AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyGirlsPLAYNCT06229457

Development and Testing of a Sports Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Rural Girls

A study testing Girls PLAY program in people with Healthy, run by San Diego State University at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to examine the impact of a 12-week sports sampling and physical literacy program on rural girls' physical activity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 10 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Girls PLAY program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 May 2024to Nov 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 10 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • living in Imperial County, California
  • identify as female
  • aged 8-10 years old
  • enrolled at a participating Boys \& Girls Club site

Who cannot join

  • has a sibling enrolled in the study
  • physical or mental impairment that would preclude physical activity or protocol compliance

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • San Diego State University

    San Diego, California, 92182

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Development and Feasibility Testing of a Boys & Girls Clubs' Sports Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Rural Girls: Girls PLAY

The goal of this study is to examine the impact of a 12-week sports sampling and physical literacy program on rural girls' physical activity.

Read the detailed description

Fewer than 30% of elementary-aged youth meet physical activity guidelines, with lower activity levels found among girls, racial minorities, and those living in rural areas. Sport is one of the best strategies for promoting physical activity, yet girls, Hispanics, and rural populations participate in youth sport at lower numbers and drop out at a higher rate. In line with Self-Determination Theory, commonly cited barriers include lack of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Physical literacy and sport sampling have also been identified as key determinants of youth sport participation. Developing interventions around physical literacy and sport sampling, with intervention delivery grounded in Self-Determination Theory principles, is a promising strategy for promoting youth sport. However, the few existing interventions aimed to promote girls' physical activity through sport were developed outside the United States, focused on adolescent (versus younger) girls, and/or conducted among urban or suburban youth, limiting generalizability. Rural, Hispanic girls face unique challenges around sport that should be identified and addressed, yet there remains a paucity of information on determinants of sport participation among this population.

This study aims to to develop, tailor, and examine the impact of a tailored Boys \& Girls Clubs (BGC) sport sampling and physical literacy program on rural girls' physical activity levels. BGC is an organization that provides learning and leadership programs to millions of rural youth nationwide, about half of whom are girls.

This study will enroll Hispanic girls ages 8-10 living in rural Imperial County, California. The first aims are to develop and refine a 12-week sport sampling and physical literacy intervention entitled "Girls Positive Learning Activities for Youth", or "Girls PLAY". The Girls PLAY intervention will be delivered as Boys \& Girls Clubs programming, and intervention delivery will be grounded in Self-Determination Theory. We will then examine the feasibility of the 12-week Girls PLAY intervention. Secondary outcomes of physical activity levels, physical literacy, Self-Determination Theory constructs, and sports participation will also be assessed.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Girls PLAY program

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Girls PLAY programBehavioural

    Girls PLAY program (8-12 weeks) will include 1) a series of in-person sessions, led by Boys and Girls Clubs staff at the Boys and Girls Club sites, and 2) take-home activities. In-person sessions (60-75 min; 2-3x/week) will center around a different developmentally appropriate sport each week. Lesson plans will outline games/activities in which youth engage in fundamental, sport-specific movement skills. Lesson plans will be delivered by Boys and Girls Club leaders using acts of instruction derived from Self-Determination Theory. Take home activities will 1) summarize and add on to the week's in-person sessions and 2) be adapted for delivery by parents and/or self-guided participation by youth. Take-home activities will provide information for engaging in the past week's activities as well as additional activities that parents and youth can participate in together.

Study groups in NCT06229457
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Girls PLAY programExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Girls PLAY program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment capability

    Feasibility metric: successfully enroll 30 participants

    Measured: Weeks 10-12

  2. Study assessments completed

    Feasibility metric: ≥75% participants complete time 1 and time 2 assessments

    Measured: Weeks 10-12

  3. Intervention acceptability and appropriateness

    Feasibility metric: Mean score ≥3 on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure; mean score ≥3 on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure

    Measured: Weeks 10-12

  4. Intervention feasibility and participant attendance

    Feasibility metric: Mean score ≥3 on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Measured: Weeks 10-12

  5. Participant attendance

    Attend ≥75% of in-person sessions (on average)

    Measured: Weeks 10-12

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change from baseline in physical activity levels at 10-12 weeks measured via Actigraph GT3X+

    We will use Actigraph GT3X+ (ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL) to obtain a valid, objective measure of physical activity. Data will be collected over 7 days (sample frequency of 30 Hz; 15-sec epochs).

    Measured: Week 0-1; Week 10-12

  2. Change from baseline in physical literacy at 10-12 weeks measured via the Canadian Assessment for Physical Literacy, Second Edition (CAPL-2)

    Physical literacy changes will be assessed using the Canadian Assessment for Physical Literacy, Second Edition (CAPL-2). This includes the plank, Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run, Canadian Agility \& Movement Skill Assessment, and 22-item questionnaire.

    Measured: Week 0-1; Week 10-12

  3. Change from baseline in autonomy at 10-12 weeks

    Autonomy will be measured using the 9-item Autonomy-Supportive Coaching Questionnaire.

    Measured: Week 0-1; Week 10-12

  4. Change in sport engagement at 10-12 weeks

    Engagement will be assessed via child survey examining current sport involvement (length of involvement, primary and secondary sport) and behavioral intention (e.g., "I intend to play sports this year") adapted from items used in studies among similar age groups.

    Measured: Week 0-1; Week 10-12

  5. Change in sport enjoyment at 10-12 weeks

    Enjoyment will be assessed using an adapted 5-item Enjoyment subscale of the Sport Commitment Questionnaire-2.

    Measured: Week 0-1; Week 10-12

  6. Change from baseline in competence at 10-12 weeks

    Competence will be measured using an adapted version of the Perceived Competence Scale (4-item).

    Measured: Week 0-1; Week 10-12

  7. Change from baseline in relatedness at 10-12 weeks

    Relatedness will be measured using a 5-item acceptance subscale of the Need for Relatedness Scale.

    Measured: Week 0-1; Week 10-12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2024
  2. Study start28 May 2024
  3. Primary completionNov 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06229457
Sponsor's protocol ID
HS-2023-0186
Other IDs
1K01HL171860-01
Acronym
GirlsPLAY
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
11 Jan 2024
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Johnson A, Bocarro J, Kroshus-Havril E, Arredondo E. Development and testing of a sports intervention (Girls PLAY)to promote physical activity among rural girls: a feasibility study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2026 Feb 2;12(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40814-026-01765-2.

    PubMed 41630110

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Girls PLAY program in people with Healthy, run by San Diego State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment capability (time frame: Weeks 10-12). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06229457, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in