AzTrials
AzTrials

Premature Ovarian InsufficiencyEMPOIHERNCT06228547

Women's Experience of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) Diagnosis: Update on Actual Practices and Patient's Follow up

An observational study of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects 2,8 to 3,5% of women before the age of 40. Previous foreign studies revealed that only half of POI disclosures occurred during a medical consultation and that the diagnosis was often discussed in less than 5 minutes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
What is being tested?
Questionnaire
How many people
101 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
26 Jul 2023to 19 Apr 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Woman aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with POI following ESHRE 2016 criteria

Who may be able to join

  • woman aged 18 years and older,
  • diagnosed with POI following ESHRE 2016 criteria,
  • speaking and reading French language,
  • woman's oral consent,
  • affiliated or beneficiary of health insurance.

Who cannot join

  • iatrogenic POI (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy linked),
  • chromosomic POI (Turner Syndrome),
  • inability for the woman to understand the nature or risks or significance and implications of the study,
  • woman under legal protection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Bordeaux

    Bordeaux

Other trials in France

About this study

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects 2,8 to 3,5% of women before the age of 40. Previous foreign studies revealed that only half of POI disclosures occurred during a medical consultation and that the diagnosis was often discussed in less than 5 minutes. As a result, most of patients felt a lack of information, and consequently sought data on the internet. None of these studies were conducted in France. The aim of this study is to analyze current practices related to POI diagnosis and to assess women's satisfaction

Read the detailed description

POI is defined by the association of 1 clinical and 1 biological criterion: amenorrhea or spaniomenorrhea of > 4 months with onset before 40 year of age, and elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) > 25 IU/L on 2 assays at > 4 weeks' interval, associated with low estradiol level. This condition affects approximately 2% of young women.

POI can first lead to infertility and various symptoms caused by a lack of estrogens. Thus, patients may experience vaso-motor flushes, genitourinary syndrome, sleep disturbance, humor disorder, decrease libido and dyspareunia. After several years, POI can lead to osteoporosis, increased cardiovascular risk, and dementia. The administration of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) can help prevent these complications. Otherwise, POI may result in psychological repercussions such as anxiety, anger, loss of self-esteem, even depression.

Few studies analyzed POI diagnosis and the way it was perceived by patients. Alzubaidi et al. and subsequently Groff et al. reported that only half of POI notifications occurred during a medical consultation. Moreover, 35% of the consultations lasted less than 5 minutes. Thereby, Singer et al. founds that 68% of women felt inadequately informed. The majority of patients sought additional information on the internet.

No recent study focused on the disclosure of POI diagnosis, and none of the existing studies were conducted in France. The purpose of this study is to analyze the circumstances surrounding POI diagnosis and to evaluate women's experience.

In other ways, in 2016, Bachelot et al. emphasized that after more than 5 years after POI diagnosis, only 61,7% of women were undergoing HRT whereas only 6% had no regular follow-up. Moreover, among the treated patients, 42,6% had already stopped HRT for more than 1 year without any medical recommendation. Therefore, this study aims to examine the association between women satisfaction regarding POI disclosure and their compliance to HRT and medical follow-up

Being tested
Questionnaire
Keywords
Premature ovarian insufficiency, diagnosis, patient satisfaction, gynecological follow-up, hormone replacement therapy
Medical subject headings
Primary Ovarian Insufficiency, Disease, Patient Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • QuestionnaireOther

    Standardized questionnaire specifically made for the study. The interview lasts approximately 15 minutes. The form gathers baseline characteristics of the patients such as socio-demographic information, symptoms, lifestyle factors and gynecological history. The questionnaire focuses also on the manner in which the diagnosis was revealed to the patient and their experience of this disclosure. Lastly, the questionnaire includes items issued from French practice guidelines concerning etiological investigations, fertility assessment, osteoporotic and cardiovascular complications, HRT use, and residual symptoms

Study groups in NCT06228547
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
POIWoman aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with POI following ESHRE 2016 criteria
Receives: Other: Questionnaire

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. women's satisfaction

    Women's satisfaction regarding POI disclosure will be evaluated using a standardized questionnaire specifically made for this study. Findings will be presented as a score based on 5 questions assessing patient's experience of POI diagnosis (Healthcare provider adjustments to patient's emotional state, speech clarity, information provided, opportunity to ask questions, relevance of the topics discussed based on the patient's concerns). For each question a score from 1 to 4 will be assigned (Very unsatisfied = 1 ; Unsatisfied = 2 ; Satisfied = 3 ; Very satisfied = 4), resulting in a total score ranging from 5 to 20. Patients scoring from 5 to 8 will be categorized as overall very unsatisfied, 9 to 12 as unsatisfied, 13 to 16 as satisfied, and 17 to 20 as very satisfied

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Patient's expectations

    Patient's expectations regarding POI disclosure

    Measured: Baseline

  2. gynecological follow-up

    Rate of patients having regular gynecological follow-up

    Measured: Baseline

  3. hormone replacement therapy

    Percentage of patients undergoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT)

    Measured: Baseline

  4. interrupted HRT

    Percentage of patients who interrupted HRT for more than one year

    Measured: Baseline

  5. bone mineral density evaluation

    Percentage of patients who ever had a bone mineral density evaluation

    Measured: Baseline

  6. osteoporosis

    Prevalence of osteoporosis

    Measured: Baseline

  7. cardiovascular risk factor

    Prevalence of patients with cardiovascular risk factor(s).

    Measured: Baseline

  8. side effects when taking HRT

    Prevalence of patients experiencing side effects when taking HRT

    Measured: Baseline

  9. residual symptoms of POI

    Prevalence of patients with residual symptoms of POI despite HRT

    Measured: Baseline

  10. cervical cancer

    Percentage of patients who had cervical cancer screening following current guidelines.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2024
  2. Study start26 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion19 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion19 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06228547
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUBX 2023/24
Acronym
EMPOIHER
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
18 Jan 2024
Last updated
8 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

women's satisfaction (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in