Environmental Enteric DysfunctionPhase 2MPIGHNCT06196450
Maternal Probiotic Intervention to Improve Gut Health
A Phase 2 study testing Vivomixx and Microcrystalline maltose in people with Environmental Enteric Dysfunction and Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis, run by International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh at 1 site in Bangladesh.
Trial summary
This trial will determine if a well-established probiotic, Vivomixx, can modulate maternal microbiota and ameliorate maternal environmental enteropathy which compromises growth in the first 1000 days. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Environmental Enteric Dysfunction, Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis
- What is being tested?
- Vivomixx and Microcrystalline maltose
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBangladesh
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2023to 31 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women aged 18 years or older in the first trimester or early second trimester of pregnancy, living in defined geographical areas of Bangladesh (Matlab), Pakistan, Senegal and Zambia, where it can be assumed that environmental enteropathy is universal
Who cannot join
- Potential participants will not be enrolled if they:
- have had diarrhea, defined as the passage of three or more loose stools per 24 hours, in the preceding 14 days
- have taken antibiotics or probiotics in the preceding 14 days
- have taken steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the preceding 14 days
- have severe pallor (hemoglobin concentration <8g/dl)
- have any chronic disease, illness or condition which in the opinion of the investigator will complicate the assessment of safety or efficacy
Show all 12Show fewer
- have any gastrointestinal contraindication to ingestion of a capsule (known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, stricture, fistula, gastroparesis, or any swallowing disorder)
- have the plan to observe fast at any time during the intervention period
- have the plan to leave the study area within the follow-up period
- are included in any other intervention trial
- belong to a household from which another woman is already enrolled in the study
- but may be enrolled if/when these disqualifiers have expired
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Bangladesh1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
Chāndpur
Salam Khan, +88 02 2222 77 001-10 ext. 3206, salamk@icddrb.org
S. M. Tafsir Hasan, MBBS, MS
About this study
Official title: Ability of the Probiotic Vivomixx to Improve Environmental Enteropathy in Pregnant Women: a Proof of Concept Trial in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Senegal and Zambia
This trial will determine if a well-established probiotic, Vivomixx, can modulate maternal microbiota and ameliorate maternal environmental enteropathy which compromises growth in the first 1000 days. The probiotic Vivomixx has been used in many thousands of people including pregnant women, both within and outside a research context. This trial is the first in a proposed series of proof-of-concept intervention studies which are intended to provide data to enable a rational selection of interventions to be evaluated at scale in future large scale trials in which birth outcomes and postnatal growth will be key endpoints.
Read the detailed description
Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 years of age were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development, impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of noncommunicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting. Indeed, EED is believed to be responsible for 40% of childhood stunting.
Disruption in intestinal barrier function affects gut immune homeostasis, nutrient flows, and consequently dysbiosis in the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota consists of 100 trillion bacteria which interact with epithelial cells, the mucus layer and the mucosal immune system that balances tolerance and effector functions. Thus, the gut microbiome has an important role in shaping the responsiveness of the gut immune system. The mucus barrier and the normal gut microbiota limit enteropathogen colonisation. Influx of bacteria from the lumen to the systemic circulation represents microbial translocation and initiation of systemic of inflammatory process through recognition of pathogenassociated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) present on Antigen Presenting Cells (APCs). Three fundamental processes drive the epithelial damage which is so important in EED: infection, undernutrition, and immune dysfunction. Multiple clinical trials show that efforts to correct malnutrition through conventional therapies and improving hygiene and sanitation do not overcome growth deficits by more than about 10%. There is increasing interest in the use of probiotics which may allow pathogen decolonization, improve barrier function and restore overall gut homeostasis. Such therapies are at early stage of trials but may have potential in addressing the global burden of EED, by improving barrier function and gut pathophysiology.
Colonization of gut by enteropathogens is common in children with EED. These include ETEC, Campylobacter, Shigella and Salmonella species. Consistent data from Bangladesh and Zambia show that children with refractory stunting carry over four pathogens on average, whilst controls carry less than two. There is also clear evidence of altered composition of the microbiota in children with EED.
Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.
To date the focus of research on childhood stunting has been on the young child. It is increasingly appreciated, however, that stunting often begins in utero and the focus has shifted to women's health and pregnancy. For example, the Lancet 2021 Series on maternal and child undernutrition states that "Investments to reduce undernutrition in women are important not only for women's own health but also for the health and nutrition of their children". Results from rural Bangladesh reveal poor gestational weight gain that ultimately leads to intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight and ultimately stunting and wasting. Furthermore, another study recently completed in slum settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh demonstrated a high prevalence of EED among undernourished women. Intestinal histopathology was abnormal in more than 80% of women. We postulate that growth retardation in utero is a consequence of EED in the mother during pregnancy and lactation. This leads to systemic inflammation, which leads to disadvantageous partitioning of nutrients, and reduced nutrient availability.
This trial will explore the conceptual framework that a well-known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can also reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.
- Being tested
- Vivomixx, Microcrystalline maltose
- Keywords
- probiotic, gut health, GWG, fetal growth, perinatal outcome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VivomixxDietary supplement
Vivomixx is a commercially available probiotic mixture consisting of eight probiotic lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus, Streptococcus salivarius subspecies thermophiles, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium infantis.
Microcrystalline maltoseDietary supplement
Microcrystalline maltose as placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Vivomixx also known as VSL#3, Powder (in sachets), weight 4.4g, 450 X 10^9 cfu of probiotic bacteria per sachet, dose 1 sachet daily for 56 days Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vivomixx |
| Placebo arm | Placebo comparator | Microcrystalline maltose, Powder (in sachets), weight 4.4g, dose 1 sachet daily for 56 days Receives: Dietary Supplement: Microcrystalline maltose |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage change (mean, unweighted) in a multiple panel of biomarkers between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, compared to control group
Plasma CRP, AGP, sCD14, LBP, CD163, iFABP, and fecal myeloperoxidase, neopterin, calprotectin and lipocalin by ELISA
Measured: 56 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Reduction in colonisation
Specific enteropathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, ETEC, EPEC, EAEC, rotavirus, norovirus, Giardia and Cryptosporidium) by TaqMan Array cards, between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, in Vivomixx compared to placebo groups
Measured: 56 days
Change in microbiome
Measured by whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing, post versus pre intervention, in the intervention and placebo groups
Measured: 56 days
Change in untargeted metabolome
Measured by LC-MS/MS in fecal and CapScan samples
Measured: 56 days
Reduction in intestinal permeability
Measured by lactulose-rhamnose (LR) ratio in Vivomixx compared to placebo group
Measured: 56 days
Change in weight gain velocity in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy
Rate of weight gain (kg/week)
Measured: 14 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2024
- Study start22 Jun 2023
- Primary completion31 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Environmental Enteric DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multi-site phase II randomised controlled trial (Proof of concept study)
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- S. M. Tafsir Hasan, MBBS, MS, Principal investigator, Nutrition Research Division, icddr,b
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06196450
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PR-22084
- Acronym
- MPIGH
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ability of the Probiotic Vivomixx to Improve Environmental Enteropathy in Pregnant Women: a Proof of Concept Trial in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Senegal and Zambia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06196450
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MPIGH / PR-22084
- Keywords
- probiotic, gut health, GWG, fetal growth, perinatal outcome
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial will determine if a well-established probiotic, Vivomixx, can modulate maternal microbiota and ameliorate maternal environmental enteropathy which compromises growth in the first 1000 days. The probiotic Vivomixx has been used in many thousands of people including pregnant women, both within and outside a research context. This trial is the first in a proposed series of proof-of-concept intervention studies which are intended to provide data to enable a rational selection of interventions to be evaluated at scale in future large scale trials in which birth outcomes and postnatal growth will be key endpoints.
Detailed description
Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 years of age were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development, impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of noncommunicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting. Indeed, EED is believed to be responsible for 40% of childhood stunting.
Disruption in intestinal barrier function affects gut immune homeostasis, nutrient flows, and consequently dysbiosis in the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota consists of 100 trillion bacteria which interact with epithelial cells, the mucus layer and the mucosal immune system that balances tolerance and effector functions. Thus, the gut microbiome has an important role in shaping the responsiveness of the gut immune system. The mucus barrier and the normal gut microbiota limit enteropathogen colonisation. Influx of bacteria from the lumen to the systemic circulation represents microbial translocation and initiation of systemic of inflammatory process through recognition of pathogenassociated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) present on Antigen Presenting Cells (APCs). Three fundamental processes drive the epithelial damage which is so important in EED: infection, undernutrition, and immune dysfunction. Multiple clinical trials show that efforts to correct malnutrition through conventional therapies and improving hygiene and sanitation do not overcome growth deficits by more than about 10%. There is increasing interest in the use of probiotics which may allow pathogen decolonization, improve barrier function and restore overall gut homeostasis. Such therapies are at early stage of trials but may have potential in addressing the global burden of EED, by improving barrier function and gut pathophysiology.
Colonization of gut by enteropathogens is common in children with EED. These include ETEC, Campylobacter, Shigella and Salmonella species. Consistent data from Bangladesh and Zambia show that children with refractory stunting carry over four pathogens on average, whilst controls carry less than two. There is also clear evidence of altered composition of the microbiota in children with EED.
Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.
To date the focus of research on childhood stunting has been on the young child. It is increasingly appreciated, however, that stunting often begins in utero and the focus has shifted to women's health and pregnancy. For example, the Lancet 2021 Series on maternal and child undernutrition states that "Investments to reduce undernutrition in women are important not only for women's own health but also for the health and nutrition of their children". Results from rural Bangladesh reveal poor gestational weight gain that ultimately leads to intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight and ultimately stunting and wasting. Furthermore, another study recently completed in slum settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh demonstrated a high prevalence of EED among undernourished women. Intestinal histopathology was abnormal in more than 80% of women. We postulate that growth retardation in utero is a consequence of EED in the mother during pregnancy and lactation. This leads to systemic inflammation, which leads to disadvantageous partitioning of nutrients, and reduced nutrient availability.
This trial will explore the conceptual framework that a well-known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can also reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multi-site phase II randomised controlled trial (Proof of concept study)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: VivomixxVivomixx also known as VSL#3, Powder (in sachets), weight 4.4g, 450 X 10^9 cfu of probiotic bacteria per sachet, dose 1 sachet daily for 56 days |
| Placebo arm | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: Microcrystalline maltoseMicrocrystalline maltose, Powder (in sachets), weight 4.4g, dose 1 sachet daily for 56 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women aged 18 years or older in the first trimester or early second trimester of pregnancy, living in defined geographical areas of Bangladesh (Matlab), Pakistan, Senegal and Zambia, where it can be assumed that environmental enteropathy is universal
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Potential participants will not be enrolled if they:
- but may be enrolled if/when these disqualifiers have expired
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VivomixxVivomixx is a commercially available probiotic mixture consisting of eight probiotic lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus, Streptococcus salivarius subspecies thermophiles, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium infantis. | Dietary supplement | Intervention arm |
| Microcrystalline maltoseMicrocrystalline maltose as placebo | Dietary supplement | Placebo arm |
Primary outcome
Percentage change (mean, unweighted) in a multiple panel of biomarkers between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, compared to control group
Time frame: 56 days
Plasma CRP, AGP, sCD14, LBP, CD163, iFABP, and fecal myeloperoxidase, neopterin, calprotectin and lipocalin by ELISA
5 secondary outcomes
Reduction in colonisation
Time frame: 56 days
Change in microbiome
Time frame: 56 days
Change in untargeted metabolome
Time frame: 56 days
Reduction in intestinal permeability
Time frame: 56 days
Change in weight gain velocity in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy
Time frame: 14 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Environmental Enteric Dysfunction
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Maternal Probiotic Intervention to Improve Gut Health-Trial II-Pakistan
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), Stunting
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Comparative Efficacy of Antibiotics for Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth in Bangladeshi Children
Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study of a Modified Therapeutic Food Compared With a Standard Nutrient Supplement in Young Children in Rural Guatemala
Stunting of Growth, Chronic Malnutrition
Enrolling by invitation
Effect of Hygiene and Menstrual Hygiene Interventions on Learning and Psychosocial Wellbeing in Madagascar
Urinary Tract Infections, Malnutrition
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Glucagon-like Peptide 2 (GLP-2) in Undernourished Women Improving From Histology-Confirmed Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED)
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
S. M. Tafsir Hasan, MBBS, MS principal investigator
Nutrition Research Division, icddr,b
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Vivomixx and Microcrystalline maltose in people with Environmental Enteric Dysfunction and Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis, run by International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh at 1 site in Bangladesh.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Bangladesh. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact S. M. Tafsir Hasan, MBBS, MS ((+88 02) 9827001-10 ext. 2216, tafsir.hasan@icddrb.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage change (mean, unweighted) in a multiple panel of biomarkers between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, compared to control group (time frame: 56 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2024.