Imaging GuidedNCT06231628
Imaging Guided Cementoplasty for Pelvic Bone Metastasis
A study testing Percutaneous cementoplasty in people with Imaging Guided and Percutaneous Cementoplasty, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Imaging Guided, Percutaneous Cementoplasty, Pelvic Bone Metstasis
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous cementoplasty
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2024to Feb 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- refractory pain and/or gait disturbance caused by pelvic bone metastasis, did not respond to conservative treatment.
- osteolytic lesion (in predominance) suitable for the pain.
- limited life expectancy (less than 3 years) or stopping medical treatment
Who cannot join
- There are no absolute contraindications for the procedure; however, the relative contraindications are:
- patients in poor condition with an expected survival period of less than 3 months.
- patients with stable course, with long life expectancy (more than 3 years) or those considered candidates for major pelvic surgery including tumor removal and hip arthroplasty.
- presence of bone destruction with soft tissue mass contaminating important organs, nerves and blood vessels (improvement is not expected).
- Patients refusing to give a written consent to the study protocol.
About this study
Official title: Immediate and Short-term Outcomes of Imaging Guided Percutaneous Cementoplasty for Pelvic Bone Metastases
This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases
Read the detailed description
Bone metastasis (BM) is the major cause of morbidity in patients with cancer. After lungs and liver, bone is the third most common site of metastatic disease. Prostate and breast cancers are responsible for the majority of bone metastases (up to 70%), followed by thyroid, lung, urinary bladder, and renal cancers, and finally melanoma. The incidence of bone metastasis is approximately 100,000 new cases per year in the united states and is increasing. Bone metastasis could result in skeletal-related events, including pain, pathological fracture, hypercalcemia, and nerve and visceral compression, which seriously affect the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Bone metastases can be classified as osteolytic (osteoclast-mediated bone resorption), osteoblastic (osteoblast-mediated bone deposition), or mixed.
Fifty percent of the pain symptoms experienced by patients with cancer originate from BM. Tumor extension to neural structures, can cause a pain that may be radicular (exacerbated by percussion or palpation) and/or mechanical (exacerbated by movement). In advanced cases, pain can become intolerable and refractory to conventional therapies, resulting in walking disability, psychological and functional impact, and significant worsening of the QoL.
The effectiveness of surgery for bone metastasis in advanced cancer patients is limited to improvement of patients' quality of life. In most of these patients, complete resection or extended curettage of the bone metastasis with major reconstruction is often not feasible due to their poor general condition and accompanying other metastases. For some types of these bone metastases, surgical resection can lead to the stripping of the surrounding soft tissue and muscle attachment and addressing bone defects, causing more intraoperative bleeding, prolonged healing time, and increase the risk of wound complications, which in turn result in a longer recovery time for patients who usually have a limited life expectancy. Therefore, less invasive procedures, including percutaneous ablation (microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and high-energy ultrasound) and/or bone cement [polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)] injection, have become possible options. This is especially true for pelvic metastatic lesions because the surgery is particularly burdensome.
In addition, life expectancy of patients with metastatic bone disease is the most important factor in the decision making for surgical and/or medical treatment. A short life expectancy is in favor of the use of less invasive procedures, that have lower complication rates and shorter rehabilitation times. In these situations, interventional radiology procedures play an important either primary or complementary role in the management of bone metastases, especially in terms of palliation of pain, improvement of ambulation problems and treatment of fractures. This is because short life expectancies, more often, require palliative rather than curative regimens and make rapid pain relief to become a priority.
Aim of the study This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases.
Materials and methods
Target Patients:
The study will include 20 patients with advanced cancer fulfilling the inclusion criteria and giving an informed consent to the study protocol (a single arm).
The following data will be collected from all patients:
- Age at the time of the procedure
- Gender
- Primary cancer
- Presence of lung metastasis
- Presence of peritoneal metastasis
- From the total bone scan:
- Unilateral or bilateral pelvic bone metastasis
- Solitary or oligometastasis (less than three sites) or multimetastasis ( 3 sites or more).
- Presence or absence of spine metastasis
- Presence or absence of lower limb metastasis
- Previous surgery for cancer (site of the operation; pelviabdominal, lower limbs, spine, chest, brain)
- Chemotherapy (preoperative, postoperative or both)
- Radiotherapy (preoperative, postoperative or both)
Procedure:
The procedure will be performed under either spinal or general anesthesia. The patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side up. The needle entry point will be adjusted with a fluoroscopic guide near the point 10 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine. The skin and bone will be punctured by a 11-gauge needle. At least 2 or 3 different routes to the lesion will be established, and one needle will remain empty to allow decompression if possible.
The detailed procedure is described in the intervention section below. During the injection of PMMA, the anesthesiologist carefully will monitor the change in blood pressure and pulse rate, given the known toxicity of bone cement. The injected dose will vary according to the number of metastatic sites injected and their sizes.
All patients who has no contraindication to anticoagulation will be given (enoxaparin 40-60 mg per day) from 1 day before the procedure until ambulation was resumed for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis.
The following procedural data will be collected:
- Total cement amount
- Injection needle number
- Injection site number
- Injected sites (Iliac bone or crest, acetabulum, ischium, pubic)
- Duration of the procedure (in minutes)
- Type of anesthesia used
- If any other operation is performed concomitantly (nominate).
Outcome measures:
Primary outcome: is pain reduction:
Secondary outcomes: are
I- Gait function:
- Gait status will be recorded pre and post operative
- Gate function change II- Complications of the procedure (if more than one complication occurred in the same patient, all complications will be recorded)
- Local:
1- Extraosseous bone leakage 2- Pathological fracture of the pelvic bones B. Systemic
- Mortality
- Pulmonary embolism
- Bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS):
Follow-up outcomes: at one month and 3 months
- Mortality
- Pain relapse (NRS score)
- Gait relapse
- Pathological fracture in the pelvic bones at the treated sites (by bone window CT).
- Being tested
- Percutaneous cementoplasty
- Keywords
- cementoplasty, metastasis, percutaneous, pelvis
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous cementoplastyProcedure or surgery
Percutaneous image guided cementoplasty will be performed as follows:
Low-viscosity radiopaque bone cement will be quickly mixed and transferred to 1-ml syringes to reduce injection resistance. Injection will be initiated 2-4 min after mixing. When the resistance to cement injection becomes high in the beginning, the cement will be pushed in with a stylet, and it will go well afterward. As much bone cement as possible will be injected while avoiding leakage into the hip joint, sciatic notch, or veins under fluoroscopic monitoring. When significant cement leakage occurred at the initial stage, cement injection will be performed via another route or will be stopped and resumed when the cement viscosity increased. The cement will begin to harden after 8 min, and the operator, therefore, will aim to complete the delivery of the injection within 10 min. The injection needles must be removed before the cement hardens completely
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | Experimental | A single arm with patients with advanced cancer who have all of the following:
1. refractory pain and/or gait disturbance caused by pelvic bone metastasis, did not respond to conservative treatment.
2. osteolytic lesion (in predominance) suitable for the pain.
3. limited life expectancy (less than 3 years) or stopping medical treatment.
Exclusion criteria:
There are no absolute contraindications for the procedure; however, the relative contraindications are:
1. patients in poor condition with an expected survival period of less than 3 months.
2. patients with stable course, with long life expectancy (more than 3 years) or those considered candidates for major pelvic surgery including tumor removal and hip arthroplasty.
3. presence of bone destruction with soft tissue mass contaminating important organs, nerves and blood vessels (improvement is not expected).
4. Patients refusing to give a written consent to the study protocol. Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous cementoplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain reduction
To evaluate pain, the numerical pain score (NRS) will be used. The NRS is an 11-point numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain (Figure 3) and pain is classified as mild pain if 1-4 points (tolerable), moderate if 5-6 points and severe if 7-10 points. NRS has been shown to be particularly reliable especially among patients with low health literacy. The NRS is also simple to score, and can be administered both orally and in written form.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Gait status
Gait status will be recorded pre and post operative: with the following order from better to worse i. Normal ii. Limping iii. Independent with crutch or cane iv. Wheelchair v. Bed-ridden vi. Dead
Measured: 3 months
Gate function change
- Improved ii. Stable iii. Worsened
Measured: 3 months
Number of participants with extraosseous cement leakage
It is a safety local outcome that reports extraosseous cement leakage (intra-articular "nominate joint", elsewhere)
Measured: 3 months
Number of participants with pathological fracture of the pelvic bones
A safety local outcome that is reported by history and confirmed by CT that could be impending or displaced
Measured: 3 months
Number of participants with mortality
procedure related mortality is considered within 2 weeks of the procedure
Measured: 3 months
Number of participants with pulmonary embolism
(Pulmonary embolism caused by thrombus, fat, tumor emboli, or bone cement will be diagnosed by pulmonary CT with contrast if clinically suspected). For pulmonary embolism, clinical or radiological factors that might be related to its occurrence were collected, including primary cancer type, presence of lung metastasis, injected cement amount and number, local cement leakage during the procedure, pathologic fracture at the site for procedure, and injected route number.
Measured: 3 months
Number of participants with bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS)
1- defined as hypoxia, hypertension or both, and/or unexpected loss of consciousness occurring around the time of cementation. BCIS will be classified according to severity of symptoms:
- grade 1 was moderate hypoxia (SpO2 < 94%) or hypotension (fall in SBP > 20%)
- grade 2 was severe hypoxia (sPO2<88%) or hypotension (fall in SBP>40%) or unexpected loss of consciousness
- grade 3 was cardiovascular collapse requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Measured: 3 months
Number of participants with pathological fracture in the pelvic bones at the treated sites (by bone window CT)
Local efficacy outcome
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2024
- Study startFeb 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionFeb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Imaging GuidedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maha Hosam Hasan Ali, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06231628
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Maha Hosam
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immediate and Short-term Outcomes of Imaging Guided Percutaneous Cementoplasty for Pelvic Bone Metastases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06231628
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Maha Hosam
- Keywords
- cementoplasty, metastasis, percutaneous, pelvis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases
Detailed description
Bone metastasis (BM) is the major cause of morbidity in patients with cancer. After lungs and liver, bone is the third most common site of metastatic disease. Prostate and breast cancers are responsible for the majority of bone metastases (up to 70%), followed by thyroid, lung, urinary bladder, and renal cancers, and finally melanoma. The incidence of bone metastasis is approximately 100,000 new cases per year in the united states and is increasing. Bone metastasis could result in skeletal-related events, including pain, pathological fracture, hypercalcemia, and nerve and visceral compression, which seriously affect the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Bone metastases can be classified as osteolytic (osteoclast-mediated bone resorption), osteoblastic (osteoblast-mediated bone deposition), or mixed.
Fifty percent of the pain symptoms experienced by patients with cancer originate from BM. Tumor extension to neural structures, can cause a pain that may be radicular (exacerbated by percussion or palpation) and/or mechanical (exacerbated by movement). In advanced cases, pain can become intolerable and refractory to conventional therapies, resulting in walking disability, psychological and functional impact, and significant worsening of the QoL.
The effectiveness of surgery for bone metastasis in advanced cancer patients is limited to improvement of patients' quality of life. In most of these patients, complete resection or extended curettage of the bone metastasis with major reconstruction is often not feasible due to their poor general condition and accompanying other metastases. For some types of these bone metastases, surgical resection can lead to the stripping of the surrounding soft tissue and muscle attachment and addressing bone defects, causing more intraoperative bleeding, prolonged healing time, and increase the risk of wound complications, which in turn result in a longer recovery time for patients who usually have a limited life expectancy. Therefore, less invasive procedures, including percutaneous ablation (microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and high-energy ultrasound) and/or bone cement [polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)] injection, have become possible options. This is especially true for pelvic metastatic lesions because the surgery is particularly burdensome.
In addition, life expectancy of patients with metastatic bone disease is the most important factor in the decision making for surgical and/or medical treatment. A short life expectancy is in favor of the use of less invasive procedures, that have lower complication rates and shorter rehabilitation times. In these situations, interventional radiology procedures play an important either primary or complementary role in the management of bone metastases, especially in terms of palliation of pain, improvement of ambulation problems and treatment of fractures. This is because short life expectancies, more often, require palliative rather than curative regimens and make rapid pain relief to become a priority.
Aim of the study This study aimed to summarize the immediate operative and short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic metastases.
Materials and methods
Target Patients:
The study will include 20 patients with advanced cancer fulfilling the inclusion criteria and giving an informed consent to the study protocol (a single arm).
The following data will be collected from all patients:
- Age at the time of the procedure
- Gender
- Primary cancer
- Presence of lung metastasis
- Presence of peritoneal metastasis
- From the total bone scan:
- Unilateral or bilateral pelvic bone metastasis
- Solitary or oligometastasis (less than three sites) or multimetastasis ( 3 sites or more).
- Presence or absence of spine metastasis
- Presence or absence of lower limb metastasis
- Previous surgery for cancer (site of the operation; pelviabdominal, lower limbs, spine, chest, brain)
- Chemotherapy (preoperative, postoperative or both)
- Radiotherapy (preoperative, postoperative or both)
Procedure:
The procedure will be performed under either spinal or general anesthesia. The patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side up. The needle entry point will be adjusted with a fluoroscopic guide near the point 10 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine. The skin and bone will be punctured by a 11-gauge needle. At least 2 or 3 different routes to the lesion will be established, and one needle will remain empty to allow decompression if possible.
The detailed procedure is described in the intervention section below. During the injection of PMMA, the anesthesiologist carefully will monitor the change in blood pressure and pulse rate, given the known toxicity of bone cement. The injected dose will vary according to the number of metastatic sites injected and their sizes.
All patients who has no contraindication to anticoagulation will be given (enoxaparin 40-60 mg per day) from 1 day before the procedure until ambulation was resumed for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis.
The following procedural data will be collected:
- Total cement amount
- Injection needle number
- Injection site number
- Injected sites (Iliac bone or crest, acetabulum, ischium, pubic)
- Duration of the procedure (in minutes)
- Type of anesthesia used
- If any other operation is performed concomitantly (nominate).
Outcome measures:
Primary outcome: is pain reduction:
Secondary outcomes: are
I- Gait function:
- Gait status will be recorded pre and post operative
- Gate function change II- Complications of the procedure (if more than one complication occurred in the same patient, all complications will be recorded)
- Local:
1- Extraosseous bone leakage 2- Pathological fracture of the pelvic bones B. Systemic
- Mortality
- Pulmonary embolism
- Bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS):
Follow-up outcomes: at one month and 3 months
- Mortality
- Pain relapse (NRS score)
- Gait relapse
- Pathological fracture in the pelvic bones at the treated sites (by bone window CT).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | Experimental | Procedure: Percutaneous cementoplastyA single arm with patients with advanced cancer who have all of the following: 1. refractory pain and/or gait disturbance caused by pelvic bone metastasis, did not respond to conservative treatment. 2. osteolytic lesion (in predominance) suitable for the pain. 3. limited life expectancy (less than 3 years) or stopping medical treatment. Exclusion criteria: There are no absolute contraindications for the procedure; however, the relative contraindications are: 1. patients in poor condition with an expected survival period of less than 3 months. 2. patients with stable course, with long life expectancy (more than 3 years) or those considered candidates for major pelvic surgery including tumor removal and hip arthroplasty. 3. presence of bone destruction with soft tissue mass contaminating important organs, nerves and blood vessels (improvement is not expected). 4. Patients refusing to give a written consent to the study protocol. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- refractory pain and/or gait disturbance caused by pelvic bone metastasis, did not respond to conservative treatment.
- osteolytic lesion (in predominance) suitable for the pain.
- limited life expectancy (less than 3 years) or stopping medical treatment
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- There are no absolute contraindications for the procedure; however, the relative contraindications are:
- patients in poor condition with an expected survival period of less than 3 months.
- patients with stable course, with long life expectancy (more than 3 years) or those considered candidates for major pelvic surgery including tumor removal and hip arthroplasty.
- presence of bone destruction with soft tissue mass contaminating important organs, nerves and blood vessels (improvement is not expected).
- Patients refusing to give a written consent to the study protocol.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous cementoplastyPercutaneous image guided cementoplasty will be performed as follows: Low-viscosity radiopaque bone cement will be quickly mixed and transferred to 1-ml syringes to reduce injection resistance. Injection will be initiated 2-4 min after mixing. When the resistance to cement injection becomes high in the beginning, the cement will be pushed in with a stylet, and it will go well afterward. As much bone cement as possible will be injected while avoiding leakage into the hip joint, sciatic notch, or veins under fluoroscopic monitoring. When significant cement leakage occurred at the initial stage, cement injection will be performed via another route or will be stopped and resumed when the cement viscosity increased. The cement will begin to harden after 8 min, and the operator, therefore, will aim to complete the delivery of the injection within 10 min. The injection needles must be removed before the cement hardens completely | Procedure or surgery | Patients |
Primary outcome
Pain reduction
Time frame: 3 months
To evaluate pain, the numerical pain score (NRS) will be used. The NRS is an 11-point numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain (Figure 3) and pain is classified as mild pain if 1-4 points (tolerable), moderate if 5-6 points and severe if 7-10 points. NRS has been shown to be particularly reliable especially among patients with low health literacy. The NRS is also simple to score, and can be administered both orally and in written form.
8 secondary outcomes
Gait status
Time frame: 3 months
Gate function change
Time frame: 3 months
Number of participants with extraosseous cement leakage
Time frame: 3 months
Number of participants with pathological fracture of the pelvic bones
Time frame: 3 months
Number of participants with mortality
Time frame: 3 months
Number of participants with pulmonary embolism
Time frame: 3 months
Number of participants with bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS)
Time frame: 3 months
Number of participants with pathological fracture in the pelvic bones at the treated sites (by bone window CT)
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2024.
Related trials for Imaging Guided
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of C-arm PCD-CBCT for Image-Guided Interventions
Imaging
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Studies to Check the Local Response of Prostate Cancer to Radiation Therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostate Cancer
Recruiting
Ketogenic Diet and Neuromodulation in Treatment Resistant Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
Not yet recruiting
Salience Network Informed rTMS for PTSD
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Not yet recruiting
MRI-guided Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease
Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous cementoplasty in people with Imaging Guided and Percutaneous Cementoplasty, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain reduction (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2024.