AzTrials
AzTrials

Oral HistoryNCT06176950

History of Neonatology

An observational study of Oral History, run by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study traces the history of neonatology in the United States from the 1960s to the present with particular attention to the ways in which neonatologists developed criteria to make treatment decisions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Oral History
What is being tested?
Oral History Interviews
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Oct 2022to Dec 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: individuals who have worked in NICUs [neonatologists, nurses, social workers] in the 20th and/or early 21st century

Who may be able to join

  • individuals who worked or are working in Neonatal Intensive Care Units as neonatologists, pediatricians, nurses, social workers or other pertinent professionals in the medical or counseling field.

Who cannot join

  • N/A

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Johanna Schoen, PhD contact

7347573376

johanna.schoen@rutgers.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Rutgers University

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901

    Johanna Schoen, PhD, 7347573376, johanna.schoen@rutgers.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study traces the history of neonatology in the United States from the 1960s to the present with particular attention to the ways in which neonatologists developed criteria to make treatment decisions. The investigator will be using oral history interviews as one source for a book that will document developments in the history of neonatology. The investigator will identify potential research subjects through their publications in the field of neonatology and through word of mouth. The investigator will locate them via the contact information provided in their publications or through an internet search.

Read the detailed description

The investigator will interview individuals who have worked in NICUs [neonatologists, nurses, social workers] to understand how technological changes and changing scientific understanding influenced decision making pertaining to the treatment of infants. The interviews will supplement extensive research of the medical literature and other pertinent publications.

Between the 1960s and the present, we have seen the emergence of medical therapies and technologies developed to treat neonates. Over this time period, there has also been a changing and growing understanding of the long-term impact that medical interventions have on the infants treated as well as on their families. Finally, the demographic characteristics of neonates have also changed as public health crises as well as the development of modern reproductive technologies led to new patient populations and new expectations of what NICUs should or should not achieve. The investigator is interested in the ways in which these changes have led to evolving treatment criteria for neonates and ways in which neonatologists decided when to treat and when treatment was considered futile. The investigator will interview medical professionals who are working or have worked at NICUs about the changes they experienced in their place of work over the course of their careers, the impact that medical technologies and changing patient populations had on considerations about treatment options, and the discussions they had with colleagues and the parents of patients.

There is to date no sustained historical analysis of neonatology. There are anthropological studies of the development of fetal surgery [Casper 1998] as well as Assisted Reproductive Technologies [Spar, 2006; Thompson, 2005]. There are analyses of the social history of particular medical interventions [abortion, birth control, etc.] [Schoen, 1995; Schoen 2005] and the treatment of the fetus [Withycombe, 2019]. And scholars have discussed the value of reproduction and the fetus as it pertains to emerging technologies of genetic testing and the history of disability [Davis, 2019; Herzog, 2018; Lowy, 2018; Maienschein, 2003; Maienschein, 2014; Rapp, 2000; Reagan, 2010.] This study will contribute to our understanding of the ways in which medical professionals have made decisions about life, death, and the quality of life of those being treated.

Conditions
Oral History
Being tested
Oral History Interviews

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oral History InterviewsOther

    I will ask interview subjects about their educational and career path, their research interests and clinical work in the field of neonatology. I will also ask them about their personal and professional motivations and thoughts about their work. And we will discuss how their interactions with colleagues and patients/caregivers shaped their work experience and decision making.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Information about the history of neonatology

    Interviews will be transcribed and indexed by key words pertaining to the history of NICUs

    Measured: 2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2023
  2. Study start4 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
15 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06176950
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro2021000877
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
11 Dec 2023
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: If interview subjects agree, I will donate the interviews to the American Academia of Pediatrics which has an archive of oral histories with pediatricians and neonatologists.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Oral History, run by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Johanna Schoen, PhD (7347573376, johanna.schoen@rutgers.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Information about the history of neonatology (time frame: 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in