AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary HypertensionNCT06240871

Contrast Enhanced PA Pressure Measurements

An observational study of Pulmonary Hypertension, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an abnormal increase of the pressure inside the lung circulation. This condition can be caused by many different diseases. If PH persists for a long period of time, irreversible damage to the lung circulation and to the heart may ensue. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Hypertension
What is being tested?
Pulmonary artery pressure measurements
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2013to Sep 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Unselected consecutively patients 18 to 80 years old referred for RHC to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Unselected consecutively patients 18 to 80 years old referred for RHC to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of Northwestern Memorial Hospital. The informed consent for RHC will be obtained as part of the clinical assessment.

Who cannot join

  • Severe pulmonary hypertension that is O2-dependent
  • History of allergy to Optison®
  • Hypersensitivity to perflutren, blood, blood products or albumin
  • History of patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD)
  • Known or suspected right-to-left, bi-directional, or transient right-to- left cardiac shunts
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Non-invasive Pulmonary Artery Pressure Measurement

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an abnormal increase of the pressure inside the lung circulation. This condition can be caused by many different diseases. If PH persists for a long period of time, irreversible damage to the lung circulation and to the heart may ensue. A definitive diagnosis of PH requires direct measurement of the pressure within the lung circulation with a procedure called right heart catheterization (RHC). While overall safe, RHC is an invasive procedure and is associated with a small risk of complications (~1.1%) and, very rarely, death (0.055%), even when performed in experienced laboratories. Therefore, alternative diagnostic approaches are often employed such as an ultrasound technique called Doppler echocardiography which is non-invasive, relatively inexpensive and widely available technique. It is suitable not only as a screening tool but also for serial monitoring of disease progression in PH. However, the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in measuring pressure in the lung circulation appears to be modest in patients with suspected PH. To improve the performance of Doppler echocardiography it is common practice to inject a small amount of agitated saline or an echocardiographic contrast medium (usually composed of microbubbles of fat containing a minuscule amount of a gas) into a vein. However, the accuracy of using agitated saline or a contrast agent in the measurement of pressures inside the lung circulation has not been established. The proposed study will assess the accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic measurements of pressures in the pulmonary circulation by simultaneously comparing the pressures collected during a RHC. The investigators will enroll 100 consecutive patients undergoing RHC in the Catheterization Laboratory of Northwestern Memorial Hospital. The investigators will measure pulmonary pressures by RHC and by Doppler echocardiography at baseline and following the injection of agitated saline as well as Optison®, an FDA-approved contrast agent commonly used in the echo laboratory. The investigators will then determine the accuracy of the Doppler echocardiography measurement without and with the use of agitated saline or Optison® with the measurements obtained during the RHC which is the gold standard. The results of this study will allow determination whether the use of echo contrast improves the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography and whether contrast-enhanced Doppler measurements are a clinically useful alternative to RHC measurements.

Read the detailed description

Background Pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 25 mmHg at rest as assessed by right heart catheterization (RHC), is present in several clinical conditions1. While considered the gold standard for the measurement of pulmonary pressure, RHC is an invasive procedure and is associated with a small risk of morbidity (1.1%) and mortality (0.055%) even when performed at experienced centers2. Therefore, alternative diagnostic approaches are often employed. Doppler echocardiography is non-invasive, relatively inexpensive and widely available technique. It is potentially suitable not only as a screening tool for PH but also as a method for serial monitoring of disease progression. Among the echocardiographic methods introduced to indirectly measure pulmonary arterial pressure, the tricuspid valve regurgitant jet method and the pulmonary artery regurgitant jet method have been widely adopted3. By measuring with Doppler ultrasound the maximum velocity of the tricuspid regurgitant jet (v), the transtricuspid pressure gradient (Pg) can be calculated using the modified Bernoulli equation: Pg = 4v2. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) can then be estimated by adding the transtricuspid pressure gradient to the right atrial pressure (RAP), indirectly estimated by the diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the degree of its collapse during spontaneous respiration4. In the absence of pulmonary valve stenosis, the RVSP can be equated to the pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP). Measurements of PASP by Doppler echocardiography show a very high correlation (r=0.93) with values obtained by RHC 5. However, the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography appears to be limited in the assessment of patients with suspected PH, in whom the difference in PASP determined by echo and by RHC may be overestimated or underestimated by greater than 10 mmHg6. To improve the performance of Doppler echocardiography, particularly in the presence of an inadequate jet of tricuspid regurgitation, it is common practice to use maneuvers such as the injection of agitated saline and/or echo contrast media such as Optison® (Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres Injectable Suspension, USP) to augment the tricuspid regurgitant velocity profile4. However, whether these maneuvers increase the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of right ventricular and pulmonary arterial pressures compared to standard Doppler echocardiography has not been investigated.

  1. Research Methods Study Design Cross-sectional investigation to assess: 1) the correlations between right sided (right ventricular, pulmonary artery, and right atrial) pressures measured by RHC and by Doppler echocardiography in the absence of contrast and during the intravenous administration of agitated saline or Optison®; and 2) to compare such measures by assessment modality. The investigators hypothesize that the correlations between right sided pressures measured by Doppler echo during agitated saline or Optison® will be higher than those measured in the absence of a contrast agent, and that the correlations between right sided pressures measured by Doppler echo during Optison® will be higher than those measured during agitated saline.

The main correlations explored in the study will be:

Correlation between right atrial pressure measured by RHC and by Doppler echocardiography in the absence of a contrast agent.

Correlation between right ventricular pressure measured by RHC and by Doppler echocardiography in the absence of a contrast agent and during the intravenous administration of agitated saline or Optison®.

Correlation between PASP measured by RHC and by Doppler echocardiography in the absence of a contrast agent and during the intravenous administration of agitated saline or Optison®.

The main comparisons performed in the study will be:

Comparison between PASP measured by Doppler echocardiography in the absence of a contrast agent and the PASP measured during the intravenous administration of agitated saline or Optison®.

Comparison between PASP measured by Doppler echocardiography during the intravenous administration of agitated saline and during the intravenous administration of Optison®.

Study Population This study will include unselected consecutively patients 18 to 80 years old referred for RHC to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of Northwestern Memorial Hospital. The informed consent for RHC will be obtained as part of the clinical assessment. A study physician will then approach patients and eligibility will be assessed. A separate informed consent will be obtained for the limited Doppler echocardiographic study to be performed simultaneously during the RHC in patients interested in participating in the protocol. Participants are expected to be in the study only for the time required to conduct the RHC and the Doppler echocardiographic study.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria will include:

Severe pulmonary hypertension that is O2-dependent History of allergy to Optison® Hypersensitivity to perflutren, blood, blood products or albumin History of patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD) Known or suspected right-to-left, bi-directional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts Pregnancy Breastfeeding Advanced liver disease

Withdrawal Criteria

Withdrawal criteria will include:

Sustained ventricular arrhythmias at the time of the procedure Evidence of PFO or ASD at the time of the Doppler echocardiographic study Development of hypersensitivity or allergy to Optison®

Right Heart Catheterization

Invasive hemodynamic assessment by Swan-Ganz catheterization will be performed according to the standard protocol of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. The following parameters will be recorded:

Right atrial pressure Right ventricular pressure Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) Cardiac output by thermodilution method (CO)

Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) will be calculated according to the following formula:

PVR=80*(Mean PAP-Mean PCWP)/CO

Blood Drawing During the right heart catheterization a total of 30 mL of blood will be drawn when the tip of the catheter is in the main pulmonary artery, in the right pulmonary artery, and in the wedged position. Blood will be collected in tubes, placed in ice and subsequently processed. Whole blood, serum and plasma will be frozen and stored for measurement of various biomarkers (e.g. osteoprotegerin and endothelin-1).

Doppler Echocardiographic Study Echocardiographic image acquisition will be performed using routine transthoracic echocardiography standards. Right ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (RVOT

VTI) will be measured. The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) will be assessed in the apical four chamber view with the M-mode cursor through the lateral tricuspid annulus. The peak velocity (v) of the tricuspid regurgitation jet will be measured by Doppler echocardiography in multiple projections, and the tricuspid pressure regurgitation gradient (P) will be calculated from the modified Bernoulli equation using the highest velocity obtained:

P=4v^2

The inferior vena cava will be visualized in the subcostal view throughout multiple respiratory cycles and IVC diameter will be measured at end expiration and end inspiration to assess right atrial pressure according to current criteria. The ratio of peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and RVOT VTI, which has been shown to correlate with PVR, will be calculated.

Monitoring The investigators will perform monitoring after the Optison® injection according to the package insert.

Statistical Analyses The primary analyses will aim to correlate noninvasive and invasive RAP or PASP measures. Secondary analyses will compare such measures by assessment modality. To address the first specific goal, Pearson's correlation coefficient will be estimated for RAP obtained noninvasively and by RHC. For the remaining three goals, the same approach will be utilized to correlate the outcome of interest measured noninvasively and by RHC. For example, in the second goal, Pearson's correlation coefficient will be estimated for PASP measured noninvasively by agitated saline solution administration and invasively via RHC. For each specific goal, measurements via the two modalities will be displayed graphically using scatterplots. To summarize the nature of this relationship, flexible regression methods, including smoothing splines regression, will be utilized in each specific goal. In secondary analyses, for each specific goal, comparisons of the two outcomes (RAP or PASP values) measured using the noninvasive and the invasive approaches will be made based on paired t-test, if the outcomes are normally distributed. Otherwise, Wilcoxon's signed rank test shall be employed. Detailed summaries of the RAP and PASP values obtained noninvasively or invasively will be presented for each specific goal. Summaries will include the mean, median, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values. Regression models will be explored to gain a better understanding of the underlying patterns in RAP or PASP values, while adjusting for important patient characteristics such as demographics. An overall type I error of 5% will be maintained. To ensure this, each of the aims will be allocated a 1.25% type I error. For each specific goal, a sample of 100 participants will yield statistical power in excess of 85% to detect a Pearson correlation level of ±0.35. To detect increased correlation levels of ±0.50 or more extreme, power exceeds 99%. Consequently, based on a sample of size 75, this study is well equipped to detect realistic level of correlation between RAP or PASP values obtained by noninvasive and invasive methods. Statistical significance for each of the four primary analyses will be performed at 1.25% alpha level. Significance level in all secondary and additional exploratory analyses will be set at 5%.

  1. Anticipated Results The investigators expect to collect accurate estimates of the correlations between cardiac right-sided pressures assessed noninvasively by Doppler echocardiography and the gold standard RHC-measured pressures. Additionally, the investigators expect to demonstrate an improvement in the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography measurements with the use of an intravenous contrast agent. Finally, the investigators expect to find associations between biomarkers level and pressures measured during the right heart catheterization.
  2. Potential Pitfalls Insufficient enrollment of research participants. Technical difficulty with echo images.
Being tested
Pulmonary artery pressure measurements
Keywords
Echo, PA pressures, comparison, Right Heart Catheterization
Medical subject headings
Hypertension, Pulmonary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pulmonary artery pressure measurementsOther

    The investigators will compare noninvasive measurements of right sided pressure measurements with invasive RHC performed in 3 steps:at rest, with agitated saline and with agitated echo contrast, Optison. This was not a clinical trial and there were no intervention arms per se. All patients received agitated saline and echocardiographic contrast.

Study groups in NCT06240871
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pulmonary artery pressure measurementsThe investigators will compare noninvasive right sided pressure measurements with invasive right heart catheterization performed in 3 steps:at rest, with agitated saline and with agitated echo contrast, Optison. This was not a clinical trial and there were no intervention arms per se. All patients received agitated saline and echocardiographic contrast.
Receives: Other: Pulmonary artery pressure measurements

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Simultaneous Noninvasive and Invasive measurements of PA pressures

    Doppler echo measurements:

    Estimated pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure without any contrast (units = mmHg) Estimated PA systolic pressure with agitated saline contrast (units = mmHg) Estimated PA systolic pressure with echocardiographic contrast (units = mmHg) Right heart catheterization (RHC) measurements: Invasively measured PA systolic pressure (units = mmHg)

    Measured: Data acquisition wll be obtained as soon as the RHC is performed, expected average of 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Simultaneous assessment of IVC collapsibility and invasive right atrial pressure measurement

    Echo measurement: Assessment of inferior venacava diameter and collapsibility to assess RA pressure measurement (Units: diameter in cm, and non-invasive RAP in mm Hg) Right heart catheterization(RHC) measurement: Invasively measured right atrial pressure (units= mm Hg) The assessment of inferior diameter and collapsibility will allow determination of RA pressure non-invasively.

    Measured: Immediately will be noted as soon as PHC is performed, expected average of 5weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2024
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionSep 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06240871
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00071358
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
8 Dec 2014
Last updated
5 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Galie N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, Torbicki A, Vachiery JL, Barbera JA, Beghetti M, Corris P, Gaine S, Gibbs JS, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jondeau G, Klepetko W, Opitz C, Peacock A, Rubin L, Zellweger M, Simonneau G; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(20):2493-537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp297. Epub 2009 Aug 27. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19713419

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Hypertension, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Simultaneous Noninvasive and Invasive measurements of PA pressures (time frame: Data acquisition wll be obtained as soon as the RHC is performed, expected average of 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06240871, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in