Classic Hodgkin LymphomaNCT06235047
Liposomal Doxorubicin-containing Front-line Treatment in Elderly Patients With HL (HL-MVD)
An observational study of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Study on the use of a polychemotherapy scheme based on liposomal doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (MVD) as first line in the therapy of elderly patients affected by classic Hodgkin lymphoma Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2013to 8 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: over60 year old c-HL patients, previously untreated with Ann Arbor stage III or IV. ECOG PS 0-3, GLS ≥-20% at echocardiographic assessment and human immunodeficiency virus negativity.
Who may be able to join
- previously untreated, biopsy-proven c-HL
- Ann Arbor stage III or IV
- ECOG PS 0-3
- LVEF≥50% at echocardiographic assessment
- human immunodeficiency virus negativity.
- any GLS value
Who cannot join
- Ann Arbor stage I or II,
- concomitant major illnesses
- creatinine clearance <30 ml/min
- serum transaminases more than three times the normal value
- total bilirubin >3.4 mg/dl
- absolute neutrophil count <500/mm 3
Show all 9Show fewer
- hemoglobin level <9 g/dL
- platelet count <75 000/mm 3
- Myocardial infarction represented an exclusion only if diagnosed within 3 months prior to MVD start.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Liposomal Doxorubicin-containing Front-line Treatment in Elderly Patients With Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Multicenter Phase II Study
Study on the use of a polychemotherapy scheme based on liposomal doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (MVD) as first line in the therapy of elderly patients affected by classic Hodgkin lymphoma
Read the detailed description
Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (c-HL) is a neoplasm that originates from B lymphocytes and represents 10% of all lymphomas. The most affected age group is between 20 and 30 years of age, with a second peak in the epidemiological distribution involving patients over 60 years of age.
Elderly patients often present with already advanced disease stages and B symptoms. On the other hand, these patients often have multiple comorbidities and reduced fitness and this can limit the therapeutic possibilities with curative intent in terms of doses and adherence to the timing foreseen by the therapeutic protocol.
The optimal therapy for this category of patients is not yet well defined. In fact, the prognosis of these patients is typically poor.
The ABVD regimen (doxorubicin, i.e. Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine) is a therapeutic option for elderly/unfit patients but is associated with considerable toxicity and mortality. In particular, mortality rates due to lung damage from Bleomycin are between 4-24% and mortality rates due to cardiac damage are reported in elderly patients suffering from c-HL and treated with regimens based on anthracyclines (of which doxorubicin belongs part) which fluctuate between 6 and 15%.
Non-pegylated liposomal anthracycline (NPLD) was initially used in patients with breast cancer and this particular formulation spares tissues characterized by tight capillary junctions (such as cardiac muscle tissue) from the direct cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin.
Regimens based on NPLD associated with bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine have been studied for the first-line treatment of cardiac patients with c-HL and NPLD has been shown to accumulate in macrophages associated with tumor tissue, as well as in the spleen, liver, lung and bones that act as long-release reservoirs with a likely prolonged therapeutic effect.
The aim of the present project is to investigate the front-line use of the MVD polychemotherapeutic regimen (NPLD, Bleomycin and Dacarbazine) for elderly patients suffering from c-HL in terms of Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival, FDG-PET/CT negativity rate at the end of therapy, toxicity and feasibility.
This was a retrospective, single-center study conducted in the Hematology Unit of the Federico II University of Naples (Italy), in which patients aged ≥60 years with previously untreated, biopsy-proven c-HL were identified in the database of the Hematology Unit of the Federico II University from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023. All necessary approvals were obtained from our ethics committee. The study was undertaken in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent for data analysis.
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate whether the front-line therapy without bleomycin by using NPLD-containing regimen, i.e., Myocet TM with its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages in terms of efficacy and safety, could improve OS in older adults with c-HL with extensive disease. Other objectives were PFS, EoT overall response rate by using FDG-PET scans interpreted with the Deauville scale (DS) 5-point scoring system (according to the Lugano Classification) , hematologic and extra-hematologic toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0), and feasibility (arbitrarily defined as ≤5 patients receiving <85% of the planned dose). Noteworthy, the cardiologic toxicity profile was established by using the echocardiography assessment of global systolic longitudinal myocardial strain (GLS), as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (according to the guidelines of the Task Force for Cancer Treatments and Cardiovascular Toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology [ESC]).
The schedule of study treatment is shown in detail in Table 1. The dosage of Myocet TM in the MVD scheme was well within the ceiling dose of 785 mg/m 2 (the median lifetime dose reported for NPLD at the onset of cardiotoxicity). Patients were scheduled to receive six cycles of therapy with MVD which consisted of 1-day outpatient i.v. infusions of Myocet TM at a dose of 25 mg/m 2 , plus vinblastine 6 mg/m 2 , and dacarbazine 375 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 14 of each course every 28 days, for twelve administrations. Planned cumulative dose-intensity of NPLD was 300 mg/m 2.
For those cases with initial large nodal mass (defined as systemic adenopathy with the largest diameter >5 cm), consolidation radiotherapy (c-RT) at 30 Gy was given (after EoT PET assessments), following the scheduled 6 MVD cycles, on residual bulky area, that is, containing post-chemotherapy FDG-PET negative nodes of size ≥2.0 cm at CT scans as already reported.
FDG-PET examinations were conducted at staging, EoT and thereafter every 3-6 months. FDG-PET results were reported according to the DS score using visual assessment followed by quantitative verification as already described. Negative FDG-PET scans were defined as DS ≤3 score, and positive FDG-PET scans were defined as DS 4 and 5 scores (Supplemental data, FDG- PET assessments). All patients were scheduled to undergo a full cardiologic examination, 2D echocardiography, and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) at baseline, interim, EoT and within six months from the end of all antineoplastic treatments.
Clinical cardiologist experts in echocardiography analyzed each study for standard echocardiography and strain measurements.
Physical examination and bone marrow biopsy were also performed at baseline, and then at physician's discretion. Routine blood laboratory test monitoring was performed before every cycle of chemotherapy, for each patient.
OS was defined as the time from the date of HL diagnosis to the date of last follow-up or death for any cause. PFS was defined as the time from day 1 of MVD first dose to disease progression/relapse (event), death from any cause (event) or last follow-up visit (censoring). All efficacy and safety evaluations were performed in patients who received at least one course of MVD. Patients' characteristics, response rate, toxicity and safety data were reported descriptively as number and percentage, or as median and range. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment effect on OS and PFS. The evaluated factors included age stratification (years: 60-69 vs. 70-79 vs. ≥80), B symptoms, large nodal mass, nodal and/or extra-nodal sites involved, stage IV, and international prognostic score (IPS) risk group at baseline. Differences between groups were tested by the log-rank test, and student-T test. The P value for statistical significance was set at 0.05 for all evaluations. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.1).
- Conditions
- Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Keywords
- cHL, >60y, liposomal doxorubicin
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
The primary endpoint was the activity of the liposomal doxorubicin-based front-line strategy in terms of OS.
Measured: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
Secondary outcomes (3)
Progression-free survival
Progression free survival
Measured: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
End of Treatment response rate
end-of-treatment (EoT) 2-deoxy-2[F-18] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-negativity
Measured: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
Adverse events
hematological and cardiac grade >3 adverse events
Measured: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2013
- Primary completion1 Jan 2023
- Study completion8 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Classic Hodgkin LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Federico II UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federico II University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marco Picardi, Federico II University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06235047
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FED-HL-MVD
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Liposomal Doxorubicin-containing Front-line Treatment in Elderly Patients With Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Multicenter Phase II Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06235047
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FED-HL-MVD
- Conditions
- Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Keywords
- cHL, >60y, liposomal doxorubicin
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Federico II UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study on the use of a polychemotherapy scheme based on liposomal doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (MVD) as first line in the therapy of elderly patients affected by classic Hodgkin lymphoma
Detailed description
Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (c-HL) is a neoplasm that originates from B lymphocytes and represents 10% of all lymphomas. The most affected age group is between 20 and 30 years of age, with a second peak in the epidemiological distribution involving patients over 60 years of age.
Elderly patients often present with already advanced disease stages and B symptoms. On the other hand, these patients often have multiple comorbidities and reduced fitness and this can limit the therapeutic possibilities with curative intent in terms of doses and adherence to the timing foreseen by the therapeutic protocol.
The optimal therapy for this category of patients is not yet well defined. In fact, the prognosis of these patients is typically poor.
The ABVD regimen (doxorubicin, i.e. Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine) is a therapeutic option for elderly/unfit patients but is associated with considerable toxicity and mortality. In particular, mortality rates due to lung damage from Bleomycin are between 4-24% and mortality rates due to cardiac damage are reported in elderly patients suffering from c-HL and treated with regimens based on anthracyclines (of which doxorubicin belongs part) which fluctuate between 6 and 15%.
Non-pegylated liposomal anthracycline (NPLD) was initially used in patients with breast cancer and this particular formulation spares tissues characterized by tight capillary junctions (such as cardiac muscle tissue) from the direct cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin.
Regimens based on NPLD associated with bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine have been studied for the first-line treatment of cardiac patients with c-HL and NPLD has been shown to accumulate in macrophages associated with tumor tissue, as well as in the spleen, liver, lung and bones that act as long-release reservoirs with a likely prolonged therapeutic effect.
The aim of the present project is to investigate the front-line use of the MVD polychemotherapeutic regimen (NPLD, Bleomycin and Dacarbazine) for elderly patients suffering from c-HL in terms of Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival, FDG-PET/CT negativity rate at the end of therapy, toxicity and feasibility.
This was a retrospective, single-center study conducted in the Hematology Unit of the Federico II University of Naples (Italy), in which patients aged ≥60 years with previously untreated, biopsy-proven c-HL were identified in the database of the Hematology Unit of the Federico II University from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023. All necessary approvals were obtained from our ethics committee. The study was undertaken in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent for data analysis.
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate whether the front-line therapy without bleomycin by using NPLD-containing regimen, i.e., Myocet TM with its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages in terms of efficacy and safety, could improve OS in older adults with c-HL with extensive disease. Other objectives were PFS, EoT overall response rate by using FDG-PET scans interpreted with the Deauville scale (DS) 5-point scoring system (according to the Lugano Classification) , hematologic and extra-hematologic toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0), and feasibility (arbitrarily defined as ≤5 patients receiving <85% of the planned dose). Noteworthy, the cardiologic toxicity profile was established by using the echocardiography assessment of global systolic longitudinal myocardial strain (GLS), as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (according to the guidelines of the Task Force for Cancer Treatments and Cardiovascular Toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology [ESC]).
The schedule of study treatment is shown in detail in Table 1. The dosage of Myocet TM in the MVD scheme was well within the ceiling dose of 785 mg/m 2 (the median lifetime dose reported for NPLD at the onset of cardiotoxicity). Patients were scheduled to receive six cycles of therapy with MVD which consisted of 1-day outpatient i.v. infusions of Myocet TM at a dose of 25 mg/m 2 , plus vinblastine 6 mg/m 2 , and dacarbazine 375 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 14 of each course every 28 days, for twelve administrations. Planned cumulative dose-intensity of NPLD was 300 mg/m 2.
For those cases with initial large nodal mass (defined as systemic adenopathy with the largest diameter >5 cm), consolidation radiotherapy (c-RT) at 30 Gy was given (after EoT PET assessments), following the scheduled 6 MVD cycles, on residual bulky area, that is, containing post-chemotherapy FDG-PET negative nodes of size ≥2.0 cm at CT scans as already reported.
FDG-PET examinations were conducted at staging, EoT and thereafter every 3-6 months. FDG-PET results were reported according to the DS score using visual assessment followed by quantitative verification as already described. Negative FDG-PET scans were defined as DS ≤3 score, and positive FDG-PET scans were defined as DS 4 and 5 scores (Supplemental data, FDG- PET assessments). All patients were scheduled to undergo a full cardiologic examination, 2D echocardiography, and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) at baseline, interim, EoT and within six months from the end of all antineoplastic treatments.
Clinical cardiologist experts in echocardiography analyzed each study for standard echocardiography and strain measurements.
Physical examination and bone marrow biopsy were also performed at baseline, and then at physician's discretion. Routine blood laboratory test monitoring was performed before every cycle of chemotherapy, for each patient.
OS was defined as the time from the date of HL diagnosis to the date of last follow-up or death for any cause. PFS was defined as the time from day 1 of MVD first dose to disease progression/relapse (event), death from any cause (event) or last follow-up visit (censoring). All efficacy and safety evaluations were performed in patients who received at least one course of MVD. Patients' characteristics, response rate, toxicity and safety data were reported descriptively as number and percentage, or as median and range. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment effect on OS and PFS. The evaluated factors included age stratification (years: 60-69 vs. 70-79 vs. ≥80), B symptoms, large nodal mass, nodal and/or extra-nodal sites involved, stage IV, and international prognostic score (IPS) risk group at baseline. Differences between groups were tested by the log-rank test, and student-T test. The P value for statistical significance was set at 0.05 for all evaluations. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.1).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- over60 year old c-HL patients, previously untreated with Ann Arbor stage III or IV. ECOG PS 0-3, GLS ≥-20% at echocardiographic assessment and human immunodeficiency virus negativity.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- previously untreated, biopsy-proven c-HL
- Ann Arbor stage III or IV
- ECOG PS 0-3
- LVEF≥50% at echocardiographic assessment
- human immunodeficiency virus negativity.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Ann Arbor stage I or II,
- concomitant major illnesses
- creatinine clearance <30 ml/min
- serum transaminases more than three times the normal value
- total bilirubin >3.4 mg/dl
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
The primary endpoint was the activity of the liposomal doxorubicin-based front-line strategy in terms of OS.
3 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival
Time frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
End of Treatment response rate
Time frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
Adverse events
Time frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2024.
Related trials for Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Standard Therapy to Treat Hodgkin Lymphoma to the Use of Two Drugs, Brentuximab Vedotin and Nivolumab
Lugano Classification Limited Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Children and Young Adults With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (MK-3475-667/KEYNOTE-667)
Hodgkin Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Pembrolizumab and Vorinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL, FCL or HL.
Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma, Recurrent B-Cell Lymphoma, Unclassifiable, With Features Intermediate Between DLBCL and Classic HL
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children and Young Adults With Stage IIB, Stage IIIB, IVA, or IVB Hodgkin Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage IIB Hodgkin Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage IIIB Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Nivolumab With Ruxolitinib in Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Hodgkin Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2024.