Postoperative PainPOPEYENCT06244732
Pain Control After Aortic EndoaneurYsmEctomy (POPEYE)
A study of Postoperative Pain and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, run by IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OR-AAA) is an operation associated with high morbidity, and has 30-day mortality rates of between 4 and 14%. Post-operative pain management represents a primary anesthetic focus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 19 Feb 2024to Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients (age > 18 years)
- patients who have given their consent to participate in the study
- patients undergoing elective "open" surgical treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a midline xipho-pubic incision.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women
- Patients being treated for chronic pain
- Known allergy to drugs included in analgesia protocols
- Contraindications to the use of one of the two methods provided:
- refusal by the patient
- infection at the puncture site
Show all 12Show fewer
- coagulopathy:
- PTT > 40 s and/or INR > 1.4
- platelet count < 50,000/µL
- taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs that have not been discontinued in good time, according to international guidelines
- Emergent intervention
- Lack of consent to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato
San Donato Milanese, Milan, 20097
Daniela Mazzaccaro, MD, PhD, + 39 025277 ext. 4341, daniela.mazzaccaro@grupposandonato.it
Gianluca Spinelli, MD, gianluca.spinelli@grupposandonato.it
About this study
Official title: Post-Operative Pain Control After Aortic EndoaneurYsmEctomy
Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OR-AAA) is an operation associated with high morbidity, and has 30-day mortality rates of between 4 and 14%. Post-operative pain management represents a primary anesthetic focus.
A better analgesia, in addition to being desirable for the patient, can potentially reduce complications associated with postoperative pain and ensure faster functional recovery.
Read more
The modern concept of multimodal analgesia involves the association of multiple drugs and/or analgesic techniques to maximize the quality of analgesia and reduce the side effects of the individual methods. In this context, the addition of epidural analgesia (EA) to the intravenous administration of "traditional" analgesic drugs has assumed the role of gold standard in many surgeries, including OR-AAA.
Over time, EA has proven to be a better analgesic technique than the use of intravenous opioids alone, however there is much uncertainty regarding its ability to reduce complications, morbidity and mortality of patients.
For some time, efforts to research effective, less invasive and safe anesthetic alternatives, have been directed towards the development of multimodal analgesia protocols with the aim of reducing complications and ensuring faster recovery. New approaches to post-operative pain management are emerging, including rectus sheat block (RSB).
Currently there is no evidence regarding the effectiveness of RSB in pain control after OR-AAA.
In this context, the study aims to compare two different post-operative pain management protocols, with the aim of verifying whether the use of RSB can guarantee a non-inferior level of analgesia with reduction of complications compared to AE.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized controlled, single-centre, non-profit, spontaneous study, which involves the evaluation of the control of post-operative pain in a population of adult patients admitted to the General Intensive Care Unit after elective open endoaneurysmectomy of the abdominal aorta.
The study will be conducted by analyzing two groups of patients, randomized to receive ether postoperative analgesia via epidural catheter (EA Group) or repeated blocks of the rectus fascia (RSB Group).
Pre- and intra-operative management In EA Group the epidural catheter will be positioned, according to the normal practices of the Operating Unit, before the operation. The insertion of the catheter will be carried out at the T10-T12 level for a maximum of 5-7 cm in the epidural space.
For both groups under study, the operation will be conducted under balanced general anesthesia, using a volatile anesthetic (Desflurane or Sevoflurane) associated with Remifentanil, with titratable doses in order to guarantee an adequate depth of anesthesia, understood as bispectral index (BIS ) between 40 and 60. Myoresolution will be maintained with the use of neuromuscular monitoring (TOF, Train Of Four).
After intubation, the bladder catheter, nasogastric tube, central venous catheter (with ultrasound-guided technique) will be positioned and the following will be prepared:
- Cell saver for blood recovery
- Body temperature monitoring via throat probe
- Minimally invasive arterial hemodynamic monitoring with FloTrac system and continuous detection of the following parameters:
- Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
- Cardiac Index (CI)
- Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) These parameters, as usual, will guide the anesthetic conduct for the optimization of blood volume and intraoperative hemodynamic performance.
- Prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting will be carried out by administering Dexamethasone 4 mg to all patients at induction and Ondansetron 4 mg before extubation
- Upon closure of the abdominal muscle fascia, intravenous analgesia will be administered with Paracetamol 1 g, Ibuprofen 600 mg and MgSO4 2 g At the end of the surgical procedure, each patient, as usual and regardless of the study protocol, will be transferred to the General Intensive Care Unit, where monitoring and the subsequent recovery phase will continue.
Post-operative management All patients will be transferred to the General Intensive Care Unit with continued sedation and mechanical ventilation, in order to standardize the close monitoring of vital functions, the recovery phase and the management of the analgesia protocol.
Each patient will be eligible for awakening and extubation - and therefore for the start of the analgesia protocol - once all the following criteria have been met:
- Body temperature ≥ 35.5° C
- MAP ≥ 65 mmHg (with max basic norepinephrine dosage 0.1 mcg/kg/min)
- TOF-Ratio ≥ 0.9 If the conditions for awakening are not respected, the clinical conditions will be optimized in order to restore the stability necessary for extubation. Patients who have not reached the aforementioned criteria within 12 hours of admission to the ICU will exit the study protocol (see "drop-out criteria").
From the moment of awakening (T0), observation and data collection will continue in the Intensive Care Unit for a total of 36 hours.
Analgesia protocol
The administration of analgesia according to the usual protocols will begin before awakening in those patients who have met the criteria for extubation:
- Group EA will receive analgesia via epidural catheter (Ropivacaine 0.15% with double initial bolus and subsequent continuous infusion 5 ml/h via elastomeric pump)
- in the RSB Group, repeated blocks of the abdominal wall will be performed using special catheters positioned bilaterally in the rectus muscle fascia using ultrasound guidance (Ropivacaine 0.375% 20 ml per side, administered every 12 hours: at T0, T12 and T24) In addition, both groups will be administered intravenous analgesia at predetermined times: 1 g of paracetamol QID (quater in day, except for patients <50 kg and/or with risk factors for hepatotoxicity in which it will be administered in a total dose of 3 g/day), 600 mg of ibuprofen BID (bis in day) and 2 g of MgSO4 TID (tris in day).
Pain symptoms will be assessed according to the NRS scale. This system involves the direct evaluation by the patient of the degree of pain perceived on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). In our study we will consider values greater than or equal to 4 to be unacceptable. In this case, rescue therapy with opioids is envisaged in addition to the intravenous therapy normally administered. The opioid of choice for our protocol is intravenous morphine, administered in boluses at a dosage of 2 mg, repeatable every 15 minutes (= max 8 mg in one hour) until pain symptoms improve with NRS<4 or appearance of side effects, considering a maximum daily dose of 50 mg.
Data collection
The following variables will be collected from the medical records, which will then be pseudonymised and inserted into a database to be adequately analysed:
- Pre-operative:
- Anthropometric parameters (age, sex, BMI)
- ASA class
- Revised Cardiac Risk Index
- METS
- Major comorbidities:
- Diabetes mellitus (DM) ii) Ischemic heart disease (IC) iii) Heart failure (HFS) iv) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) v) Chronic kidney disease (CKD) vi) Other significant pathologies
- Intra-operative:
- Type of surgical procedure i) aortobisiliac repair (AO-BIS) ii) aorto-bifemoral repair (AO-BIF) iii) aorto-aortic (AO-AO) repair b) Surgical time c) Time and type of aortic clamping d) Hemodynamic parameters and events i) Maximum dosage of Norepinephrine (mcg/kg/min) ii) MAP ≤ 65 mmHg iii) FloTrac: CI ≤ 2 L/min and/or SVV > 13% iv) Water balance v) Total transfusions in ml (exogenous + blood recovery) vi) Intraoperative AAII thrombotic complications
- Post-operative:
- Pain (NRS scale) both at rest ("static") and upon coughing ("dynamic") i) upon awakening (T0) ii) 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 hours after waking up b) Total dose of rescue opioid c) Occurrence of complications related to the operation and/or the patient's comorbidities i) Re-intervention ii) Thrombosis AAII iii) Hemorrhage iv) major cardiac complications (ACS, ACC, arrhythmias) v) infectious complications (wound infection, sepsis, septic shock) vi) pulmonary complications (pneumonia, respiratory failure, pulmonary edema) vii) acute renal failure d) Occurrence of complications related to the therapy administered i) Nausea/vomiting from opioid consumption ii) Failure of the analgesic technique (uncontrolled pain) iii) Hypotension treatable with max norepinephrine base 0.1 mcg/kg/min iv) Hypotension not treatable without higher doses of basic norepinephrine v) Paresthesia of lower limbs vi) Motor deficit of lower limbs vii) Other complications of AE: direct neurological damage, dural puncture headache, subarachnoid injection/spinal anesthesia, urinary retention, low back pain, epidural hematoma, infection, drug allergy, AL absorption viii) Other complications of RSB: infections, fascial hematoma, drug allergy, AL absorption The analysis continues for a total period of 36 hours after waking up in the Intensive Care Unit. The length of in-hospital stay will be also recorded.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- Being tested
- Postoperative pain control
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Postoperative pain controlProcedure or surgery
Postoperative analgesia after OR-AAA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RSB | Experimental | In patients in the RSB Group, repeated blocks of the abdominal wall will be performed using special catheters positioned bilaterally in the rectus muscle fascia using ultrasound guidance (Ropivacaine 0.375% 20 ml per side, administered every 12 hours: at T0, T12 and T24) Receives: Procedure: Postoperative pain control |
| EA | Active comparator | Patients of EA Group will receive analgesia via epidural catheter (Ropivacaine 0.15% with double initial bolus and subsequent continuous infusion 5 ml/h via elastomeric pump) Receives: Procedure: Postoperative pain control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative pain evaluation
Postoperative pain will be evaluated using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 is the worst pain ever had)
Measured: day 0 (12 h after extubation)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Opioids consumption
Quantify and compare the consumption of opioids administered to optimize analgesia ("rescue") in case of uncontrolled pain in the two groups during the observation period
Measured: within 36 hours from extubation
Complications associated to postoperative analgesia
Detect the onset of complications related to the analgesia technique performed in the study groups
Measured: within 36 hours from extubation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2024
- Study start19 Feb 2024
- Primary completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniela Mazzaccaro, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06244732
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- POPEYE_CET 131-2023
- Acronym
- POPEYE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Chang DC, Parina RP, Wilson SE. Survival After Endovascular vs Open Aortic Aneurysm Repairs. JAMA Surg. 2015 Dec;150(12):1160-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2644.
PubMed 26331571Hicks CW, Wick EC, Canner JK, Black JH 3rd, Arhuidese I, Qazi U, Obeid T, Freischlag JA, Malas MB. Hospital-Level Factors Associated With Mortality After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. JAMA Surg. 2015 Jul;150(7):632-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3871.
PubMed 25970850Deery SE, Schermerhorn ML. Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries. Surgery. 2017 Oct;162(4):721-731. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
PubMed 28343694Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kolbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, Esvs Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F, Document Reviewers, Bjorck M, Cheng S, Dalman R, Davidovic L, Donas K, Earnshaw J, Eckstein HH, Golledge J, Haulon S, Mastracci T, Naylor R, Ricco JB, Verhagen H. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;57(1):8-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Dec 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 30528142Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.
PubMed 14612482Stenger M, Fabrin A, Schmidt H, Greisen J, Erik Mortensen P, Jakobsen CJ. High thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia is associated with better outcome in low-to-moderate risk cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1301-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
PubMed 23906858Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK. Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):560-9; discussion 569-71. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00015.
PubMed 11573049Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Austin PC, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Epidural anaesthesia and survival after intermediate-to-high risk non-cardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2008 Aug 16;372(9638):562-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61121-6. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
PubMed 18692893Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS; MASTER Anaethesia Trial Study Group. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1276-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08266-1.
PubMed 11965272Ali M, Winter DC, Hanly AM, O'Hagan C, Keaveny J, Broe P. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of thoracic epidural or patient-controlled opiate analgesia on perioperative quality of life. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;104(3):292-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq006. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
PubMed 20124282Nishimori M, Low JH, Zheng H, Ballantyne JC. Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD005059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005059.pub3.
PubMed 22786494Norris EJ, Beattie C, Perler BA, Martinez EA, Meinert CL, Anderson GF, Grass JA, Sakima NT, Gorman R, Achuff SC, Martin BK, Minken SL, Williams GM, Traystman RJ. Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2001 Nov;95(5):1054-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00006.
PubMed 11684971Bardia A, Sood A, Mahmood F, Orhurhu V, Mueller A, Montealegre-Gallegos M, Shnider MR, Ultee KH, Schermerhorn ML, Matyal R. Combined Epidural-General Anesthesia vs General Anesthesia Alone for Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1116-1123. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2733.
PubMed 27603002Guay J, Kopp S. Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD005059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005059.pub4.
PubMed 26731032Greco KJ, Brovman EY, Nguyen LL, Urman RD. The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on Perioperative Morbidity or Mortality after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.054. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
PubMed 31672606
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post-Operative Pain Control After Aortic EndoaneurYsmEctomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06244732
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- POPEYE / POPEYE_CET 131-2023
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OR-AAA) is an operation associated with high morbidity, and has 30-day mortality rates of between 4 and 14%. Post-operative pain management represents a primary anesthetic focus.
A better analgesia, in addition to being desirable for the patient, can potentially reduce complications associated with postoperative pain and ensure faster functional recovery.
The modern concept of multimodal analgesia involves the association of multiple drugs and/or analgesic techniques to maximize the quality of analgesia and reduce the side effects of the individual methods. In this context, the addition of epidural analgesia (EA) to the intravenous administration of "traditional" analgesic drugs has assumed the role of gold standard in many surgeries, including OR-AAA.
Over time, EA has proven to be a better analgesic technique than the use of intravenous opioids alone, however there is much uncertainty regarding its ability to reduce complications, morbidity and mortality of patients.
For some time, efforts to research effective, less invasive and safe anesthetic alternatives, have been directed towards the development of multimodal analgesia protocols with the aim of reducing complications and ensuring faster recovery. New approaches to post-operative pain management are emerging, including rectus sheat block (RSB).
Currently there is no evidence regarding the effectiveness of RSB in pain control after OR-AAA.
In this context, the study aims to compare two different post-operative pain management protocols, with the aim of verifying whether the use of RSB can guarantee a non-inferior level of analgesia with reduction of complications compared to AE.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized controlled, single-centre, non-profit, spontaneous study, which involves the evaluation of the control of post-operative pain in a population of adult patients admitted to the General Intensive Care Unit after elective open endoaneurysmectomy of the abdominal aorta.
The study will be conducted by analyzing two groups of patients, randomized to receive ether postoperative analgesia via epidural catheter (EA Group) or repeated blocks of the rectus fascia (RSB Group).
Pre- and intra-operative management In EA Group the epidural catheter will be positioned, according to the normal practices of the Operating Unit, before the operation. The insertion of the catheter will be carried out at the T10-T12 level for a maximum of 5-7 cm in the epidural space.
For both groups under study, the operation will be conducted under balanced general anesthesia, using a volatile anesthetic (Desflurane or Sevoflurane) associated with Remifentanil, with titratable doses in order to guarantee an adequate depth of anesthesia, understood as bispectral index (BIS ) between 40 and 60. Myoresolution will be maintained with the use of neuromuscular monitoring (TOF, Train Of Four).
After intubation, the bladder catheter, nasogastric tube, central venous catheter (with ultrasound-guided technique) will be positioned and the following will be prepared:
- Cell saver for blood recovery
- Body temperature monitoring via throat probe
- Minimally invasive arterial hemodynamic monitoring with FloTrac system and continuous detection of the following parameters:
- Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
- Cardiac Index (CI)
- Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) These parameters, as usual, will guide the anesthetic conduct for the optimization of blood volume and intraoperative hemodynamic performance.
- Prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting will be carried out by administering Dexamethasone 4 mg to all patients at induction and Ondansetron 4 mg before extubation
- Upon closure of the abdominal muscle fascia, intravenous analgesia will be administered with Paracetamol 1 g, Ibuprofen 600 mg and MgSO4 2 g At the end of the surgical procedure, each patient, as usual and regardless of the study protocol, will be transferred to the General Intensive Care Unit, where monitoring and the subsequent recovery phase will continue.
Post-operative management All patients will be transferred to the General Intensive Care Unit with continued sedation and mechanical ventilation, in order to standardize the close monitoring of vital functions, the recovery phase and the management of the analgesia protocol.
Each patient will be eligible for awakening and extubation - and therefore for the start of the analgesia protocol - once all the following criteria have been met:
- Body temperature ≥ 35.5° C
- MAP ≥ 65 mmHg (with max basic norepinephrine dosage 0.1 mcg/kg/min)
- TOF-Ratio ≥ 0.9 If the conditions for awakening are not respected, the clinical conditions will be optimized in order to restore the stability necessary for extubation. Patients who have not reached the aforementioned criteria within 12 hours of admission to the ICU will exit the study protocol (see "drop-out criteria").
From the moment of awakening (T0), observation and data collection will continue in the Intensive Care Unit for a total of 36 hours.
Analgesia protocol
The administration of analgesia according to the usual protocols will begin before awakening in those patients who have met the criteria for extubation:
- Group EA will receive analgesia via epidural catheter (Ropivacaine 0.15% with double initial bolus and subsequent continuous infusion 5 ml/h via elastomeric pump)
- in the RSB Group, repeated blocks of the abdominal wall will be performed using special catheters positioned bilaterally in the rectus muscle fascia using ultrasound guidance (Ropivacaine 0.375% 20 ml per side, administered every 12 hours: at T0, T12 and T24) In addition, both groups will be administered intravenous analgesia at predetermined times: 1 g of paracetamol QID (quater in day, except for patients <50 kg and/or with risk factors for hepatotoxicity in which it will be administered in a total dose of 3 g/day), 600 mg of ibuprofen BID (bis in day) and 2 g of MgSO4 TID (tris in day).
Pain symptoms will be assessed according to the NRS scale. This system involves the direct evaluation by the patient of the degree of pain perceived on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). In our study we will consider values greater than or equal to 4 to be unacceptable. In this case, rescue therapy with opioids is envisaged in addition to the intravenous therapy normally administered. The opioid of choice for our protocol is intravenous morphine, administered in boluses at a dosage of 2 mg, repeatable every 15 minutes (= max 8 mg in one hour) until pain symptoms improve with NRS<4 or appearance of side effects, considering a maximum daily dose of 50 mg.
Data collection
The following variables will be collected from the medical records, which will then be pseudonymised and inserted into a database to be adequately analysed:
- Pre-operative:
- Anthropometric parameters (age, sex, BMI)
- ASA class
- Revised Cardiac Risk Index
- METS
- Major comorbidities:
- Diabetes mellitus (DM) ii) Ischemic heart disease (IC) iii) Heart failure (HFS) iv) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) v) Chronic kidney disease (CKD) vi) Other significant pathologies
- Intra-operative:
- Type of surgical procedure i) aortobisiliac repair (AO-BIS) ii) aorto-bifemoral repair (AO-BIF) iii) aorto-aortic (AO-AO) repair b) Surgical time c) Time and type of aortic clamping d) Hemodynamic parameters and events i) Maximum dosage of Norepinephrine (mcg/kg/min) ii) MAP ≤ 65 mmHg iii) FloTrac: CI ≤ 2 L/min and/or SVV > 13% iv) Water balance v) Total transfusions in ml (exogenous + blood recovery) vi) Intraoperative AAII thrombotic complications
- Post-operative:
- Pain (NRS scale) both at rest ("static") and upon coughing ("dynamic") i) upon awakening (T0) ii) 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 hours after waking up b) Total dose of rescue opioid c) Occurrence of complications related to the operation and/or the patient's comorbidities i) Re-intervention ii) Thrombosis AAII iii) Hemorrhage iv) major cardiac complications (ACS, ACC, arrhythmias) v) infectious complications (wound infection, sepsis, septic shock) vi) pulmonary complications (pneumonia, respiratory failure, pulmonary edema) vii) acute renal failure d) Occurrence of complications related to the therapy administered i) Nausea/vomiting from opioid consumption ii) Failure of the analgesic technique (uncontrolled pain) iii) Hypotension treatable with max norepinephrine base 0.1 mcg/kg/min iv) Hypotension not treatable without higher doses of basic norepinephrine v) Paresthesia of lower limbs vi) Motor deficit of lower limbs vii) Other complications of AE: direct neurological damage, dural puncture headache, subarachnoid injection/spinal anesthesia, urinary retention, low back pain, epidural hematoma, infection, drug allergy, AL absorption viii) Other complications of RSB: infections, fascial hematoma, drug allergy, AL absorption The analysis continues for a total period of 36 hours after waking up in the Intensive Care Unit. The length of in-hospital stay will be also recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RSB | Experimental | Procedure: Postoperative pain controlIn patients in the RSB Group, repeated blocks of the abdominal wall will be performed using special catheters positioned bilaterally in the rectus muscle fascia using ultrasound guidance (Ropivacaine 0.375% 20 ml per side, administered every 12 hours: at T0, T12 and T24) |
| EA | Active comparator | Procedure: Postoperative pain controlPatients of EA Group will receive analgesia via epidural catheter (Ropivacaine 0.15% with double initial bolus and subsequent continuous infusion 5 ml/h via elastomeric pump) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adult patients (age > 18 years)
- patients who have given their consent to participate in the study
- patients undergoing elective "open" surgical treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a midline xipho-pubic incision.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Pregnant women
- Patients being treated for chronic pain
- Known allergy to drugs included in analgesia protocols
- Contraindications to the use of one of the two methods provided:
- Emergent intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain controlPostoperative analgesia after OR-AAA | Procedure or surgery | EA, RSB |
Primary outcome
Postoperative pain evaluation
Time frame: day 0 (12 h after extubation)
Postoperative pain will be evaluated using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 is the worst pain ever had)
2 secondary outcomes
Opioids consumption
Time frame: within 36 hours from extubation
Complications associated to postoperative analgesia
Time frame: within 36 hours from extubation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 26331571Chang DC, Parina RP, Wilson SE. Survival After Endovascular vs Open Aortic Aneurysm Repairs. JAMA Surg. 2015 Dec;150(12):1160-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2644.
- Results publication: PubMed 25970850Hicks CW, Wick EC, Canner JK, Black JH 3rd, Arhuidese I, Qazi U, Obeid T, Freischlag JA, Malas MB. Hospital-Level Factors Associated With Mortality After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. JAMA Surg. 2015 Jul;150(7):632-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3871.
- Results publication: PubMed 28343694Deery SE, Schermerhorn ML. Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries. Surgery. 2017 Oct;162(4):721-731. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 30528142Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kolbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, Esvs Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F, Document Reviewers, Bjorck M, Cheng S, Dalman R, Davidovic L, Donas K, Earnshaw J, Eckstein HH, Golledge J, Haulon S, Mastracci T, Naylor R, Ricco JB, Verhagen H. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;57(1):8-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Dec 5. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 14612482Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.
- Results publication: PubMed 23906858Stenger M, Fabrin A, Schmidt H, Greisen J, Erik Mortensen P, Jakobsen CJ. High thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia is associated with better outcome in low-to-moderate risk cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1301-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 11573049Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK. Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):560-9; discussion 569-71. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00015.
- Results publication: PubMed 18692893Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Austin PC, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Epidural anaesthesia and survival after intermediate-to-high risk non-cardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2008 Aug 16;372(9638):562-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61121-6. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 11965272Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS; MASTER Anaethesia Trial Study Group. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1276-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08266-1.
- Results publication: PubMed 20124282Ali M, Winter DC, Hanly AM, O'Hagan C, Keaveny J, Broe P. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of thoracic epidural or patient-controlled opiate analgesia on perioperative quality of life. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;104(3):292-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq006. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 22786494Nishimori M, Low JH, Zheng H, Ballantyne JC. Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD005059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005059.pub3.
- Results publication: PubMed 11684971Norris EJ, Beattie C, Perler BA, Martinez EA, Meinert CL, Anderson GF, Grass JA, Sakima NT, Gorman R, Achuff SC, Martin BK, Minken SL, Williams GM, Traystman RJ. Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2001 Nov;95(5):1054-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00006.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Postoperative Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Recruiting
NOL Guided Analgesia During Elective Laparoscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia
Intraoperative Analgesia
Recruiting
Aescin-Based Herbal Extract (Reparil) for Postoperative Sequelae After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
Postoperative Pain, Facial Swelling
Recruiting
Effect of Ultrasonic and Diode Laser Activated Irrigation on Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis and Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Postoperative Pain and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, run by IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mattia Ricotti (+390252774236, mattia.ricotti@grupposandonato.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative pain evaluation (time frame: day 0 (12 h after extubation)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06244732, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2026.