Atrial FibrillationNCT06198933
Renal Function and Hemolysis After Pulsed-field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
The aim of the project is to assess hemolysis and renal function after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using pulsed-field energy. Hemolysis will be determined using the concentration of red blood cell microparticles at the end of the ablation (when all ablation were done, before sheath removal). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Pulsed-field ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 1 May 2024to 30 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient will symptomatic paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation indicated for catheter ablation according to the standard criteria will be enrolled.
Who may be able to join
- symptomatic paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Who cannot join
- known hematologic disorders
- disorders associated with increased hemolysis
- known significant hepatic disease
- patient in permanent hemodialysis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cardiocenter, 3rd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague, 10034
University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 00420 ext. 267161111, pavel.osmancik@volny.cz
Pavel Osmančík
About this study
Official title: The Assessment of Hemolysis and Renal Functions During and After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using Pulsed-field Energy
The aim of the project is to assess hemolysis and renal function after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using pulsed-field energy. Hemolysis will be determined using the concentration of red blood cell microparticles at the end of the ablation (when all ablation were done, before sheath removal). Hemoglobinuria will be assessed one day after the procedure. Renal functions will be assessed one and three day after the procedure using standard parameters (creatinine, urea). The goal is to assess the acute worsening fo renal functions after pulsed-field ablation in relation to the number of PF applications, and to the degree of immediate post-procedural hemolysis.
Read the detailed description
Methods The project will include patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF who, according to standard recommended procedures, are indicated for catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy and will sign informed consent. Patients with spontaneously present hemolysis (hematologic disorders) and patients in a dialysis program will be excluded. The catheterization procedure will be performed routinely as currently practiced at our institution. Specifically, pulmonary vein isolation will be conducted in all patients, and for patients with non-paroxysmal AF, additional additive ablation lesions will also be performed (most commonly ablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium and mitral isthmus, possibly the cavotricuspid isthmus). The ablation will always be performed under moderate sedation or general anesthesia with the participation of an anesthesiologist, as per our institution's practice. A total of 100 patients are planned to be enrolled. Prior to the procedure, patients will receive at least 4 weeks of anticoagulant treatment with NOACs, as recommended, and this treatment will be discontinued on the day of the procedure (i.e., the last tablet will be taken the day before the procedure). NOACs will be reintroduced into their medication regimen the day after ablation. All patients will undergo outpatient baseline blood tests, including renal function (creatinine, urea), as currently standard and required (up to 2 weeks before the procedure). Post-procedure, patients will be adequately hydrated; in addition to the recommended active oral intake post-procedure, all patients will receive an extra 1000 ml of saline solution during the afternoon following the procedure (unless there is a risk of overhydration, for instance, in the case of severe dysfunction).
Blood sampling Blood samples will be collected at two different times. Firstly, at the end of the procedure, 12 ml of blood will be drawn into tubes for hemolysis examination (anticoagulated blood with EDTA and Li-heparin). The degree of hemolysis will be assessed by examining red blood cell fragments (RBC microparticles) using flow cytometry. This examination is highly sensitive and capable of detecting even minimal amounts of damaged erythrocytes. The second blood sample will be collected the morning after the procedure, following the standard protocol, and will also include renal parameters (creatinine, urea) as routinely done. Additionally, on this day, a urine test for the presence of hemoglobinuria will be conducted. Both initial blood samples will be collected and analyzed during the hospitalization. A third sample for a follow-up assessment of kidney function will be required 2-3 days after the procedure. The patient will be asked to come either to our hospital for blood collection or to have it done at a laboratory near their residence. Results of this examination, if conducted outside the hospital, will be obtained from the patient over the phone. If kidney function in this sample is slightly reduced, the patient will be instructed for further monitoring or outpatient examination. In case of significantly elevated values, appropriate action will be advised promptly.
Three months post-procedure, an outpatient check-up will be conducted. Before this evaluation, the effectiveness of the ablation will be assessed using a 24-hour ECG Holter monitor, which is our current standard procedure. Additionally, kidney function will be rechecked. The purpose is to compare the number of applications of pulsed-field energy with the degree of hemolysis observed immediately after the procedure, along with kidney function shortly after. Hemolysis, the damage or breakdown of red blood cells, will be determined using a highly sensitive method and is practically certain to be present at the end of the procedure. However, whether hemolysis might lead to hemoglobinuria the following day in some cases has not been investigated, nor has the potential for temporary worsening of kidney function in certain patients. If this were the case, selecting at-risk patients (those with higher creatinine levels before the procedure) and implementing simple measures (sufficient fluid intake) could effectively prevent this complication. Our primary hypothesis is that while ablation using pulsed-field is associated with intravascular hemolysis, leading to the damage of some red blood cells, this process in only a minimal number of patients will result in hemoglobinuria, and it will not have any significant consequences on kidney function post-procedure.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Pulsed-field ablation
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, pulsed-fied ablation, hemolysis, renal function
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Hemolysis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pulsed-field ablationDevice
Patients will atrial fibrillation will undergo catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pulsed-field ablation group | Patient with atrial fibrillation will undergo catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy Receives: Device: Pulsed-field ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Red blood cell microparticles
The concentration of red blood cell microparticles in the plasma assessed using flow cytometry
Measured: day of the procedure - at the end of the procedure
Hemoglobinuria
The concentration of hemoglobin in urine
Measured: One day after the procedure
Creatinine three days
The concentration of creatinine three days after ablation
Measured: 3 days after the procedure
Secondary outcomes (3)
Lactate dehydrogenase
The concentration of lactate dehydrogenase at the end of ablation
Measured: the day of the procedure - at the end of the procedure
Haptoglobin
The concentration of haptoglobin at the end of ablation
Measured: the day of the procedure - at the end of the procedure
Creatinine one day
The concentration of creatinine one day after ablation
Measured: one day after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2024
- Study start1 May 2024
- Primary completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech Republic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06198933
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PFA RENAL HEMOLYSIS
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will be shared 6 months after publication on request.
Publications
Zoni-Berisso M, Filippi A, Landolina M, Brignoli O, D'Ambrosio G, Maglia G, Grimaldi M, Ermini G. Frequency, patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and resource usage of atrial fibrillation (from the Italian Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Management [ISAF] study). Am J Cardiol. 2013 Mar 1;111(5):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
PubMed 23273528Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Levy D, D'Agostino RB. Secular trends in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation: The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1996 Apr;131(4):790-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90288-4. No abstract available.
PubMed 8721656Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Anic A, Petru J, Funasako M, Cochet H, Minami K, Breskovic T, Sikiric I, Sediva L, Chovanec M, Koruth J, Jais P. Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 May;7(5):614-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
PubMed 33933412Ekanem E, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Reichlin T, Neven K, Metzner A, Hansen J, Blaauw Y, Maury P, Arentz T, Sommer P, Anic A, Anselme F, Boveda S, Deneke T, Willems S, van der Voort P, Tilz R, Funasako M, Scherr D, Wakili R, Steven D, Kautzner J, Vijgen J, Jais P, Petru J, Chun J, Roten L, Futing A, Rillig A, Mulder BA, Johannessen A, Rollin A, Lehrmann H, Sohns C, Jurisic Z, Savoure A, Combes S, Nentwich K, Gunawardene M, Ouss A, Kirstein B, Manninger M, Bohnen JE, Sultan A, Peichl P, Koopman P, Derval N, Turagam MK, Neuzil P; MANIFEST-PF Cooperative. Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF). Europace. 2022 Sep 1;24(8):1256-1266. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac050.
PubMed 35647644
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Assessment of Hemolysis and Renal Functions During and After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using Pulsed-field Energy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06198933
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PFA RENAL HEMOLYSIS
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, pulsed-fied ablation, hemolysis, renal function
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech RepublicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the project is to assess hemolysis and renal function after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using pulsed-field energy. Hemolysis will be determined using the concentration of red blood cell microparticles at the end of the ablation (when all ablation were done, before sheath removal). Hemoglobinuria will be assessed one day after the procedure. Renal functions will be assessed one and three day after the procedure using standard parameters (creatinine, urea). The goal is to assess the acute worsening fo renal functions after pulsed-field ablation in relation to the number of PF applications, and to the degree of immediate post-procedural hemolysis.
Detailed description
Methods The project will include patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF who, according to standard recommended procedures, are indicated for catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy and will sign informed consent. Patients with spontaneously present hemolysis (hematologic disorders) and patients in a dialysis program will be excluded. The catheterization procedure will be performed routinely as currently practiced at our institution. Specifically, pulmonary vein isolation will be conducted in all patients, and for patients with non-paroxysmal AF, additional additive ablation lesions will also be performed (most commonly ablation of the posterior wall of the left atrium and mitral isthmus, possibly the cavotricuspid isthmus). The ablation will always be performed under moderate sedation or general anesthesia with the participation of an anesthesiologist, as per our institution's practice. A total of 100 patients are planned to be enrolled. Prior to the procedure, patients will receive at least 4 weeks of anticoagulant treatment with NOACs, as recommended, and this treatment will be discontinued on the day of the procedure (i.e., the last tablet will be taken the day before the procedure). NOACs will be reintroduced into their medication regimen the day after ablation. All patients will undergo outpatient baseline blood tests, including renal function (creatinine, urea), as currently standard and required (up to 2 weeks before the procedure). Post-procedure, patients will be adequately hydrated; in addition to the recommended active oral intake post-procedure, all patients will receive an extra 1000 ml of saline solution during the afternoon following the procedure (unless there is a risk of overhydration, for instance, in the case of severe dysfunction).
Blood sampling Blood samples will be collected at two different times. Firstly, at the end of the procedure, 12 ml of blood will be drawn into tubes for hemolysis examination (anticoagulated blood with EDTA and Li-heparin). The degree of hemolysis will be assessed by examining red blood cell fragments (RBC microparticles) using flow cytometry. This examination is highly sensitive and capable of detecting even minimal amounts of damaged erythrocytes. The second blood sample will be collected the morning after the procedure, following the standard protocol, and will also include renal parameters (creatinine, urea) as routinely done. Additionally, on this day, a urine test for the presence of hemoglobinuria will be conducted. Both initial blood samples will be collected and analyzed during the hospitalization. A third sample for a follow-up assessment of kidney function will be required 2-3 days after the procedure. The patient will be asked to come either to our hospital for blood collection or to have it done at a laboratory near their residence. Results of this examination, if conducted outside the hospital, will be obtained from the patient over the phone. If kidney function in this sample is slightly reduced, the patient will be instructed for further monitoring or outpatient examination. In case of significantly elevated values, appropriate action will be advised promptly.
Three months post-procedure, an outpatient check-up will be conducted. Before this evaluation, the effectiveness of the ablation will be assessed using a 24-hour ECG Holter monitor, which is our current standard procedure. Additionally, kidney function will be rechecked. The purpose is to compare the number of applications of pulsed-field energy with the degree of hemolysis observed immediately after the procedure, along with kidney function shortly after. Hemolysis, the damage or breakdown of red blood cells, will be determined using a highly sensitive method and is practically certain to be present at the end of the procedure. However, whether hemolysis might lead to hemoglobinuria the following day in some cases has not been investigated, nor has the potential for temporary worsening of kidney function in certain patients. If this were the case, selecting at-risk patients (those with higher creatinine levels before the procedure) and implementing simple measures (sufficient fluid intake) could effectively prevent this complication. Our primary hypothesis is that while ablation using pulsed-field is associated with intravascular hemolysis, leading to the damage of some red blood cells, this process in only a minimal number of patients will result in hemoglobinuria, and it will not have any significant consequences on kidney function post-procedure.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pulsed-field ablation group | – | Device: Pulsed-field ablationPatient with atrial fibrillation will undergo catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient will symptomatic paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation indicated for catheter ablation according to the standard criteria will be enrolled.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- symptomatic paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- known hematologic disorders
- disorders associated with increased hemolysis
- known significant hepatic disease
- patient in permanent hemodialysis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pulsed-field ablationPatients will atrial fibrillation will undergo catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy | Device | Pulsed-field ablation group |
Primary outcome
Red blood cell microparticles
Time frame: day of the procedure - at the end of the procedure
The concentration of red blood cell microparticles in the plasma assessed using flow cytometry
Hemoglobinuria
Time frame: One day after the procedure
The concentration of hemoglobin in urine
Creatinine three days
Time frame: 3 days after the procedure
The concentration of creatinine three days after ablation
3 secondary outcomes
Lactate dehydrogenase
Time frame: the day of the procedure - at the end of the procedure
Haptoglobin
Time frame: the day of the procedure - at the end of the procedure
Creatinine one day
Time frame: one day after the procedure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 23273528Zoni-Berisso M, Filippi A, Landolina M, Brignoli O, D'Ambrosio G, Maglia G, Grimaldi M, Ermini G. Frequency, patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and resource usage of atrial fibrillation (from the Italian Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Management [ISAF] study). Am J Cardiol. 2013 Mar 1;111(5):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 8721656Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Levy D, D'Agostino RB. Secular trends in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation: The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1996 Apr;131(4):790-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90288-4. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 33933412Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Anic A, Petru J, Funasako M, Cochet H, Minami K, Breskovic T, Sikiric I, Sediva L, Chovanec M, Koruth J, Jais P. Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 May;7(5):614-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 35647644Ekanem E, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Reichlin T, Neven K, Metzner A, Hansen J, Blaauw Y, Maury P, Arentz T, Sommer P, Anic A, Anselme F, Boveda S, Deneke T, Willems S, van der Voort P, Tilz R, Funasako M, Scherr D, Wakili R, Steven D, Kautzner J, Vijgen J, Jais P, Petru J, Chun J, Roten L, Futing A, Rillig A, Mulder BA, Johannessen A, Rollin A, Lehrmann H, Sohns C, Jurisic Z, Savoure A, Combes S, Nentwich K, Gunawardene M, Ouss A, Kirstein B, Manninger M, Bohnen JE, Sultan A, Peichl P, Koopman P, Derval N, Turagam MK, Neuzil P; MANIFEST-PF Cooperative. Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF). Europace. 2022 Sep 1;24(8):1256-1266. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac050.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will be shared 6 months after publication on request.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
VOLT CE Mark Study
Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingObservational study
AI-Based Cardiac Analysis Using 12-Lead and 1-Lead ECG
Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Treatment With BTK Inhibitors or Venetoclax
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Waldenstr(SqrRoot)(Delta)m s Macroglobulinemia
Not yet recruiting
CATCH AF - Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Cryptogenic Stroke
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Active, not recruiting
ARIADNE Clinical Trial
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cardiocenter, 3rd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague, Czechia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Red blood cell microparticles (time frame: day of the procedure - at the end of the procedure). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06198933, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.