AzTrials
AzTrials

Congestive Heart FailureBAT-VADNCT06195046

Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients Study

A study testing Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Medical University of South Carolina.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will involve LVAD patients who have already received a clinically-indicated BAT (BAROSTIM) device. After recovery from LVAD implant, we will investigate the effects of BAT in a double-blind cross-over study design. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Congestive Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2025to 1 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years
  • LVAD patient > 3 months post implant
  • Existing BAT device

Who cannot join

  • Presence of cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, hypotension or unstable heart failure
  • Bradycardia (resting HR <60 beats/minute)
  • Presence of suspected pump thrombosis at the time of enrollment
  • Presence of any significant ventricular arrhythmias at the time of enrollment

About this study

Official title: Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients Study (BAT-VAD Study)

This study will involve LVAD patients who have already received a clinically-indicated BAT (BAROSTIM) device. After recovery from LVAD implant, we will investigate the effects of BAT in a double-blind cross-over study design.

Read the detailed description

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide a meaningful therapeutic option for patients with end-stage systolic heart failure who cannot receive cardiac transplantation. For these patients, LVADs have been shown to improve mortality, functional capacity, and quality of life [1-3]. With ever-improving technological and procedural advances, the number of LVAD implantations for patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy as bridge to transplant, recovery, or even as destination therapy continues to rise [4]. Despite the short term clinical benefits of LVAD support, studies show that deleterious neurohormonal activation does not abate after LVAD implantation and that left ventricular scarring (or fibrosis) does not regress and may worsen. Similarly, the prevalence of myocardial recovery with LVAD support has been dismally low with <1% of patients recovering to the point where their LVAD can be safely explanted. Given that the majority of patients undergoing LVAD are now doing so with a destination therapy designation, and that the median estimated survival time on LVAD support ranges from 4-6 years, the importance of therapies to maximize chances for myocardial recovery while LVAD supported is evident.

The pathophysiologic reasons underlying the lack of abrogation of sympathetic and neurohormonal signaling with LVAD support, even in the face of adequate hemodynamic support, may center around the non-pulsatile nature of the device. Markham and Levine described sympathetic nerve activity in both pulsatile and nonpuslatile LVAD patients in 2013, demonstrating that patients with nonpulsatile devices had markedly elevated muscle sympathetic nerve activity, though pulsatile LVAD patients and normal controls had similar sympathetic activity. In a sequence of experiments, the authors demonstrated that this was at least partly due to baroreceptor unloading in the nonpulsatile patients. Further studies have demonstrated that plasma norepinephrine levels remain elevated after VAD implant, as do neurohormones in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Sympathetic neurohormone levels have been shown to correlate with clinical response to LVAD therapy (defined by significant improvement in quality of life determined by the KCCQ), with reduced B-adrenergic receptor kinase-1 and DHPG levels differentiating those with better clinical response. Further, pathologic studies pre- and post-LVAD have demonstrated an acceleration of deleterious myocardial fibrosis during LVAD support, potentially driven by sympathetic and/or RAAS signaling pathways.

As demonstrated in preclinical studies and the clinical BeAT-HF trial, autonomic modulation with baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) with the BAROSTIM NEO system reduced sympathetic signaling, leading to increased NT-proBNP, 6-minute hall walk distance (6MHW), and improved quality of life in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.

However, the role of BAT in the unique physiologic LVAD-supported state has not be characterized. Given the concerns that LVAD support by augment sympathetic and thereby RAAS signaling, and that BAT may abrogate those deleterious pathways, we propose to study the clinical and neurohormonal effects of BAT in LVAD supported patients.

Being tested
Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)
Keywords
Ventricular Assist Device, Baroreflex activation therapy
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)Device

    activation of BAROSTIM NEO system that affects autonomic modulation with BAT therapy.

Study groups in NCT06195046
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
control (BAT off)Sham comparatorBaroreflex activation therapy turned off for three months
Receives: Device: Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)
treatment (BAT on)ExperimentalBaroreflex activation therapy turned on for three months
Receives: Device: Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 6 Minute Hall Walk

    change in distance walked during 6 Minute Hall Walk

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire

    quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  2. Change in LVAD system monitor reported flow

    Liters/minute

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  3. Cardiac 123-mIBG scan

    Heart to mediastinum uptake ratio; Rate of 123-mIBG washout

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  4. Change in left ventricular size on transthoracic echocardiogram

    Centimeters

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  5. Change in aortic valve opening frequency on transthoracic echocardiogram

    Valve opening per beat

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  6. Change in mitral valve regurgitation severity on transthoracic echocardiogram

    None, mild, moderate, severe

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  7. Change in right ventricular size on transthoracic echocardiogram

    Centimeters

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  8. Change in Serum catecholamines

    pg/mL

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  9. Change in Serum norepinephrine

    pg/mL

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  10. Change in serum renin

    ng/mL

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  11. Change in serum aldosterone

    ng/dL

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  12. Change in serum angiotensin

    U/L

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  13. Change in serum BNP

    pg/mL

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2024
  2. Study start1 Jul 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2025

Why it stopped: Study not moving forward due to unable to identify patients who qualify.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
double-blind cross-over study design
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06195046
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00115552
Acronym
BAT-VAD
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
21 Jul 2023
Last updated
23 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Medical University of South Carolina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

6 Minute Hall Walk (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
BAT-VAD Clinical Trial NCT06195046 | AzTrials