AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerNCT06225414

Empowering Hispanic Patients' Lung Cancer Screening Uptake (Empower Latinx)

A study testing Brief Patient Education, Patient education and Referral to financial navigation resources in people with Lung Cancer, run by University of California, Irvine at 10 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Hispanic/Latinx community (hereafter Hispanic) is the country's second-largest racial/ethnic group, accounting for 19.1% of the total population. However, they remain one of the most underserved populations with suboptimal access to healthcare and screening services due to low income, lack of health insurance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
Brief Patient Education, Patient education and Referral to financial navigation resources
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
10 sitesUnited States
Study dates
12 Feb 2024to 11 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 50- 80 years of age.
  • Be able to speak English and Spanish
  • Must have a Primary Care Provider.
  • History of 20-pack year smoking history ( based on survey self-report)
  • Current smoker or a former smoker who has quit smoking within the last 15 years (based on survey self-report)
  • Resident of California

Who cannot join

  • Prior history of lung cancer
  • Chest CT for any reason in the last 12 months based on self-report and UCI EMR
  • History of Alzheimer's disease or dementia

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

United States10 sites
  • UCI Health Family Health Center - Anaheim

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • UCI Health-Costa Mesa

    Costa Mesa, California, 92627

  • UCI Health-Irvine

    Irvine, California, 92612

  • UCI Health-Laguna hilla

    Laguna Hills, California, 92653

  • UCI Health-Newport

    Newport Beach, California, 92660

  • UCI Health SeniorHealth Center -Pavillion 4

    Orange, California, 92868

  • UCI Medical Center, Pavilion 3

    Orange, California, 92868

  • UCI Health Family Health Center - Santa Ana

    Santa Ana, California, 92701

  • UCI-Health Tustin

    Tustin, California, 92780

  • UCI Health-Yorba Linda

    Yorba Linda, California, 92886

Other trials in United States

About this study

The Hispanic/Latinx community (hereafter Hispanic) is the country's second-largest racial/ethnic group, accounting for 19.1% of the total population. However, they remain one of the most underserved populations with suboptimal access to healthcare and screening services due to low income, lack of health insurance, perceived discrimination, language barriers, and limited health literacy. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related mortality with 1.8 million annual deaths worldwide, with Hispanic patients known to have lower survival rates compared with non-Hispanic whites. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) decreases this mortality rate of lung cancer by 20%. Yet many Latinx patients who are eligible for lung cancer screening are still falling through the cracks which prevents patients the ability to detect lung cancer early. This study will test and compare the effect of a multi-level intervention on ordering LDCT within 4 months after patient enrollment to those in an Enhanced Usual Care. Our proposed intervention includes:

  • Primary care provider notifications of patients' LCS eligibility;
  • Patients' education;
  • Patients' referral to financial navigation resources;
  • Patients' reminder to discuss LCS during primary care provider (PCP) visit.
Conditions
Lung Cancer
Being tested
Usual Care, Brief Patient Education, Patient education, Referral to financial navigation resources, Patient Reminders
Keywords
Lung Cancer, Screening, Multi-level intervention
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Usual CareOther

    The usual care includes a provider flag in electronic medical record (EMR) on patients' eligibility for LCS if their smoking history is complete.

  • Brief Patient EducationBehavioural

    Brief one-page education material on lung cancer screening benefits and risk

  • Patient educationBehavioural

    Patients will be sent information (in preferred language) on lung cancer risk, lung cancer screening (LCS) benefits, harms, false positive rates, recommendations of follow-up for positive results, and exam insurance coverage.

  • Referral to financial navigation resourcesBehavioural

    Patients who self-report needing help with health-related social risks at baseline will be sent a brochure (in preferred language) from patient advocate foundation (PAF), a national non-profit financial navigation organization, where patients can self-refer.

  • Patient RemindersBehavioural

    within 2 weeks prior to appointment, patients will receive a text message or a phone call (if not having a phone that receives text messaging) encouraging patients to discuss lung cancer screening with their provider.

  • Provider RemindersBehavioural

    Within 2 weeks prior to primary care appointment, providers will be notified of their patient's eligibility for lung cancer screening and their reported barriers.

Study groups in NCT06225414
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: Enhanced Usual CareExperimentalUsual Care + Brief Educational Material
Receives: Other: Usual Care; Behavioral: Brief Patient Education
Arm B: Empower LatinxExperimental* PCP notifications of patients' LCS eligibility (addressing provider time constraints and barrier in identifying eligible patients); * Patients' education (addressing knowledge barriers); * Patients' referral to financial navigation resources (addressing health-related social risks) * Patients' reminder to discuss LCS during PCP visit.
Receives: Other: Usual Care; Behavioral: Patient education; Behavioral: Referral to financial navigation resources; Behavioral: Patient Reminders; Behavioral: Provider Reminders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with order of Low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS)

    Measured: Within 4 months of randomization

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Number of Participants who received LDCT for LCS

    Measured: Within 4 months of randomization

  2. Number of Participants with the documented discussion of lung cancer screening with their providers in the electronic medical record

    Measured: Within 4 months of randomization

  3. Patients' perceived risk of lung cancer

    3-item perceived risk of lung cancer questionnaire developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018) will be used. The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all 3 item. Score will range between 3 and 15. Higher score= higher perceived risk.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 months after randomization

  4. Patients' perceived severity of lung cancer

    5-items about the health consequences and severity of lung cancer will be used. The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all items. Score will range between 5-25. Higher score= higher perceived benefits.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 months after randomization

  5. Patients' perceived benefits of lung cancer screening

    6-item perceived benefit of lung cancer questionnaire developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018) will be used. The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all items. Score will range between 6-30. Higher score= higher perceived benefits.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 months after randomization

  6. Patients' perceived barriers of lung cancer screening

    19-item perceived barriers of lung cancer questionnaire will be used. 17 of these items were developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018). The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all 17 validated items. Score will range between 17 and 85. Higher score= higher perceived barriers. An additional score including all 19 items will also be calculated.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 months after randomization

  7. Patients' self-efficacy of lung cancer screening

    10-item self-efficacy for lung cancer screening questionnaire will be used. 9 of these items were developed by Carter Harris et al (Cancer Nurs, 2018). The responses for each item will be based on a 5-point likert scale. A sum score will be calculated based on responses to all 9 validated item. Score will range between 9 and 45. Higher score= higher self-efficacy. An additional score including all 10 items will also be calculated.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 months after randomization

  8. Patients' knowledge about lung cancer screening

    9 questions adopted and modified from Volk R et al (PMID: 24518006) will be used. Responses will be based on true, false, unsure. Sum of correctly responded questions will be calculated. Higher score= higher knowledge.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 months after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2024
  2. Study start12 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion11 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion11 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06225414
Sponsor's protocol ID
4471
Other IDs
UCI 23-219
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
15 Jan 2024
Last updated
30 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Brief Patient Education, Patient education and Referral to financial navigation resources in people with Lung Cancer, run by University of California, Irvine at 10 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with order of Low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) (time frame: Within 4 months of randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in