Congestive Heart FailureBAT-VADNCT06195046
Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients Study
A study testing Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Medical University of South Carolina.
Trial summary
This study will involve LVAD patients who have already received a clinically-indicated BAT (BAROSTIM) device. After recovery from LVAD implant, we will investigate the effects of BAT in a double-blind cross-over study design. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Congestive Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2025to 1 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- LVAD patient > 3 months post implant
- Existing BAT device
Who cannot join
- Presence of cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, hypotension or unstable heart failure
- Bradycardia (resting HR <60 beats/minute)
- Presence of suspected pump thrombosis at the time of enrollment
- Presence of any significant ventricular arrhythmias at the time of enrollment
About this study
Official title: Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients Study (BAT-VAD Study)
This study will involve LVAD patients who have already received a clinically-indicated BAT (BAROSTIM) device. After recovery from LVAD implant, we will investigate the effects of BAT in a double-blind cross-over study design.
Read the detailed description
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide a meaningful therapeutic option for patients with end-stage systolic heart failure who cannot receive cardiac transplantation. For these patients, LVADs have been shown to improve mortality, functional capacity, and quality of life [1-3]. With ever-improving technological and procedural advances, the number of LVAD implantations for patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy as bridge to transplant, recovery, or even as destination therapy continues to rise [4]. Despite the short term clinical benefits of LVAD support, studies show that deleterious neurohormonal activation does not abate after LVAD implantation and that left ventricular scarring (or fibrosis) does not regress and may worsen. Similarly, the prevalence of myocardial recovery with LVAD support has been dismally low with <1% of patients recovering to the point where their LVAD can be safely explanted. Given that the majority of patients undergoing LVAD are now doing so with a destination therapy designation, and that the median estimated survival time on LVAD support ranges from 4-6 years, the importance of therapies to maximize chances for myocardial recovery while LVAD supported is evident.
The pathophysiologic reasons underlying the lack of abrogation of sympathetic and neurohormonal signaling with LVAD support, even in the face of adequate hemodynamic support, may center around the non-pulsatile nature of the device. Markham and Levine described sympathetic nerve activity in both pulsatile and nonpuslatile LVAD patients in 2013, demonstrating that patients with nonpulsatile devices had markedly elevated muscle sympathetic nerve activity, though pulsatile LVAD patients and normal controls had similar sympathetic activity. In a sequence of experiments, the authors demonstrated that this was at least partly due to baroreceptor unloading in the nonpulsatile patients. Further studies have demonstrated that plasma norepinephrine levels remain elevated after VAD implant, as do neurohormones in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Sympathetic neurohormone levels have been shown to correlate with clinical response to LVAD therapy (defined by significant improvement in quality of life determined by the KCCQ), with reduced B-adrenergic receptor kinase-1 and DHPG levels differentiating those with better clinical response. Further, pathologic studies pre- and post-LVAD have demonstrated an acceleration of deleterious myocardial fibrosis during LVAD support, potentially driven by sympathetic and/or RAAS signaling pathways.
As demonstrated in preclinical studies and the clinical BeAT-HF trial, autonomic modulation with baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) with the BAROSTIM NEO system reduced sympathetic signaling, leading to increased NT-proBNP, 6-minute hall walk distance (6MHW), and improved quality of life in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.
However, the role of BAT in the unique physiologic LVAD-supported state has not be characterized. Given the concerns that LVAD support by augment sympathetic and thereby RAAS signaling, and that BAT may abrogate those deleterious pathways, we propose to study the clinical and neurohormonal effects of BAT in LVAD supported patients.
- Conditions
- Congestive Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)
- Keywords
- Ventricular Assist Device, Baroreflex activation therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)Device
activation of BAROSTIM NEO system that affects autonomic modulation with BAT therapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control (BAT off) | Sham comparator | Baroreflex activation therapy turned off for three months Receives: Device: Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) |
| treatment (BAT on) | Experimental | Baroreflex activation therapy turned on for three months Receives: Device: Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
6 Minute Hall Walk
change in distance walked during 6 Minute Hall Walk
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire
quality of life questionnaire
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in LVAD system monitor reported flow
Liters/minute
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Cardiac 123-mIBG scan
Heart to mediastinum uptake ratio; Rate of 123-mIBG washout
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in left ventricular size on transthoracic echocardiogram
Centimeters
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in aortic valve opening frequency on transthoracic echocardiogram
Valve opening per beat
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in mitral valve regurgitation severity on transthoracic echocardiogram
None, mild, moderate, severe
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in right ventricular size on transthoracic echocardiogram
Centimeters
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in Serum catecholamines
pg/mL
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in Serum norepinephrine
pg/mL
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum renin
ng/mL
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum aldosterone
ng/dL
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum angiotensin
U/L
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum BNP
pg/mL
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2024
- Study start1 Jul 2025
- Primary completion1 Jul 2025
- Study completion1 Jul 2025
Why it stopped: Study not moving forward due to unable to identify patients who qualify.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Congestive Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- double-blind cross-over study design
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CVRx, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06195046
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00115552
- Acronym
- BAT-VAD
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients Study (BAT-VAD Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06195046
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BAT-VAD / Pro00115552
- Conditions
- Congestive Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Ventricular Assist Device, Baroreflex activation therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study not moving forward due to unable to identify patients who qualify.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South CarolinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CVRx, Inc.
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will involve LVAD patients who have already received a clinically-indicated BAT (BAROSTIM) device. After recovery from LVAD implant, we will investigate the effects of BAT in a double-blind cross-over study design.
Detailed description
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide a meaningful therapeutic option for patients with end-stage systolic heart failure who cannot receive cardiac transplantation. For these patients, LVADs have been shown to improve mortality, functional capacity, and quality of life [1-3]. With ever-improving technological and procedural advances, the number of LVAD implantations for patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy as bridge to transplant, recovery, or even as destination therapy continues to rise [4]. Despite the short term clinical benefits of LVAD support, studies show that deleterious neurohormonal activation does not abate after LVAD implantation and that left ventricular scarring (or fibrosis) does not regress and may worsen. Similarly, the prevalence of myocardial recovery with LVAD support has been dismally low with <1% of patients recovering to the point where their LVAD can be safely explanted. Given that the majority of patients undergoing LVAD are now doing so with a destination therapy designation, and that the median estimated survival time on LVAD support ranges from 4-6 years, the importance of therapies to maximize chances for myocardial recovery while LVAD supported is evident.
The pathophysiologic reasons underlying the lack of abrogation of sympathetic and neurohormonal signaling with LVAD support, even in the face of adequate hemodynamic support, may center around the non-pulsatile nature of the device. Markham and Levine described sympathetic nerve activity in both pulsatile and nonpuslatile LVAD patients in 2013, demonstrating that patients with nonpulsatile devices had markedly elevated muscle sympathetic nerve activity, though pulsatile LVAD patients and normal controls had similar sympathetic activity. In a sequence of experiments, the authors demonstrated that this was at least partly due to baroreceptor unloading in the nonpulsatile patients. Further studies have demonstrated that plasma norepinephrine levels remain elevated after VAD implant, as do neurohormones in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Sympathetic neurohormone levels have been shown to correlate with clinical response to LVAD therapy (defined by significant improvement in quality of life determined by the KCCQ), with reduced B-adrenergic receptor kinase-1 and DHPG levels differentiating those with better clinical response. Further, pathologic studies pre- and post-LVAD have demonstrated an acceleration of deleterious myocardial fibrosis during LVAD support, potentially driven by sympathetic and/or RAAS signaling pathways.
As demonstrated in preclinical studies and the clinical BeAT-HF trial, autonomic modulation with baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) with the BAROSTIM NEO system reduced sympathetic signaling, leading to increased NT-proBNP, 6-minute hall walk distance (6MHW), and improved quality of life in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.
However, the role of BAT in the unique physiologic LVAD-supported state has not be characterized. Given the concerns that LVAD support by augment sympathetic and thereby RAAS signaling, and that BAT may abrogate those deleterious pathways, we propose to study the clinical and neurohormonal effects of BAT in LVAD supported patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- double-blind cross-over study design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control (BAT off) | Sham comparator | Device: Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)Baroreflex activation therapy turned off for three months |
| treatment (BAT on) | Experimental | Device: Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)Baroreflex activation therapy turned on for three months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- LVAD patient > 3 months post implant
- Existing BAT device
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Presence of cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, hypotension or unstable heart failure
- Bradycardia (resting HR <60 beats/minute)
- Presence of suspected pump thrombosis at the time of enrollment
- Presence of any significant ventricular arrhythmias at the time of enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT)activation of BAROSTIM NEO system that affects autonomic modulation with BAT therapy. | Device | control (BAT off), treatment (BAT on) |
Primary outcome
6 Minute Hall Walk
Time frame: 3 months
change in distance walked during 6 Minute Hall Walk
13 secondary outcomes
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in LVAD system monitor reported flow
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Cardiac 123-mIBG scan
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in left ventricular size on transthoracic echocardiogram
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in aortic valve opening frequency on transthoracic echocardiogram
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in mitral valve regurgitation severity on transthoracic echocardiogram
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in right ventricular size on transthoracic echocardiogram
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in Serum catecholamines
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in Serum norepinephrine
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum renin
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum aldosterone
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum angiotensin
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Change in serum BNP
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Congestive Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vericiguat in Pediatric Participants With Heart Failure Due to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (MK-1242-036)
Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingPhase 1/2
HS235 Study in Overweight and Obese Participants With Combined Pre and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Pulmonary Hypertension, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Active, not recruiting
Heart Failure Patient Management and Interventions Using Continuous Patient Monitoring Outside Hospitals and Real-world Data
Chronic Heart Failure, Heart Transplant Recipient
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Savagen (Sacubitril/Valsartan) in Malaysian HFrEF Patients
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Medical University of South Carolina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
6 Minute Hall Walk (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2025.