Anterior EpistaxisPhase 4TranexamicacidNCT06183918
Tranexamic Acid Dosage for Topical Treatment of Anterior Epistaxis
A Phase 4 study testing Tranexamic acid and Saline in people with Anterior Epistaxis and Tranexamic Acid, run by Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Patients with epistaxis usually apply to the emergency department for initial treatment. According to recent research, tranexamic acid is effective in the treatment of epistaxis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 92 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Epistaxis, Tranexamic Acid
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic acid and Saline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 152 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 16 Dec 2021to 15 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 92 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years and older
- Those who applied to the emergency department with the complaint of nosebleeds
- Those who agreed to participate in the study by giving written consent
Who cannot join
- posterior epistaxis
- history of nose or pharynx surgery in the last 3 months,
- facial and head trauma,
- unstable vital signs,
- who applied for the second time with a recurrent bleeding
- history of allergy to TXA,
Show all 13Show fewer
- subarachnoid hemorrhage,
- coagulation disorders such as hemophilia, hereditary telangiectasia, von Willebrand disease, etc.
- thromboembolic disease
- history of convulsions
- intracerebral processes
- pregnant or lactating
- who wished to withdraw from the study at any stage of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ataturk 'Training and Research Hospital
Izmir, Basın Sitesi, 35360
About this study
Official title: Appropriate Dose Of Tranexamic Acid In The Topical Treatment Of Anterior Epistaxis, 500mg Vs 1000mg; A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Patients with epistaxis usually apply to the emergency department for initial treatment. According to recent research, tranexamic acid is effective in the treatment of epistaxis. The research compare the therapeutic superiority of saline with 500 and 1000 mg doses of topical tranexamic acid in the treatment of anterior epistaxis. The design of the phase 4 clinical trial was randomized controlled double-blind. A total of 152 cases in 3 groups were included in the study. Group 1 was treated with 1000 mg of tranexamic acid, group 2 with 500 mg of tranexamic acid, and group 3 with saline. The primary outcome of the study was bleeding control at the 5th and 10th minutes. Secondary outcomes were determined as the need for salvage therapy, recurrent bleeding within 24 hours, the presence of side effects, and the need for otorhinolaryngology consultation.
Read the detailed description
This randomized, double-blinded, phase-4 study was conducted in a single center between July and December 2022.
Among the patients aged 18 years and older who applied to the emergency department with epistaxis that accepted to participate in the study and could give written consent, patients with posterior epistaxis, with a history of nose or pharynx surgery in the last 3 months, with facial and head trauma, with unstable vital signs, patients who applied for the second time with a recurrent bleeding, patients with a history of allergy to TXA, patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, patients with coagulation disorders such as hemophilia, hereditary telangiectasia, von Willebrand disease, etc., patients with thromboembolic disease, history of convulsions or intracerebral processes, and those who were pregnant or lactating, and who wished to withdraw from the study at any stage of the study were excluded from the study. 152 patients who did not meet the exclusion criteria were included in the study.
In this study, 3 different materials used to soak the gauze in nasal packing with gauze application, which is a treatment method for anterior epistaxis, were compared in terms of their superiority. Physicians and nurses participating in the study were given a total of 2 hours of theoretical and practical training on the design of the study and nasal packing application before the study. First, those who met the study criteria and accepted to participate in the study and whose written consent was obtained were assigned to one of the treatment groups according to the next randomization number. Treatment groups were determined as;
- Group: Gauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical
- Group: Gauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical
- Group: Gauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical. The research products, saline and tranexamic acid ampoules containing 250 mg/2.5 ml of injectable solution, both in colorless, odorless, clean, and clear liquid form. The medications and medical supplies (gauze soaked with saline and TXA) to be used in the treatment according to the randomization number were prepared by a physician and a nurse working in the emergency room that were informed about the research priorly. Blindness was ensured by filling all groups to a 10 cc volume with saline. The prepared ANP and medication administration were performed blindly by another emergency physician. Pressure was applied to both sides of the nose wings during the application for 10 minutes. Another researcher, who was not responsible for the preparation and administration of the medication, recorded the data in the Case Report Form (CRF). It was checked whether the bleeding continued at the 5th and 10th minutes after ANP and medication administration. In cases of bleeding lasting longer than ten minutes, one of the standard treatments used in epistaxis treatment (Sponge-shaped nasal tampon or inflatable balloon-shaped nasal tampon) was applied as salvage therapy, and otorhinolaryngology consultation was requested when necessary. In addition, patients were followed up for at least 1 hour in terms of possible side effects. Demographic data (age, gender), vital signs, use of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs, hemoglobin (Hgb), platelet (Plt), and International Normalized Ratio (INR) values of the cases, data of the applied procedure (5th and 10th minute bleeding control, necessity of salvage therapy), treatment-related side effects (administration site reaction, rash, rash, itching, erythema, urticaria, hives, chest pain, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, blackout, headache, dizziness), the need for otorhinolaryngology consultation, and whether recurrency developed within 24 hours was recorded in the CRF. Participants were advised to inform the principal investigator by telephone if recurrent bleeding occurs within 24 hours and to apply to the emergency department again in case of recurrent and/or prolonged bleeding.
The primary outcome of the study was bleeding control at the 5th and 10th minutes. Secondary outcomes were determined as the need for salvage therapy, recurrent bleeding within 24 hours, the presence of side effects, and the need for otorhinolaryngology consultation.
- Conditions
- Anterior Epistaxis, Tranexamic Acid
- Being tested
- Tranexamic acid, Saline
- Keywords
- Anterior epistaxis, Tranexamic acid, Topical treatment, Emergency medicine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic acidDrug
- Group: Gauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical
- Group: Gauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical The prepared anterior nasal packing and medication administration were performed. Pressure was applied to both sides of the nose wings during the application for 10 minutes. It was checked whether the bleeding continued at the 5th and 10th minutes after anterior nasal packing and medication administration.
SalineOther
- Group: Gauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical. The prepared anterior nasal packing and medication administration were performed. Pressure was applied to both sides of the nose wings during the application for 10 minutes. It was checked whether the bleeding continued at the 5th and 10th minutes after anterior nasal packing and medication administration.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Group | Active comparator | Gauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical Receives: Drug: Tranexamic acid |
| 2. Group | Active comparator | Gauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical Receives: Drug: Tranexamic acid |
| 3. Group | Active comparator | Gauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical. Receives: Other: Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of cases whose nosebleeds were completely stopped
Number of cases in which nosebleeds were completely stopped at the 5th and 10th minutes
Measured: 5th and 10th minutes
Secondary outcomes (4)
Need for salvage therapy
Cases whose bleeding cannot be controlled and need additional treatment
Measured: After 10 minutes
The presence of side effects
Treatment-related side effects (administration site reaction, rash, rash, itching, erythema, urticaria, hives, chest pain, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, blackout, headache, dizziness)
Measured: 1 hour
Need for otorhinolaryngology consultation
Number of cases whose bleeding cannot be controlled despite salvage treatment or for which otorhinolaryngology consultation is requested for another reason
Measured: After 1 hour
Recurrent bleeding within 24 hours
Number of cases with recurrent bleeding within 24 hours
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2023
- Study start16 Dec 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022
- Study completion15 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Anterior EpistaxisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This randomized, double-blinded, phase-4 study. 3 different materials used to soak the gauze in nasal packing with gauze application, which is a treatment method for anterior epistaxis, were compared in terms of their superiority. First, those who met the study criteria and accepted to participate in the study and whose written consent was obtained were assigned to one of the treatment groups according to the next randomization number. Treatment groups were determined as; 1. Group: Gauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical 2. Group: Gauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical 3. Group: Gauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cuneyt Arikan, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06183918
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IzmirATRH
- Acronym
- Tranexamicacid
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 28 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data of the research will be shared upon the request of the competent health authorities.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Appropriate Dose Of Tranexamic Acid In The Topical Treatment Of Anterior Epistaxis, 500mg Vs 1000mg; A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06183918
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Tranexamicacid / IzmirATRH
- Conditions
- Anterior Epistaxis, Tranexamic Acid
- Keywords
- Anterior epistaxis, Tranexamic acid, Topical treatment, Emergency medicine
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Ataturk Training and Research HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with epistaxis usually apply to the emergency department for initial treatment. According to recent research, tranexamic acid is effective in the treatment of epistaxis. The research compare the therapeutic superiority of saline with 500 and 1000 mg doses of topical tranexamic acid in the treatment of anterior epistaxis. The design of the phase 4 clinical trial was randomized controlled double-blind. A total of 152 cases in 3 groups were included in the study. Group 1 was treated with 1000 mg of tranexamic acid, group 2 with 500 mg of tranexamic acid, and group 3 with saline. The primary outcome of the study was bleeding control at the 5th and 10th minutes. Secondary outcomes were determined as the need for salvage therapy, recurrent bleeding within 24 hours, the presence of side effects, and the need for otorhinolaryngology consultation.
Detailed description
This randomized, double-blinded, phase-4 study was conducted in a single center between July and December 2022.
Among the patients aged 18 years and older who applied to the emergency department with epistaxis that accepted to participate in the study and could give written consent, patients with posterior epistaxis, with a history of nose or pharynx surgery in the last 3 months, with facial and head trauma, with unstable vital signs, patients who applied for the second time with a recurrent bleeding, patients with a history of allergy to TXA, patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, patients with coagulation disorders such as hemophilia, hereditary telangiectasia, von Willebrand disease, etc., patients with thromboembolic disease, history of convulsions or intracerebral processes, and those who were pregnant or lactating, and who wished to withdraw from the study at any stage of the study were excluded from the study. 152 patients who did not meet the exclusion criteria were included in the study.
In this study, 3 different materials used to soak the gauze in nasal packing with gauze application, which is a treatment method for anterior epistaxis, were compared in terms of their superiority. Physicians and nurses participating in the study were given a total of 2 hours of theoretical and practical training on the design of the study and nasal packing application before the study. First, those who met the study criteria and accepted to participate in the study and whose written consent was obtained were assigned to one of the treatment groups according to the next randomization number. Treatment groups were determined as;
- Group: Gauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical
- Group: Gauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical
- Group: Gauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical. The research products, saline and tranexamic acid ampoules containing 250 mg/2.5 ml of injectable solution, both in colorless, odorless, clean, and clear liquid form. The medications and medical supplies (gauze soaked with saline and TXA) to be used in the treatment according to the randomization number were prepared by a physician and a nurse working in the emergency room that were informed about the research priorly. Blindness was ensured by filling all groups to a 10 cc volume with saline. The prepared ANP and medication administration were performed blindly by another emergency physician. Pressure was applied to both sides of the nose wings during the application for 10 minutes. Another researcher, who was not responsible for the preparation and administration of the medication, recorded the data in the Case Report Form (CRF). It was checked whether the bleeding continued at the 5th and 10th minutes after ANP and medication administration. In cases of bleeding lasting longer than ten minutes, one of the standard treatments used in epistaxis treatment (Sponge-shaped nasal tampon or inflatable balloon-shaped nasal tampon) was applied as salvage therapy, and otorhinolaryngology consultation was requested when necessary. In addition, patients were followed up for at least 1 hour in terms of possible side effects. Demographic data (age, gender), vital signs, use of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs, hemoglobin (Hgb), platelet (Plt), and International Normalized Ratio (INR) values of the cases, data of the applied procedure (5th and 10th minute bleeding control, necessity of salvage therapy), treatment-related side effects (administration site reaction, rash, rash, itching, erythema, urticaria, hives, chest pain, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, blackout, headache, dizziness), the need for otorhinolaryngology consultation, and whether recurrency developed within 24 hours was recorded in the CRF. Participants were advised to inform the principal investigator by telephone if recurrent bleeding occurs within 24 hours and to apply to the emergency department again in case of recurrent and/or prolonged bleeding.
The primary outcome of the study was bleeding control at the 5th and 10th minutes. Secondary outcomes were determined as the need for salvage therapy, recurrent bleeding within 24 hours, the presence of side effects, and the need for otorhinolaryngology consultation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This randomized, double-blinded, phase-4 study. 3 different materials used to soak the gauze in nasal packing with gauze application, which is a treatment method for anterior epistaxis, were compared in terms of their superiority. First, those who met the study criteria and accepted to participate in the study and whose written consent was obtained were assigned to one of the treatment groups according to the next randomization number. Treatment groups were determined as; 1. Group: Gauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical 2. Group: Gauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical 3. Group: Gauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Group | Active comparator | Drug: Tranexamic acidGauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical |
| 2. Group | Active comparator | Drug: Tranexamic acidGauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical |
| 3. Group | Active comparator | Other: SalineGauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 92 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 years and older
- Those who applied to the emergency department with the complaint of nosebleeds
- Those who agreed to participate in the study by giving written consent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- posterior epistaxis
- history of nose or pharynx surgery in the last 3 months,
- facial and head trauma,
- unstable vital signs,
- who applied for the second time with a recurrent bleeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic acid1. Group: Gauze soaked with 1000 mg TXA-topical 2. Group: Gauze soaked with 500 mg TXA + 5 cc saline -topical The prepared anterior nasal packing and medication administration were performed. Pressure was applied to both sides of the nose wings during the application for 10 minutes. It was checked whether the bleeding continued at the 5th and 10th minutes after anterior nasal packing and medication administration. | Drug | 1. Group, 2. Group |
| Saline3. Group: Gauze soaked with 10 cc of saline-topical. The prepared anterior nasal packing and medication administration were performed. Pressure was applied to both sides of the nose wings during the application for 10 minutes. It was checked whether the bleeding continued at the 5th and 10th minutes after anterior nasal packing and medication administration. | Other | 3. Group |
Primary outcome
Number of cases whose nosebleeds were completely stopped
Time frame: 5th and 10th minutes
Number of cases in which nosebleeds were completely stopped at the 5th and 10th minutes
4 secondary outcomes
Need for salvage therapy
Time frame: After 10 minutes
The presence of side effects
Time frame: 1 hour
Need for otorhinolaryngology consultation
Time frame: After 1 hour
Recurrent bleeding within 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Dec 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data of the research will be shared upon the request of the competent health authorities.
Related trials for Anterior Epistaxis
Recruiting
Comparative Study - Transseptal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty
Deviated Nasal Septum, Postoperative Nasal Pain
Not yet recruiting
Coblation Versus Bipolar Diathermy in Management of Refractory Idiopathic Recurrent Anterior Epistaxis in Children.
Epistaxis Nosebleed
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tranexamic acid and Saline in people with Anterior Epistaxis and Tranexamic Acid, run by Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of cases whose nosebleeds were completely stopped (time frame: 5th and 10th minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2023.