AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT06228703

The Effects of Different Flow Settings on Lung Impedance

A study testing High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher in people with Healthy, run by Rush University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, randomized crossover trial will enroll adult healthy volunteers. Initially, the subject's peak inspiratory flow will be measured using a mask connected with a respiratory monitor. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 May 2024to 26 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy volunteers between 21-65 years old

Who cannot join

  • Chronic pulmonary diseases, including COPD, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, etc.
  • Uncontrolled asthma;
  • Pregnancy
  • Subjects who have cold/flu symptoms (sore throat, runny nose, fever, chills, coughing)
  • Nose abnormalities that can affect the functionality of the nasal prongs

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rush University

    Forest Park, Illinois, 60612

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Different Flow Settings on Lung Impedance Using Two New HFNC Devices: A Randomized Crossover Study on Healthy Volunteers

This prospective, randomized crossover trial will enroll adult healthy volunteers. Initially, the subject's peak inspiratory flow will be measured using a mask connected with a respiratory monitor. Subsequently, the volunteers will undergo HFNC treatment at different flow settings while their peak inspiratory flow will be continuously monitored. The primary outcome of this study is the lung aeration with different flow settings. Secondary outcomes include the lung aeration with different devices, subject's comfort at different flow settings, and the correlation between the subject's peak inspiratory flow measured by HFNC and by a mask connected with a respiratory monitor.

Read the detailed description

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a device that can reduce the work of breathing (WOB) and improve oxygenation by providing a flow that matches or exceeds patient's peak inspiratory flow during tidal breathing. Despite its widespread use, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal flow settings. Two new HFNC devices that can provide information regarding patient's peak tidal inspiratory flow breath by breath are recently available, which might help guide set and titrate the flow settings. This study aims to investigate the effects of different flow settings on lung impedance in a cohort of healthy volunteers by using the two new HFNC devices.

Methods: This prospective, randomized crossover trial will enroll adult healthy volunteers. Initially, the subject's peak inspiratory flow will be measured using a mask connected with a respiratory monitor. Subsequently, the volunteers will undergo HFNC treatment at different flow settings while their peak inspiratory flow will be continuously monitored. The primary outcome of this study is the lung aeration with different flow settings. Secondary outcomes include the lung aeration with different devices, subject's comfort at different flow settings, and the correlation between the subject's peak inspiratory flow measured by HFNC and by a mask connected with a respiratory monitor.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher
Keywords
high-flow nasal cannula, ventilation distribution, lung impedance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higherDevice

    Also called HFNC flow at 40 L/min or higher

    Eligible participants will use the high-flow nasal cannula device (Airvo3 or HFT 750) with flow set at 40 L/min or higher

Study groups in NCT06228703
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Airvo 3 high-flow nasal cannula device with flow set at 20 L/minNo interventionA new high-flow nasal cannula device (Airvo 3) will be used in the study, with the flow set at 20 L/min
HFT 750 high-flow nasal cannula device with flow set at 20 L/minNo interventionA new high-flow nasal cannula device (HFT 750) will be used in the study, with the flow set at 20 L/min
Airvo 3 high-flow nasal cannula device with flow set at 40 L/minExperimentalAirvo 3 will be used with the flow set at 40 L/min
Receives: Device: High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher
Airvo 3 high-flow nasal cannula device with flow set at 60 L/minExperimentalAirvo 3 will be used with the flow set at 60 L/min
Receives: Device: High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher
HFT 750 high-flow nasal cannula device with flow set at 40 L/minExperimentalHFT 750 will be used with the flow set at 40 L/min
Receives: Device: High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher
HFT 750 high-flow nasal cannula device with flow set at 60 L/minExperimentalHFT 750 will be used with the flow set at 60 L/min
Receives: Device: High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in End-expiratory Lung Impedance From Baseline Measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    End-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) was measured continuously using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). For each flow-setting condition, EELI values were averaged over a stable 1-minute period. The outcome represents the change in EELI (in arbitrary impedance units) from each participant's baseline measurement prior to intervention. Positive values indicate an increase in end-expiratory lung volume compared to baseline, while negative values indicate a decrease. EIT impedance units are dimensionless and device-specific and are used to represent relative changes in ventilation and lung volume.

    Measured: Up to 4 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Changes in Respiratory Rates Compared to Baseline

    Respiratory rate was measured as breaths per minute. Change was calculated as the value during each HFNC flow condition minus the baseline respiratory rate. Positive values indicate an increase in respiratory rate, and negative values indicate a decrease.

    Measured: Up to 4 hours

  2. Subject's Comfort Level

    Comfort level reported by participants using a visual numerical scale ranging between 0 (extreme discomfort) and 10 (very comfortable) at the end of each flow setting

    Measured: Up to 4 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2024
  2. Study start19 May 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion26 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06228703
Sponsor's protocol ID
HFNC-05
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
18 Jan 2024
Last updated
19 Dec 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared.

Publications

  • McKinstry S, Pilcher J, Bardsley G, Berry J, Van de Hei S, Braithwaite I, Fingleton J, Weatherall M, Beasley R. Nasal high flow therapy and PtCO2 in stable COPD: A randomized controlled cross-over trial. Respirology. 2018 Apr;23(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/resp.13185. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

    PubMed 28940962
  • Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, Frat JP, Mekontso-Dessap A, Schreiber A, Azoulay E, Mercat A, Demoule A, Lemiale V, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Burns K. High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

    PubMed 30888444
  • Li J, Albuainain FA, Tan W, Scott JB, Roca O, Mauri T. The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula support for adult subjects: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2023 Feb 28;27(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04361-5.

    PubMed 36855198

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing High-flow nasal cannula device with flow setting at 40 L/min or higher in people with Healthy, run by Rush University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in End-expiratory Lung Impedance From Baseline Measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) (time frame: Up to 4 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06228703, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in