GlioblastomaMOSAICNCT06183983
Hitting the Mark: Introducing State-of-the-art MRI for Precision Radiotherapy of Glioblastoma
A study testing Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapy in people with Glioblastoma, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The goal of this prospective cohort study is to assess the potential of advanced MRI for improved radiotherapy target delineation in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. The main questions it aims to answer are: How does the coverage of the recurrence volume by a radiotherapy plan based on advanced MRI compare to the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioblastoma
- What is being tested?
- Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2024to Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent;
- Adult (18 years or older);
- Diagnosed with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, as confirmed by pathology including molecular analysis post resection/biopsy;
- Referred to the outpatient clinic of the Dept. of Radiotherapy to undergo standard treatment with radiotherapy (30x2 Gy or 15x2.67Gy or 10x3.4Gy).
Who cannot join
- Contraindication for (3 Tesla) MRI;
- Contraindication for use of gadolinium-based contrast agent (e.g. subject having renal deficiency or known allergy);
- Referred for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma;
- Previous radiotherapy to the brain;
- Unable to give informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
René Vernhout, MSc contact
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015GD
Patrick Tang, MSc, +31634271995, p.l.y.tang@erasmusmc.nl
René Vernhout, MSc, r.vernhout@erasmusmc.nl
About this study
The goal of this prospective cohort study is to assess the potential of advanced MRI for improved radiotherapy target delineation in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How does the coverage of the recurrence volume by a radiotherapy plan based on advanced MRI compare to the coverage by the clinical radiotherapy plan?
- How does the distribution of the dose to organs at risk by a radiotherapy plan based on advanced MRI compare to the distribution by the clinical radiotherapy plan?
Participants will undergo an extended MRI-protocol prior to radiotherapy. This extended MRI-protocol includes the clinical brain tumor imaging protocol plus additional advanced MRI-sequences. Radiation treatment and patient follow-up will occur according to the clinical standard.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: One of the fundamentals of glioblastoma management is radiotherapy, where ionizing radiation is aimed towards a specific target area in the brain to inhibit further tumor growth. As these brain tumors are notorious for their extensive tumor infiltration, where tumor grows beyond the tumor that is visible on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), this target area, defined as the clinical target volume (CTV), consists of the visible tumor plus a 1.5-cm isotropic safety margin. In the majority of cases, this unspecific CTV margin adequately covers tumor infiltration, but inevitably also includes considerable amounts of healthy tissue. Radiation-induced side-effects like headaches, nausea, fatigue and cognitive decline can substantially affect the quality of life for these patients. An opportunity arises to indirectly visualize tumor infiltration with state-of-the-art advanced MRI (aMRI) techniques, providing additional information on biology rather than only showing anatomical information through conventional MRI. A workflow has been developed to create a CTV based on these aMRI scans (CTVbio) rather than an isotropic expansion. With the additional information that aMRI provides, it could be possible to more accurately define what needs to be targeted and thus minimize damage to healthy tissue. In this research, the aim is to assess the potential of integrating aMRI into radiotherapy target delineation for patients with a glioblastoma by comparing the pattern of failure (coverage of first tumor recurrence by the radiotherapy plan) and the expected radiation dose to organs at risk between the CTVbio and the 1.5-cm CTV. It is hypothesized that the CTVbio can result in decreased radiation dose to organs at risk, whilst having similar pattern of failure.
Primary objective:
- To demonstrate that the probability for reduced coverage of the recurrence volume by a radiotherapy plan based on a CTVbio, compared to the clinical radiotherapy plan (1.5-cm CTV), is lower than 0.20.
Secondary objectives:
- To illustrate a reduction in dose to organs at risk with a radiotherapy plan based on a conceptual CTVbio compared to the clinical radiotherapy plan (1.5-cm CTV).
- To evaluate the synergistic information that each individual aMRI-scan provides for the identification of tumor infiltration.
- To explore the association between pathophysiological changes on aMRI and future tumor recurrence.
Study design: In this prospective cohort study, the clinical standard MRI session used for radiotherapy planning of glioblastoma patients will be extended with aMRI techniques that assess altered oxygenation, angiogenesis and increased protein concentration. In clinical practice at the Erasmus MC, not all patients get an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy. Patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, will get an extra MRI-scan when they participate in this study. Radiation treatment (and patient follow-up) will occur according to the clinical standard, i.e. using the 1.5-cm CTV for radiotherapy planning. The aMRI-scans will be used to create a theoretical CTVbio and corresponding radiotherapy plan. Pattern-of-failure analysis and assessment of dose to organs at risk will be done to compare the radiotherapy plan based on the 1.5-cm CTV with the (theoretical) radiotherapy plan based on the CTVbio. Additionally, various theoretical CTVs based on different combinations of aMRI-scans are generated to explore the added value of the different aMRI techniques. Lastly, the signal intensities on the aMRI-scans at the site of tumor recurrence are compared with contralateral normal-appearing white matter.
Study population: Patients (≥ 18 years), diagnosed with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, as confirmed by molecular or immunohistochemistry analysis post resection/biopsy and referred to outpatient clinic of the Department of Radiotherapy to undergo standard treatment with radiotherapy. The inclusion comes to an end when 53 patients have been included.
Intervention: Patients will have an extension to their standard radiotherapy planning MRI-scan taken for regular clinical care (Brain tumor MRI protocol: ± 25 minutes). Patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, will get an extra MRI-scan when they participate in the study. The duration of the extended MRI-scan, which includes the brain tumor MRI protocol, is ± 45 minutes.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Pattern of failure and dose to organs at risk by the radiotherapy plan based on the 1.5-cm CTV and the theoretical plan created with the CTVbio.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: For patients who will already undergo an MRI-scan for radiotherapy, the burden will be an extended MRI-scan (+20 minutes; the total scan time will be 45 minutes instead of 25 minutes). There is no benefit for these patients. For patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, the burden of participation will be an extra MRI-scan (total scan time: 45 minutes) with additional contrast injection. The dosage and administration are similar to the standard Brain tumor MRI protocol, which has often already been acquired before in these patients. The radiation oncologist may decide to use the conventional MRI-scan from this study MRI for target delineation if they believe it has an added value. The use of the conventional MRI-scans is recommended in the ESTRO-EANO guidelines, but is not routinely done for all patients at Erasmus MC. The advanced MRI-scans investigated in this research will not be used by the radiation oncologist
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma
- Being tested
- Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Glioblastoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapyDiagnostic test
The MRI-protocol before radiotherapy is extended with 20 minutes. Patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, will get an extra MRI-scan when participating.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Extended MRI group | Other | In this group, patients with a glioblastoma undergo an extended MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pattern-of-failure analysis
The primary outcome measure is a comparison of the pattern-of-failure by the radiotherapy plan based on CTVbio and the clinical radiotherapy plan (1.5-cm CTV). For both the clinical radiotherapy plan and the aMRI radiotherapy plan of each patient, the recurrence volumes will be classified as in-field, marginal, or distant recurrence if more than 80%, 20-80%, or less than 20% of the recurrence volume falls within the 95% isodose line, respectively.
Measured: The time frame is until tumor recurrence occurs (follow-up for this study will last 2 years maximum for a participant).
Secondary outcomes (3)
Distribution of dose to organs at risk.
The difference in expected dose to important organs at risk between the clinical radiotherapy plan (1.5-cm CTV) and the aMRI radiotherapy plan (CTVbio). Important organs at risk include the brainstem, optic nerves, eyes, lenses, cochlea and optic chiasm.
Measured: Through study completion (on average 1 year after the extended MRI-scan).
Recurrence coverage by different combinations of CTVbio
The differences in tumor recurrence coverage and size between the CTVbio (based on all three aMRI-scans) and CTVs based on individual or other combinations of aMRI, i.e. based on two or one aMRI-scan(s).
Measured: The time frame is until tumor recurrence occurs (follow-up for this study will last 2 years maximum for a participant).
Signal intensity on aMRI at the site of tumor recurrence
The difference in mean and maximum signal intensity on the individual aMRI-scans between the tumor recurrence site and the contralateral normal-appearing white matter.
Measured: The time frame is until tumor recurrence occurs (follow-up for this study will last 2 years maximum for a participant).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2023
- Study start3 Jan 2024
- Primary completionAug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GlioblastomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Erasmus Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alejandra Mendez Romero, Erasmus Medical Center
- Investigators
- Alejandra Méndez Romero, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Erasmus Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06183983
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL84994.078.23
- Acronym
- MOSAIC
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Not available yet
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hitting the Mark: Introducing State-of-the-art MRI for Precision Radiotherapy of Glioblastoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06183983
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MOSAIC / NL84994.078.23
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this prospective cohort study is to assess the potential of advanced MRI for improved radiotherapy target delineation in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How does the coverage of the recurrence volume by a radiotherapy plan based on advanced MRI compare to the coverage by the clinical radiotherapy plan?
- How does the distribution of the dose to organs at risk by a radiotherapy plan based on advanced MRI compare to the distribution by the clinical radiotherapy plan?
Participants will undergo an extended MRI-protocol prior to radiotherapy. This extended MRI-protocol includes the clinical brain tumor imaging protocol plus additional advanced MRI-sequences. Radiation treatment and patient follow-up will occur according to the clinical standard.
Detailed description
Rationale: One of the fundamentals of glioblastoma management is radiotherapy, where ionizing radiation is aimed towards a specific target area in the brain to inhibit further tumor growth. As these brain tumors are notorious for their extensive tumor infiltration, where tumor grows beyond the tumor that is visible on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), this target area, defined as the clinical target volume (CTV), consists of the visible tumor plus a 1.5-cm isotropic safety margin. In the majority of cases, this unspecific CTV margin adequately covers tumor infiltration, but inevitably also includes considerable amounts of healthy tissue. Radiation-induced side-effects like headaches, nausea, fatigue and cognitive decline can substantially affect the quality of life for these patients. An opportunity arises to indirectly visualize tumor infiltration with state-of-the-art advanced MRI (aMRI) techniques, providing additional information on biology rather than only showing anatomical information through conventional MRI. A workflow has been developed to create a CTV based on these aMRI scans (CTVbio) rather than an isotropic expansion. With the additional information that aMRI provides, it could be possible to more accurately define what needs to be targeted and thus minimize damage to healthy tissue. In this research, the aim is to assess the potential of integrating aMRI into radiotherapy target delineation for patients with a glioblastoma by comparing the pattern of failure (coverage of first tumor recurrence by the radiotherapy plan) and the expected radiation dose to organs at risk between the CTVbio and the 1.5-cm CTV. It is hypothesized that the CTVbio can result in decreased radiation dose to organs at risk, whilst having similar pattern of failure.
Primary objective:
- To demonstrate that the probability for reduced coverage of the recurrence volume by a radiotherapy plan based on a CTVbio, compared to the clinical radiotherapy plan (1.5-cm CTV), is lower than 0.20.
Secondary objectives:
- To illustrate a reduction in dose to organs at risk with a radiotherapy plan based on a conceptual CTVbio compared to the clinical radiotherapy plan (1.5-cm CTV).
- To evaluate the synergistic information that each individual aMRI-scan provides for the identification of tumor infiltration.
- To explore the association between pathophysiological changes on aMRI and future tumor recurrence.
Study design: In this prospective cohort study, the clinical standard MRI session used for radiotherapy planning of glioblastoma patients will be extended with aMRI techniques that assess altered oxygenation, angiogenesis and increased protein concentration. In clinical practice at the Erasmus MC, not all patients get an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy. Patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, will get an extra MRI-scan when they participate in this study. Radiation treatment (and patient follow-up) will occur according to the clinical standard, i.e. using the 1.5-cm CTV for radiotherapy planning. The aMRI-scans will be used to create a theoretical CTVbio and corresponding radiotherapy plan. Pattern-of-failure analysis and assessment of dose to organs at risk will be done to compare the radiotherapy plan based on the 1.5-cm CTV with the (theoretical) radiotherapy plan based on the CTVbio. Additionally, various theoretical CTVs based on different combinations of aMRI-scans are generated to explore the added value of the different aMRI techniques. Lastly, the signal intensities on the aMRI-scans at the site of tumor recurrence are compared with contralateral normal-appearing white matter.
Study population: Patients (≥ 18 years), diagnosed with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, as confirmed by molecular or immunohistochemistry analysis post resection/biopsy and referred to outpatient clinic of the Department of Radiotherapy to undergo standard treatment with radiotherapy. The inclusion comes to an end when 53 patients have been included.
Intervention: Patients will have an extension to their standard radiotherapy planning MRI-scan taken for regular clinical care (Brain tumor MRI protocol: ± 25 minutes). Patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, will get an extra MRI-scan when they participate in the study. The duration of the extended MRI-scan, which includes the brain tumor MRI protocol, is ± 45 minutes.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Pattern of failure and dose to organs at risk by the radiotherapy plan based on the 1.5-cm CTV and the theoretical plan created with the CTVbio.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: For patients who will already undergo an MRI-scan for radiotherapy, the burden will be an extended MRI-scan (+20 minutes; the total scan time will be 45 minutes instead of 25 minutes). There is no benefit for these patients. For patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, the burden of participation will be an extra MRI-scan (total scan time: 45 minutes) with additional contrast injection. The dosage and administration are similar to the standard Brain tumor MRI protocol, which has often already been acquired before in these patients. The radiation oncologist may decide to use the conventional MRI-scan from this study MRI for target delineation if they believe it has an added value. The use of the conventional MRI-scans is recommended in the ESTRO-EANO guidelines, but is not routinely done for all patients at Erasmus MC. The advanced MRI-scans investigated in this research will not be used by the radiation oncologist
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Extended MRI group | Other | Diagnostic Test: Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapyIn this group, patients with a glioblastoma undergo an extended MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Written informed consent;
- Adult (18 years or older);
- Diagnosed with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, as confirmed by pathology including molecular analysis post resection/biopsy;
- Referred to the outpatient clinic of the Dept. of Radiotherapy to undergo standard treatment with radiotherapy (30x2 Gy or 15x2.67Gy or 10x3.4Gy).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Contraindication for (3 Tesla) MRI;
- Contraindication for use of gadolinium-based contrast agent (e.g. subject having renal deficiency or known allergy);
- Referred for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma;
- Previous radiotherapy to the brain;
- Unable to give informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapyThe MRI-protocol before radiotherapy is extended with 20 minutes. Patients who would not have received an MRI-scan prior to radiotherapy, will get an extra MRI-scan when participating. | Diagnostic test | Extended MRI group |
Primary outcome
Pattern-of-failure analysis
Time frame: The time frame is until tumor recurrence occurs (follow-up for this study will last 2 years maximum for a participant).
The primary outcome measure is a comparison of the pattern-of-failure by the radiotherapy plan based on CTVbio and the clinical radiotherapy plan (1.5-cm CTV). For both the clinical radiotherapy plan and the aMRI radiotherapy plan of each patient, the recurrence volumes will be classified as in-field, marginal, or distant recurrence if more than 80%, 20-80%, or less than 20% of the recurrence volume falls within the 95% isodose line, respectively.
3 secondary outcomes
Distribution of dose to organs at risk.
Time frame: Through study completion (on average 1 year after the extended MRI-scan).
Recurrence coverage by different combinations of CTVbio
Time frame: The time frame is until tumor recurrence occurs (follow-up for this study will last 2 years maximum for a participant).
Signal intensity on aMRI at the site of tumor recurrence
Time frame: The time frame is until tumor recurrence occurs (follow-up for this study will last 2 years maximum for a participant).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Not available yet
Related trials for Glioblastoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
EF-41/KEYNOTE D58: Phase 3 Study of Optune Concomitant With Temozolomide Plus Pembrolizumab in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Beginning Radiation Immediately With GammaTile at GBM Excision Versus Standard of Care
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Selinexor, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Temozolomide) for Brain Tumors That Have Returned After Previous Treatment
Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, Recurrent MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Oral Gallium Maltolate for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
PLX038 in Primary Central Nervous System Tumors Containing MYC or MYCN Amplifications
Glioma, Medulloblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
René Vernhout, MSc contact
Alejandra Méndez Romero, MD, PhD principal investigator
Erasmus Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Extended or additional MRI-scan (with contrast) prior to radiotherapy in people with Glioblastoma, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Patrick Tang, MSc (+31634271995, p.l.y.tang@erasmusmc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pattern-of-failure analysis (time frame: The time frame is until tumor recurrence occurs (follow-up for this study will last 2 years maximum for a participant).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2025.