Mucositis OralPBMT/MTXNCT06217224
Evaluation of Prophylactic Photobiomodulation Therapy in Patients With Osteosarcoma
A study testing Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) in people with Mucositis Oral, run by Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for the prevention of oral mucositis in osteosarcoma patients submitted to high doses of methotrexate, through two different protocols. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 19 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mucositis Oral
- What is being tested?
- Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2022to 30 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 19 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients enrolled at INCA diagnosed with OS (ICD10-C41), aged 0 to 19 years;
- Patients with indication for Glato chemotherapy protocol, which will use high doses of MTX (HD-MTX (>1 g/m2).
- Patients who, after receiving information and instructions, signed the patient's informed consent/assent form, in accordance with Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council.
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not agree with the proposed treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Cancer Institute
Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130
Ana Maria D da Costa, +55 21 3207-1859, anadias257@gmail.com
Heliton S Antunes, Dr., +55 21 3207-1859, hspindola@inca.gov.br
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Prophylactic Photobiomodulation Therapy in Patients With Osteosarcoma Undergoing High Doses of Methotrexate
This study aims to evaluate the photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for the prevention of oral mucositis in osteosarcoma patients submitted to high doses of methotrexate, through two different protocols. As a hypothesis, photobiomodulation for the prevention of oral mucositis after cycles of Cisplatin, Doxorubicin and Methotrexate is more effective than just the application of preventive low-power laser after Methotrexate alone.
Read the detailed description
This is a phase 3, randomized study, with patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma, enrolled at national cancer institute in Brazil (INCA), candidates for the Glato protocol (chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate and surgery). Patients will be randomly randomized in permuted blocks to groups 1 or 2. After confirming the eligibility criteria, patients will be invited to participate in the research before starting treatment and the TCLE/TALE will be applied in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice Guide and national ethical standards.
After signing the TALE/TCLE, patients will be instructed to perform oral hygiene after all meals, solid or liquid, with fluoridated toothpaste. On the first day of chemotherapy, in addition to the oral hygiene protocol, patients will be instructed to rinse their mouth twice a day with 0.12% chlorhexidine for 7 days. Once hyposalivation is diagnosed, patients will use oral humidifying gel four times a day (brand provided by the institution).
Photobiomodulation therapy
- Preventative photobiomodulation therapy will be performed with the MMO device (São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil), with an indium gallium aluminum phosphide (InGaAlP) diode with radiation emission in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum (660 nm) with power of 100mW, with a beam area of 0.03cm². An energy of 1J/point and an energy density of 33.3 J/cm²/point were determined, which will be applied punctually, with a distance between points of 1cm, for 10s per point, totaling 9 points per region .
- The technique will be performed on the first day of methotrexate infusion and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or lower than 0.3 mmol/L; on the days of doxorubicin and cisplatin infusion and the day after; and on the days of infusion of doxorubicin alone in weeks 24 and 28 of the Glato protocol. Photobiomodulation will be performed in all cycles of chemotherapy treatment depending on patient randomization.
- Group 1- Preventive photobiomodulation will be carried out on the day of methotrexate infusion and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or lower than 0.3 mmol/L, from weeks 4, 5, 9, 10, 17, 18, 22, 23 , 26, 27, 30 and 31). On the days of infusion of doxorubicin and cisplatin and doxorubicin isoleted, patients will not receive photobiomodulation therapy.
- Group 2- Preventative photobiomodulation will be carried out on the days of doxorubicin infusion (weeks 1, 6, 14, 19, 24 and 28) and cisplatin (weeks 1, 6, 14 and 19) and on the day after doxorubicin infusion and cisplatin (weeks 1, 6, 14, 19), on the days of infusion of doxorubicin isoleted, weeks 24 and 28, photobiomodulation will be performed only on the first and second day. The technique will also be performed on the day of methotrexate infusion and on subsequent days until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or less than 0.3 mmol/L, from weeks 4, 5, 9, 10, 17, 18, 22, 23 , 26, 27, 30 and 31).
- If the patient presents oral mucositis Grade 1, 2, 3 or 4, they will receive treatment with the MMO device (São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil), with an indium gallium aluminum phosphide diode (InGaAlP) with radiation emission in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum (660 nm) with a power of 100mW, with a beam area of 0.03cm². An energy of 2J/point and an energy density of 66.6 J/cm²/point were determined, which will be applied punctually, for 20s per point in the area with MO and in healthy areas.
- The regions treated with laser of the oral mucosa will be: right and left buccal mucosa, lower and upper lip, upper and lower labial mucosa, right and left lateral border of the tongue, lingual belly, floor of the mouth and soft palate.
- Assessment of the patient's oral mucosa will be carried out by members of the research project team.
Oral assessment
Patients will be evaluated at the beginning of chemotherapy treatment (D1) and in a second moment between the third and seventh subsequent days (D3 to D7). In weeks 24 and 28, the dental evaluation will be carried out on D1 and between the second and seventh day (D2 to D7). In the weeks when the patient does not attend the hospital, a teleconsultation will be carried out to monitor the symptoms and, if a need for face-to-face evaluation is identified, an appointment will be scheduled.The mucous membranes will be evaluated for color, hydration, integrity, presence of oral mucositis and fungal, bacterial and viral infections.
The assessment of oral mucositis will be established according to the 1979 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the criteria established by Sonis et al in 1999 (OMAS). The WHO assessment scale is made up of: Grade 0 - no change (Absent); Grade 1 - presence of erythema; Grade 2 - presence of erythema and ulcers, but the patient is able to ingest solids and liquids; Grade 3 - presence of ulcers, but the patient can only ingest a liquid and pasty diet and Grade 4 - presence of ulcers and impossibility of ingesting solids or liquids.
The OMAS scale considers the presence and size of ulcerations/pseudomembranes and erythema. Ulcerations/pseudomembranes will be evaluated according to the following scores: 0 - in the absence of lesions, 1 - in lesions smaller than 1 cm3, 2 - in lesions measuring between 1 and 3 cm3 and 3 - in lesions larger than 3cm3. Erythema will be evaluated according to the following scores: 0 - when absent, 1 - when present but not severe and 2 - when present and severe. A daily calculation will be made of the sum of the weighted average of the ulcerated area and intensity of the erythema (MP=2.5 x [(∑ui : 3 x Nu )+ (∑ei: 2 x Ne) ], where ∑ ui= sum of ulcerated area, Nu= number of ulcerated areas, ∑ei= sum of erythema intensity and Ne= number of areas with erythema A millimeter dental ruler will be used to measure the area.
Patients will be asked about the presence or absence of oral and oropharyngeal pain. Both will be classified according to CTCAE v5.0 into grades 1, 2 and 3, associated with the Visual Analogue Scale, where the value 0 corresponds to no pain and 10, the greatest pain. According to the standards established by the visual analogue scale, values from 0 to 3 correspond to mild pain, from 4 to 6 to moderate pain and from 7 to 10 to severe pain.
The collection of adverse events will only be directed to events of interest to the study, related to toxicities in the oral cavity. It is not expected that there will be collection and analysis of serious adverse events in this study.
Xerostomia will be assessed according to the presence or absence of complaints about this condition on the part of the patient, associated with sialometry according to CTCAE v5.0 in grades 1, 2 and 3, on the first day of each chemotherapy cycle and between the third and seventh day (D3 and D7) of the same week of chemotherapy. In weeks 24 and 28, salivary flow will be assessed on the first day (D1) and between the second and seventh day (D2 to D7).
Unstimulated saliva collection will be performed according to the method described by Davies et al. (2002) The patient will remain seated vertically in a comfortable place. The first saliva sample will be discarded and the rest will be collected in a decontaminated bottle. The collected saliva will be converted into ml/minute and an unstimulated salivary flow of less than 0.1mL/min will be considered hyposalivation. Clinical criteria will also be used to identify xerostomia, such as sublingual salivary lake, salivary thickening and adherence of the wooden spatula to the oral mucosa, associated with the patient's complaint.
- Conditions
- Mucositis Oral
- Being tested
- Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)
- Keywords
- osteosarcoma, Mucositis Oral, Methotrexate Toxicity, Low-Level Light Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Stomatitis, Osteosarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)Other
Also called Preventive Low Power Laser Therapy (TLBP )
The application of preventive TLBP will be performed with a laser device containing an aluminum phosphide and indium gallium diode (InGaAlP) emitting radiation in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum (660 nm) with a power of 100mW and a beam area of 0.03 cm2 . An energy of 1J/point and an energy density of 33.3 J/cm2/point were determined, which will be applied punctually, with a distance between the points of 1cm, for 10s per point, totaling 9 points per region.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Preventative photobiomodulation therapy arm only in methotrexate weeks. | Active comparator | The application of preventive photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) will be carried out on the day of methotrexate infusion (D1) and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or less than 0.3 mmol/L. Receives: Other: Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) |
| Preventive photobiomodulation therapy arm in the weeks of methotrexate, cisplatin and doxorubicin. | Experimental | The application of preventive photobiomodulation therapy will be performed on the days of doxorubicin infusion and cisplatin and on the day after the doxorubicin infusion; on the day of the methotrexate infusion and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or less than 0.3 mmol /L. Receives: Other: Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate the best photobiomodulation protocol for preventing oral mucositis
To compare the effectiveness of two photobiomodulation protocols for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients with osteosarcoma undergoing high doses of methotrexate.
Measured: Throughout the entire glato protocol.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Incidence of Oral Mucositis
Compare the duration of oral mucositis in patients undergoing preventive photobiomodulation in groups 1 (only in the chemotherapy cycle of methotrexate) and group 2 (in cycles of methotrexate, doxorubicin and cisplatin).
Measured: From the first day of infusion of each chemotherapy agent to the third and seventh day of the same week of infusion throughout the entire glato protocol.
Oral mucositis development time
Evaluate the development time of oral mucositis following the chemotherapy cycle.
Measured: From the first day of infusion of each chemotherapy agent to the third and seventh day of the same week of infusion throughout the entire glato protocol.
Assess salivary flow
Assess salivary flow before starting the first cycle of chemotherapy and in subsequent consultations.
Measured: From the first day of infusion of each chemotherapy agent to the third and seventh day of the same week of infusion throughout the entire glato protocol.
Methotrexate serum levels
Assess serum methotrexate levels after chemotherapy infusion, until they are regularized, during the study.
Measured: From the first day of meotrexate infusion until serum regularization.
Hospital internment
To evaluate the frequency of hospital admissions due to adverse events of interest to the study during chemotherapy treatment.
Measured: Throughout the entire glato protocol.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2024
- Study start17 Oct 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mucositis OralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Phase 3, randomized study with patients diagnosed with OS, enrolled at INCA, candidates for the Glato protocol (chemotherapy -doxorubicin, cisplatin, dexamethasone and MTX + surgery). Patients will be randomized through the computerized system to groups 1 or 2. Randomization will be performed in permuted blocks.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Heliton Spindola Antunes, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil
- Investigators
- Heliton S Antunes, Dr., Study director, National Cancer Institute (NCI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06217224
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 54417221.3.0000.5274
- Acronym
- PBMT/MTX
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
PubMed 30350310Steliarova-Foucher E, Colombet M, Ries LAG, Moreno F, Dolya A, Bray F, Hesseling P, Shin HY, Stiller CA; IICC-3 contributors. International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001-10: a population-based registry study. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):719-731. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30186-9. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
PubMed 28410997Parkin DM, Stiller CA, Nectoux J. International variations in the incidence of childhood bone tumours. Int J Cancer. 1993 Feb 1;53(3):371-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530305.
PubMed 8428791Gaebler M, Silvestri A, Haybaeck J, Reichardt P, Lowery CD, Stancato LF, Zybarth G, Regenbrecht CRA. Three-Dimensional Patient-Derived In Vitro Sarcoma Models: Promising Tools for Improving Clinical Tumor Management. Front Oncol. 2017 Sep 11;7:203. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00203. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28955656Mutsaers AJ, Walkley CR. Cells of origin in osteosarcoma: mesenchymal stem cells or osteoblast committed cells? Bone. 2014 May;62:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
PubMed 24530473Arndt CA, Crist WM. Common musculoskeletal tumors of childhood and adolescence. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 29;341(5):342-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907293410507. No abstract available.
PubMed 10423470Howard SC, McCormick J, Pui CH, Buddington RK, Harvey RD. Preventing and Managing Toxicities of High-Dose Methotrexate. Oncologist. 2016 Dec;21(12):1471-1482. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0164. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
PubMed 27496039Park JA, Shin HY. Influence of genetic polymorphisms in the folate pathway on toxicity after high-dose methotrexate treatment in pediatric osteosarcoma. Blood Res. 2016 Mar;51(1):50-7. doi: 10.5045/br.2016.51.1.50. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
PubMed 27104192Mazhari F, Shirazi AS, Shabzendehdar M. Management of oral mucositis in pediatric patients receiving cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Mar;66(3):e27403. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27403. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
PubMed 30421549Liu SG, Gao C, Zhang RD, Zhao XX, Cui L, Li WJ, Chen ZP, Yue ZX, Zhang YY, Wu MY, Wang JX, Li ZG, Zheng HY. Polymorphisms in methotrexate transporters and their relationship to plasma methotrexate levels, toxicity of high-dose methotrexate, and outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 6;8(23):37761-37772. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17781.
PubMed 28525903Maiguma T, Hayashi Y, Ueshima S, Kaji H, Egawa T, Chayama K, Morishima T, Kitamura Y, Sendo T, Gomita Y, Teshima D. Relationship between oral mucositis and high-dose methotrexate therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Nov;46(11):584-90. doi: 10.5414/cpp46584.
PubMed 19000557Hong CHL, Gueiros LA, Fulton JS, Cheng KKF, Kandwal A, Galiti D, Fall-Dickson JM, Johansen J, Ameringer S, Kataoka T, Weikel D, Eilers J, Ranna V, Vaddi A, Lalla RV, Bossi P, Elad S; Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3949-3967. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04848-4. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
PubMed 31286232Migliorati C, Hewson I, Lalla RV, Antunes HS, Estilo CL, Hodgson B, Lopes NN, Schubert MM, Bowen J, Elad S; Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). Systematic review of laser and other light therapy for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jan;21(1):333-41. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1605-6. Epub 2012 Sep 22.
PubMed 23001179Zadik Y, Arany PR, Fregnani ER, Bossi P, Antunes HS, Bensadoun RJ, Gueiros LA, Majorana A, Nair RG, Ranna V, Tissing WJE, Vaddi A, Lubart R, Migliorati CA, Lalla RV, Cheng KKF, Elad S; Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). Systematic review of photobiomodulation for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3969-3983. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04890-2. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
PubMed 31286228He M, Zhang B, Shen N, Wu N, Sun J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients. Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;177(1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-3043-4. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
PubMed 29128883
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Prophylactic Photobiomodulation Therapy in Patients With Osteosarcoma Undergoing High Doses of Methotrexate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06217224
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PBMT/MTX / 54417221.3.0000.5274
- Conditions
- Mucositis Oral
- Keywords
- osteosarcoma, Mucositis Oral, Methotrexate Toxicity, Low-Level Light Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer, BrazilOther government
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for the prevention of oral mucositis in osteosarcoma patients submitted to high doses of methotrexate, through two different protocols. As a hypothesis, photobiomodulation for the prevention of oral mucositis after cycles of Cisplatin, Doxorubicin and Methotrexate is more effective than just the application of preventive low-power laser after Methotrexate alone.
Detailed description
This is a phase 3, randomized study, with patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma, enrolled at national cancer institute in Brazil (INCA), candidates for the Glato protocol (chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate and surgery). Patients will be randomly randomized in permuted blocks to groups 1 or 2. After confirming the eligibility criteria, patients will be invited to participate in the research before starting treatment and the TCLE/TALE will be applied in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice Guide and national ethical standards.
After signing the TALE/TCLE, patients will be instructed to perform oral hygiene after all meals, solid or liquid, with fluoridated toothpaste. On the first day of chemotherapy, in addition to the oral hygiene protocol, patients will be instructed to rinse their mouth twice a day with 0.12% chlorhexidine for 7 days. Once hyposalivation is diagnosed, patients will use oral humidifying gel four times a day (brand provided by the institution).
Photobiomodulation therapy
- Preventative photobiomodulation therapy will be performed with the MMO device (São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil), with an indium gallium aluminum phosphide (InGaAlP) diode with radiation emission in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum (660 nm) with power of 100mW, with a beam area of 0.03cm². An energy of 1J/point and an energy density of 33.3 J/cm²/point were determined, which will be applied punctually, with a distance between points of 1cm, for 10s per point, totaling 9 points per region .
- The technique will be performed on the first day of methotrexate infusion and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or lower than 0.3 mmol/L; on the days of doxorubicin and cisplatin infusion and the day after; and on the days of infusion of doxorubicin alone in weeks 24 and 28 of the Glato protocol. Photobiomodulation will be performed in all cycles of chemotherapy treatment depending on patient randomization.
- Group 1- Preventive photobiomodulation will be carried out on the day of methotrexate infusion and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or lower than 0.3 mmol/L, from weeks 4, 5, 9, 10, 17, 18, 22, 23 , 26, 27, 30 and 31). On the days of infusion of doxorubicin and cisplatin and doxorubicin isoleted, patients will not receive photobiomodulation therapy.
- Group 2- Preventative photobiomodulation will be carried out on the days of doxorubicin infusion (weeks 1, 6, 14, 19, 24 and 28) and cisplatin (weeks 1, 6, 14 and 19) and on the day after doxorubicin infusion and cisplatin (weeks 1, 6, 14, 19), on the days of infusion of doxorubicin isoleted, weeks 24 and 28, photobiomodulation will be performed only on the first and second day. The technique will also be performed on the day of methotrexate infusion and on subsequent days until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or less than 0.3 mmol/L, from weeks 4, 5, 9, 10, 17, 18, 22, 23 , 26, 27, 30 and 31).
- If the patient presents oral mucositis Grade 1, 2, 3 or 4, they will receive treatment with the MMO device (São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil), with an indium gallium aluminum phosphide diode (InGaAlP) with radiation emission in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum (660 nm) with a power of 100mW, with a beam area of 0.03cm². An energy of 2J/point and an energy density of 66.6 J/cm²/point were determined, which will be applied punctually, for 20s per point in the area with MO and in healthy areas.
- The regions treated with laser of the oral mucosa will be: right and left buccal mucosa, lower and upper lip, upper and lower labial mucosa, right and left lateral border of the tongue, lingual belly, floor of the mouth and soft palate.
- Assessment of the patient's oral mucosa will be carried out by members of the research project team.
Oral assessment
Patients will be evaluated at the beginning of chemotherapy treatment (D1) and in a second moment between the third and seventh subsequent days (D3 to D7). In weeks 24 and 28, the dental evaluation will be carried out on D1 and between the second and seventh day (D2 to D7). In the weeks when the patient does not attend the hospital, a teleconsultation will be carried out to monitor the symptoms and, if a need for face-to-face evaluation is identified, an appointment will be scheduled.The mucous membranes will be evaluated for color, hydration, integrity, presence of oral mucositis and fungal, bacterial and viral infections.
The assessment of oral mucositis will be established according to the 1979 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the criteria established by Sonis et al in 1999 (OMAS). The WHO assessment scale is made up of: Grade 0 - no change (Absent); Grade 1 - presence of erythema; Grade 2 - presence of erythema and ulcers, but the patient is able to ingest solids and liquids; Grade 3 - presence of ulcers, but the patient can only ingest a liquid and pasty diet and Grade 4 - presence of ulcers and impossibility of ingesting solids or liquids.
The OMAS scale considers the presence and size of ulcerations/pseudomembranes and erythema. Ulcerations/pseudomembranes will be evaluated according to the following scores: 0 - in the absence of lesions, 1 - in lesions smaller than 1 cm3, 2 - in lesions measuring between 1 and 3 cm3 and 3 - in lesions larger than 3cm3. Erythema will be evaluated according to the following scores: 0 - when absent, 1 - when present but not severe and 2 - when present and severe. A daily calculation will be made of the sum of the weighted average of the ulcerated area and intensity of the erythema (MP=2.5 x [(∑ui : 3 x Nu )+ (∑ei: 2 x Ne) ], where ∑ ui= sum of ulcerated area, Nu= number of ulcerated areas, ∑ei= sum of erythema intensity and Ne= number of areas with erythema A millimeter dental ruler will be used to measure the area.
Patients will be asked about the presence or absence of oral and oropharyngeal pain. Both will be classified according to CTCAE v5.0 into grades 1, 2 and 3, associated with the Visual Analogue Scale, where the value 0 corresponds to no pain and 10, the greatest pain. According to the standards established by the visual analogue scale, values from 0 to 3 correspond to mild pain, from 4 to 6 to moderate pain and from 7 to 10 to severe pain.
The collection of adverse events will only be directed to events of interest to the study, related to toxicities in the oral cavity. It is not expected that there will be collection and analysis of serious adverse events in this study.
Xerostomia will be assessed according to the presence or absence of complaints about this condition on the part of the patient, associated with sialometry according to CTCAE v5.0 in grades 1, 2 and 3, on the first day of each chemotherapy cycle and between the third and seventh day (D3 and D7) of the same week of chemotherapy. In weeks 24 and 28, salivary flow will be assessed on the first day (D1) and between the second and seventh day (D2 to D7).
Unstimulated saliva collection will be performed according to the method described by Davies et al. (2002) The patient will remain seated vertically in a comfortable place. The first saliva sample will be discarded and the rest will be collected in a decontaminated bottle. The collected saliva will be converted into ml/minute and an unstimulated salivary flow of less than 0.1mL/min will be considered hyposalivation. Clinical criteria will also be used to identify xerostomia, such as sublingual salivary lake, salivary thickening and adherence of the wooden spatula to the oral mucosa, associated with the patient's complaint.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Phase 3, randomized study with patients diagnosed with OS, enrolled at INCA, candidates for the Glato protocol (chemotherapy -doxorubicin, cisplatin, dexamethasone and MTX + surgery). Patients will be randomized through the computerized system to groups 1 or 2. Randomization will be performed in permuted blocks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Preventative photobiomodulation therapy arm only in methotrexate weeks. | Active comparator | Other: Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)The application of preventive photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) will be carried out on the day of methotrexate infusion (D1) and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or less than 0.3 mmol/L. |
| Preventive photobiomodulation therapy arm in the weeks of methotrexate, cisplatin and doxorubicin. | Experimental | Other: Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)The application of preventive photobiomodulation therapy will be performed on the days of doxorubicin infusion and cisplatin and on the day after the doxorubicin infusion; on the day of the methotrexate infusion and until the patient reaches a serum concentration equal to or less than 0.3 mmol /L. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 19 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients enrolled at INCA diagnosed with OS (ICD10-C41), aged 0 to 19 years;
- Patients with indication for Glato chemotherapy protocol, which will use high doses of MTX (HD-MTX (>1 g/m2).
- Patients who, after receiving information and instructions, signed the patient's informed consent/assent form, in accordance with Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who do not agree with the proposed treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)Also: Preventive Low Power Laser Therapy (TLBP )The application of preventive TLBP will be performed with a laser device containing an aluminum phosphide and indium gallium diode (InGaAlP) emitting radiation in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum (660 nm) with a power of 100mW and a beam area of 0.03 cm2 . An energy of 1J/point and an energy density of 33.3 J/cm2/point were determined, which will be applied punctually, with a distance between the points of 1cm, for 10s per point, totaling 9 points per region. | Other | Preventative photobiomodulation therapy arm only in methotrexate weeks., Preventive photobiomodulation therapy arm in the weeks of methotrexate, cisplatin and doxorubicin. |
Primary outcome
Evaluate the best photobiomodulation protocol for preventing oral mucositis
Time frame: Throughout the entire glato protocol.
To compare the effectiveness of two photobiomodulation protocols for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients with osteosarcoma undergoing high doses of methotrexate.
5 secondary outcomes
Incidence of Oral Mucositis
Time frame: From the first day of infusion of each chemotherapy agent to the third and seventh day of the same week of infusion throughout the entire glato protocol.
Oral mucositis development time
Time frame: From the first day of infusion of each chemotherapy agent to the third and seventh day of the same week of infusion throughout the entire glato protocol.
Assess salivary flow
Time frame: From the first day of infusion of each chemotherapy agent to the third and seventh day of the same week of infusion throughout the entire glato protocol.
Methotrexate serum levels
Time frame: From the first day of meotrexate infusion until serum regularization.
Hospital internment
Time frame: Throughout the entire glato protocol.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30350310Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
- Background: PubMed 28410997Steliarova-Foucher E, Colombet M, Ries LAG, Moreno F, Dolya A, Bray F, Hesseling P, Shin HY, Stiller CA; IICC-3 contributors. International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001-10: a population-based registry study. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):719-731. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30186-9. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
- Background: PubMed 8428791Parkin DM, Stiller CA, Nectoux J. International variations in the incidence of childhood bone tumours. Int J Cancer. 1993 Feb 1;53(3):371-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530305.
- Background: PubMed 28955656Gaebler M, Silvestri A, Haybaeck J, Reichardt P, Lowery CD, Stancato LF, Zybarth G, Regenbrecht CRA. Three-Dimensional Patient-Derived In Vitro Sarcoma Models: Promising Tools for Improving Clinical Tumor Management. Front Oncol. 2017 Sep 11;7:203. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00203. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24530473Mutsaers AJ, Walkley CR. Cells of origin in osteosarcoma: mesenchymal stem cells or osteoblast committed cells? Bone. 2014 May;62:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 10423470Arndt CA, Crist WM. Common musculoskeletal tumors of childhood and adolescence. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 29;341(5):342-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907293410507. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27496039Howard SC, McCormick J, Pui CH, Buddington RK, Harvey RD. Preventing and Managing Toxicities of High-Dose Methotrexate. Oncologist. 2016 Dec;21(12):1471-1482. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0164. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
- Background: PubMed 27104192Park JA, Shin HY. Influence of genetic polymorphisms in the folate pathway on toxicity after high-dose methotrexate treatment in pediatric osteosarcoma. Blood Res. 2016 Mar;51(1):50-7. doi: 10.5045/br.2016.51.1.50. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
- Background: PubMed 30421549Mazhari F, Shirazi AS, Shabzendehdar M. Management of oral mucositis in pediatric patients receiving cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Mar;66(3):e27403. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27403. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
- Background: PubMed 28525903Liu SG, Gao C, Zhang RD, Zhao XX, Cui L, Li WJ, Chen ZP, Yue ZX, Zhang YY, Wu MY, Wang JX, Li ZG, Zheng HY. Polymorphisms in methotrexate transporters and their relationship to plasma methotrexate levels, toxicity of high-dose methotrexate, and outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 6;8(23):37761-37772. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17781.
- Background: PubMed 19000557Maiguma T, Hayashi Y, Ueshima S, Kaji H, Egawa T, Chayama K, Morishima T, Kitamura Y, Sendo T, Gomita Y, Teshima D. Relationship between oral mucositis and high-dose methotrexate therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Nov;46(11):584-90. doi: 10.5414/cpp46584.
- Background: PubMed 31286232Hong CHL, Gueiros LA, Fulton JS, Cheng KKF, Kandwal A, Galiti D, Fall-Dickson JM, Johansen J, Ameringer S, Kataoka T, Weikel D, Eilers J, Ranna V, Vaddi A, Lalla RV, Bossi P, Elad S; Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3949-3967. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04848-4. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mucositis Oral
Not yet recruiting
Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis Management in Children Using Diode Laser 980 Nanometer Versus Hyaluronic Acid Gel (RCT)
Apthous Ulcer
RecruitingPhase 2
Traditional Chinese Medicine Preparation Alleviates Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis
RecruitingPhase 3
High-dose Prophylactic Gabapentin (HOPE) vs. Placebo to Prevent Opioid Use for Oral Mucositis Pain During Concurrent Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Stage I Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma AJCC v8
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of 25(OH)D3 and LL-37 Levels in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid
Peri Implantitis, Peri Implant Mucositis
RecruitingPhase 2
Taurine for the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Oral Mucositis (Ulcerative) Due to Radiation, Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heliton S Antunes, Dr. study director
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Preventive photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) in people with Mucositis Oral, run by Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ana Maria D da Costa (+55 21 3207 - 1859, anadias257@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate the best photobiomodulation protocol for preventing oral mucositis (time frame: Throughout the entire glato protocol.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06217224, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2024.