Healthy VolunteersNCT06189716
Gas Composition in the Oropharynx During High-flow Oxygen Therapy Through Nasal Cannula in Healthy Volunteers
A study testing High flow oxygen through nasal cannula in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.
Trial summary
Observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown the high effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas, reaching 50-60% in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Volunteers
- What is being tested?
- High flow oxygen through nasal cannula
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRussia
- Study dates
- 9 Jan 2024to 10 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy Volunteers
- Age over 18 years
- Written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Any primary or secondary lung diseases (COPD, bronchial asthma, interstitial lung diseases, metastatic lung disease, lung cancer)
- Any chronic diseases that can cause respiratory disorders (chronic heart failure, liver cirrhosis, systemic connective tissue diseases, cancer, neuromuscular diseases etc)
- Heart rhythm disturbances
- Body mass index more than 30 kg/m2
- Swallowing disorders
- History of epileptic syndrome
Show all 9Show fewer
- Recent head surgery or anatomy that precludes the use of nasal cannulas
- Pregnancy and lactation period
- Inability to cooperate with staff.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Gas Composition in the Oropharynx During High-flow Oxygen Therapy Through Nasal Cannula in Healthy Volunteers: a Physiological Study
Observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown the high effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas, reaching 50-60% in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Some bench studies showed the advantages of high-flow oxygen therapy compared with standard oxygen therapy, consisting in reducing the anatomical dead space and maintaining a given inspiratory oxygen fraction in the hypopharynx of the mannequin, but the actual state of the gas composition of the hypopharynx was not studied. The study aim is measurement of the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) fractions of oxygen, as well as the inspiratory (FiСO2) and expiratory (FeСO2) fractions of carbon dioxide in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas in different physiological conditions.
Read the detailed description
Randomized controlled trials showed reduction of tracheal intubation in high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas group in patients with acute respiratory failure as compared to standard oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation before Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic.
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a pandemic of COVID-19 on March 11th, 2020. Since then observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown the high effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas (HFNC), reaching 50-60% in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Bench studies showed the advantages of HFNC compared with standard oxygen therapy, consisting in reducing the anatomical dead space and maintaining a given inspiratory oxygen fraction in the hypopharynx of the mannequin, but the actual state of the gas composition of the hypopharynx during HFNC was not studied.
The study aim is measurement of the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) fractions of oxygen, as well as the inspiratory (FiСO2) and expiratory (FeСO2) fractions of carbon dioxide in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas in different physiological conditions.
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Being tested
- High flow oxygen through nasal cannula
- Keywords
- healthy volunteers, HFNC, high flow oxygen, oximetry, capnometry, pharyngeal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High flow oxygen through nasal cannulaDevice
High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers in different physiological conditions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | High flow oxygen through nasal cannula, oxygen and carbon dioxide measurement in the hypopharynx Receives: Device: High flow oxygen through nasal cannula |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in the hypopharynx
Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Expiratory oxygen fraction (FeO2) in the hypopharynx
Expiratory oxygen fraction (FeO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Inspiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FiCO2) in the hypopharynx
Inspiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FiCO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Expiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FeCO2) in the hypopharynx
Expiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FeCO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Secondary outcomes (6)
Respiratory rate (RR)
Respiratory rate (RR) during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Tidal volume (VT)
Tidal volume (VT) during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Modified ventilatory ratio (mVR)
Modified ventilatory ratio (mVR) during different physiological conditions. mVR = [RR * tidal volume* (PetCO2 (mmHg) - 4 mmHg)] / [predicted body weight (kg) * 100 * 37,5 mmHg]
Measured: 5 minutes
The ratio of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry/inspiratory oxygen fraction to respiratory rate (ROX-index)
ROX-index (SpO2/FiO2/RR) during different physiological conditions
Measured: 5 minutes
Comfort
Visual-analog scale (VAS) for comfort evaluation (from 1 to 10, 1-full comfort, 10-full comfort)
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2024
- Study start9 Jan 2024
- Primary completion30 Apr 2024
- Study completion10 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Healthy VolunteersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Measurement of the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) fractions of oxygen (FiСO2 and FeСO2, respectively), as well as the inspiratory and expiratory fractions of carbon dioxide (FiСO2 and FeСO2, respectively) in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas in different physiological conditions
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrey I Yaroshetskiy, MD, PhD, ScD, Principal investigator, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06189716
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HFNC-OXIMETRY
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17.
PubMed 25981908Grieco DL, Maggiore SM, Roca O, Spinelli E, Patel BK, Thille AW, Barbas CSV, de Acilu MG, Cutuli SL, Bongiovanni F, Amato M, Frat JP, Mauri T, Kress JP, Mancebo J, Antonelli M. Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Aug;47(8):851-866. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06459-2. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
PubMed 34232336He Y, Zhuang X, Liu H, Ma W. Comparison of the efficacy and comfort of high-flow nasal cannula with different initial flow settings in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Intensive Care. 2023 May 10;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00667-2.
PubMed 37165464Ospina-Tascon GA, Calderon-Tapia LE, Garcia AF, Zarama V, Gomez-Alvarez F, Alvarez-Saa T, Pardo-Otalvaro S, Bautista-Rincon DF, Vargas MP, Aldana-Diaz JL, Marulanda A, Gutierrez A, Varon J, Gomez M, Ochoa ME, Escobar E, Umana M, Diez J, Tobon GJ, Albornoz LL, Celemin Florez CA, Ruiz GO, Caceres EL, Reyes LF, Damiani LP, Cavalcanti AB; HiFLo-Covid Investigators. Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2161-2171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20714.
PubMed 34874419Perkins GD, Ji C, Connolly BA, Couper K, Lall R, Baillie JK, Bradley JM, Dark P, Dave C, De Soyza A, Dennis AV, Devrell A, Fairbairn S, Ghani H, Gorman EA, Green CA, Hart N, Hee SW, Kimbley Z, Madathil S, McGowan N, Messer B, Naisbitt J, Norman C, Parekh D, Parkin EM, Patel J, Regan SE, Ross C, Rostron AJ, Saim M, Simonds AK, Skilton E, Stallard N, Steiner M, Vancheeswaran R, Yeung J, McAuley DF; RECOVERY-RS Collaborators. Effect of Noninvasive Respiratory Strategies on Intubation or Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and COVID-19: The RECOVERY-RS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):546-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0028.
PubMed 35072713Yaroshetskiy AI, Krasnoshchekova AP, Tkachenko FD, Rubashchenko AV, Zubarev DD, Konanykhin VD, Savelenok MI, Nosenko MM, Merzhoeva ZM, Avdeev SN. Gas composition and pressure in the hypopharynx during high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula in healthy volunteers with different breathing patterns. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03267-9.
PubMed 40849448
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Gas Composition in the Oropharynx During High-flow Oxygen Therapy Through Nasal Cannula in Healthy Volunteers: a Physiological Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06189716
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HFNC-OXIMETRY
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Keywords
- healthy volunteers, HFNC, high flow oxygen, oximetry, capnometry, pharyngeal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown the high effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas, reaching 50-60% in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Some bench studies showed the advantages of high-flow oxygen therapy compared with standard oxygen therapy, consisting in reducing the anatomical dead space and maintaining a given inspiratory oxygen fraction in the hypopharynx of the mannequin, but the actual state of the gas composition of the hypopharynx was not studied. The study aim is measurement of the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) fractions of oxygen, as well as the inspiratory (FiСO2) and expiratory (FeСO2) fractions of carbon dioxide in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas in different physiological conditions.
Detailed description
Randomized controlled trials showed reduction of tracheal intubation in high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas group in patients with acute respiratory failure as compared to standard oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation before Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic.
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a pandemic of COVID-19 on March 11th, 2020. Since then observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown the high effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas (HFNC), reaching 50-60% in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Bench studies showed the advantages of HFNC compared with standard oxygen therapy, consisting in reducing the anatomical dead space and maintaining a given inspiratory oxygen fraction in the hypopharynx of the mannequin, but the actual state of the gas composition of the hypopharynx during HFNC was not studied.
The study aim is measurement of the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) fractions of oxygen, as well as the inspiratory (FiСO2) and expiratory (FeСO2) fractions of carbon dioxide in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas in different physiological conditions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Measurement of the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) fractions of oxygen (FiСO2 and FeСO2, respectively), as well as the inspiratory and expiratory fractions of carbon dioxide (FiСO2 and FeСO2, respectively) in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas in different physiological conditions
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Device: High flow oxygen through nasal cannulaHigh flow oxygen through nasal cannula, oxygen and carbon dioxide measurement in the hypopharynx |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Healthy Volunteers
- Age over 18 years
- Written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Any primary or secondary lung diseases (COPD, bronchial asthma, interstitial lung diseases, metastatic lung disease, lung cancer)
- Any chronic diseases that can cause respiratory disorders (chronic heart failure, liver cirrhosis, systemic connective tissue diseases, cancer, neuromuscular diseases etc)
- Heart rhythm disturbances
- Body mass index more than 30 kg/m2
- Swallowing disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High flow oxygen through nasal cannulaHigh flow oxygen through nasal cannula and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers in different physiological conditions. | Device | Experimental |
Primary outcome
Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in the hypopharynx
Time frame: 5 minutes
Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
Expiratory oxygen fraction (FeO2) in the hypopharynx
Time frame: 5 minutes
Expiratory oxygen fraction (FeO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
Inspiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FiCO2) in the hypopharynx
Time frame: 5 minutes
Inspiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FiCO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
Expiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FeCO2) in the hypopharynx
Time frame: 5 minutes
Expiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FeCO2) in the hypopharynx during different physiological conditions
6 secondary outcomes
Respiratory rate (RR)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Tidal volume (VT)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Modified ventilatory ratio (mVR)
Time frame: 5 minutes
The ratio of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry/inspiratory oxygen fraction to respiratory rate (ROX-index)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Comfort
Time frame: 5 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 25981908Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 34232336Grieco DL, Maggiore SM, Roca O, Spinelli E, Patel BK, Thille AW, Barbas CSV, de Acilu MG, Cutuli SL, Bongiovanni F, Amato M, Frat JP, Mauri T, Kress JP, Mancebo J, Antonelli M. Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Aug;47(8):851-866. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06459-2. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 37165464He Y, Zhuang X, Liu H, Ma W. Comparison of the efficacy and comfort of high-flow nasal cannula with different initial flow settings in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Intensive Care. 2023 May 10;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00667-2.
- Background: PubMed 34874419Ospina-Tascon GA, Calderon-Tapia LE, Garcia AF, Zarama V, Gomez-Alvarez F, Alvarez-Saa T, Pardo-Otalvaro S, Bautista-Rincon DF, Vargas MP, Aldana-Diaz JL, Marulanda A, Gutierrez A, Varon J, Gomez M, Ochoa ME, Escobar E, Umana M, Diez J, Tobon GJ, Albornoz LL, Celemin Florez CA, Ruiz GO, Caceres EL, Reyes LF, Damiani LP, Cavalcanti AB; HiFLo-Covid Investigators. Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2161-2171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20714.
- Background: PubMed 35072713Perkins GD, Ji C, Connolly BA, Couper K, Lall R, Baillie JK, Bradley JM, Dark P, Dave C, De Soyza A, Dennis AV, Devrell A, Fairbairn S, Ghani H, Gorman EA, Green CA, Hart N, Hee SW, Kimbley Z, Madathil S, McGowan N, Messer B, Naisbitt J, Norman C, Parekh D, Parkin EM, Patel J, Regan SE, Ross C, Rostron AJ, Saim M, Simonds AK, Skilton E, Stallard N, Steiner M, Vancheeswaran R, Yeung J, McAuley DF; RECOVERY-RS Collaborators. Effect of Noninvasive Respiratory Strategies on Intubation or Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and COVID-19: The RECOVERY-RS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):546-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0028.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40849448Yaroshetskiy AI, Krasnoshchekova AP, Tkachenko FD, Rubashchenko AV, Zubarev DD, Konanykhin VD, Savelenok MI, Nosenko MM, Merzhoeva ZM, Avdeev SN. Gas composition and pressure in the hypopharynx during high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula in healthy volunteers with different breathing patterns. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03267-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Establishment of Biobank of Nasal Epithelium Samples From Healthy Volunteers
Healthy
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Screening Protocol
Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrey I Yaroshetskiy, MD, PhD, ScD principal investigator
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High flow oxygen through nasal cannula in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in the hypopharynx (time frame: 5 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06189716, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.