Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeCURA-PRONENCT06212492
Effects on Biotrauma of NMBAs and PP Association During ARDS
A study testing NMBAs and Prone positioning in people with Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The improved survival of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) over the last decades is related to the use of so-called "protective" mechanical ventilation. Two therapies have been shown to increase survival among the most hypoxemic patients (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg): a continuous use of neuromuscular… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- NMBAs and Prone positioning
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 8 Aug 2024to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Written informed consent of proxy to the study participation
- Invasive mechanical ventilation for ≤ 72 hours at inclusion
- Criteria of moderate to severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition
- Patients covered by or having the rights to social security
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women, patients deprived of freedom or under legal authority
- Patients having undergone previous PP sessions during the same stay
- Patients who had already been curarized prior to inclusion
- Patient currently receiving ECMO or any technique of extracorporeal CO2 removal at the time of inclusion
- Patient with a contraindication to PP
- Previous hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reaction to any NMBA
Show all 9Show fewer
- Chronic respiratory insufficiency with oxygen or long-term ventilation
- SAPS II score at the time of enrollment > 75
- Patients who are moribund or for whom limitations of active therapies have been decided.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Service Médecine Intensive et Réanimation
Marseille, 13015
Sami Hraiech, MD, 0491964358 ext. +33, sami.hraiech@ap-hm.fr
About this study
Official title: Effects on Biotrauma of Combining Routine CURArization With Prone Positioning During Adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
The improved survival of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) over the last decades is related to the use of so-called "protective" mechanical ventilation. Two therapies have been shown to increase survival among the most hypoxemic patients (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg): a continuous use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) for 48 hours in the acute phase of ARDS and prone positioning (PP). NMBAs and PP are part of the latest guidelines from French ICU Society. However, North American guidelines recommend PP for patients with severe ARDS only but not NMBAs, given the results of the ROSE study which did not confirm the benefit on mortality demonstrated in the ACURASYS study. However, in the ROSE study, ventilatory strategy, use of NMBAs and PP were different from the ACURASYS study.
Yet, NMBAs and PP are frequently associated in clinical practice, particularly with the COVID-19 pandemic, but also in randomized trials. In the PROSEVA study, almost all the patients (91%) received a continuous infusion of NMBAs during PP. Indeed, there is a common physiopathological rationale in both techniques: they favor the homogenization of transpulmonary pressures (TPP), reduce lung overdistension, Pendelluft effect and thus ventilator induced lung injury (VILI), in particular barotrauma and biotrauma. This reduction of biotrauma has been demonstrated for PP and NMBAs separately, but never by comparing the combined effect of the 2 techniques to each of them separately. This comparison requires reliable tools. In recent years, the "soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation end products" (sRAGE), a new biomarker specific of pulmonary epithelial aggression and therefore of biotrauma, has been described and evaluated during ARDS and appears to be associated with the severity of pulmonary damage and prognosis.
Read more
Overall, despite an interesting physiopathological rationale and a clinically widespread practice, there is currently no study evaluating the synergistic effect of PP and NMBAs in the treatment of ARDS, in particular on the prevention of VILI, and more precisely of biotrauma. This question seems crucial to better specify the respective place of each of these treatments in the management strategy of ARDS patients whose prevalence and mortality remain high.
The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate, using a recent and reliable biomarker, the synergistic effect of a short-term NMBAs infusion using cisatracurium and PP on the reduction of biotrauma during moderate to severe ARDS. The investigators will compare this "synergistic" treatment to the use of PP alone. They will also evaluate, in secondary objectives, the effects of PP and NMBAs combination on clinical outcomes and on the patients' prognosis.
- Being tested
- NMBAs, Prone positioning
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NMBAsDrug
Early and systematic use of NMBAs
Prone positioningOther
Early and systematic use of prone positioning
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prone Positioning and NMBAs (PP-NMBAs) | Experimental | Early and systematic use of Prone positioning and NMBAs Receives: Drug: NMBAs; Other: Prone positioning |
| Prone Positioning (PP) | Active comparator | Early and systematic use of prone positioning with NMBAs indicated ONLY as rescue Receives: Other: Prone positioning |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference between the plasma sRAGE value at the end of the first PP session and the baseline value before PP (∆ sRAGE).
Our primary outcome will be the comparison of the differences in plasma sRAGE levels before and after the first PP session (∆ sRAGE), a kinetic being probably more relevant than a raw value, given the observed inter-individual variations of sRAGE at basal state.
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (101)
Plasma determination of IL1 before the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of IL1 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of IL1 at the end of the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of IL1 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 2
Plasma determination of TNFα before the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of TNFα 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of TNFα at the end of the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of TNFα 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 2
Plasma determination of sRAGE before the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of sRAGE 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of sRAGE at the end of the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of sRAGE 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 2
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 before the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 at the end of the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 1
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Measured: Day 2
PaO2/FiO2 before each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 at the end of each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 48 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
PaO2/FiO2 72 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
PaO2/FiO2 7 days after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
pH before each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
pH 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
pH 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
pH at the end of each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
pH 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
pH 48 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
pH 72 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
pH 7 days after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
PaCO2 before each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaCO2at the end of each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Hematosis
Measured: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 48 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
PaCO2 72 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
PaCO2 7 days after inclusion
Hematosis
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
Plateau pressure (Pplat) before each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Plateau pressure (Pplat) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Plateau pressure (Pplat) 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Plateau pressure (Pplat) at the end of each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Plateau pressure (Pplat) 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Plateau pressure (Pplat) 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
Plateau pressure (Pplat) 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
Plateau pressure (Pplat) 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) before each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) at the end of each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
Driving Pressure (Δp) before each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Driving Pressure (Δp) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28,
Driving Pressure (Δp) 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Driving Pressure (Δp) at the end of each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Driving Pressure (Δp) 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Driving Pressure (Δp) 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
Driving Pressure (Δp) 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
Driving Pressure (Δp) 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
Tidal Volume (Vt) before each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Tidal Volume (Vt) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Tidal Volume (Vt) 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Tidal Volume (Vt) at the end of each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Tidal Volume (Vt) 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Tidal Volume (Vt) 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
Tidal Volume (Vt) 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
Tidal Volume (Vt) 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
Respiratory Rate (Fr) before each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Respiratory Rate (Fr) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Respiratory Rate (Fr) 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Respiratory Rate (Fr) at the end of each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Respiratory Rate (Fr) 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: Up to Day 28
Respiratory Rate (Fr) 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 48 hours after inclusion
Respiratory Rate (Fr) 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 72 hours after inclusion
Respiratory Rate (Fr) 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Measured: 7 days after inclusion
Esophageal pressure (for equipped sites) before each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Esophageal pressure (for equipped sites) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Esophageal pressure (for equipped sites) at the end of each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Transpulmonary pressure (TPP) (for equipped sites) before each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Transpulmonary pressure (TPP) (for equipped sites) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Transpulmonary pressure (TPP) (for equipped sites) at the end of each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Electrical Impedance Tomography data (for equipped sites) before each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Electrical Impedance Tomography data (for equipped sites) 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Electrical Impedance Tomography data (for equipped sites) at the end of each PP session
Alveolar recruitment
Measured: Up to Day 28
Pneumothorax
Barotrauma
Measured: Within the first 7 days
Pneumomediastinum
Barotrauma
Measured: Within the first 7 days
Sub cutaneous emphysema
Barotrauma
Measured: Within the first 7 days
Hospital mortality
Measured: At Day 28
Hospital mortality
Measured: At Day 90
Ventilator free days (VFD)
Measured: At Day 28
Ventilator free days (VFD)
Measured: At Day 90
Number of days alive without extra-respiratory organ failure
Measured: At Day 28
Number of days alive without extra-respiratory organ failure
Measured: At Day 90
Length of stay in intensive care unit
Measured: Maximum 3 months after inclusion (follow-up duration)
Length of hospital stay
Measured: Maximum 3 months after inclusion (follow-up duration)
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Measured: At day 28 or discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2024
- Study start8 Aug 2024
- Primary completionAug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- François Cremieux, Study director, AP-HM
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06212492
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RCAPHM21_0414
- Other IDs
- ID-RCB
- Acronym
- CURA-PRONE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Papazian L, Aubron C, Brochard L, Chiche JD, Combes A, Dreyfuss D, Forel JM, Guerin C, Jaber S, Mekontso-Dessap A, Mercat A, Richard JC, Roux D, Vieillard-Baron A, Faure H. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jun 13;9(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0540-9.
PubMed 31197492National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network; Moss M, Huang DT, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Ginde AA, Gong MN, Grissom CK, Gundel S, Hayden D, Hite RD, Hou PC, Hough CL, Iwashyna TJ, Khan A, Liu KD, Talmor D, Thompson BT, Ulysse CA, Yealy DM, Angus DC. Early Neuromuscular Blockade in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):1997-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901686. Epub 2019 May 19.
PubMed 31112383Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
PubMed 20843245Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
PubMed 23688302Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
PubMed 26903337
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects on Biotrauma of Combining Routine CURArization With Prone Positioning During Adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06212492
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CURA-PRONE / RCAPHM21_0414
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The improved survival of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) over the last decades is related to the use of so-called "protective" mechanical ventilation. Two therapies have been shown to increase survival among the most hypoxemic patients (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg): a continuous use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) for 48 hours in the acute phase of ARDS and prone positioning (PP). NMBAs and PP are part of the latest guidelines from French ICU Society. However, North American guidelines recommend PP for patients with severe ARDS only but not NMBAs, given the results of the ROSE study which did not confirm the benefit on mortality demonstrated in the ACURASYS study. However, in the ROSE study, ventilatory strategy, use of NMBAs and PP were different from the ACURASYS study.
Yet, NMBAs and PP are frequently associated in clinical practice, particularly with the COVID-19 pandemic, but also in randomized trials. In the PROSEVA study, almost all the patients (91%) received a continuous infusion of NMBAs during PP. Indeed, there is a common physiopathological rationale in both techniques: they favor the homogenization of transpulmonary pressures (TPP), reduce lung overdistension, Pendelluft effect and thus ventilator induced lung injury (VILI), in particular barotrauma and biotrauma. This reduction of biotrauma has been demonstrated for PP and NMBAs separately, but never by comparing the combined effect of the 2 techniques to each of them separately. This comparison requires reliable tools. In recent years, the "soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation end products" (sRAGE), a new biomarker specific of pulmonary epithelial aggression and therefore of biotrauma, has been described and evaluated during ARDS and appears to be associated with the severity of pulmonary damage and prognosis.
Overall, despite an interesting physiopathological rationale and a clinically widespread practice, there is currently no study evaluating the synergistic effect of PP and NMBAs in the treatment of ARDS, in particular on the prevention of VILI, and more precisely of biotrauma. This question seems crucial to better specify the respective place of each of these treatments in the management strategy of ARDS patients whose prevalence and mortality remain high.
The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate, using a recent and reliable biomarker, the synergistic effect of a short-term NMBAs infusion using cisatracurium and PP on the reduction of biotrauma during moderate to severe ARDS. The investigators will compare this "synergistic" treatment to the use of PP alone. They will also evaluate, in secondary objectives, the effects of PP and NMBAs combination on clinical outcomes and on the patients' prognosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prone Positioning and NMBAs (PP-NMBAs) | Experimental | Drug: NMBAs, Other: Prone positioningEarly and systematic use of Prone positioning and NMBAs |
| Prone Positioning (PP) | Active comparator | Other: Prone positioningEarly and systematic use of prone positioning with NMBAs indicated ONLY as rescue |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Written informed consent of proxy to the study participation
- Invasive mechanical ventilation for ≤ 72 hours at inclusion
- Criteria of moderate to severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition
- Patients covered by or having the rights to social security
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women, patients deprived of freedom or under legal authority
- Patients having undergone previous PP sessions during the same stay
- Patients who had already been curarized prior to inclusion
- Patient currently receiving ECMO or any technique of extracorporeal CO2 removal at the time of inclusion
- Patient with a contraindication to PP
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NMBAsEarly and systematic use of NMBAs | Drug | Prone Positioning and NMBAs (PP-NMBAs) |
| Prone positioningEarly and systematic use of prone positioning | Other | Prone Positioning (PP), Prone Positioning and NMBAs (PP-NMBAs) |
Primary outcome
Difference between the plasma sRAGE value at the end of the first PP session and the baseline value before PP (∆ sRAGE).
Time frame: Day 1
Our primary outcome will be the comparison of the differences in plasma sRAGE levels before and after the first PP session (∆ sRAGE), a kinetic being probably more relevant than a raw value, given the observed inter-individual variations of sRAGE at basal state.
101 secondary outcomes
Plasma determination of IL1 before the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of IL1 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of IL1 at the end of the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of IL1 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Time frame: Day 2
Plasma determination of TNFα before the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of TNFα 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of TNFα at the end of the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of TNFα 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Time frame: Day 2
Plasma determination of sRAGE before the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of sRAGE 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of sRAGE at the end of the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of sRAGE 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Time frame: Day 2
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 before the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 1 hour after PP initiation at the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 at the end of the first PP session
Time frame: Day 1
Plasma determination of angiopoietin 2 4 hours after return to supine after the first PP session
Time frame: Day 2
PaO2/FiO2 before each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 at the end of each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaO2/FiO2 48 hours after inclusion
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
PaO2/FiO2 72 hours after inclusion
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
PaO2/FiO2 7 days after inclusion
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
pH before each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
pH 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
pH 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
pH at the end of each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
pH 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
pH 48 hours after inclusion
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
pH 72 hours after inclusion
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
pH 7 days after inclusion
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
PaCO2 before each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 1 hour after PP initiation at each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 6 hours after PP initiation at each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaCO2at the end of each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 4 hours after return to supine after each PP session
Time frame: Up to Day 28
PaCO2 48 hours after inclusion
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
PaCO2 72 hours after inclusion
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
PaCO2 7 days after inclusion
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 31197492Papazian L, Aubron C, Brochard L, Chiche JD, Combes A, Dreyfuss D, Forel JM, Guerin C, Jaber S, Mekontso-Dessap A, Mercat A, Richard JC, Roux D, Vieillard-Baron A, Faure H. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jun 13;9(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0540-9.
- Background: PubMed 31112383National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network; Moss M, Huang DT, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Ginde AA, Gong MN, Grissom CK, Gundel S, Hayden D, Hite RD, Hou PC, Hough CL, Iwashyna TJ, Khan A, Liu KD, Talmor D, Thompson BT, Ulysse CA, Yealy DM, Angus DC. Early Neuromuscular Blockade in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):1997-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901686. Epub 2019 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 20843245Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
- Background: PubMed 23688302Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 26903337Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Rhu-pGSN for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy Study of GKL-006RTU in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Multicentric, Randomized Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Centhaquine in Patients With ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingObservational study
Personalized Ventilation Based on Ventilation-perfusion Mismatch and Lung Recruitability
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Positive-Pressure Respiration
Not yet recruiting
Early EIT-Guided PEEP Titration on Pulmonary Physiology in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe ARDS Undergoing Prone Positioning (EIT-PEEP-PRONE)
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
François Cremieux study director
AP-HM
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NMBAs and Prone positioning in people with Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sami Hraiech, MD (0491964358 ext. +33, sami.hraiech@ap-hm.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference between the plasma sRAGE value at the end of the first PP session and the baseline value before PP (∆ sRAGE). (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06212492, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2024.