AzTrials
AzTrials

Abnormal Uterine BleedingNCT06201767

Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Adolescents: A Cross Sectional Observational Study

An observational study of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, run by Al-Azhar University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Adolescents: A Cross Sectional Observational Study Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 19 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
How many people
323 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2024to Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 19 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Detailed History tacking including: * Personal history age, residence, marital status, special habits, menstrual history * Present history * Obstetric history for married adolescents for gravity, parity, pregnancy complication * Past history and gynecological conditions as myomectomy, ovarian cystectomy * Family history for bleeding tendency as von willebrand disease or coagulopathies * Examination: * Investigations Laboratory like complete blood picture, coagulation profile, hormonal analysis (TSH, prolactin, LH, FSH), assessment von wollbrand disease by von wollbrand factor antigen and activity Ultrasonography for evaluation

Who may be able to join

  • - Adolescent female 10- 19 years old
  • Any abnormal uterine bleeding

Who cannot join

  • Adolescent female with normal uterine bleeding
  • Primary amenorrhea

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Wafaa kassem Badr, resident contact

+201127873462

wqasem924@gmail.com

Abd Elhalim Mohammed Abd Elhalim contact

About this study

Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Adolescents: A Cross Sectional Observational Study

Read the detailed description

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is defined as any type of bleeding in which the amount, duration, frequency and cyclicity is abnormal for a patient. It is very common symptom and it is seen in 15-20% of patient from the commencement of menarche to menopause (Singh et al., 2021). Over all prevalence of AUB varies in different population fluctuating between 10% and 30% (Sarala and Gopalan, 2020).

Although AUB may be characterized by specific menstrual abnormalities including dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, oligomenorrhea, etc., the cause of AUB is often unknown. According to International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) the classification of AUB is based on PALMCOEIN which is an acronym for various etiologies namely polyp, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, malignancy and hyperplasia, coagulopathy, ovulatory dysfunction, endometrial disorders, iatrogenic and not otherwise classified (PALM-COEIN) (Betha et al., 2017, Sabre et al., 2021).

At the pathological level, AUB is predominantly characterized by anovulatory cycles. When ovulation does not occur, no corpus luteum is formed to produce progesterone, leading to prolonged estrogenic stimulation of the endometrium and irregular bleeding. The patient will present with polymennorrhagia, polymenorrhea and metrorrhagia (Tuchkina et al., 2020).

The non-shedding of endometrium causes an increased risk of endometrial cancer. As a clinical approach to AUB, it is essential to obtain history pertaining to puberty and menstrual history in terms of regularity, volume and duration of cycles. In addition, reproductive and sexual history plays a major role in determining the etiology of AUB in married women (Tsakiridis et al., 2022).

It is also essential to consider various non-reproductive causes of AUB, namely nutritional history, endocrine disorders, socioeconomic status and current medication history. Clinical evaluation in terms of abdominal and per vaginal examination aids in the diagnosis. But conclusive results are obtained only when the endometrium is examined either by ultrasound or histological sampling (Sabre et al., 2021, Bisht and Kalra, 2023).

Diagnosis of AUB depends upon comprehensive medical history, blood tests, imaging and histopathology. Bleeding pattern style forms the clinical basis for diagnosis of different types of AUB. Some standard menstrual index parameters are used to define bleeding pattern which are frequency, duration, regularity, volume and intermenstrual bleeding (Munro et al., 2018, Singh et al., 2019).

In majority of the patients, AUB is a recurring problem and therefore, poses a challenge to the care providers in terms of clinical management. Moreover, its consequences are increasingly incriminating on the quality of life of these reproductive women, due to the impact on general health and wellbeing (Sarala and Gopalan, 2020).

Although studies have been done on evaluating the endometrium for various pathologies, there is still a vacuum with regards to the clinical presentation and correlation of AUB (Marnach and Laughlin-Tommaso, 2019, Van Den Bosch et al., 2021, Heremans et al., 2022). Clinical correlation plays a significant role in limited resource settings, especially in developing economies like Egypt, and an in-depth evaluation of clinical presentation of AUB will aid the primary care physician to detect AUB at an early stage and appropriate referral for advanced care.

Medical subject headings
Metrorrhagia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and determining the type of abnormality.

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Analysing various cause of AUB in this age according to FIGO classification system. Analysing various cause of AUB in this age according to FIGO classification system

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2024
  2. Study startJan 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionFeb 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
323 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06201767
Sponsor's protocol ID
Evaluation of AUB
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
2 Jan 2024
Last updated
11 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Betha, K., Malavatu, L. & Talasani, S. 2017. Distribution of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding using new FIGO classification system-PALM COEIN: a rural tertiary hospital based study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 3523-3528. Bisht, D. S. & Kalra, R. 2023. Endometrial Biopsy Audit and its Clinico-Pathological Correlation in Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in a Zonal Care Centre. International Journal of Contemporary Pathology, 9. Heremans, R., Van Den Bosch, T., Valentin, L., et al. 2022. Ultrasound features of endometrial pathology in women without abnormal uterine bleeding: results from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis study (IETA3). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 60, 243-255. Marnach, M. L. & Laughlin-Tommaso, S. K. Evaluation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2019. Elsevier, 326-335. Munro, M. G., Critchley, H. O., Fraser, I. S., et al. 2018. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 143, 393-408. Sabre, A., Serventi, L., Nuritdinova, D., et al. 2021. Abnormal uterine bleeding types according to the PALM-COEIN FIGO classification in a medically underserved American community. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 22, 91. Sarala, V. & Gopalan, U. 2020. Clinical pattern and presentation of abnormal uterine bleeding. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9, 126-129. Singh, N., Faruqi, M. & Pradeep, Y. 2019. Clinico epidemiological profile of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive womens: a cross sectional study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8, 4396. Singh, P. B., Purwar, R. & Mall, R. P. 2021. Clinical spectrum and causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive age according to two FIGO systems. The New Indian Journal of OBGYN, 8, 105-106. Tsakiridis, I., Giouleka, S., Koutsouki, G., et al. 2022. Investigation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women: a descriptive review of national and international recommendations. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 27, 504-517. Tuchkina, I. O., Vygivska, L. A. & Novikova, A. A. 2020. Abnormal uterine bleeding in adolescents: current state of the problem. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 73, 1752-1755. Van Den Bosch, T., Verbakel, J., Valentin, L., et al. 2021. Typical ultrasound features of various endometrial pathologies described using International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 57, 164-172.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, run by Al-Azhar University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Wafaa kassem Badr, resident (+201127873462, wqasem924@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and determining the type of abnormality. (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06201767, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in