Cervical CancerNCT06197126
MRI-based Signatures for Survival Prediction in Cervical Cancer With Radiotherapy
An observational study of Cervical Cancer and Radiotherapy, run by Fujian Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study aims to validate the value of tumor involvement features based on MRI in cervical cancer, facilitate the development of a more appropriate model for risk stratification, and help patients with varying risk profiles make appropriate decisions in treatment selection and follow-up plans. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 85 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer, Radiotherapy, Prognostic Model
- What is being tested?
- Treatment mainly composed of external pelvic beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by individualized high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) .
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 85 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: cervical cancer patients received definitive radiotherapy with pre-treatment MRI.
Who may be able to join
- (1) pathologically confirmed CC, (2) initially treated in our center
Who cannot join
- (1) lack of pre-treatment MRI, (2) prior anti-tumor treatment, (3) pelvic surgery history, (4) incomplete therapy, (5) loss of follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: A Prognostic Model Based on MRI for Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Radiotherapy
This study aims to validate the value of tumor involvement features based on MRI in cervical cancer, facilitate the development of a more appropriate model for risk stratification, and help patients with varying risk profiles make appropriate decisions in treatment selection and follow-up plans.
Read the detailed description
Even with the development of advanced technology, the prognosis for CC patients who received radiotherapy is still an intractable problem. Almost 40% suffered disease recurrence among locally advanced patients after radiotherapy and the reported 5-year overall survival is 50-70%. The present FIGO staging is controversial in pre-treatment assessment, which is mainly based on physical examination. An ambiguous diagnosis leads to different treatment strategies and follow-up plans, which is associated with prognosis non-improvement. Incorporation of the tumor involvement features based on the MRI into pre-treatment assessment could standardize and improve the consistency and repeatability of diagnosis.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer, Radiotherapy, Prognostic Model, MRI
- Being tested
- Treatment mainly composed of external pelvic beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by individualized high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) .
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment mainly composed of external pelvic beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by individualized high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) .Radiation
Also called concurrent chemothearpy
The chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (40 mg/m2) or nedaplatin (80 mg/m2) monotherapy or combined with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) every three weeks during radiotherapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| cervical cancer patients with radiotherapy | Radiotherapy is the main treatment strategy with an overall dose of over 75Gy. Receives: Radiation: Treatment mainly composed of external pelvic beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by individualized high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) . |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
overall survival
the interval from diagnostic day to death or the last follow-up
Measured: 1-36 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
progression-free survival
the interval from diagnostic day to death, the last follow-up, or the onset of regional recurrence or distant metastasis
Measured: 1-36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fujian Cancer HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fujian Cancer Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06197126
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SY-GO001
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PubMed 33538338Cibula D, Potter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C, Kohler C, Landoni F, Lax S, Lindegaard JC, Mahantshetty U, Mathevet P, McCluggage WG, McCormack M, Naik R, Nout R, Pignata S, Ponce J, Querleu D, Raspagliesi F, Rodolakis A, Tamussino K, Wimberger P, Raspollini MR. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jun;127(3):404-416. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 May 1.
PubMed 29728273Matsuo K, Shimada M, Nakamura K, Takei Y, Ushijima K, Sumi T, Ohara T, Yahata H, Mikami M, Sugiyama T. Predictors for pathological parametrial invasion in clinical stage IIB cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1417-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
PubMed 30846298Jiang W, He T, Liu S, Zheng Y, Xiang L, Pei X, Wang Z, Yang H. The PIK3CA E542K and E545K mutations promote glycolysis and proliferation via induction of the beta-catenin/SIRT3 signaling pathway in cervical cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Dec 14;11(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0674-5.
PubMed 30547809Lindegaard JC, Petric P, Lindegaard AM, Tanderup K, Fokdal LU. Evaluation of a New Prognostic Tumor Score in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Integrating Clinical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 15;106(4):754-763. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.031. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
PubMed 31794837Balcacer P, Shergill A, Litkouhi B. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jul;44(7):2557-2571. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01984-7.
PubMed 30903231Salib MY, Russell JHB, Stewart VR, Sudderuddin SA, Barwick TD, Rockall AG, Bharwani N. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging. Radiographics. 2020 Oct;40(6):1807-1822. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020200013. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
PubMed 32946322Tsuruoka S, Kataoka M, Hamamoto Y, Tokumasu A, Uwatsu K, Kanzaki H, Takata N, Ishikawa H, Ouchi A, Mochizuki T. Tumor growth patterns on magnetic resonance imaging and treatment outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1119-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01457-3. Epub 2019 May 11.
PubMed 31079257Bhatla N, Singhal S, Dhamija E, Mathur S, Natarajan J, Maheshwari A. Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system. Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug;154(2):273-283. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4225_20.
PubMed 35295012Ren J, Li Y, Yang JJ, Zhao J, Xiang Y, Xia C, Cao Y, Chen B, Guan H, Qi YF, Tang W, Chen K, He YL, Jin ZY, Xue HD. MRI-based radiomics analysis improves preoperative diagnostic performance for the depth of stromal invasion in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Insights Imaging. 2022 Jan 29;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01156-0.
PubMed 35092505
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prognostic Model Based on MRI for Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Radiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06197126
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SY-GO001
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer, Radiotherapy, Prognostic Model, MRI
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fujian Cancer HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to validate the value of tumor involvement features based on MRI in cervical cancer, facilitate the development of a more appropriate model for risk stratification, and help patients with varying risk profiles make appropriate decisions in treatment selection and follow-up plans.
Detailed description
Even with the development of advanced technology, the prognosis for CC patients who received radiotherapy is still an intractable problem. Almost 40% suffered disease recurrence among locally advanced patients after radiotherapy and the reported 5-year overall survival is 50-70%. The present FIGO staging is controversial in pre-treatment assessment, which is mainly based on physical examination. An ambiguous diagnosis leads to different treatment strategies and follow-up plans, which is associated with prognosis non-improvement. Incorporation of the tumor involvement features based on the MRI into pre-treatment assessment could standardize and improve the consistency and repeatability of diagnosis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| cervical cancer patients with radiotherapy | – | Radiation: Treatment mainly composed of external pelvic beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by individualized high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) .Radiotherapy is the main treatment strategy with an overall dose of over 75Gy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 85 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- cervical cancer patients received definitive radiotherapy with pre-treatment MRI.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- (1) pathologically confirmed CC, (2) initially treated in our center
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- (1) lack of pre-treatment MRI, (2) prior anti-tumor treatment, (3) pelvic surgery history, (4) incomplete therapy, (5) loss of follow-up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment mainly composed of external pelvic beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by individualized high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) .Also: concurrent chemothearpyThe chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (40 mg/m2) or nedaplatin (80 mg/m2) monotherapy or combined with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) every three weeks during radiotherapy. | Radiation | cervical cancer patients with radiotherapy |
Primary outcome
overall survival
Time frame: 1-36 months
the interval from diagnostic day to death or the last follow-up
1 secondary outcome
progression-free survival
Time frame: 1-36 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 33538338Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 29728273Cibula D, Potter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C, Kohler C, Landoni F, Lax S, Lindegaard JC, Mahantshetty U, Mathevet P, McCluggage WG, McCormack M, Naik R, Nout R, Pignata S, Ponce J, Querleu D, Raspagliesi F, Rodolakis A, Tamussino K, Wimberger P, Raspollini MR. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jun;127(3):404-416. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 May 1.
- Background: PubMed 30846298Matsuo K, Shimada M, Nakamura K, Takei Y, Ushijima K, Sumi T, Ohara T, Yahata H, Mikami M, Sugiyama T. Predictors for pathological parametrial invasion in clinical stage IIB cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1417-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 30547809Jiang W, He T, Liu S, Zheng Y, Xiang L, Pei X, Wang Z, Yang H. The PIK3CA E542K and E545K mutations promote glycolysis and proliferation via induction of the beta-catenin/SIRT3 signaling pathway in cervical cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Dec 14;11(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0674-5.
- Background: PubMed 31794837Lindegaard JC, Petric P, Lindegaard AM, Tanderup K, Fokdal LU. Evaluation of a New Prognostic Tumor Score in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Integrating Clinical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 15;106(4):754-763. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.031. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
- Background: PubMed 30903231Balcacer P, Shergill A, Litkouhi B. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jul;44(7):2557-2571. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01984-7.
- Background: PubMed 32946322Salib MY, Russell JHB, Stewart VR, Sudderuddin SA, Barwick TD, Rockall AG, Bharwani N. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging. Radiographics. 2020 Oct;40(6):1807-1822. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020200013. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 31079257Tsuruoka S, Kataoka M, Hamamoto Y, Tokumasu A, Uwatsu K, Kanzaki H, Takata N, Ishikawa H, Ouchi A, Mochizuki T. Tumor growth patterns on magnetic resonance imaging and treatment outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1119-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01457-3. Epub 2019 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 35295012Bhatla N, Singhal S, Dhamija E, Mathur S, Natarajan J, Maheshwari A. Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system. Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug;154(2):273-283. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4225_20.
- Background: PubMed 35092505Ren J, Li Y, Yang JJ, Zhao J, Xiang Y, Xia C, Cao Y, Chen B, Guan H, Qi YF, Tang W, Chen K, He YL, Jin ZY, Xue HD. MRI-based radiomics analysis improves preoperative diagnostic performance for the depth of stromal invasion in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Insights Imaging. 2022 Jan 29;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01156-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervical Cancer and Radiotherapy, run by Fujian Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yang Sun (+8615959028989, sunyang@fjzlhospital.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
overall survival (time frame: 1-36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06197126, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2024.