Immediate Implant PlacementNCT06246253
Socket Evaluation System to Predict Labial Bone Formation Around Immediate Implants. A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis.
An observational study of Immediate Implant Placement, run by Misr International University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Palate implant placement in extraction sockets, with a minimum of 2 mm between the implant and the inner side of the facial socket wall, has been advised as a step towards a 3D restorative-driven posture. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Immediate Implant Placement
- What is being tested?
- Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept and actual implant placement following safe angle concept
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 May 2019to 1 May 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Immediate implant placement in anterior maxillary teeth
Who may be able to join
- anterior maxillary teeth
- Immediate implant placement
Who cannot join
- fractured apical part of the root
- teeth with apical resorption or displacement
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Novel Prognostic Socket Evaluation System to Predict Labial Bone Formation Around Immediate Implants: A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis
Palate implant placement in extraction sockets, with a minimum of 2 mm between the implant and the inner side of the facial socket wall, has been advised as a step towards a 3D restorative-driven posture. The buccal gap left by this palatal location is identified by the term "jumping gap" or "jumping distance," which describes the capacity of bone to fill the void and bridge the horizontal gap. The gap is made up of a vertical and horizontal component. Significantly, this gap denotes the future buccal bone that will directly contribute to the buccal contour and impact the soft tissue levels, thus influencing the implant's final appearance. Consequently, it is now considered desirable to have a bigger horizontal gap since more newly created buccal bone is predicted to occur in areas with larger horizontal gaps.
- Conditions
- Immediate Implant Placement
- Being tested
- Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept, actual implant placement following safe angle concept
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual implant placement following safe angle conceptProcedure or surgery
Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept in anterior maxillary teeth.
actual implant placement following safe angle conceptProcedure or surgery
actual implant placement following safe angle concept in anterior maxillary teeth
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept | Not described Receives: Procedure: Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept | |
| actual implant placement following safe angle concept | Not described Receives: Procedure: actual implant placement following safe angle concept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
labial gap dimension
labial gap dimension will be measured as an area from the preoperative and immediatly post operative CBCTs
Measured: pre and immediately after implant placement
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2024
- Study start1 May 2019
- Primary completion1 Mar 2025
- Study completion1 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Immediate Implant PlacementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Misr International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- International Dental Contiuing Education
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Abo El Futtouh, International Dental Contiuing Education
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06246253
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IDCE-12207025
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 28 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Novel Prognostic Socket Evaluation System to Predict Labial Bone Formation Around Immediate Implants: A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06246253
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IDCE-12207025
- Conditions
- Immediate Implant Placement
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Misr International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- International Dental Contiuing Education
- Study start
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Palate implant placement in extraction sockets, with a minimum of 2 mm between the implant and the inner side of the facial socket wall, has been advised as a step towards a 3D restorative-driven posture. The buccal gap left by this palatal location is identified by the term "jumping gap" or "jumping distance," which describes the capacity of bone to fill the void and bridge the horizontal gap. The gap is made up of a vertical and horizontal component. Significantly, this gap denotes the future buccal bone that will directly contribute to the buccal contour and impact the soft tissue levels, thus influencing the implant's final appearance. Consequently, it is now considered desirable to have a bigger horizontal gap since more newly created buccal bone is predicted to occur in areas with larger horizontal gaps.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept | – | Procedure: Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept |
| actual implant placement following safe angle concept | – | Procedure: actual implant placement following safe angle concept |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Immediate implant placement in anterior maxillary teeth
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- anterior maxillary teeth
- Immediate implant placement
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- fractured apical part of the root
- teeth with apical resorption or displacement
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual implant placement following safe angle conceptVirtual implant placement following safe angle concept in anterior maxillary teeth. | Procedure or surgery | Virtual implant placement following safe angle concept |
| actual implant placement following safe angle conceptactual implant placement following safe angle concept in anterior maxillary teeth | Procedure or surgery | actual implant placement following safe angle concept |
Primary outcome
labial gap dimension
Time frame: pre and immediately after implant placement
labial gap dimension will be measured as an area from the preoperative and immediatly post operative CBCTs
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Immediate Implant Placement
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Lactoferrin Nanohydrogel for Soft And Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability in Immediate Implant Placement
Dental Implant, Wound Healing
Not yet recruiting
Immediate vs Conventional Loading With Different Crown Materials on Immediately Placed Single Implants
Partial Edentulism, Dental Implant
Recruiting
Melatonin Effect on Immediate Dental Implants in the Posterior Mandible
Dental Implant, Immediate Dental Implant Placement
Recruiting
Accuracy of Immediate Implant Placement
Edentulism in Lower Jaw
Not yet recruiting
Do Immediate Digital Workflows Increase Patient Value?
Dental Implant, Implant Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Immediate Implant Placement, run by Misr International University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
labial gap dimension (time frame: pre and immediately after implant placement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2026.