StrokeNESTNCT06219382
Neurorehabilitation Ecosystem for Sustained Therapy (NEST): A Feasibility Study
An observational study of Stroke, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The global burden of stroke is staggering, with over 15M new cases reported annually. Of these cases, around 40% require motor and cognitive rehabilitation, resulting in approximately 6M new patients requiring treatment each year, in addition to the more than 33M chronic patients worldwide. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Neurorehabilitation ecosystem
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2023to 30 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with upper limb paresia secondary to a first-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least three months prior to study recruitment, confirmed by brain CT or MRI
Who may be able to join
- Patients presenting a first-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least three months prior to study recruitment, confirmed by brain CT or MRI;
- Mild to moderate motor impairment of the upper extremity (MRC ≥ 2)
- Age = 18 - 80 years old;
- Able to sit in a regular chair or wheelchair;
- Experience with smartphone technology
Who cannot join
- The presence of a condition or abnormality that could compromise the patient's safety or data quality;
- Severe cognitive impairments that prevent the execution of the experiment (MoCA < 19). This cut-off point is based on a pilot study (Maier, M. et al., 2019).
- Arteriovenous malformation or other brain lesions not related to stroke;
- Previous history of upper limb motor impairment
- Sensory aphasia;
- Associated impairments: spasticity of the upper limb (Modified Ashworth scale≥ 3), apraxia, major pain, or other impairments that would interfere with the correct execution of the experiment;
- The NEST system cannot be used independently according to the therapist's observations and there is no available support from a caregiver to help use the system;
- No experience with smartphone technology.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
INRCA
Ancona
Vera Stara, PHD, V.Stara@inrca.it
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sint Maartenskliniek
Nijmegen
Noël Keijsers, Noël, PHD, n.keijsers@maartenskliniek.nl
About this study
The global burden of stroke is staggering, with over 15M new cases reported annually. Of these cases, around 40% require motor and cognitive rehabilitation, resulting in approximately 6M new patients requiring treatment each year, in addition to the more than 33M chronic patients worldwide. This massive incidence puts great pressure on healthcare systems and mounting costs. Consequently, there is an urgent need for patient-specific solutions that maximize rehabilitation efficiency and improve the patient´s performance, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life. While several technological solutions have been proposed for stroke recovery during hospitalization, there is a notable lack of attention to home rehabilitation, which is crucial for long-term recovery, cost reduction and minimizing the demand for rehabilitation personnel.
Investigators propose NEST, the Neurorehabilitation Ecosystem for Sustained Treatment based on the Rehabilitation Gaming System (RGS), an advanced digital rehabilitation program that uses serious gaming and Augmented Reality (AR)- and Virtual Reality VR-based training and is grounded on neuroscientific principles, that has been shown to promote motor recovery after stroke at the clinic and at home (Ballester et al., 2017; Ballester et al., 2019).
Read more
NEST uses a patient's user model solution interfaced via a novel digital and portable technology to provide a home rehabilitation program accepted by the patients and clinicians. The NEST system integrates the following components:
- RGS-wear advances a multimodal unobtrusive wearable interface starting from the state-of-the-art wearable technologies including off-the-shelf wearables for the detection of arm activity. This data is sent through Bluetooth to a paired smartphone, which allows for the filtering of body movements.
- The RGS-Mobile App (smartphones) communicates with the RGS-wear and integrates sensor data for the delivery of patient-tailored Augmented Reality AR-based exercises for motor and cognitive training, customized feedback via the AWA coach, and activity reports through the MIMS.
- The AWA Coach (Agent for Wellbeing Assistance) which provides specific feedback based on the performance and the status of well-being of the user. The user can access information through the AWA Coach dashboard (AWAtar App), which is an interface that reports their performance. and progress. It also provides the user with direct and motivational feedback and training activities in order to assist them in acting when needed.
- MIMS (Medical Information Management System) is a cloud service in which relevant information on the patient's state is uploaded, allowing the monitoring of progress and the customization of the RGS-based training and evaluation protocols.
Guaranteeing the correct use of this NEST ecosystem by post-stroke patients performing upper limb telerehabilitation implies conducting an usability study to measure its usability, adherence, acceptance and the user's experience. Investigators will also explore effectiveness of the NEST ecosystem in improving motor function of the paretic arm after stroke. Furthermore, uncovering end-user's experiences with NEST in an international multi-centre study should give valuable information into improving its features for a future clinical trial focusing on the effectiveness of the NEST system. This multicenter study will follow a mixed methods approach (quantitative and qualitative measurements).
Read the detailed description
The main objective of the feasibility study is to assess 1) the usability, 2) adherence, 3) user experience and 4) acceptability of the NEST system during a six-week intervention. In particular, Investigators will study the long-term adherence by measuring the time participants use the system beyond the prescribed exercises. Investigators will also examine the user's feedback to further improve the NEST system's design and functionality. Our hypothesis is that the NEST system will be a practical and well-accepted rehabilitation solution for home use. More specifically, investigators expect this approach to show good adherence to treatment.
Investigators will also explore the impact of the NEST system on arm hand function, impairment and quality of life.
By conducting this investigation across three clinical sites in Spain, Italy, and The Netherlands, each with 5-10 subjects, investigatorsI can gain diverse insights into the system's performance.
Primary objective The first objective of this study is to measure the usability, adherence, user experience and acceptance of the NEST system.
Secondary objectives Investigators will also evaluate the user needs and preferences to further improve the NEST system's features and functionalities.
In addition, the impact of the NEST system on arm hand function, impairment, pain, fatigue and quality of life will be evaluated.
- STUDY DESIGN AND POPULATION The study is a feasibility study based on both quantitative and qualitative data collection. The general objective is to measure the usability of the system, the user experience, the adherence and the acceptance of the NEST system. Each clinical site will include 5 to 10 late subacute and chronic stroke patients (in total a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 30 patients), aged 18-80 years. Over a period of six weeks, the participants will integrate the NEST system into their daily routines, running parallel to their regular neurorehabilitation treatment.
1.1 STUDY SETTING The study will be conducted in parallel in 3 European hospitals: Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron in Spain, Sint MaartensKliniek in the Netherlands and INRCA in Italy. The experimentation involves 3 different phases: Recruitment (R), Baseline assessment (T0) before the start of the trial, Final evaluation (T1) at the end of the trial, after 6 weeks.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Neurorehabilitation ecosystem
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neurorehabilitation ecosystemDevice
Over a period of six weeks, the participants will integrate the NEST system into their daily routines, running parallel to their regular neurorehabilitation treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neurorehabilitation ecosystem (NEST) | Patients will use Nest apart from the regular neurorehabilitation treatment Receives: Device: Neurorehabilitation ecosystem |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Usability
Usability will be assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS), (Brooke J., 1996). Scores range between 0-100, low scores mean the device is not acceptable by users and higher scores mean good acceptance by users
Measured: Week 6
User experience
User experience will be assessed by the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), (Laugwitz et al., 2008). Scores range (26-182), low scores mean the device is not attractive to users users and higher scores mean the product is very attractive to users.
Measured: Week 6
Adherence
Adherence will be assessed by the total time the RGSapp is used, in comparison to the advised dosage, (via the user ID is possible to monitor the patient's access to the RGSapp and the hours trained), for the entire duration of the study.
Measured: Week 6
Acceptance
.Acceptance will be assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0), (Demers, L. et al., 2000). Scores range (0-100), low scores mean bad quality of movement performed by the user and higher scores mean good quality of movement performed by the user.
Measured: Week 6
Secondary outcomes (7)
Attitude towards the system
Attitude towards the system will be assessed by ad hoc questions.
Measured: Day 0, Week 6
Fugl Meyer assessment motor score
It is a stroke-specific and performance-based impairment index ranging from 0-66. Low scores translate poor motor control of the affected limb and the highest scores mean good recovery.
Measured: Day 0, Week 6
Barthel Index
The Barthel Index is a measure of functional disability that assesses independence mobility and need for assistance in performing 10 common activities of daily living. Scores range from 0-100, low scores mean high degree of dependency while higher scores translate less dependency in the execution of daily living activities.
Measured: Day 0, Week 6
Modified Ashworth Scale
It is a muscle tone assessment scale that measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching. It is used as a simple measure of spasticity in patients with lesions of the Central Nervous System. Scores range from 0 to 4, where lower scores represent normal muscle tone and higher scores represent spasticity.
Measured: Day 0, Week 6
Fatigue Severity Scale
Questionnaire designed to measure fatigue in people with chronic diseases. The scale is a self-report, paper-and-pencil requiring 2-3 min to be completed. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 ("completely disagree") to 7 ("completely agree") to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale
Measured: Day 0, Week 6
Visual Analogue Scale
Measure of pain intensity used to record patients' pain progression. It is a horizontal/vertical straight line of fixed length, (100 mm), beginning and ending with the extreme limits of the evaluated parameter, oriented from left (worst) to right (best).
Measured: Day 0, Week 6
EuroQol - 5 Dimension - 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L),
It is a self-report survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 5-level severity ranking that ranges from 'No problems' through 'Extreme problems';
Measured: Day 0, Week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2024
- Study start15 Jan 2023
- Primary completion30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sint Maartenskliniek, NRCA - IRCCS Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susana Rodriguez, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Vall d'Hebron
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06219382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PR(AT)463/2023
- Acronym
- NEST
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurorehabilitation Ecosystem for Sustained Therapy (NEST): A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06219382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEST / PR(AT)463/2023
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sint Maartenskliniek, NRCA - IRCCS Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The global burden of stroke is staggering, with over 15M new cases reported annually. Of these cases, around 40% require motor and cognitive rehabilitation, resulting in approximately 6M new patients requiring treatment each year, in addition to the more than 33M chronic patients worldwide. This massive incidence puts great pressure on healthcare systems and mounting costs. Consequently, there is an urgent need for patient-specific solutions that maximize rehabilitation efficiency and improve the patient´s performance, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life. While several technological solutions have been proposed for stroke recovery during hospitalization, there is a notable lack of attention to home rehabilitation, which is crucial for long-term recovery, cost reduction and minimizing the demand for rehabilitation personnel.
Investigators propose NEST, the Neurorehabilitation Ecosystem for Sustained Treatment based on the Rehabilitation Gaming System (RGS), an advanced digital rehabilitation program that uses serious gaming and Augmented Reality (AR)- and Virtual Reality VR-based training and is grounded on neuroscientific principles, that has been shown to promote motor recovery after stroke at the clinic and at home (Ballester et al., 2017; Ballester et al., 2019).
NEST uses a patient's user model solution interfaced via a novel digital and portable technology to provide a home rehabilitation program accepted by the patients and clinicians. The NEST system integrates the following components:
- RGS-wear advances a multimodal unobtrusive wearable interface starting from the state-of-the-art wearable technologies including off-the-shelf wearables for the detection of arm activity. This data is sent through Bluetooth to a paired smartphone, which allows for the filtering of body movements.
- The RGS-Mobile App (smartphones) communicates with the RGS-wear and integrates sensor data for the delivery of patient-tailored Augmented Reality AR-based exercises for motor and cognitive training, customized feedback via the AWA coach, and activity reports through the MIMS.
- The AWA Coach (Agent for Wellbeing Assistance) which provides specific feedback based on the performance and the status of well-being of the user. The user can access information through the AWA Coach dashboard (AWAtar App), which is an interface that reports their performance. and progress. It also provides the user with direct and motivational feedback and training activities in order to assist them in acting when needed.
- MIMS (Medical Information Management System) is a cloud service in which relevant information on the patient's state is uploaded, allowing the monitoring of progress and the customization of the RGS-based training and evaluation protocols.
Guaranteeing the correct use of this NEST ecosystem by post-stroke patients performing upper limb telerehabilitation implies conducting an usability study to measure its usability, adherence, acceptance and the user's experience. Investigators will also explore effectiveness of the NEST ecosystem in improving motor function of the paretic arm after stroke. Furthermore, uncovering end-user's experiences with NEST in an international multi-centre study should give valuable information into improving its features for a future clinical trial focusing on the effectiveness of the NEST system. This multicenter study will follow a mixed methods approach (quantitative and qualitative measurements).
Detailed description
The main objective of the feasibility study is to assess 1) the usability, 2) adherence, 3) user experience and 4) acceptability of the NEST system during a six-week intervention. In particular, Investigators will study the long-term adherence by measuring the time participants use the system beyond the prescribed exercises. Investigators will also examine the user's feedback to further improve the NEST system's design and functionality. Our hypothesis is that the NEST system will be a practical and well-accepted rehabilitation solution for home use. More specifically, investigators expect this approach to show good adherence to treatment.
Investigators will also explore the impact of the NEST system on arm hand function, impairment and quality of life.
By conducting this investigation across three clinical sites in Spain, Italy, and The Netherlands, each with 5-10 subjects, investigatorsI can gain diverse insights into the system's performance.
Primary objective The first objective of this study is to measure the usability, adherence, user experience and acceptance of the NEST system.
Secondary objectives Investigators will also evaluate the user needs and preferences to further improve the NEST system's features and functionalities.
In addition, the impact of the NEST system on arm hand function, impairment, pain, fatigue and quality of life will be evaluated.
- STUDY DESIGN AND POPULATION The study is a feasibility study based on both quantitative and qualitative data collection. The general objective is to measure the usability of the system, the user experience, the adherence and the acceptance of the NEST system. Each clinical site will include 5 to 10 late subacute and chronic stroke patients (in total a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 30 patients), aged 18-80 years. Over a period of six weeks, the participants will integrate the NEST system into their daily routines, running parallel to their regular neurorehabilitation treatment.
1.1 STUDY SETTING The study will be conducted in parallel in 3 European hospitals: Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron in Spain, Sint MaartensKliniek in the Netherlands and INRCA in Italy. The experimentation involves 3 different phases: Recruitment (R), Baseline assessment (T0) before the start of the trial, Final evaluation (T1) at the end of the trial, after 6 weeks.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neurorehabilitation ecosystem (NEST) | – | Device: Neurorehabilitation ecosystemPatients will use Nest apart from the regular neurorehabilitation treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with upper limb paresia secondary to a first-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least three months prior to study recruitment, confirmed by brain CT or MRI
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients presenting a first-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least three months prior to study recruitment, confirmed by brain CT or MRI;
- Mild to moderate motor impairment of the upper extremity (MRC ≥ 2)
- Age = 18 - 80 years old;
- Able to sit in a regular chair or wheelchair;
- Experience with smartphone technology
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- The presence of a condition or abnormality that could compromise the patient's safety or data quality;
- Severe cognitive impairments that prevent the execution of the experiment (MoCA < 19). This cut-off point is based on a pilot study (Maier, M. et al., 2019).
- Arteriovenous malformation or other brain lesions not related to stroke;
- Previous history of upper limb motor impairment
- Sensory aphasia;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neurorehabilitation ecosystemOver a period of six weeks, the participants will integrate the NEST system into their daily routines, running parallel to their regular neurorehabilitation treatment. | Device | Neurorehabilitation ecosystem (NEST) |
Primary outcome
Usability
Time frame: Week 6
Usability will be assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS), (Brooke J., 1996). Scores range between 0-100, low scores mean the device is not acceptable by users and higher scores mean good acceptance by users
User experience
Time frame: Week 6
User experience will be assessed by the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), (Laugwitz et al., 2008). Scores range (26-182), low scores mean the device is not attractive to users users and higher scores mean the product is very attractive to users.
Adherence
Time frame: Week 6
Adherence will be assessed by the total time the RGSapp is used, in comparison to the advised dosage, (via the user ID is possible to monitor the patient's access to the RGSapp and the hours trained), for the entire duration of the study.
Acceptance
Time frame: Week 6
.Acceptance will be assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0), (Demers, L. et al., 2000). Scores range (0-100), low scores mean bad quality of movement performed by the user and higher scores mean good quality of movement performed by the user.
7 secondary outcomes
Attitude towards the system
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6
Fugl Meyer assessment motor score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6
Barthel Index
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6
Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6
EuroQol - 5 Dimension - 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L),
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susana Rodriguez, MD principal investigator
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Susana Rodriguez, MD (+34607609067, susana.rodriguezgonzalez@vallhebron.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Usability (time frame: Week 6). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2024.