AzTrials
AzTrials

BleedingNCT06211699

Effect of Clips Versus Omentopexy on Postoperative Bleeding

A study testing Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in people with Bleeding and Postoperative Complications, run by Umraniye Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this prospective randomized study, patients were divided into two groups: clips group and omentopexy group. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, preoperative and peroperative blood pressure values, duration of surgery, number of patients requiring… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
148 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jul 2023to 25 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The Patients who underwent LSG
  • Between the ages of 18 and 65,
  • A Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40 or BMI ≥ 35 with at least one obesity-related comorbidity

Who cannot join

  • Patients who underwent other bariatric surgery procedures,
  • Patients who declined to be participate
  • uncontrolled hypertension
  • preoperative history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Umraniye Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, Umraniye, 34764

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Omentopexy and Clips on the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Early Postoperative Outcomes: A Randomized Trial

In this prospective randomized study, patients were divided into two groups: clips group and omentopexy group. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, preoperative and peroperative blood pressure values, duration of surgery, number of patients requiring erythrocyte suspension (ES) transfusion, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions in the first 30-days postoperatively and early postoperative complications.

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University of Health Science Umraniye Training and Research hospital between July 2023 and November 2023. The Patients who underwent LSG, were between the ages of 18 and 65, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40 or BMI ≥ 35 with at least one obesity-related comorbidity were included in the study. Patients who underwent other bariatric surgery procedures, had uncontrolled hypertension, and had preoperative history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were excluded. Approval for the study was received from the ethics committee of tertiary health institution (21.06.2023/218494864). Before the surgery, each of the participants were received comprehensive information about the study, the techniques to be applied were explained, they would be randomly assigned in one of the two groups and the consent form obtained in this context.

Study Groups In the study, patients were divided into two groups: Patients who underwent consecutive clippping along the staple line of the remnant stomach during LSG (clips group) and patients who underwent continuous through-and-through omentopexy of the omentum to the remnant stomach staple line after resection during LSG (omentopexy group).

Data Collection Age, gender, comorbidities, smoking history, preoperative height-weight-BMI values, preoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP)-diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values, preoperative hemoglobin-hematocrit values, peroperative SBP-DBP-mean blood pressure (MBP), duration of surgery, postoperative 6th hour and time of discharge hemoglobin-hematocrit values, number of patients transfused erythrocyte suspension (ES) or requiring invasive intervention due to bleeding, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions in the first postoperative month, and early postoperative complications were recorded. Duration of surgery was determined from the first skin incision to the last skin suture.

Preoperative, peroperative and Postoperative Evaluation Preoperative anesthesia, cardiology and pulmonology evaluations were performed for each patient. Hepatobiliary ultrasound and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy evaluation were performed. Each patient was administered low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 6000 units 1x1 subcutaneously) 12 hours before surgery and was taken to surgery with antiembolism stockings. Intermittant pneumatic compressor device was used perioperatively. Omentopexy was performed with 3-0 V-loc suture (26 mm, V-20 Tapper) and clippping was performed with endo clips II (10 mm, medium/large). Since ERAS protocol was applied in our clinic, no drain was placed in any patient.

At the 4th postoperative hour, all patients were mobilized, intensive respiratory exercise was performed and clear liquid food was started. Complete blood count and C-reactive protein (CRP) laboratory parameters were checked at postoperative 6th, 24th and 48th hour (discharge). Vital parameters were checked every 6 hours postoperatively. Patients who have an acute decrease in hemoglobin value together with a pulse rate of 100 or more per minute and systolic/diastolic blood pressure values below 90/60 mmHg were considered as bleeding and erythrocyte suspension was transfused. Early on the second postoperative day, the patient who could tolerate oral food and did not require additional intervention was discharged.

The primary outcome of the study was to compare the two methods in terms of early postoperative bleeding. The seconder outcome of the study is to compare the groups in terms of duration of surgery, lengh of hospital stay and hospital readmission in the first 30-days postoperatively.

Randomization Patients were numbered according to the order of enrollment and randomly assigned 1:1 to the clips group or the omentopexy group. Allocations were generated using randomly permuted blocks (available at www.randomization.com). All randomization was done by an individual who wasn't included in the study, and the allocations were preserved in sealed envelopes. A research assistant opened the sealed envelope at the beginning of surgery, disclosing the patient's allocation group to the surgeon. The primary surgeon is naturally not blinded to the patient groups and the other surgeon who records and evaluates the data is blinded to the patient groups. All operations were performed laparoscopically by the same surgeon. Since this was a pilot study, no sample size was calculated.

Comparison of Groups The groups were compared in terms of postoperative decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, preoperative and peroperative blood pressure values, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions in the first 30-days postoperatively, early postoperative complications and number of patients requiring ES transfusion.

Statical Analaysis A meticulous statistical evaluation was performed on the collected baseline clinical data to ensure robust and reliable conclusions. For continuous variables, the analysis employed both t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on the distribution characteristics of the data. Categorical variables, on the other hand, were rigorously examined using either Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test, based on the appropriateness for the dataset at hand.

This analytical process was facilitated by the use of SPSS software, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), which is renowned for its precision and versatility in handling diverse statistical tasks. Care was taken to conduct all tests as two-tailed, providing a comprehensive view of the data. The threshold for statistical significance was set at a p value of less than 0.05, aligning with standard practices in clinical research.

Being tested
Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Keywords
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, Bleeding, Staple Line Reinforcement, Postoperative First Month Readmission
Medical subject headings
Hemorrhage, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve GastrectomyProcedure or surgery

    Patients with omentum sewed to the remnant gastric staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

  • Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve GastrectomyProcedure or surgery

    Patients performed clips to the remnant gastric staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Study groups in NCT06211699
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve GastrectomyActive comparatorPatients who underwent continuous through-and-through omentopexy of the omentum to the remnant stomach staple line after resection during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (omentopexy group).
Receives: Procedure: Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve GastrectomyActive comparatorPatients who underwent consecutive clippping along the staple line of the remnant stomach during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (clips group)
Receives: Procedure: Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative Bleeding

    The primary outcome of the study was to compare the two methods in terms of early postoperative bleeding. This comparison will be made with hemoglobin and hematocrit values measured at postoperative 6th hour, 24th hour and at discharge. The groups will be compared according to the decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, whether ES displacement is required, and whether intervention is required.

    Measured: up to 3 Months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Postoperative First Month Readmission

    The seconder outcome of the study is to compare the groups in terms of hospital readmission in the first 30-days postoperatively. Patients readmitted to the hospital in the first postoperative month will be recorded and reasons for readmission will be categorized and groups will be compared.

    Measured: 30-days postoperatively

  2. The duration of surgery (minutes)

    The seconder outcome of the study is to compare the groups in terms of duration of surgery (minutes) Surgical time will be calculated based on the time between the first port incision and the last skin suture.

    Measured: Intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2024
  2. Study start1 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion25 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion25 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
148 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06211699
Sponsor's protocol ID
218494864
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
7 Jan 2024
Last updated
18 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in people with Bleeding and Postoperative Complications, run by Umraniye Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative Bleeding (time frame: up to 3 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in