Cervix CancerNCT06196190
Prognostic Value of Conization and Negative HPV After Conization in AIS and Early Stage Cervical Cancer
An observational study of Cervix Cancer and HPV-Related Malignancy, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
In women with cervical cancer -Squamous cell carcinoma, Adeno carcinoma, Adeno-squamous carcinoma or AIS we want to examine prospectively: 1. Examine if negative HR-HPV after conization to the HR-HPV the women had before conization has a high prognostic value for no residual tumor in the final pathology. 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervix Cancer, HPV-Related Malignancy
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 26 Jul 2023to 1 Jul 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Women with cervical cancer -Squamous cell carcinoma, Adeno carcinoma, Adeno-squamous carcinoma or AIS
Who may be able to join
- Age Range: 18-85 years old Cervical cancer stage I B 2(Tumor up to 4 cm FIGO 2018) AIS HPV types before and after conization
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women under 18 years old. Women who refused to continue to be in study. Women that data about HPV types , final pathology or complication are missing.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Rambam Health Care Center
Haifa, 31906
Yoav Siegler, MD, yoav.siegler@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: The Prognostic Value of Conization and Negative HPV Typing After Conization Prior to Surgical Intervention in Adenocarcinoma in Situ and Early Stage Cervical Cancer
In women with cervical cancer -Squamous cell carcinoma, Adeno carcinoma,
Adeno-squamous carcinoma or AIS we want to examine prospectively:
- Examine if negative HR-HPV after conization to the HR-HPV the women had before conization has a high prognostic value for no residual tumor in the final pathology.
- To examine if conization in women with cervical tumor up to Stage I B 2 (FIGO 2018) is corelated with better prognosis.
Read the detailed description
The treatment of invasive cervical cancer is tailored according to the FIGO recommendations. The standard treatment for women with early-stage, (IA2-IB1) cervical cancer is simple or Radical Hysterectomy (RH) and in women with Adenocarcinoma in Situ hysterectomy is recommended when they finish their fertility program .A Few studies describe that conization before Radical Hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer stage I B 1 ( tumour up to 4 cm according to FIGO 2009 ) , are in correlation with better prognosis , Bizzari describe women that had conization before RH had better 5 year survival. Uppal report that those women have less recurrence, OR of 0.4 compared with women without conization. Chacon summarize SUCCOR study, a multi center study that collected data about 374 women with cervical cancer Stage I B 1 according to FIGO 2009 -tumour up to 4 cm .187 women had conization before RH and 187 had RH without conization. Women that had conization had 65% less recurrence 'and 75% les mortality.
Several studies have explored the possibility of a less aggressive approach for cervical cancer patients with low-risk early-stage disease who wish to preserve fertility. The parameters that were investigated were: the depth of invasion, tumour diameter, lymph node status positive margins in conization, positive Endo Cervical Curettage (ECC) and lymph-vascular space invasion. Those parameters have a low sensitivity and between 50-65% of women who had RH had no residual tumour in the final pathology.
Schmeler describe that woman who had conization before RH in 97.5% had no residual tumour.
A study of 92 women with cervical cancer and Adeno Carcinoma In situ (AIS) that short time after conization were negative to High-Risk HPV (HR-HPV) they had before the conization in 95% there was no residual tumour in the final pathology, or during the follow up.
To our knowledge there is no prospective study that examined the the prognostic value of Conization and negative HR- HPV typing after Conization prior to surgical intervention in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer and Adenocarcinoma in Situ.
Aim:
In women with cervical cancer -Squamous cell carcinoma, Adeno carcinoma,
Adeno-squamous carcinoma or AIS we want to examine prospectively:
- Examine if negative HR-HPV after conization to the HR-HPV the women had before conization has a high prognostic value for no residual tumour in the final pathology.
- To examine if conization in women with cervical tumour up to Stage I B 2 (FIGO 2018) is corelated with better prognosis.
- Conditions
- Cervix Cancer, HPV-Related Malignancy
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Post Conization HR HPV positive | Women with a Post Conization cervical test positive for HR HPV | |
| Post Conization HR HPV negative | Women with a Post Conization cervical test negative for HR HPV | |
| No Conization HR HPV positive | Women who did not go through Conization prior to surgery and had a cervical test positive for HR HPV | |
| No Conization HR HPV negative | Women who did not go through Conization prior to surgery and had a cervical test negative for HR HPV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Final Pathology
Residual disease in final pathology
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Disease recurrence
number of months until Disease recurrence
Measured: 5 year
Mortality
mortality rate during the study between the groups
Measured: 5 year
complications
major complications
Measured: 5 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2024
- Study start26 Jul 2023
- Primary completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervix CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rambam Health Care Campus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yoav Siegler B.Sc. M.D, Rambam Health Care Campus
- Investigators
- Yoav Siegler, MD, Principal investigator, Rambam Health Care Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06196190
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0256-23-RMB
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, Geraets DT, Klaustermeier JE, Lloveras B, Tous S, Felix A, Bravo LE, Shin HR, Vallejos CS, de Ruiz PA, Lima MA, Guimera N, Clavero O, Alejo M, Llombart-Bosch A, Cheng-Yang C, Tatti SA, Kasamatsu E, Iljazovic E, Odida M, Prado R, Seoud M, Grce M, Usubutun A, Jain A, Suarez GA, Lombardi LE, Banjo A, Menendez C, Domingo EJ, Velasco J, Nessa A, Chichareon SC, Qiao YL, Lerma E, Garland SM, Sasagawa T, Ferrera A, Hammouda D, Mariani L, Pelayo A, Steiner I, Oliva E, Meijer CJ, Al-Jassar WF, Cruz E, Wright TC, Puras A, Llave CL, Tzardi M, Agorastos T, Garcia-Barriola V, Clavel C, Ordi J, Andujar M, Castellsague X, Sanchez GI, Nowakowski AM, Bornstein J, Munoz N, Bosch FX; Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1048-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
PubMed 20952254Siegler E, Reichman Y, Kugelman N, Mackuli L, Lavie O, Ostrovsky L, Shaked-Mishan P, Segev Y. Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Types in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2-3 and in Invasive Cervical Cancer Patients. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2019 Oct;23(4):248-252. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000486.
PubMed 31592971Cuschieri K, Bhatia R, Cruickshank M, Hillemanns P, Arbyn M. HPV testing in the context of post-treatment follow up (test of cure). J Clin Virol. 2016 Mar;76 Suppl 1:S56-S61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
PubMed 26525202Bizzarri N, Pedone Anchora L, Kucukmetin A, Ratnavelu N, Korompelis P, Carbone V, Fedele C, Bruno M, Vizzielli G, Gallotta V, De Vincenzo R, Chiantera V, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Ferrandina G, Scambia G. Protective Role of Conization Before Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3585-3594. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09695-4. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
PubMed 33620615Uppal S, Gehrig PA, Peng K, Bixel KL, Matsuo K, Vetter MH, Davidson BA, Cisa MP, Lees BF, Brunette LL, Tucker K, Stuart Staley A, Gotlieb WH, Holloway RW, Essel KG, Holman LL, Goldfeld E, Olawaiye A, Rose SL. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1030-1040. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03012. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
PubMed 32031867Chacon E, Manzour N, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Nunez-Cordoba JM, Martin-Calvo N, Capilna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Gil Moreno A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujic G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vazquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Boria F, Alcazar JL, Chiva L; SUCCOR study group; SUCCOR study Group. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Feb;32(2):117-124. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002544. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
PubMed 35039455Plante M, Renaud MC, Francois H, Roy M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Sep;94(3):614-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.032.
PubMed 15350349Suri A, Frumovitz M, Milam MR, dos Reis R, Ramirez PT. Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan;112(1):110-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
PubMed 18952270Li X, Xia L, Chen X, Fu Y, Wu X. Simple conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
PubMed 32518013Costa S, Negri G, Sideri M, Santini D, Martinelli G, Venturoli S, Pelusi C, Syrjanen S, Syrjanen K, Pelusi G. Human papillomavirus (HPV) test and PAP smear as predictors of outcome in conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul;106(1):170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 4.
PubMed 17481701Costa S, Sideri M, Negri G, Venturoli S, Santini D, Casadio C, Sandri MT, Bucchi L. The predictive value of human papillomavirus testing for the outcome of patients conservatively treated for stage IA squamous cell cervical carcinoma. J Clin Virol. 2015 Sep;70:53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
PubMed 26305820Siegler E, Goldberg Y, Siegler Y, Shaked-Mishan P, Mazareb S, Kugelman N, Mackuli L, Sabo E, Lavie O, Segev Y. The Association Between Clearance of Human Papillomavirus After Conization for Cervical Cancer and Absence of Cancer. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021 Oct 1;25(4):276-280. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000622.
PubMed 34369434
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Prognostic Value of Conization and Negative HPV Typing After Conization Prior to Surgical Intervention in Adenocarcinoma in Situ and Early Stage Cervical Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06196190
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0256-23-RMB
- Conditions
- Cervix Cancer, HPV-Related Malignancy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Rambam Health Care CampusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In women with cervical cancer -Squamous cell carcinoma, Adeno carcinoma,
Adeno-squamous carcinoma or AIS we want to examine prospectively:
- Examine if negative HR-HPV after conization to the HR-HPV the women had before conization has a high prognostic value for no residual tumor in the final pathology.
- To examine if conization in women with cervical tumor up to Stage I B 2 (FIGO 2018) is corelated with better prognosis.
Detailed description
The treatment of invasive cervical cancer is tailored according to the FIGO recommendations. The standard treatment for women with early-stage, (IA2-IB1) cervical cancer is simple or Radical Hysterectomy (RH) and in women with Adenocarcinoma in Situ hysterectomy is recommended when they finish their fertility program .A Few studies describe that conization before Radical Hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer stage I B 1 ( tumour up to 4 cm according to FIGO 2009 ) , are in correlation with better prognosis , Bizzari describe women that had conization before RH had better 5 year survival. Uppal report that those women have less recurrence, OR of 0.4 compared with women without conization. Chacon summarize SUCCOR study, a multi center study that collected data about 374 women with cervical cancer Stage I B 1 according to FIGO 2009 -tumour up to 4 cm .187 women had conization before RH and 187 had RH without conization. Women that had conization had 65% less recurrence 'and 75% les mortality.
Several studies have explored the possibility of a less aggressive approach for cervical cancer patients with low-risk early-stage disease who wish to preserve fertility. The parameters that were investigated were: the depth of invasion, tumour diameter, lymph node status positive margins in conization, positive Endo Cervical Curettage (ECC) and lymph-vascular space invasion. Those parameters have a low sensitivity and between 50-65% of women who had RH had no residual tumour in the final pathology.
Schmeler describe that woman who had conization before RH in 97.5% had no residual tumour.
A study of 92 women with cervical cancer and Adeno Carcinoma In situ (AIS) that short time after conization were negative to High-Risk HPV (HR-HPV) they had before the conization in 95% there was no residual tumour in the final pathology, or during the follow up.
To our knowledge there is no prospective study that examined the the prognostic value of Conization and negative HR- HPV typing after Conization prior to surgical intervention in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer and Adenocarcinoma in Situ.
Aim:
In women with cervical cancer -Squamous cell carcinoma, Adeno carcinoma,
Adeno-squamous carcinoma or AIS we want to examine prospectively:
- Examine if negative HR-HPV after conization to the HR-HPV the women had before conization has a high prognostic value for no residual tumour in the final pathology.
- To examine if conization in women with cervical tumour up to Stage I B 2 (FIGO 2018) is corelated with better prognosis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Post Conization HR HPV positive | – | –Women with a Post Conization cervical test positive for HR HPV |
| Post Conization HR HPV negative | – | –Women with a Post Conization cervical test negative for HR HPV |
| No Conization HR HPV positive | – | –Women who did not go through Conization prior to surgery and had a cervical test positive for HR HPV |
| No Conization HR HPV negative | – | –Women who did not go through Conization prior to surgery and had a cervical test negative for HR HPV |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Women with cervical cancer -Squamous cell carcinoma, Adeno carcinoma, Adeno-squamous carcinoma or AIS
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age Range: 18-85 years old Cervical cancer stage I B 2(Tumor up to 4 cm FIGO 2018) AIS HPV types before and after conization
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnant women under 18 years old. Women who refused to continue to be in study. Women that data about HPV types , final pathology or complication are missing.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Final Pathology
Time frame: 1 year
Residual disease in final pathology
3 secondary outcomes
Disease recurrence
Time frame: 5 year
Mortality
Time frame: 5 year
complications
Time frame: 5 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 20952254de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, Geraets DT, Klaustermeier JE, Lloveras B, Tous S, Felix A, Bravo LE, Shin HR, Vallejos CS, de Ruiz PA, Lima MA, Guimera N, Clavero O, Alejo M, Llombart-Bosch A, Cheng-Yang C, Tatti SA, Kasamatsu E, Iljazovic E, Odida M, Prado R, Seoud M, Grce M, Usubutun A, Jain A, Suarez GA, Lombardi LE, Banjo A, Menendez C, Domingo EJ, Velasco J, Nessa A, Chichareon SC, Qiao YL, Lerma E, Garland SM, Sasagawa T, Ferrera A, Hammouda D, Mariani L, Pelayo A, Steiner I, Oliva E, Meijer CJ, Al-Jassar WF, Cruz E, Wright TC, Puras A, Llave CL, Tzardi M, Agorastos T, Garcia-Barriola V, Clavel C, Ordi J, Andujar M, Castellsague X, Sanchez GI, Nowakowski AM, Bornstein J, Munoz N, Bosch FX; Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1048-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
- Background: PubMed 31592971Siegler E, Reichman Y, Kugelman N, Mackuli L, Lavie O, Ostrovsky L, Shaked-Mishan P, Segev Y. Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Types in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2-3 and in Invasive Cervical Cancer Patients. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2019 Oct;23(4):248-252. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000486.
- Background: PubMed 26525202Cuschieri K, Bhatia R, Cruickshank M, Hillemanns P, Arbyn M. HPV testing in the context of post-treatment follow up (test of cure). J Clin Virol. 2016 Mar;76 Suppl 1:S56-S61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 33620615Bizzarri N, Pedone Anchora L, Kucukmetin A, Ratnavelu N, Korompelis P, Carbone V, Fedele C, Bruno M, Vizzielli G, Gallotta V, De Vincenzo R, Chiantera V, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Ferrandina G, Scambia G. Protective Role of Conization Before Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3585-3594. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09695-4. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
- Background: PubMed 32031867Uppal S, Gehrig PA, Peng K, Bixel KL, Matsuo K, Vetter MH, Davidson BA, Cisa MP, Lees BF, Brunette LL, Tucker K, Stuart Staley A, Gotlieb WH, Holloway RW, Essel KG, Holman LL, Goldfeld E, Olawaiye A, Rose SL. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1030-1040. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03012. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
- Background: PubMed 35039455Chacon E, Manzour N, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Nunez-Cordoba JM, Martin-Calvo N, Capilna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Gil Moreno A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujic G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vazquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Boria F, Alcazar JL, Chiva L; SUCCOR study group; SUCCOR study Group. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Feb;32(2):117-124. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002544. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 15350349Plante M, Renaud MC, Francois H, Roy M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Sep;94(3):614-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.032.
- Background: PubMed 18952270Suri A, Frumovitz M, Milam MR, dos Reis R, Ramirez PT. Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan;112(1):110-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 32518013Li X, Xia L, Chen X, Fu Y, Wu X. Simple conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 17481701Costa S, Negri G, Sideri M, Santini D, Martinelli G, Venturoli S, Pelusi C, Syrjanen S, Syrjanen K, Pelusi G. Human papillomavirus (HPV) test and PAP smear as predictors of outcome in conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul;106(1):170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 26305820Costa S, Sideri M, Negri G, Venturoli S, Santini D, Casadio C, Sandri MT, Bucchi L. The predictive value of human papillomavirus testing for the outcome of patients conservatively treated for stage IA squamous cell cervical carcinoma. J Clin Virol. 2015 Sep;70:53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
- Background: PubMed 34369434Siegler E, Goldberg Y, Siegler Y, Shaked-Mishan P, Mazareb S, Kugelman N, Mackuli L, Sabo E, Lavie O, Segev Y. The Association Between Clearance of Human Papillomavirus After Conization for Cervical Cancer and Absence of Cancer. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021 Oct 1;25(4):276-280. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000622.
Related trials for Cervix Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Recruiting
Ameliorated Pap Tests and Cervical Cancer Screening Participation
Cervical Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer Screening Methods
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Triapine With Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With IB2-IVA Cervical or Vaginal Cancer
Advanced Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Not yet recruiting
Development of Systems and Education for Cervical Cancer Prevention (DOSE-CC)
Cervical Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Adaptive Radiotherapy for Safe Hypofractionation
Cancer, Endometrial Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Yoav Siegler, MD principal investigator
Rambam Health Care Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervix Cancer and HPV-Related Malignancy, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yoav Siegler, MD (+972528263054, yoav.siegler@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Final Pathology (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06196190, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2024.