technology Attitudes
5 items scored on a Likert scale, scored 1-5 (strongly disagree to agree). Items summed and divided by # of items. Mean score across participants. Score range 1-5, with 5 indicating more positive attitude about technology.
Measured: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Glu-Coach satisfaction scale
5 items scored on a Likert scale, scored 1-5 (not at all to extremely). Items summed and divided by # of items. Mean score across participants. Score range 1-5, with 5 indicating greater satisfaction.
Measured: 3 months and 6 months
Mean count Barriers to Device Use
19 items with yes/no response. Mean number of barriers across participants. Higher value indicates more barriers.
Measured: 3 months and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Dec 2023
- Study start21 May 2024
- Primary completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robin Whittemore, PhD, APRN, FAAN, Principal investigator, Yale School of NursingStuart A Weinzimer, MD, Principal investigator, Yale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06171412
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000033606
- Other IDs
- 1R01DK134977-01
- Acronym
- Glu-COACH
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data associated with the study, upon request for qualified academic investigators for non-commercial use. Meta-analysis data along with data content, format, and organization, will be available on request. Submitted data will comply with relevant data and terminology standards. De-identified data will be made available upon request by the study principal investigators, and that these data will be shared with investigators working under an institution with a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA). Names and Institutions of persons either given or denied access to the data, and the bases for such decisions, will be summarized in the annual progress report. Data and secondary analysis of data will be maintained in a secure data-base on the Yale system.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Glu-COACH: a Peer-mentoring Intervention to Reduce Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Use
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06171412
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Glu-COACH / 2000033606
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitor
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
- Study start
- 21 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to develop and evaluate a peer mentoring intervention for Black and Latinx adolescents with type 1 diabetes to increase the initiation and maintenance of a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. This device is a standard of care to improve diabetes management related to diet, exercise, and insulin. Use of CGM has been shown to improve health outcomes, but is not used by adolescents of color. Peer mentors may help improve usage.
Detailed description
In Phase 1, investigators developed the intervention with a stakeholder advisory group. In Phase 2, investigators will conduct a small clinical trial to evaluate the intervention. Phase 1 is complete with the focus of this registration being Phase 2, the clinical trial.
All study procedures will be conducted remotely by ZOOM, including consent/assent, device and training, and peer mentor sessions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Glu-COACH | Experimental | Behavioral: Glu-COACHThe experimental group will receive ESOC plus peer-mentoring support from a peer of the same cultural identity (Glu-COACH) and access to a private social media group for all Black and Latinx teens to improve the initiation and maintenance of CGM (Dexcom) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, as determined clinically by the presence of ketosis or ketoacidosis at presentation and/or the presence of at least one diabetes-related auto-antibody
- Self-identification as Black and/or Latinx.
- Ability of participant to comprehend and communicate in written and spoken English, in order to complete surveys and participate in mentioning sessions and other interview (parents/caregivers do not need to have English fluency)
- Access to personal cellphone or tablet to participate in remote video sessions with the peer mentor
- using CGM <50% of the time over the last 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants with a prior severe skin reaction to CGM sensor or adhesive.
- Current use of CGM
- Current or planned pregnancy
- Inability to comprehend or communicate in spoken/written English
- Subjects with other medical or mental health conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigators, interfere with the conduct of the study or present additional risk to the individual.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Glu-COACHpeer-mentoring support from a peer of the same cultural identity and access to a private social media group for all Black and Latinx teens | Behavioural | Glu-COACH |
Primary outcome
Mean hours per week CGM worn
Time frame: 3 months and 6 months
Mean hours per week of documented CGM wear. This will be documented through the CGM program. The primary analysis will be CGM use time at 6 months between the two groups.
14 secondary outcomes
CGM Mean glucose
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
CGM Percentage time in range (70-180mg/dL)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean A1C concentration
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Number of Adverse diabetes-related events (diabetic ketoacidosis)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Number of Adverse diabetes-related events (severe hypoglycemia)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score in Diabetes Distress using Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen (PAID-T) survey
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Diabetes self-efficacy using Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy scale (DMSES)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Depressive symptoms using Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Anxiety symptoms using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Family conflict using Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Benefits and burdens of CGM use
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean Score Technology Attitudes
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Mean score Glu-Coach satisfaction scale
Time frame: 3 months and 6 months
Mean count Barriers to Device Use
Time frame: 3 months and 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data associated with the study, upon request for qualified academic investigators for non-commercial use. Meta-analysis data along with data content, format, and organization, will be available on request. Submitted data will comply with relevant data and terminology standards. De-identified data will be made available upon request by the study principal investigators, and that these data will be shared with investigators working under an institution with a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA). Names and Institutions of persons either given or denied access to the data, and the bases for such decisions, will be summarized in the annual progress report. Data and secondary analysis of data will be maintained in a secure data-base on the Yale system.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Robin Whittemore, PhD, APRN, FAAN principal investigator
Yale School of Nursing
Stuart A Weinzimer, MD principal investigator
Yale University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Glu-COACH in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stuart A Weinzimer, MD (877.925.3637, stuart.weinzimer@yale.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean hours per week CGM worn (time frame: 3 months and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2025.