Sexual HarassmentE-STOPNCT06171633
Ending Sexual Harassment - Teaching Of Principal Investigators
A study testing E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition) in people with Sexual Harassment, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study targets three aims: Aim 1: focuses on PIs' and mentors' confidence in their ability to intervene on sexual harassment and their attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge (APK) about sexual harassment, civility, microaggressions, and unconscious bias. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sexual Harassment
- What is being tested?
- E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Mar 2024to Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- PIs, Mentors and Trainees of T-32 Programs
Who cannot join
- People who are not PIs, Mentors and Trainees of T-32 Programs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
The study targets three aims: Aim 1: focuses on PIs' and mentors' confidence in their ability to intervene on sexual harassment and their attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge (APK) about sexual harassment, civility, microaggressions, and unconscious bias. Aim 2: focuses on trainees' experiences of sexual harassment and microaggressions and civility, sense of belonging, well-being, productivity, and persistence in a research career. Aim 3: focuses on the culture and climate of the research learning environment.
Read the detailed description
Participants (PIs, mentors, and trainees), starting in year one, will be asked to complete a baseline survey (using the secure survey software Qualtrics) regardless of condition assignment. Then, for several months, PIs, mentors, and mentees will receive virtual educational materials (presented using a Learning Management System) appropriate to the condition to which their program has been randomized.
The initial post-survey for PIs and mentors will be shortly after the final module to evaluate short-term outcomes, encompassing attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge. Subsequently, the second post-survey will be administered one year later. Trainees will participate in three post-surveys: one immediately after, another one year later, and a final one two years later.
- Conditions
- Sexual Harassment
- Being tested
- E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition), E-STOP online educational program (control condition)
- Keywords
- Sexual Harassment Prevention, Educational Online Training, Video Game Elements, Upstanding
- Medical subject headings
- Sexual Harassment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition)Behavioural
Participants access online video modules through an online learning platform. Program includes modules on civility and upstander interventions and education about sexual harassment, microaggressions, and implicit bias.
E-STOP online educational program (control condition)Behavioural
Participants access online video modules through an online learning platform. Program includes authorship ethics only.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group / year 1 | Experimental | Beginning in year 1, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. Receives: Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition) |
| Control Condition Group / year 1 | Experimental | Beginning in year 1, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. Receives: Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (control condition) |
| Intervention Group / year 2 | Experimental | Beginning in year 2, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. Receives: Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition) |
| Control Condition Group / year 2 | Experimental | Beginning in year 2, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. Receives: Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (control condition) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Confidence to Intervene on Sexual Harassment Scale Score
Participants are asked to rate: "How confident are you in your ability to intervene when you hear about or witness sexual harassment?" Score range: 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (extremely confident).
Measured: Survey at baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after the completion of the 9-month intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Persistence in research careers
Participants are asked to rate: "How extensively do you expect to be involved in research during your medical career?" Score range 1 (not involved) to 5 (exclusively)
Measured: baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after completion of the 9-month intervention.
Experiences of sexual harassment as measured by the short Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ-DoDs)
The SEQ consists of 4 domains: gender harassment--sexist hostility (4 questions); gender harassment--sexual hostility (4 questions); unwanted sexual attention (4 questions); and sexual coercion (4 questions); the score for each question ranges from 1 (never) to 5 (many times); scores for questions within each domain are summed and divided by the number of questions, resulting in an average score range from 1 (never) to 5 (many times) for each domain.
Measured: baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after completion of the 9-month intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Dec 2023
- Study start6 Mar 2024
- Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sexual HarassmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Arghavan Salles, MD, PhD, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Arghavan Salles, Principal investigator, arghavan@stanford.edu
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06171633
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 66842
- Other IDs
- 1R01GM147063
- Acronym
- E-STOP
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 29 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and Reacting to Microaggressions in Medicine and Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):868-872. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648.
PubMed 31290954Montanaro E, Fiellin LE, Fakhouri T, Kyriakides TC, Duncan LR. Using Videogame Apps to Assess Gains in Adolescents' Substance Use Knowledge: New Opportunities for Evaluating Intervention Exposure and Content Mastery. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 28;17(10):e245. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4377.
PubMed 26510775Sompayrac L, Danna KJ. An SV40 mutant oncoprotein has a nuclear location. Virology. 1989 Jul;171(1):267-70. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90536-9.
PubMed 2741344Salles A, Mueller CM, Cohen GL. Exploring the Relationship Between Stereotype Perception and Residents' Well-Being. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
PubMed 26616033Fiellin LE, Hieftje KD, Pendergrass TM, Kyriakides TC, Duncan LR, Dziura JD, Sawyer BG, Mayes L, Crusto CA, Forsyth BW, Fiellin DA. Video Game Intervention for Sexual Risk Reduction in Minority Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 18;19(9):e314. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8148.
PubMed 28923788Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal A, O'Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender Differences in Attending Physicians' Feedback to Residents: A Qualitative Analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Oct;9(5):577-585. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00126.1.
PubMed 29075375Tenbrunsel AE, Rees MR, Diekmann KA. Sexual Harassment in Academia: Ethical Climates and Bounded Ethicality. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:245-270. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102945. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
PubMed 30156976
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ending Sexual Harassment - Teaching Of Principal Investigators
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06171633
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-STOP / 66842
- Conditions
- Sexual Harassment
- Keywords
- Sexual Harassment Prevention, Educational Online Training, Video Game Elements, Upstanding
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 2,160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Study start
- 6 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study targets three aims: Aim 1: focuses on PIs' and mentors' confidence in their ability to intervene on sexual harassment and their attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge (APK) about sexual harassment, civility, microaggressions, and unconscious bias. Aim 2: focuses on trainees' experiences of sexual harassment and microaggressions and civility, sense of belonging, well-being, productivity, and persistence in a research career. Aim 3: focuses on the culture and climate of the research learning environment.
Detailed description
Participants (PIs, mentors, and trainees), starting in year one, will be asked to complete a baseline survey (using the secure survey software Qualtrics) regardless of condition assignment. Then, for several months, PIs, mentors, and mentees will receive virtual educational materials (presented using a Learning Management System) appropriate to the condition to which their program has been randomized.
The initial post-survey for PIs and mentors will be shortly after the final module to evaluate short-term outcomes, encompassing attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge. Subsequently, the second post-survey will be administered one year later. Trainees will participate in three post-surveys: one immediately after, another one year later, and a final one two years later.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group / year 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition)Beginning in year 1, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. |
| Control Condition Group / year 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (control condition)Beginning in year 1, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. |
| Intervention Group / year 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition)Beginning in year 2, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. |
| Control Condition Group / year 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (control condition)Beginning in year 2, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- PIs, Mentors and Trainees of T-32 Programs
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- People who are not PIs, Mentors and Trainees of T-32 Programs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition)Participants access online video modules through an online learning platform. Program includes modules on civility and upstander interventions and education about sexual harassment, microaggressions, and implicit bias. | Behavioural | Intervention Group / year 1, Intervention Group / year 2 |
| E-STOP online educational program (control condition)Participants access online video modules through an online learning platform. Program includes authorship ethics only. | Behavioural | Control Condition Group / year 1, Control Condition Group / year 2 |
Primary outcome
Confidence to Intervene on Sexual Harassment Scale Score
Time frame: Survey at baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after the completion of the 9-month intervention
Participants are asked to rate: "How confident are you in your ability to intervene when you hear about or witness sexual harassment?" Score range: 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (extremely confident).
2 secondary outcomes
Persistence in research careers
Time frame: baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after completion of the 9-month intervention.
Experiences of sexual harassment as measured by the short Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ-DoDs)
Time frame: baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after completion of the 9-month intervention.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 31290954Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and Reacting to Microaggressions in Medicine and Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):868-872. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648.
- Background: PubMed 26510775Montanaro E, Fiellin LE, Fakhouri T, Kyriakides TC, Duncan LR. Using Videogame Apps to Assess Gains in Adolescents' Substance Use Knowledge: New Opportunities for Evaluating Intervention Exposure and Content Mastery. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 28;17(10):e245. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4377.
- Background: PubMed 2741344Sompayrac L, Danna KJ. An SV40 mutant oncoprotein has a nuclear location. Virology. 1989 Jul;171(1):267-70. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90536-9.
- Background: PubMed 26616033Salles A, Mueller CM, Cohen GL. Exploring the Relationship Between Stereotype Perception and Residents' Well-Being. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
- Background: PubMed 28923788Fiellin LE, Hieftje KD, Pendergrass TM, Kyriakides TC, Duncan LR, Dziura JD, Sawyer BG, Mayes L, Crusto CA, Forsyth BW, Fiellin DA. Video Game Intervention for Sexual Risk Reduction in Minority Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 18;19(9):e314. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8148.
- Background: PubMed 29075375Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal A, O'Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender Differences in Attending Physicians' Feedback to Residents: A Qualitative Analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Oct;9(5):577-585. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00126.1.
- Background: PubMed 30156976Tenbrunsel AE, Rees MR, Diekmann KA. Sexual Harassment in Academia: Ethical Climates and Bounded Ethicality. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:245-270. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102945. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
- ReferencesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sexual Harassment
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Effectiveness of the LifeSkills Training - Lombardia - Primary Shool Program ( Val3P-LST )
Well Being, Drug Addiction
Active, not recruiting
Methodology of Super-Early Training of Developer Engineers and Leading Analysts With a Diagnosis of ADHD/ASD for Ensuring the Engineering Sovereignty of the State: Time Horizon: 2026-2038-2050
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Multi-level School Intervention for LGBTQ Youth
Depression, Anxiety
Active, not recruiting
Community-Based Intervention to Reduce Problematic Video Game Use in First-Year Secondary School Students: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Video Game Addiction, Gaming Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Psychosocial Correlates of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Psychosomatic Symptoms Among Adolescents Exposed to Bullying and the Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction.
Childhood Trauma, Stress
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Arghavan Salles principal investigator
arghavan@stanford.edu
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition) in people with Sexual Harassment, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Confidence to Intervene on Sexual Harassment Scale Score (time frame: Survey at baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after the completion of the 9-month intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06171633, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2025.