Staphylococcus Aureus InfectionPhase 4SHIELDNCT06210594
Staph Intervention for Effective Local Defense
A Phase 4 study testing Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconate and Education + Household supplies in people with Staphylococcus Aureus Infection, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Indigenous persons experience a high burden of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) invasive disease and skin and soft tissue infections. SA carriage on the skin is factor for development of SA infections. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a community-informed approach to reduce carriage of SA. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Staphylococcus Aureus Infection
- What is being tested?
- Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconate and Education + Household supplies
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2024to 14 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Native American adult living on or adjacent to the WMA Tribal lands
- 18 years of age and older
- Lab-confirmed SA carriage at time of enrollment
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Ability to comply with follow-up activities
- Risk factor for SA-associated infection: Diagnosed with diabetes OR body mass index ≥30 OR documented SSTI or SA infection in the past 3 years
Who cannot join
- Immediate family member of study staff
- Allergy to citrus or any ingredient in Nozin, Hibiclens, or mupirocin
- Without a permanent home (e.g., living in a group home, shelter, or is unhoused)
- Use of antibiotics within 30 days prior to the first study visit (time-limited)
- Current SA infection (time-limited)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Whiteriver Center for Indigenous Health
Whiteriver, Arizona, 85941
About this study
Official title: SHIELD (Staph Intervention for Effective Local Defense): An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Efficacy of a Sustained Intervention (Topical Antibiotics and Skin Antisepsis) to Decrease Staphylococcus Aureus Carriage in Adults
Indigenous persons experience a high burden of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) invasive disease and skin and soft tissue infections. SA carriage on the skin is factor for development of SA infections. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a community-informed approach to reduce carriage of SA. Participants will be assigned to education and household supplies for prevention of SA with and without a biomedical intervention. Researchers will compare SA carriage in the two groups.
Read the detailed description
Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) and invasive infections in the United States (US). Infections caused by methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) are of particular concern because MRSA is harder to treat and associated with significant costs to healthcare systems and patients. The White Mountain Apache (WMA) Tribe experiences a higher burden of SA and MRSA infections than the general US population. Most cases of invasive SA occurred among adults with underlying conditions and led to significant morbidity.
SA carriage is an important factor for development of SA infections. When individuals or the household contacts have recurrent SA infections, the use of antimicrobial or antiseptic agents to suppress or eliminate SA carriage (so called "decolonization") may be recommended to help prevent infection. While there are several regimens available to suppress carriage, each has limitations (e.g., potential antimicrobial resistance following repeated use of mupirocin antibiotic ointment, lack of access to a bathtub or reliable water supply for bleach baths). These interventions are typically used over a short period of time (e.g., one-time administration over 5-10 days). Re-acquisition of carriage in the months following completion of the carriage suppression regimen is common. Use of the standard approaches to SA carriage suppression in the WMA community has been inconsistent and has been insufficient to control SA disease. New approaches are urgently needed.
In formative research conducted by the study team, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with healthcare providers and community members to understand the culture and context of tribal communities as related to SA infections, disease, and prevention. The researchers found that there are gaps in community knowledge about SA as a cause of skin infections and how to prevent an infection. When asked about preferred method of intervention to reduce SA carriage, participants indicated a preference for the antiseptic nasal spray (daily use) and antiseptic body wash (regular use), which were easily administered and could be incorporated into a daily routine.
In this study, the investigators will conduct an open-label randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a carriage suppression regimen in reducing the prevalence of SA carriage and SA infections among adults at high risk of SA infections who are currently carrying SA on the skin. Following informed consent, participants will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either: A) education about SA and receipt of household supplies to reduce SA transmission in the home plus use of a nasal antibiotic twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (N = 50; Group A); or B) education/household supplies alone (N = 50; Group B). The antiseptic regimen will consist of twice daily Nozin nasal antiseptic plus chlorhexidine gluconate wash three times a week. Participants assigned to Group A will continue the antiseptic regimen for 4 months. All participants will be followed for 4 months.
Study visits will occur at baseline (Day 0) and Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120. At each visit, a questionnaire will be administered and swabs will be collected at common carriage sites on the body (anterior nares, oropharynx, and groin). Group A will also receive reminder text messages or phone calls at a frequency of choice (e.g., once per day or once per week). After the Day 0 and Day 120 visits, the participant's medical record will be reviewed to document relevant medical history and outpatient and inpatient visits for SSTI and SA-related infections.
A home visit will be scheduled after Day 0 to collect environmental swabs at frequent hand-contact sites (e.g., bedroom, living room, bathroom) and swabs from indoor pet cats and dogs (e.g., dorsal fur and skin of groin). Household members will also be recruited to complete a brief questionnaire and sample collection (anterior nares, oropharynx, and groin).
A qualitative assessment will be conducted in a subset of index participants (n=6-10) in Group A to assess adherence and acceptability of the prevention regimen. Participants will be chosen using purposive sampling to represent a range of reported adherence at the D60 visit and invited to provide informed consent. The qualitative assessment will consist of one in-depth interview at the endpoint (4 months).
- Conditions
- Staphylococcus Aureus Infection
- Being tested
- Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconate, Education + Household supplies
- Keywords
- Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Carriage density, Biomedical intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Staphylococcal Infections, Soft Tissue Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconateCombination product
Also called Bactroban + Nozin + Hibiclens
Education/household supplies + antibiotic + antiseptic regimen
Education + Household suppliesBehavioural
Education/household supplies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Education + Household supplies + Nasal antibiotic + Antiseptic regimen | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive education about SA and household supplies (e.g., cleaning products, pump lotion, laundry detergent, towels) plus use of a nasal antibiotic (mupirocin) twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (Nozin twice daily plus chlorhexidine gluconate wash 3 times per week) Receives: Combination Product: Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconate; Behavioral: Education + Household supplies |
| Education + Household supplies | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive education about SA and household supplies (e.g., cleaning products, pump lotion, laundry detergent, towels). Receives: Behavioral: Education + Household supplies |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of SA carriage
Compare SA carriage prevalence in the nose, throat, and skin (any site) between arms.
Measured: 4 months after randomization
Secondary outcomes (7)
Feasibility and Acceptability
Proportion adhering to intervention.
Measured: 4 months
Feasibility and Acceptability as assessed by in depth interviews
Assess the feasibility and acceptability qualitatively through in-depth interviews (with a subset of participants).
Measured: 4 months
Incidence of SSTI
Compare the incidence of skin and soft tissue infections (all cause) between arms.
Measured: 4 months
Characterize SA isolates
Characterize SA isolates, including lineages (proportion belonging to each clonal complex) and antimicrobial resistance (proportion MRSA), during follow-up in both arms.
Measured: 4 months
Confirmed SA infection
Compare the incidence of lab-confirmed SA infection (all types and SSTI separately) between arms.
Measured: 4 months
Prevalence of SA carriage in index participants, household members, indoor pets, and household surfaces
Describe baseline prevalence of SA carriage in index patients, household members, indoor pets, and household surfaces, and longitudinal prevalence in index participants, and compare between arms.
Measured: Baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 90, day 120
Adverse events
The proportion of participants with adverse events (e.g., dry skin) and compare between arms.
Measured: 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2024
- Study start1 Apr 2024
- Primary completion14 Nov 2025
- Study completion14 Nov 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Staphylococcus Aureus InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study will be an open-label randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a carriage suppression regimen in reducing the prevalence of SA carriage and SA infections among adults at high risk of SA infections who are currently carrying SA in the oropharynx or anterior nares. Participants will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either: 1. education about SA and receipt of household supplies to reduce SA transmission in the home plus use of a nasal antibiotic twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (N=50; intervention group); or 2. education/household supplies alone (N = 50; control group). All participants will be followed for 4 months.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laura Hammitt, MD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06210594
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00027090
- Other IDs
- 5S06GM142120
- Acronym
- SHIELD
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SHIELD (Staph Intervention for Effective Local Defense): An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Efficacy of a Sustained Intervention (Topical Antibiotics and Skin Antisepsis) to Decrease Staphylococcus Aureus Carriage in Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06210594
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHIELD / IRB00027090
- Conditions
- Staphylococcus Aureus Infection
- Keywords
- Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Carriage density, Biomedical intervention
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Nov 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Indigenous persons experience a high burden of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) invasive disease and skin and soft tissue infections. SA carriage on the skin is factor for development of SA infections. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a community-informed approach to reduce carriage of SA. Participants will be assigned to education and household supplies for prevention of SA with and without a biomedical intervention. Researchers will compare SA carriage in the two groups.
Detailed description
Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) and invasive infections in the United States (US). Infections caused by methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) are of particular concern because MRSA is harder to treat and associated with significant costs to healthcare systems and patients. The White Mountain Apache (WMA) Tribe experiences a higher burden of SA and MRSA infections than the general US population. Most cases of invasive SA occurred among adults with underlying conditions and led to significant morbidity.
SA carriage is an important factor for development of SA infections. When individuals or the household contacts have recurrent SA infections, the use of antimicrobial or antiseptic agents to suppress or eliminate SA carriage (so called "decolonization") may be recommended to help prevent infection. While there are several regimens available to suppress carriage, each has limitations (e.g., potential antimicrobial resistance following repeated use of mupirocin antibiotic ointment, lack of access to a bathtub or reliable water supply for bleach baths). These interventions are typically used over a short period of time (e.g., one-time administration over 5-10 days). Re-acquisition of carriage in the months following completion of the carriage suppression regimen is common. Use of the standard approaches to SA carriage suppression in the WMA community has been inconsistent and has been insufficient to control SA disease. New approaches are urgently needed.
In formative research conducted by the study team, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with healthcare providers and community members to understand the culture and context of tribal communities as related to SA infections, disease, and prevention. The researchers found that there are gaps in community knowledge about SA as a cause of skin infections and how to prevent an infection. When asked about preferred method of intervention to reduce SA carriage, participants indicated a preference for the antiseptic nasal spray (daily use) and antiseptic body wash (regular use), which were easily administered and could be incorporated into a daily routine.
In this study, the investigators will conduct an open-label randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a carriage suppression regimen in reducing the prevalence of SA carriage and SA infections among adults at high risk of SA infections who are currently carrying SA on the skin. Following informed consent, participants will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either: A) education about SA and receipt of household supplies to reduce SA transmission in the home plus use of a nasal antibiotic twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (N = 50; Group A); or B) education/household supplies alone (N = 50; Group B). The antiseptic regimen will consist of twice daily Nozin nasal antiseptic plus chlorhexidine gluconate wash three times a week. Participants assigned to Group A will continue the antiseptic regimen for 4 months. All participants will be followed for 4 months.
Study visits will occur at baseline (Day 0) and Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120. At each visit, a questionnaire will be administered and swabs will be collected at common carriage sites on the body (anterior nares, oropharynx, and groin). Group A will also receive reminder text messages or phone calls at a frequency of choice (e.g., once per day or once per week). After the Day 0 and Day 120 visits, the participant's medical record will be reviewed to document relevant medical history and outpatient and inpatient visits for SSTI and SA-related infections.
A home visit will be scheduled after Day 0 to collect environmental swabs at frequent hand-contact sites (e.g., bedroom, living room, bathroom) and swabs from indoor pet cats and dogs (e.g., dorsal fur and skin of groin). Household members will also be recruited to complete a brief questionnaire and sample collection (anterior nares, oropharynx, and groin).
A qualitative assessment will be conducted in a subset of index participants (n=6-10) in Group A to assess adherence and acceptability of the prevention regimen. Participants will be chosen using purposive sampling to represent a range of reported adherence at the D60 visit and invited to provide informed consent. The qualitative assessment will consist of one in-depth interview at the endpoint (4 months).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study will be an open-label randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a carriage suppression regimen in reducing the prevalence of SA carriage and SA infections among adults at high risk of SA infections who are currently carrying SA in the oropharynx or anterior nares. Participants will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either: 1. education about SA and receipt of household supplies to reduce SA transmission in the home plus use of a nasal antibiotic twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (N=50; intervention group); or 2. education/household supplies alone (N = 50; control group). All participants will be followed for 4 months.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Education + Household supplies + Nasal antibiotic + Antiseptic regimen | Experimental | Combination Product: Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconate, Behavioral: Education + Household suppliesParticipants in this arm will receive education about SA and household supplies (e.g., cleaning products, pump lotion, laundry detergent, towels) plus use of a nasal antibiotic (mupirocin) twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (Nozin twice daily plus chlorhexidine gluconate wash 3 times per week) |
| Education + Household supplies | Active comparator | Behavioral: Education + Household suppliesParticipants in this arm will receive education about SA and household supplies (e.g., cleaning products, pump lotion, laundry detergent, towels). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Native American adult living on or adjacent to the WMA Tribal lands
- 18 years of age and older
- Lab-confirmed SA carriage at time of enrollment
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Ability to comply with follow-up activities
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Immediate family member of study staff
- Allergy to citrus or any ingredient in Nozin, Hibiclens, or mupirocin
- Without a permanent home (e.g., living in a group home, shelter, or is unhoused)
- Use of antibiotics within 30 days prior to the first study visit (time-limited)
- Current SA infection (time-limited)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconateAlso: Bactroban + Nozin + HibiclensEducation/household supplies + antibiotic + antiseptic regimen | Combination product | Education + Household supplies + Nasal antibiotic + Antiseptic regimen |
| Education + Household suppliesEducation/household supplies | Behavioural | Education + Household supplies, Education + Household supplies + Nasal antibiotic + Antiseptic regimen |
Primary outcome
Prevalence of SA carriage
Time frame: 4 months after randomization
Compare SA carriage prevalence in the nose, throat, and skin (any site) between arms.
7 secondary outcomes
Feasibility and Acceptability
Time frame: 4 months
Feasibility and Acceptability as assessed by in depth interviews
Time frame: 4 months
Incidence of SSTI
Time frame: 4 months
Characterize SA isolates
Time frame: 4 months
Confirmed SA infection
Time frame: 4 months
Prevalence of SA carriage in index participants, household members, indoor pets, and household surfaces
Time frame: Baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 90, day 120
Adverse events
Time frame: 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Staphylococcus Aureus Infection
Not yet recruiting
Farm-originated Antimicrobial Resistance Modeling: Exploring Humans-to-Animal Dissemination
Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Not yet recruiting
Bacterial Decolonization to Prevent Severe Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
HNSCC
RecruitingPhase 3
Rifampin-free Regimen Versus Rifampin-containing Regimen in the Treatment of Staphylococcal Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis
Infective Endocarditis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate AZD7760 Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults (Phase I) and Adults With End-stage Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis With a Central Venous Catheter (Phase IIa)
Staphylococcus Aureus
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of AZD7760 in Healthy Japanese Adults
Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Hammitt, MD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Mupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconate and Education + Household supplies in people with Staphylococcus Aureus Infection, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of SA carriage (time frame: 4 months after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.