AzTrials
AzTrials

Imaging GuidedNCT06231628

Imaging Guided Cementoplasty for Pelvic Bone Metastasis

A study testing Percutaneous cementoplasty in people with Imaging Guided and Percutaneous Cementoplasty, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Percutaneous cementoplasty
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2024to Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • refractory pain and/or gait disturbance caused by pelvic bone metastasis, did not respond to conservative treatment.
  • osteolytic lesion (in predominance) suitable for the pain.
  • limited life expectancy (less than 3 years) or stopping medical treatment

Who cannot join

  • There are no absolute contraindications for the procedure; however, the relative contraindications are:
  • patients in poor condition with an expected survival period of less than 3 months.
  • patients with stable course, with long life expectancy (more than 3 years) or those considered candidates for major pelvic surgery including tumor removal and hip arthroplasty.
  • presence of bone destruction with soft tissue mass contaminating important organs, nerves and blood vessels (improvement is not expected).
  • Patients refusing to give a written consent to the study protocol.

About this study

Official title: Immediate and Short-term Outcomes of Imaging Guided Percutaneous Cementoplasty for Pelvic Bone Metastases

This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases

Read the detailed description

Bone metastasis (BM) is the major cause of morbidity in patients with cancer. After lungs and liver, bone is the third most common site of metastatic disease. Prostate and breast cancers are responsible for the majority of bone metastases (up to 70%), followed by thyroid, lung, urinary bladder, and renal cancers, and finally melanoma. The incidence of bone metastasis is approximately 100,000 new cases per year in the united states and is increasing. Bone metastasis could result in skeletal-related events, including pain, pathological fracture, hypercalcemia, and nerve and visceral compression, which seriously affect the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Bone metastases can be classified as osteolytic (osteoclast-mediated bone resorption), osteoblastic (osteoblast-mediated bone deposition), or mixed.

Fifty percent of the pain symptoms experienced by patients with cancer originate from BM. Tumor extension to neural structures, can cause a pain that may be radicular (exacerbated by percussion or palpation) and/or mechanical (exacerbated by movement). In advanced cases, pain can become intolerable and refractory to conventional therapies, resulting in walking disability, psychological and functional impact, and significant worsening of the QoL.

The effectiveness of surgery for bone metastasis in advanced cancer patients is limited to improvement of patients' quality of life. In most of these patients, complete resection or extended curettage of the bone metastasis with major reconstruction is often not feasible due to their poor general condition and accompanying other metastases. For some types of these bone metastases, surgical resection can lead to the stripping of the surrounding soft tissue and muscle attachment and addressing bone defects, causing more intraoperative bleeding, prolonged healing time, and increase the risk of wound complications, which in turn result in a longer recovery time for patients who usually have a limited life expectancy. Therefore, less invasive procedures, including percutaneous ablation (microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and high-energy ultrasound) and/or bone cement [polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)] injection, have become possible options. This is especially true for pelvic metastatic lesions because the surgery is particularly burdensome.

In addition, life expectancy of patients with metastatic bone disease is the most important factor in the decision making for surgical and/or medical treatment. A short life expectancy is in favor of the use of less invasive procedures, that have lower complication rates and shorter rehabilitation times. In these situations, interventional radiology procedures play an important either primary or complementary role in the management of bone metastases, especially in terms of palliation of pain, improvement of ambulation problems and treatment of fractures. This is because short life expectancies, more often, require palliative rather than curative regimens and make rapid pain relief to become a priority.

Aim of the study This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases.

Materials and methods

Target Patients:

The study will include 20 patients with advanced cancer fulfilling the inclusion criteria and giving an informed consent to the study protocol (a single arm).

The following data will be collected from all patients:

  1. Age at the time of the procedure
  2. Gender
  3. Primary cancer
  4. Presence of lung metastasis
  5. Presence of peritoneal metastasis
  6. From the total bone scan:
  7. Unilateral or bilateral pelvic bone metastasis
  8. Solitary or oligometastasis (less than three sites) or multimetastasis ( 3 sites or more).
  9. Presence or absence of spine metastasis
  10. Presence or absence of lower limb metastasis
  11. Previous surgery for cancer (site of the operation; pelviabdominal, lower limbs, spine, chest, brain)
  12. Chemotherapy (preoperative, postoperative or both)
  13. Radiotherapy (preoperative, postoperative or both)

Procedure:

The procedure will be performed under either spinal or general anesthesia. The patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side up. The needle entry point will be adjusted with a fluoroscopic guide near the point 10 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine. The skin and bone will be punctured by a 11-gauge needle. At least 2 or 3 different routes to the lesion will be established, and one needle will remain empty to allow decompression if possible.

The detailed procedure is described in the intervention section below. During the injection of PMMA, the anesthesiologist carefully will monitor the change in blood pressure and pulse rate, given the known toxicity of bone cement. The injected dose will vary according to the number of metastatic sites injected and their sizes.

All patients who has no contraindication to anticoagulation will be given (enoxaparin 40-60 mg per day) from 1 day before the procedure until ambulation was resumed for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis.

The following procedural data will be collected:

  1. Total cement amount
  2. Injection needle number
  3. Injection site number
  4. Injected sites (Iliac bone or crest, acetabulum, ischium, pubic)
  5. Duration of the procedure (in minutes)
  6. Type of anesthesia used
  7. If any other operation is performed concomitantly (nominate).

Outcome measures:

Primary outcome: is pain reduction:

Secondary outcomes: are

I- Gait function:

  1. Gait status will be recorded pre and post operative
  2. Gate function change II- Complications of the procedure (if more than one complication occurred in the same patient, all complications will be recorded)
  3. Local:

1- Extraosseous bone leakage 2- Pathological fracture of the pelvic bones B. Systemic

  1. Mortality
  2. Pulmonary embolism
  3. Bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS):

Follow-up outcomes: at one month and 3 months

  1. Mortality
  2. Pain relapse (NRS score)
  3. Gait relapse
  4. Pathological fracture in the pelvic bones at the treated sites (by bone window CT).
Being tested
Percutaneous cementoplasty
Keywords
cementoplasty, metastasis, percutaneous, pelvis
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Percutaneous cementoplastyProcedure or surgery

    Percutaneous image guided cementoplasty will be performed as follows:

    Low-viscosity radiopaque bone cement will be quickly mixed and transferred to 1-ml syringes to reduce injection resistance. Injection will be initiated 2-4 min after mixing. When the resistance to cement injection becomes high in the beginning, the cement will be pushed in with a stylet, and it will go well afterward. As much bone cement as possible will be injected while avoiding leakage into the hip joint, sciatic notch, or veins under fluoroscopic monitoring. When significant cement leakage occurred at the initial stage, cement injection will be performed via another route or will be stopped and resumed when the cement viscosity increased. The cement will begin to harden after 8 min, and the operator, therefore, will aim to complete the delivery of the injection within 10 min. The injection needles must be removed before the cement hardens completely

Study groups in NCT06231628
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PatientsExperimentalA single arm with patients with advanced cancer who have all of the following: 1. refractory pain and/or gait disturbance caused by pelvic bone metastasis, did not respond to conservative treatment. 2. osteolytic lesion (in predominance) suitable for the pain. 3. limited life expectancy (less than 3 years) or stopping medical treatment. Exclusion criteria: There are no absolute contraindications for the procedure; however, the relative contraindications are: 1. patients in poor condition with an expected survival period of less than 3 months. 2. patients with stable course, with long life expectancy (more than 3 years) or those considered candidates for major pelvic surgery including tumor removal and hip arthroplasty. 3. presence of bone destruction with soft tissue mass contaminating important organs, nerves and blood vessels (improvement is not expected). 4. Patients refusing to give a written consent to the study protocol.
Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous cementoplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain reduction

    To evaluate pain, the numerical pain score (NRS) will be used. The NRS is an 11-point numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain (Figure 3) and pain is classified as mild pain if 1-4 points (tolerable), moderate if 5-6 points and severe if 7-10 points. NRS has been shown to be particularly reliable especially among patients with low health literacy. The NRS is also simple to score, and can be administered both orally and in written form.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Gait status

    Gait status will be recorded pre and post operative: with the following order from better to worse i. Normal ii. Limping iii. Independent with crutch or cane iv. Wheelchair v. Bed-ridden vi. Dead

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Gate function change

    1. Improved ii. Stable iii. Worsened

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Number of participants with extraosseous cement leakage

    It is a safety local outcome that reports extraosseous cement leakage (intra-articular "nominate joint", elsewhere)

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Number of participants with pathological fracture of the pelvic bones

    A safety local outcome that is reported by history and confirmed by CT that could be impending or displaced

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Number of participants with mortality

    procedure related mortality is considered within 2 weeks of the procedure

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Number of participants with pulmonary embolism

    (Pulmonary embolism caused by thrombus, fat, tumor emboli, or bone cement will be diagnosed by pulmonary CT with contrast if clinically suspected). For pulmonary embolism, clinical or radiological factors that might be related to its occurrence were collected, including primary cancer type, presence of lung metastasis, injected cement amount and number, local cement leakage during the procedure, pathologic fracture at the site for procedure, and injected route number.

    Measured: 3 months

  7. Number of participants with bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS)

    1- defined as hypoxia, hypertension or both, and/or unexpected loss of consciousness occurring around the time of cementation. BCIS will be classified according to severity of symptoms:

    1. grade 1 was moderate hypoxia (SpO2 < 94%) or hypotension (fall in SBP > 20%)
    2. grade 2 was severe hypoxia (sPO2<88%) or hypotension (fall in SBP>40%) or unexpected loss of consciousness
    3. grade 3 was cardiovascular collapse requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Number of participants with pathological fracture in the pelvic bones at the treated sites (by bone window CT)

    Local efficacy outcome

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2024
  2. Study startFeb 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionFeb 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06231628
Sponsor's protocol ID
Maha Hosam
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
9 Jan 2024
Last updated
30 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Percutaneous cementoplasty in people with Imaging Guided and Percutaneous Cementoplasty, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain reduction (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in