AzTrials
AzTrials

PulpitisPOPAVPTNCT06216951

Post-Operative Pain After Vital Pulpotomy in Molars With Symptomatic Pulpitis

An observational study of Pulpitis and Post Operative Pain, run by Uşak University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate post-operative pain (PEP) in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis following Vital Pulpotomy Treatments (VPT) with Calcium Silicate Cement (CSC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Pulpitis, Post Operative Pain, Toothache
What is being tested?
Vital Pulpotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
15 Dec 2021to 15 Mar 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients aged between 7 and 70 with a noncontributory medical history presented for endodontic treatment at the Department of Endodontics and Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Usak University, Turkey

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged between 7 and 70 years
  • The teeth with diagnosis of irreversible symptomatic pulpitis
  • Permanent first and second molars with vital pulp
  • PAI ≤ 2 with vital pulp. (Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, \& Eriksen HM (1986) The periapical index: A scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis Dent Traumatol 2(1) 20-34, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x.)

Who cannot join

  • Clinical or radiographic signs of a necrotic pulp
  • The presence of a sinus, buccal tenderness, pathological mobility or evidence of pathology on a periapical radiograph
  • Teeth with horizontal or vertical root fractures
  • Swelling, acute endodontic, or periodontal abscess
  • Insufficient tooth tissue for a restoration, teeth requiring a post
  • Unable to give informed consent
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Contraindicated systemic disease
  • Allergies the local anesthesia
  • Antibiotics, biphosphonates, and corticosteroid intake during the 7 days before treatment.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Patients who needed endodontic treatment on several teeth to avoid a potentially confused pain referral.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Usak University School of Dentistry Department of Endodontics

    Uşak, 64200

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Post-operative Pain After Vital Pulpotomy in Molars With Symptomatic Pulpitis: A Prospective Clinical Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate post-operative pain (PEP) in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis following Vital Pulpotomy Treatments (VPT) with Calcium Silicate Cement (CSC). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the post-operative pain one week after VPT significantly lower than pre-operative pain in permanent molars with symptomatic pulpitis?
  • How does post-operative pain in these teeth correlate with patient-related factors, such as age, gender, and painkiller intake?
Read more

Participants will:

  • Undergo Vital Pulpotomy Treatment with Calcium Silicate Cement (MTA)
  • Provide pain level assessments before VPT, immediately post-treatment, and at 24, 72 hours, and 1 week after treatment.

If there is a comparison group:

Researchers will compare the post-operative pain levels in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis undergoing VPT to assess its effectiveness in reducing pain compared to a control group not undergoing the treatment.

Read the detailed description

Informed Consent:

Volunteers or parents will receive detailed information about protocols, risks, and benefits. Informed consent was obtained in writing after providing subject information, and participants could withdraw voluntarily at any time.

Sample Size Calculation:

Sample size calculation, utilizing G. Power-3.1.9.2, aimed at relationship analyses with a 95% confidence level, α=0.05, effect size of 0.30, and theoretical power of 0.80, resulting in a minimum sample size of 108.

Treatment Procedure:

Vital pulpotomy, administered by experienced professionals, involved local anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, caries removal, pulp amputation, hemostasis, application of ProRoot MTA and glass ionomer, and permanent restoration. Pain scores, assessed using the modified Wong-Baker scale, were recorded pre-treatment, at 24 and 72 hours post-procedure, along with inquiries about painkiller usage.

Being tested
Vital Pulpotomy
Keywords
toothache, pulpitis, pulpotomy, pain, postoperative
Medical subject headings
Pulpitis, Pain, Postoperative, Toothache, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vital PulpotomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called vital pulp amputation

    Vital pulpotomy involves the removal of the coronal pulp, while MTA is used to seal the root orifices. It is clear that vital pulp treatments for symptomatic pulpitis are a more reliable, cost-effective, and generally easier option than root canal treatment (RCT) once the mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is introduced in dentistry. In vital pulpotomy, as opposed to RCT, tooth healing and symptoms are diminished while the vitality of the tooth is maintained. Furthermore, vital pulpotomy is a significantly more practical and economical treatment alternative than RCT.

Study groups in NCT06216951
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with symptomatic pulpitisvital permanent molars with symptomatic pulpitis in patients aged between 7-70
Receives: Procedure: Vital Pulpotomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative Pain Assesment

    Pain scores before and after treatment will be assessed using a modified Wong-Baker pain rating scale. The patients and parents will be given with comprehensive information and instructed to indicate their level of pain using a pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain) before treatment, at 24 hours, and 72 hours after the procedure. Additionally, they will be asked about the use of painkillers.

    Measured: 1) on treatment day, before starting the treatment; 2)24 hours later; 3)72 hours later and 4) 1 week later

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2024
  2. Study start15 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06216951
Sponsor's protocol ID
180-180-13
Acronym
POPAVPT
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
11 Jan 2024
Last updated
27 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: due to possible plagiarism issues, we are kindly requesting that the study descriptions be shared only after journal publication

Publications

  • Lin LM, Ricucci D, Saoud TM, Sigurdsson A, Kahler B. Vital pulp therapy of mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis from the perspective of pulp biology. Aust Endod J. 2020 Apr;46(1):154-166. doi: 10.1111/aej.12392. Epub 2019 Dec 21.

    PubMed 31865629
  • Zanini M, Hennequin M, Cousson PY. A Review of Criteria for the Evaluation of Pulpotomy Outcomes in Mature Permanent Teeth. J Endod. 2016 Aug;42(8):1167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

    PubMed 27339631
  • Witherspoon DE, Small JC, Harris GZ. Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies: a case series outcomes assessment. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 May;137(5):610-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0256.

    PubMed 16739540

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulpitis and Post Operative Pain, run by Uşak University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative Pain Assesment (time frame: 1) on treatment day, before starting the treatment; 2)24 hours later; 3)72 hours later and 4) 1 week later). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06216951, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in